unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

A Woman Scorned...

sameena khan September 15, 2004

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5

#66 Posted by Vertical on October 3, 2004 6:56:08 am
one thing that has been bothering me is the fact, that did Jemima actually ebrace Islam, did she actually convert, or was it just the same `once a jew always a jew`. I mean if she had even accpeted 5 % of the islam, she wouldnt have been flauning herself like this with hugh.. no issue with going out with him.. but hell no not half naked...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#65 Posted by echoboom on September 22, 2004 10:18:17 pm
There are KanjaRR way of doing things and then there are Mullah (good word use it often)
maulvi , maulana, and Allama way of doing things. One is westernised scum the other is learned & civilised. Such is the lot of a canine from cantonements & civil lines. He gets thoroughly & highly educated--only to love the master.

[ drooling-dogs , tail awagging, biting into its his mangy back
Eyes a-googly , sneers a-loony; yelping his orgasmic crack.]


The idea is to flush out the margarine-muslims, near-muslims, KG muslims,
closet-ahmadees and mastered-muslims:

Tie`em up on TiKK-Tikki and unbound the Jallaad.
The west is in its own cess-pit, no one to Faryaad.


An overview of Al-Khidmat Foundation`s activities

`Al Khidmat to construct cardiac hospital in Lahore`

Lahore, Feb 10: President of the Al Khidmat Foundation and Member of the National Assembly (MNA) Liaqat Baloch said the foundation plans to construct a hospital for cardiac diseases in Lahore along with many other projects during the year 2003. This is in addition to Rs 600 million spent during 2002 on the various welfare projects by the foundation, he said while briefing reporters on Monday.

The foundation, which functions under the Jamaat-e Islami, also plans to construct general hospitals in Hyderabad, Multan and Faisalabad during this year to provide proper health facilities to deserving people. Secretary General Syed Ihsan Ullah Waqas, a Member of the Provincial Assembly (MPA) and Ahsan Ali Syed were also present on the occasion.

Appreciating the working of Surayya Azeem Hospital, the biggest one operating under the supervision of Al Khidmat, Mr Baloch said around 800 people visited its out-patients department every day. He said the foundation was in contact with international donors and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) interested in providing medical equipment to developing countries.

Mr Baloch said over 700,000 students were currently getting education from the various educational institutions operated by the foundation and 1.5 million poor people were being treated in its different hospitals all over the country for free. Giving details of the welfare projects to aid poor people, Mr Baloch said the foundation is focussing on schools, mosques, maternity homes, ambulance services, dispensaries, facilities for women prisoners, free eye and medical camps and vaccination againstHepatitis A and B.

Al Khidmat also helps dowry victims and provides financial help to orphans, widows and refugees from Afghanistan, Kashmir and Palestine, providing them with basic commodities, he said.

Mr Baloch said the foundation had distributed around Rs 2.5 million among the families of killed Kashmiri militants and over 20,000 families were provided financial assistance all over the country.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#64 Posted by syke on September 22, 2004 8:10:00 am
i would like to add that along with jemima khan having a fling after her divorce..recall atiqa odho who left her kids in the States and went to Pk to pursure her career...Zeba Bukhtiar..who i agree went through hell with Adnan Sami over her kid..has moved on aswell...its just that each individual has there own way of enjoying there freedom once they get it....getting divorced and then hooking up with ur first love..who amazingly also is divorced by then..is common practice in Asian societies..if the goras just keep it casual..i think v can allow them that they dont have the social and cultuaral restrains v have....as i said b4 its NOONES business wat she does...so get a life..but i think it became obvious when i read that your married..that you would be interested in gossip like this..its just a topic that middle class women can not resist!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#63 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2004 7:32:01 am
samankhan: you are a pathetic individual: everything i have written is based on the garbage you wrote in your article. you merely copy words i used (``prurient``) to correctly describe what you had written (i.e. your cheap references to other women) and use that in response - however, unlike you, i dont write garbage about other people on chowk and i dare you to back your use of the word ``prurient`` to describe my post by cutting and pasting anyting i have written.

i have wasted enough time with a cheapster moron like you, and will not be responding any more (unless i catch you lying again).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#62 Posted by samankhan on September 20, 2004 9:16:30 pm
#55,
Do not include my husband in your category of men.
He is a cut above woman bashers like you and a class apart.

And, just as it is none of my business if Jemima wishes to come unwrapped, it is none of your business to comment on what I write. You should be ashamed of writing such prurient posts on the internet. I wish your wife gives you a good thrashing every day for doing so.
HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#61 Posted by ZahraJ on September 20, 2004 5:44:54 pm
[As Mrs. Imran Khan, Jemima had an air of respectability around her, whether or not she covered her hair or wore full-length clothes. Somehow, there was a certain innocence reflected on her face, a certain poise and dignified demeanor. As Hugh boy’s girl friend and playmate, she is looking like a witch, as one colleague put it. I agree.]

