Sushil Bhatnagar September 21, 2004
#100 Posted by HP on September 27, 2004 12:17:47 am
#99 by nakhok
``it shouldn`t be difficult for him to peruse the census data from the archives ``
You continue to prove that you are a total imbecile. I asked you to provide any reference and you go back in your vitriol w/o addressing the issue.
Come on show me at least the census numbers that show that 25 million Hinus were killed by Pakistanis.
You write BS and I should do the search, thats a good one! Here is my research for you crazybum!
You know how 25 million works out:
25 million / 57 years = 438596 Hindus per year
438596 / 365days = 1201 daily
1201 / 24 hours = 50 Hindus every hour of the day.
So, as you read this one hindu per minute approx. or 50 Hindus per hour are being killed in Pakistanis.
Just show me a single piece of evidence that shows that 50 Hindus are being killed in Pakistan every hour. No RSS BS Site.
Get real! Moron!
#99 Posted by nakhok on September 26, 2004 10:35:37 pm
#85 by HP
*****
Only a total idiot would bring this up again and again.
*****
If someone is genuinely interestedin the facts, it shouldn`t be difficult for him to peruse the census data from the archives and verify for himself that a quarter of the population of pre-partition Pakistan was indeed non-Muslim. It should be just as easy to find out that today`s Pakistan is over 97% Muslim.
But those that find nothing wrong with this grotesque change in Pakistan`s demography are often the first to moan the change of demography in Israel following the UN-sanctioned partition of Palestine.
Apparently what is sauce for the goose isn`t sauce for the gander. It matters little to them that just as many Jews were forced to flee the Arab lands after the partition as the number of Palestinians that had to flee Israel. Today, it is Israel that has a significant Arab population in its midst while the Arab lands, from Morocco to Iraq, have managed to cleanse themselves completely of Jewish citizens!
The record in the subcontinent is very similar. Pakistan managed to whittle down the non-Muslim population from a quarter of the population to insignificance. India, on the other hand, has a percentage of Muslim population that is actually higher than in pre-partition India - thanks to the somehat higher birthrate of the Muslims.
*****
Only a total idiot would bring this up again and again.
*****
If someone is genuinely interestedin the facts, it shouldn`t be difficult for him to peruse the census data from the archives and verify for himself that a quarter of the population of pre-partition Pakistan was indeed non-Muslim. It should be just as easy to find out that today`s Pakistan is over 97% Muslim.
But those that find nothing wrong with this grotesque change in Pakistan`s demography are often the first to moan the change of demography in Israel following the UN-sanctioned partition of Palestine.
Apparently what is sauce for the goose isn`t sauce for the gander. It matters little to them that just as many Jews were forced to flee the Arab lands after the partition as the number of Palestinians that had to flee Israel. Today, it is Israel that has a significant Arab population in its midst while the Arab lands, from Morocco to Iraq, have managed to cleanse themselves completely of Jewish citizens!
The record in the subcontinent is very similar. Pakistan managed to whittle down the non-Muslim population from a quarter of the population to insignificance. India, on the other hand, has a percentage of Muslim population that is actually higher than in pre-partition India - thanks to the somehat higher birthrate of the Muslims.
#98 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on September 26, 2004 7:45:33 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#97 Posted by harimau on September 26, 2004 7:00:58 pm
Ref M.B.Z.Isphahani #91
[rsridhar,muslims live where union carbide massacred in bhopal like Halabja. Insurance did not pay.]
So, what was important to the Muslims of Bhopal? Protection of the deen as witnessed by the Shah Bano case (didn`t that come from Bhopal?) whereby a Muslima upon divorce is entitled to only 3 months` alimony as decreed by The Book.
Did the mullahs who demanded the enactment of the Muslim Women`s Protection Act (which cruelly limited the alimony to three months as opposed to what the courts had ordered) ever demand payment of compensation to the victims of the Bhopal tragedy with the same vehemence? No.
It is more important for ALL segments of Indian society -- politicians, NGOs, mullahs, ``secularists`` -- to continue the misery of the people so that their vote banks are intact.
[rsridhar,muslims live where union carbide massacred in bhopal like Halabja. Insurance did not pay.]
So, what was important to the Muslims of Bhopal? Protection of the deen as witnessed by the Shah Bano case (didn`t that come from Bhopal?) whereby a Muslima upon divorce is entitled to only 3 months` alimony as decreed by The Book.
Did the mullahs who demanded the enactment of the Muslim Women`s Protection Act (which cruelly limited the alimony to three months as opposed to what the courts had ordered) ever demand payment of compensation to the victims of the Bhopal tragedy with the same vehemence? No.
It is more important for ALL segments of Indian society -- politicians, NGOs, mullahs, ``secularists`` -- to continue the misery of the people so that their vote banks are intact.
#96 Posted by HP on September 26, 2004 9:31:10 am
rsridhar, dost-mittar
I am afraid despite being a doctor and a senior fella, you missed the basic element about the person in question. Sometimes, he does show signs of his lost brilliance… His reply to Khamakha was a master piece. He is above and beyond and engaging him in any conversation means that you are as naïve as they come. He is from Calcutta and comes from a well known Bengali Muslim family. I don’t know if he ever lived in Pakistan himself or not. Your addressing him is enough anguish for him. Please just let him be.