That`s why they say do not try to be someone that you are not. Let`s not forget that Imran married Jemima to be Mr. Goldsmith and not vice versa.

[I understand the current mantra is to flaunt it if you have it. But goris have been flaunting it for ages whether they had it or not. They just can’t live without flaunting it, is it? As Mrs. K, Jemima could have never done that, frolic with him openly on the beach, that is. So, was she itching to do it? Or as I said before, is it just an act of defiance? Her way of taking revenge and getting equal. For after all, hell knows no fury like a woman scorned. ]

This is a very amusing passage. Probably, Jemima was a bold woman and felt that her husband was not paying much attention to her and being a chimpanzee was more involved with the ugly looking politicians around him so she decided to move on. It`s her prerogative. No big deal! If goris can do that then why not brownies, wheatish and blackies take their appropriate steps when the need arises?

Thank you for not spelling out the gist of this feature!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#60 Posted by nikki7777 on September 20, 2004 11:29:10 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#59 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 11:29:10 am
yogiraj: To you is assigned CREIP Number 445 (CREIP = Chowk Registered Expert from India on Pakistan) Number 440. This particular type of creep is defined as one who drags has a never-ending obsession with ridiculing other people`s religions, and so drags religion into everything.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#58 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 11:29:09 am
amit #46 I admire your loyalty to desi women, and am pleased to learn that you are happily married to a wonderful desi woman (and cha-cha ji wishes you a long and happy married life and bids you to go forth and multiply).

Nevertheless, I am afraid the reality remains unchanged from what I already mentioned: there are good eggs and bad eggs in every basket, so there are classy people and trashy people in every community. Kindly observe this article, for example.

Once again, also, I must therefore remind you not to generalize about people based on nationality, religion, or race. Lesser minds than yours are no doubt imprisoned in that simplistic view of the world - but you my friend have a choice!! Remain a prisoner with the lesser minds, or rise beyond them and set yourself free.

And realize that under the thin veneer of religion, nationality and race all God chillun are same-same (as my half-black and half-chinese friend would have said if he had existed).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#57 Posted by yogiraj on September 20, 2004 9:44:35 am
``#55 by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 8:11am PT
samankhan #52 I should add that you should be ashamed of writing such prurient stuff on the internet. No wonder your husband gives you a good thrashing every other day!! ha! ha! ``


Ha Ha ha,

I asked you a question long back. There was a widow your prophet married. He was not forced. He never beat her. She owned a business. Your prophet was her employee. He was perfectly ok with that. Did his job honestly. So much so, he actually earned ``her`` respect and married her.

There was a tradition of woman being a business owner before your god revealed eh?.

Same question. What happened? Islam?

Last time your answer was ... it is a good question. Answer Ha ha ha what happened?.

Does Islam allows woman to drive? Or ``just`` beat her?

You never had the guts, neither you will ever have one today, tomorrow or.

So you fancy beating a woman on net, Ha?

Yours truely

Yogiraj Patil



reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#56 Posted by amit on September 20, 2004 9:01:32 am
Re:#46

Chachaji, sorry!! Mujhe maaf kar dena....In the spirit of South Asian unity, I was actually defending poor Imran Khan by lashing out against bewafa gori babes....:)

Seriously though, east or west, desi women are the best. They have the optimal combination of beauty, brains and morals. Even the firangs are all crazy about our exotic beauties. And no, I am not frustrated here, been happily married for a long time to a wonderful woman.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#55 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 8:11:46 am
samankhan #52 I should add that you should be ashamed of writing such prurient stuff on the internet. No wonder your husband gives you a good thrashing every other day!! ha! ha!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#54 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 7:04:40 am
You can claim what you like - but your article speaks for itself. Why didnt you write a happy little article about your handsome husband instead of a gossipy little article loaded with high emotion about other people`s marriages and cheap thrills about Sara Ferguson going topless and men drooling over Jemima`s legs? (and which men did you see drooling over Jemima??)

I think you should have have edited out everything from your article except for the following two lines:

``Is it any of my business if Jemima wishes to come unwrapped?

No. ``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#53 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2004 7:04:40 am
temporal #50 Mr. t, you are too kind - it is I who is your humble servant. And yes indeed ... we are still looking for Mr. scott`s (is he really a Scot? Or is it that he does not like to be called by his real name which is Saranapananvangalamarishamkishamawalla??) goat.

As for the arab brothers, it is indeed true that they merely chop of people`s heads and my concerns were baseless. But then, i understand they make their rules ``on the fly`` out there, and so you never know.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#52 Posted by samankhan on September 20, 2004 12:04:18 am
#48,
Tahmed Chacha,
Thanks, but no thanks, for your `free diagnosis`.
My husband is thousand times `handsome` than what you have on offer. So I need not look here and there.
BTW, since the `british boy` is in the habit of yahan wahan munh maarna, feel free to direct him to one of your girls, whether Jemima drops him or not.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#51 Posted by ballukhan on September 19, 2004 11:22:35 am
``Her way of taking revenge and getting equal.``

Not very sure! She may have been frolicking all the while till she married our good boy. Now she is back to her old ways. Does it have anything to do with jewish conspiracy???
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#50 Posted by temporal on September 18, 2004 4:12:16 pm
tahmed32:

begging your most honourable pardon sirji and in furtherance continuing in the same nab`z may i beg your permissin to state with utmost respect that you have the gall, not the gaal;) and the ball (and yes not the baal) to goat-attack the hapless and not helpless scott esqr. while calling the jewels nuts and not balls or marbles...

on another note...forget this: as long as they are saved and safe;)...

on yet another note: aaj humari maaloomaat maiN buhat izafa hu`a...hmmm... i knew they cut off the culprit`s hands and in extreme cases the neck...but crown jewels? astaghfirullah!

your most obedient servant,

t
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#49 Posted by tahmed32 on September 18, 2004 1:42:47 pm
scott: Kindly stop using stupid phrases rattofied from your 10 grade english textbook like ``what gets my goat``. you dont own a goat.

the rest of your post makes good sense though. indeed, the only place on earth i ever saw a sex-crazed woman was in a hotel in jeddah saudi arabia whom i caught staring at me (ugly middle aged toad that i am) in the hotel corridor from the door next to my room from behind that stupid black veil. realizing that this was saudi arabia where they cut your nuts off if you so much as touch strange women, i was quick to turn back (which of course i would have in any case, being a respectable man). i have been to bangkok and i have been to rome and i have been to many places where women are supposed to be easy - but never have i seen such a lecherous look as i saw from behind the veil of that woman in the hotel corridor in jeddah.

So, let us not generalize as you so aptly say, about which women are loyal and which women will fool around as amit does. there are loyal eggs and disloyal eggs in every carton. you are a very sensible man to have said this. just try not to get to scholarly and start talking about goats and pigs.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by tahmed32 on September 18, 2004 1:16:16 pm
Finally...a gossip article on chowk. Ms. Sameena Khan, it is clear that you would much rather be the one unwrapping and frolicking on the beaches of south france with that british boy (who knows that he is so handsome that no streetwalker on earth can resist him PLUS 20 bucks). That is the Id that drove your ego to write this article. (Please give 5 pound sterling as donation to SOS or DIL as payment for this free diagnosis provided by tahmed, student of sigmund freud.)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by tahmed32 on September 18, 2004 1:16:15 pm
amit: I commend you in performing a mass psychoanalysis of pakistanis plus that of goris, ABCDs, desi women - and all in one para. However, this also means that you are setting yourself up to be assigned a CREIP (Chowk Registered Expert from India on Pakistan) number. And, from your past posts, I know you are normally quite level-headed - must be the thought of jemima khan unwrapping herself that sent you in a spin. If you really so sexually frustrated, I suggest you get a hold of yourself (and I dont mean that literally, if you know what I mean...wink/wink).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by tahmed32 on September 18, 2004 1:16:15 pm
hamidm2: are you sure you are hamidm too? i dont think so. the original hamidm had spirit...he had verve...panache....even though he was always wrong....but either you are some other guy who likes to write in dots or else you have been rendered decrepit due to some mishap. maybe begum hamidm finally caught up with you and gave you a shoe thrashing to put you in your place. what is it??

are you the real hamidm, or are you a defanged version of the hamidm we all used to know on chowk???
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by scott on September 18, 2004 9:44:28 am
read this http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IE420040917064258&Page=4&Title=Features+%2D+People+%26+Lifestyle&Topic=0&NEW~DELHI:~Sex~without~condoms~and~with~multiple~partners~is~becoming~a~trend~among~India`s~adolescents,~says~a~study~by~the~health~and~family~welfare~ministry....
``NEW DELHI: Sex without condoms and with multiple partners is becoming a trend among India`s adolescents, says a study by the health and family welfare ministry.
``
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by scott on September 18, 2004 9:18:35 am
Go Ana.....3 cheers for sanity.