I am afraid despite being a doctor and a senior fella, you missed the basic element about the person in question. Sometimes, he does show signs of his lost brilliance… His reply to Khamakha was a master piece. He is above and beyond and engaging him in any conversation means that you are as naïve as they come. He is from Calcutta and comes from a well known Bengali Muslim family. I don’t know if he ever lived in Pakistan himself or not. Your addressing him is enough anguish for him. Please just let him be.
#95 Posted by nb on September 26, 2004 8:13:33 am
dostmittar, that`s interesting.
What happened to MBZI? Did it take anything to happen, or was he born Muslim-centric as he put it, and is that not part of being a good Muslim. It`s not bad, just different, and difficult to accept.
What happened to MBZI? Did it take anything to happen, or was he born Muslim-centric as he put it, and is that not part of being a good Muslim. It`s not bad, just different, and difficult to accept.
#94 Posted by nb on September 26, 2004 8:13:33 am
Sorry, Dr Bhatnagar, there isn`t a lot of new stuff in this article.
#93 Posted by rsridhar on September 26, 2004 8:13:33 am
re:#92 by dost-mittar
This guy Isphani sounds like a Paki masquerading as an Indian on chowk. I can hardly understand what he writes. Reminds me of one other Paki character who was noted for his interest in IT and worked as a hotelier (forgetting his name).
Sridhar
This guy Isphani sounds like a Paki masquerading as an Indian on chowk. I can hardly understand what he writes. Reminds me of one other Paki character who was noted for his interest in IT and worked as a hotelier (forgetting his name).
Sridhar
#92 Posted by dost_mittar on September 26, 2004 4:26:09 am
rsridhar:
Please note that our friend MBZI is a genuine Indian and so could have gone anywhere in the country. He may be angry (God knows what the country did to him or his family because of his religion to generate such hatred for his land of birth!). In case you dont know, he is a Bihari who probably had some college education in Calcutta. His criticisms stem from the fact that he is passionately muslim-centric and not India-centric.
Please note that our friend MBZI is a genuine Indian and so could have gone anywhere in the country. He may be angry (God knows what the country did to him or his family because of his religion to generate such hatred for his land of birth!). In case you dont know, he is a Bihari who probably had some college education in Calcutta. His criticisms stem from the fact that he is passionately muslim-centric and not India-centric.
#91 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on September 25, 2004 4:10:51 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#90 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on September 25, 2004 1:05:46 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#89 Posted by khamkhwa. on September 25, 2004 10:21:48 am
...ispahani saheb..
... were you born stupid or have you acquired it from living in india, bangladesh, pakistan, germany, england, dubai, abudhabi, kuwait, saudi arabia, usa and canada... and why did they let you out...;)
... were you born stupid or have you acquired it from living in india, bangladesh, pakistan, germany, england, dubai, abudhabi, kuwait, saudi arabia, usa and canada... and why did they let you out...;)
#88 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on September 25, 2004 6:29:04 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#87 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on September 25, 2004 6:29:03 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#86 Posted by rsridhar on September 25, 2004 6:29:03 am
re:#78 by M.B.Z.Isphahani
It is obvious you are biased against Indians. So, there is no use interacting with you.
If you visited India, u could not have gone to all the places u mentioned. Visitors from Pak are (at least i believe it to be so) allowed to visit limited number of places.
So, if u visited Bihar, Jharkhand etc, u would not find much progress because not much progress is happening there!!
If u go south, u would see a lot of progress. A lot of progress is also happening in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana: places u did not visit. Even Bengal is progressing now-a-days!
India is a huge country, so it takes time. Some states are moving faster than others. As i said before, even Bihar will progress some day. Only, it will take a long time.
As far as Manmohan Singh is concerned, he is doing what an Economist knows best: bring in the much needed foreign investment into the country. Godhra will take its own course. You do not seem to realize political parties do not award punishment. This is the job of court.
Sridhar
It is obvious you are biased against Indians. So, there is no use interacting with you.
If you visited India, u could not have gone to all the places u mentioned. Visitors from Pak are (at least i believe it to be so) allowed to visit limited number of places.
So, if u visited Bihar, Jharkhand etc, u would not find much progress because not much progress is happening there!!
If u go south, u would see a lot of progress. A lot of progress is also happening in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana: places u did not visit. Even Bengal is progressing now-a-days!
India is a huge country, so it takes time. Some states are moving faster than others. As i said before, even Bihar will progress some day. Only, it will take a long time.
As far as Manmohan Singh is concerned, he is doing what an Economist knows best: bring in the much needed foreign investment into the country. Godhra will take its own course. You do not seem to realize political parties do not award punishment. This is the job of court.
Sridhar
#85 Posted by HP on September 25, 2004 12:07:04 am
Only a total idiot would bring this up again and again.
#82 by nakhok
“Why is today`s Pakistan 97% Muslim even though a quarter of the population was non-Muslim at the time of the 1947 partition?”
Okay dude. Say for instance, Pakistan population was 100 millions at the time of partition a quarter of that population would mean 25 million people.
100 Millions / 4 = 25Million. Seems simple.
Now stupid fakk! You are telling that Pakistanis have killed 25 million people or may be more considering the population increases and nobody knew about!!
Indians killed about two thousand people in Gujarat and the whole world knew about it within days. What secret methods Pakistanis used to kill 25 million or more people and nobody knew about it?
Can you quote me even a single statement from the Government of India protesting or talking about it? Or the Indian government was an accomplice too?
Show me any independent news resource other than RSS that has any reference to it.
How many Jews were killed in Europe? Approx 10 million and every body knows about it