What gets my goat is the desis staying in West and sporting this ``i am so culturally superior`` attitude all the time - ``My woman is faithful, yours is not ni ni ni ni..``. Aurat nahi hai koi prized chattle hai (chattle/cattle what`s the difference).
Men and women are the same - all over the world. To consider the desi`s as the only race of faithful spouses is stretching it a bit, empirical evdence notwithstanding.
Seen and experienced too much of this world. That reminds me about the wife of this Indian engineer (from that college considered so divine ..IIT) who I knew.....very much married from desiland, makes Jemima look like an innocent angel. Apart from that part of her life she was a really nice person too, who the hell are we to pass judgement on the private lives of individuals. Desis/goris real people with real desires. Aur intnay harami Desis I have known too. I have been to nightclubs with married men whose behaviour has exceeded that of the bachelors in our group. I am being polite here...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by ana on September 17, 2004 10:50:29 pm
amit,

there are cases of desis marrying goris where it has been the gori who has been more than loyal to the desi husband.

there are desi wives who are zaroorat se zyada loyal to their husbands while they go out and do their ``womanizing``

and then the opposite is true as well, but not enough to make sweeping generalizations.

what the hell does empirical evidence prove anyway?

i`m sure you are very capable at doing what you do, but in your recent posts about women on this board and others, you really don`t sound like you know what you`re talking about. when you do figure these things out, perhaps some people will actually take you seriously.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by hamidm2 on September 17, 2004 8:10:24 pm
amit,

........ get a grip on yourself ! .......... if you think desi women (or men) are perfect angles, you are in for a big disappointment when you grow up ................
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by hamidm2 on September 17, 2004 10:01:46 am
mullah boom,

``There are ``rumours`` about hospital too. I`ve talked to people who have had the experience of this ``charity`` treatment`` ...........

........... what would you say if i told you that there are poor people who are alive today because of this hospital ? trust me ...........

...... in any case, please send your donations to my favorite charity :

Please make cheques payable to ``Imran Khan Cancer Appeal, Inc.`` and mail to:
449 South Ashland Avenue,
Lexington, KY 40502, USA
Tel: +1 (859) 266 5330
Fax:+1 (859) 269 5763
Email: nburki@uchc.edu
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by ItsZeitgeist on September 17, 2004 10:01:45 am
Whose sensitivity has Jemima hit, whether she dons clothes, or goes nude. We all should be happier that our chattels still remain ``zann e bakra`. Down with the Goris and the Goras, but aren`t they the tempting one`s.LOL. Devil`s shot, isn`t it? Down with him. HAHAHA. We and confusions compounded.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#39 Posted by amit on September 17, 2004 8:37:05 am
Re:#35

When did I say that an unmarried woman cannot have fun? When you are single, you can date whoever you want and do whatever you want. It holds true for both genders. All I am saying is that emprical evidence suggests that it is risky to go beyond just casual dating with goris/ABCDs. When you are selecting a life partner, that is different from dating and you want someone for the long haul. Otherwise, you are playing russian roulette with your life. Sure you may luck out and find a girl who is also a long-term possibility. The chances of that are rare, given the environment here.

In fact, you may very well get messed up, as you might form an emotional bond with someone who is not suitable for the long-term. This is what the empirical evidence shows, even if it is not politically correct to say so. You can see with the situation with Imran, where he not only faces career problems but on top has to stomach the humiliation of seeing his ex-wife frolicking on the beach with her new boyfriend. Of course, if you are masochistic and want to take chances with your life, go right ahead. If you are mature enough to see reality for what it is, then you can spare yourself a lot of grief.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#38 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 10:22:24 pm
echobust:

don`t hallucinate in public again...!

srif Khuda kay paas yeh qudrat hay...aur tu Khuda nahiN hay
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#37 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 9:27:14 pm
tampon:36
Ja tujhhay mua`af kiya. 2 number maal.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#36 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 8:07:21 pm
echobust:

don`t expect you to admit ever:)

there are two kinds of desis

your kind

and my kind

simple as that;)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#35 Posted by scott on September 16, 2004 6:26:55 pm
Yeah sure - are desi guys are tremendous SNAGS (thats Sensitive New Age Guy to those who are from a different century) and all goris are uncaring selfish bi***s. Welcome to the mind of a typical desi male. Lets quote this superior desi again ``fun with goris and ABCDs before marriage but you never, ever marry them, because they have no concept of loyalty ``. What was that again ``no question of loyalty``...hmmm..so when the sensitive desi male his having ``fun with goris and ABCDs before marriage`` obviously his mind is full of loyalty. Yep thats loyalty. So men can have all the fun (being the superior studs they are) but an unmarried woman having fun? The mind boggles (and other misc. body parts too).
Rare to find a caring gori or ABCD eh? One simple sentence and you condemn all ``western`` women - obviously based on your deep insight into the minds of these women. Desi man divorces wife and marries the homely desi bride - obviously the woman he left was to blame. Not the fact that most of these ``men`` cannot handle women with a mind of their own. Ah crap why bother telling you anything, it will probably bounce of the closed mind of yours.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#34 Posted by amit on September 16, 2004 4:43:06 pm
Re:#27

Well it is a question of probabilities. It is rare to find a very caring gori or ABCD girl. Since they have grown up in a culture of instant gratification, they love to share your good times. But when times are bad, they cannot handle the hardship and tend to walk away. Among Americans, a job loss can trigger a breakdown in the relationship. I have seen many cases where the desi guy got divorced from the gori/ABCD and went back to India for a traditional marriage.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#33 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 4:43:05 pm
Repeated for public convenience & record.


tampoN #32
wrote
[``echobust:
no and yes...but not the vulgar, frothing i-am-a-muslim-u-r-not-a-muslim kind with multiple nicks to assuage ego.``]

tampon #29
claimed
{``desis thrive on rumours.``}
and then admits he is a desi but then says he does not thrive on rumours.


Explain! O desi, how do you NOT thrive on rumours.
No wiggle , wriggle room here. Explain!

[No anger here Urstruly, Malik99 and Khamkhwa: Just smiling & laughing now; having lots of fun here]

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#32 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 1:01:03 pm
echobust:

no and yes...but not the vulgar, frothing i-am-a-muslim-u-r-not-a-muslim kind with multiple nicks to assuage ego

:)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#31 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 12:38:47 pm
Urstruly:30
O.K O.k and you did make the point very well. But the purpose was to flush out the usuual suspects and that has been accomplished.

tempoo:29
Do you thrive on rumours. Are you a desi?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#30 Posted by Urstruly on September 16, 2004 11:03:26 am
echo

you remind of the father who admonishes his son by saying ``abey haramzaday ab gaali di tau zubaan kaat dooN ga``.

I wouldn`t beleive the ``rumors`` about the hospital whatever they are. My own aunt (khaalaaji) lost her battle with cancer in this hospital. I witnessed, this woman who was once the most beautiful girl in our family, lying on that hospital bed like a slab of meat, with a bald head and both breasts cut off. This hospital was not only her but our last hope as well. We couldn`t save her but we know that we did all that we could. If it weren`t for Imran Khan we wouldn`t be able to claim that today. If we are not ready to consider Imran a saint yet then the least we can do is to extend the dignity of human being to him.

Plz calm down.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#29 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 10:50:41 am
echoboom:

desis thrive on rumours

there are rumours about everybody in pakistan...the list includes edhi, burney, this maulana and that maulvi...

the fact that cannot be denied is that he raised that institution and it is thriving providing medical cae to those in need...

there are some religious institutions that also provide medical care to the needy...free dispensaries and consultation and medicines...along with providing training for misguided and bigoted jihadis...but nothing on imran khan`s scale...and there is a lot of talk about the double life of the founders of those madresas too!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#28 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 10:40:14 am
malik99:
There are ``rumours`` about hospital too. I`ve talked to people who have had the experience of this ``charity`` treatment.

Cancer ranks far lower in a country where fear for life, suicides, malaria , typhoid and so many other poor man`s diseases , especially those of children, should be a priprity. Is it not a shame that children are being sent to India for cheaper treatment?

One day this will come out as well. Seta Whites case is less about his proclivities but more about his characterless dead-beat dad `performance`. Such person should never ever been entrusted with any donation money or power-position. He is a duBBaa-peer in a west-striped mind.

I hope and pray that I`m wrong.

Giving some benefit of doubt I sometimes get the feeling that the purpose for the hospital might have other angles with other than medical benefits for the nation. Acquiring super- technology being one of them.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#27 Posted by Ralph on September 16, 2004 10:25:48 am
amit #25

How can you write what you wrote?!

``Any discerning desi male knows that you can have all the fun with goris and ABCDs before marriage but you never, ever marry them, because they have no concept of loyalty and will leave you if times are bad. Imran thought he was special...poor guy!!``

Women born in the US are more independent but that doesn`t mean they can`t be loyal when the times are bad! Some ABCD girls are everybit as `cultured` as those back home.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#26 Posted by Jibbe on September 16, 2004 10:03:35 am
oh this is just too funny...i hope that vein does burst!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#25 Posted by amit on September 16, 2004 10:03:35 am
Sameena,

Some Pakistanis are taking this Imran-Jemima issue personally for two reasons -

a. Imran is there hero who led Pakistan in Cricket and represents the jaanbaaz Pakistani male. Hence his rejection is interpreted as a rejection of Pakistan.

b. Jemima had embraced conservative islamic behavior which she has now renounced. If she had left Imran but maintained a conservative behavior it would have been ok. But she has gone to other extreme - from the burqa to the bikini. This is being interpreted as a rejection of Islam by her.

Hence the constant heartburn on this matter, although it is obvious that she just dumped an older has-been and returned back to her roots. This is natural behavior for goris. Basically Imran overestimated himself with her. Any discerning desi male knows that you can have all the fun with goris and ABCDs before marriage but you never, ever marry them, because they have no concept of loyalty and will leave you if times are bad. Imran thought he was special...poor guy!!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#24 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 10:03:35 am
Urstruly, Khamkhwa, and malik99:

[khamkhwa: How can you be wrong? The entire nation has been pidr-sokhtaaed post 9/11--1948; The pidrs really never left. Some consider it an honour, some do`nt. ]

Urstruly: Your advice is valuable & appreciated. Amr bil maroof, & nihi al munkir is a good reminder. Thanks again.

Malik99: ditto as above.

Thanks guys but it is NOT about the person per se. It is about the selectivity with which people are treated in our society.

It is westernised-trash in Pakistan which holds all the keys to power through its club, gymkhana
and army-stores mentality. How many of these do-gooder foreign funded and blessed ones decide to ask for divorce because the husband a rishvat-khore. In fact the westernised-trash particularly seeks those in marriage who has ooper-kee amadni & has alien-looks.

Maulana Sattar Edhi (shrugged shoulder) is g--ooo-d too; but Imraan Khaan, bhaee vah vah.[ angraiz kaa bachaa lagtaa hai]
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#23 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 9:57:04 am
Urstruly:

agree with you fully in #18

as for #22...he is incorrigible and irredeemable…prayers might work…though am not very sure of their efficacy in his case…

rgds,

t
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#22 Posted by Urstruly on September 16, 2004 9:06:20 am

Echo

You should calm down, for God`s sakes or I am pretty sure that a vein will bust in your temple soon. ghussa haraam hay - shouldn`t that be enough for you; why you transgress then?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#21 Posted by malik99 on September 16, 2004 9:04:24 am
echo sahib - I think you are being too harsh on Imran. A poor man taking his cancer ridden mother to the Shaukat Khanum hospital will not pause and reflect on Imran`s personal life. He has done more for pakistan by that one act of building a hospital than many of who lead a puritanical life without any acts of charity that benefit the less fortunate.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#20 Posted by khamkhwa. on September 16, 2004 9:04:24 am
chacha boom boom...
...the way you are incessantly `booming` on forces me to conclude that the pidar sokhta did something to you in your younger days...am i right...?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#19 Posted by echoboom on September 16, 2004 8:46:15 am
This from Iran Regional power board is apt here as well.


``Sure to flush out near-muslims, margarine muslims, Haraamkhore muslims , munaafique muslims and the westernised scum.
Put up the tik-tiky and release the Jallaads.``


Its working!

The real issue is why this zaani is roaming around free? Why are not women`s groups ( ngo`s--the westernised scum) not demanding the same punishments meted out to adultresses elsewhere. How come the hookers-for-Bookers have nothing bad to write about this greatest of the treat-woman-as-sex-object mantras.
Clinton good good, Imran khan good good--harem men bad bad, 4-wives man bad bad.

Is`nt it surprisingly refreshing that now there is no more gloat-posts about haraamkaree ( nudge nudge wink wink: `` don`t ask me for details about my carribbean cruise``), and Haramkhorees ( merlots? ah! the weed: `` but I`m a maaadren muslim. do goraa stuff often``)

Its working!

The tik-tikki is always a great deterrant. Public humiliartion is a must & in a muslim society it is important that such behaviour is never exhibited with deeda-dilairee , let alone taking pride in it. Like rishvat in na-pakistan.

as I said : Lukhh laanut on pidr-sokhtaas.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#18 Posted by Urstruly on September 16, 2004 8:34:58 am

Must we learn and practice every bad thing that white man does. This tabloidism is below human dignity. The privacy of private life of any human being, whether celebrity or sheeda mussalli, is his privilige. Discussing private lives of people in media is like committing the cardinal sin of gheebat on mass scale. `A Muslim is a cover for his Muslim brother` as the hadith goes, but then white man doesn`t do that so we mustn`t do that either. And now that the life of IK is public knowledge, I will probably never vote for him unless he recants the errors of his ways and fulfills his obligations to his daughter Taryan, but I will never rub this fact in his nose either. White man does some very good things too, why don`t we learn those instead. Personally I think very high of Imran; he is a remarkable human being and I think he is a very fortunate person as well because there must be thousands of people who must pray for him everyday whose loved ones benefited from his great act of kindness of building SK Hospital. My prayrs are with him as well.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#17 Posted by syke on September 16, 2004 7:58:53 am
it is just such a typical attitude to criticize jemima`s behaviour..but if today some one saw imran at the beach with a bandee it wod be all OOh s n AAhs...for she gets to be with the legendary..Imran Khan...big bloody deal!! wat they do after there divorce is up to them..the fact remains..she played the role well when his wife i think she was committed..now she is not..who are we to complain..
i dont want to seem harsh...but really it is no ones business who she dates now..
i think your article was a good read..but not our Business...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#16 Posted by temporal on September 16, 2004 7:13:36 am
...when you can achieve THIS some of your earthly and human escapades/weaknesses can be overlooked

...the cyber-jihadis and self styled islam-muslim saviors’ frothing diatribes tend to overlook such minor earthly endeavors

...oddly i agree: by some standards immoral Jemima and Seta have shown more character than a thousand apparently moral echobooms, chusnis, farangikushs, hamzads and other nicks...

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#15 Posted by scout on September 16, 2004 7:05:15 am
arrite arrite, i`m sorry samankhan for my harsh comments

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#14 Posted by Humsab on September 16, 2004 7:05:15 am
After a very very long time, she could afford to start leading a normal life of a British girl. We should be happy for her when we see that she is happy.

Imran does not matter as he is now her past. Over.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by samankhan on September 16, 2004 7:04:28 am
Scout,
:)
Thanks, Ralph.
At least there are no back and forth fireworks here!

Hail Chowk!
Hail Chowk Staff!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by Ralph on September 15, 2004 11:37:53 pm
Folks are being too harsh on samankhan. Some gossip is not going to harm the front page. As it is, much fiction is paraded as fact here.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by scout on September 15, 2004 10:55:38 pm
samankhan,

i don`t blame you for submitting it, i blame chowk for publishing it on the front page :)
this is what unplugged is for
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by samankhan on September 15, 2004 9:32:45 pm
Hello people,
My my! Some very cool people are getting so hot and cross!

When so much trash gets to be thrown on the face of religion, what`s this in comparison, huh?! Freedom of expression, remember?!

Ah, gossip! As if we haven`t indulged in it ever!

And sorry for the disappointment, but I am one happily married, professional woman with not a minute to spare.
Submitting such crap is my hobby.
:)


Yes, t, the true reasons are best known to the persons concerned but public figures do pay the price of being just that I suppose. More so their kids.
Regards.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by echoboom on September 15, 2004 9:32:22 pm
hamidm:6

......... earthworm torturers grow up to become suiciders and homiciders

Oh that was the funniest and most lovey-dovey comment I`ve read . I laughed so much. Thanks again.

You remind me of this boy in class who always ran away (eeeww) while even the girls were having fun with this salt-torture.

Must have been your type. ( nothing insinuated here)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by rafay_alam on September 15, 2004 9:32:20 pm
How interesting. For once, chowk interacts seem to be sharing the same opinion.

Sameena, you wrote:

``And what is it with the British women to let go of themselves once they file for divorce?``

Since this piece is so obviously a cunningly diguised piece of satire, I could not take offence at the generalization above (which is kind of like asking why Paki women keep on getting themselves honour killed and, since one is beating this dead horse, why African children refuse to eat properly).

Rafay Alam
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by hamidm2 on September 15, 2004 6:14:46 pm
a terrorist is born,

``In contrast the earthworm is looking like the earthworm I used to put salt on rainy days`` - echoboom

......... earthworm torturers grow up to become suiciders and homiciders ......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by echoboom on September 15, 2004 6:14:46 pm
Correction:
Instead of:
Two people with character & a sense of honour: Jemima Khan & Imran Khan.

Please read:
Two people with character & a sense of honour: Jemima Khan & Seta White


Laa`nut luKHH laa-nut on Imran Khan: No PukhtO there in that razeel, Khanzeer, pidr sokhtaa.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by scout on September 15, 2004 5:14:33 pm
why did this gibberish deserve a place on chowk`s front page?

sounds like a woman complaining to another woman, tape recording it, and typing it for chowk

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by echoboom on September 15, 2004 5:14:32 pm
Two people with character & a sense of honour: Jemima Khan & Imran Khan.

Pre Tehrik-e-Insaf Imran Khan was oohed & aahed by the weternised brown-trash [sons & daughters of the ``educated`` but corrupt class]. After his announcements in TI he was dropped like a hot-patoto by the same scum. What the brown-trash was not aware that this ``muslim`` card & ``brown-sahib`` card was simply being used, a la Ataturk , as a smokescreen for his debauchery & adultery. Funny, that such behaviour among the brown-trash, especially women, is highly valued among the na-Paks.

Seta White was a woman of character & courage. As per her societal values , if she slept with this tadpole, she certainly was wronged. As a woman, with her high sense of ethics & morality, she wanted to expose this turd for what he really is. I am thankful to her that because of her this tadpole was soundly crushed as a politician.

Then Jemima Khan , by adopting Seta Whites daughter, has displayed a similar high standard of morality and ethics. In contrast the earthworm is looking like the earthworm I used to put salt on rainy days.

If she unwraps, struts naked, smokes, drinks, sleeps around that is her business or the business of tabloids she is tempting. If someone who calls himself/herself muslim , let alone, wants to be a leader , and behaves in such westernish-trashy ways it definitely IS a huge problem with muslims everywhere around the world.

I want to see him further humiliated, disgraced and vilified because he is still not giving up his grandstanding and baighairatee. May Allah hasten his misery so that he could be an example to the coming generation of muslims.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by temporal on September 15, 2004 2:35:13 pm
Saman:

only jemima and imran know the real reasons why they separated…all else is mere conjecture and speculation…

paparazzi make public the most private moments of a public person…it is their livelihood…hence my slight disagreement with the use of the word flaunting

lve

t
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by coolpaki66 on September 15, 2004 2:16:50 pm
There two important questions that you have raised in this junk:

First: Is it any of my business if Jemima wishes to come unwrapped?
And to my utter suprise, you have answered it correctly yourself. NO

Second: Then why am I fuming?
I`ll answer this for you, so here goes. Because you are a typical woman who just can`t resist interfering with other people`s business. And probably, you see youself as another candidate to be Mrs Khan.

Please get yourself a life and stop wasting time by writing nonsense about others personal issues. If you dont agree with me, let me know. I`d love write a similar letter on a public forum after your husband divorces you.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by Urstruly on September 15, 2004 12:54:32 pm

and women never get tired of juicy gossip either - get a hobby for cryin` out loud.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 1-16   1 2 3 4 5

Interact Index

    #66 Vertical
    #65 echoboom
    #64 syke
    #63 tahmed32
    #62 samankhan
    #61 ZahraJ
    #60 nikki7777
    #59 tahmed32
    #58 tahmed32
    #57 yogiraj
    #56 amit
    #55 tahmed32
    #54 tahmed32
    #53 tahmed32
    #52 samankhan
    #51 ballukhan
    #50 temporal
    #49 tahmed32
    #48 tahmed32
    #47 tahmed32
    #46 tahmed32
    #45 scott
    #44 scott
    #43 ana
    #42 hamidm2
    #41 hamidm2
    #40 ItsZeitgeist
    #39 amit
    #38 temporal
    #37 echoboom
    #36 temporal
    #35 scott
    #34 amit
    #33 echoboom
    #32 temporal
    #31 echoboom
    #30 Urstruly
    #29 temporal
    #28 echoboom
    #27 Ralph
    #26 Jibbe
    #25 amit
    #24 echoboom
    #23 temporal
    #22 Urstruly
    #21 malik99
    #20 khamkhwa.
    #19 echoboom
    #18 Urstruly
    #17 syke
    #16 temporal
    #15 scout
    #14 Humsab
    #13 samankhan
    #12 Ralph
    #11 scout
    #10 samankhan
    #9 echoboom
    #8 rafay_alam
    #7 hamidm2
    #6 echoboom
    #5 scout
    #4 echoboom
    #3 temporal
    #2 coolpaki66
    #1 Urstruly

Latest Interacts

  • majumdar: Muthu, And the whole cycle... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
  • Eklavya: maumdar dada, other than... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
  • masanamuthu: 1.I dubt that there... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
  • nkg: Re: # 693 buba..... Russia will... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • majumdar: Kaal bhai, 1.I doubt that... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
  • Eklavya: Back to 2001 http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/12/02/india.attacks/index.html CNN)... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in
  • nkg: Re: # 673 masadi... indians... Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • Eklavya: "refrain from drawing chut!ya... India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Mumbai Attacks: Shocking
  • An Indian Muslim
  • Sexless and Loveless Marriages
  • Terror in Mumbai.....and also in 'Bannu or somewhere'
  • India-Pakistan: Empathy, grief in Pakistan for Mumbai mayhem
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Ranjha
  • Letter from Nagasaki
  • Hakim Said Assassinated
  • Funding Lower Education
  • Status of Parents in Al-Quran

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited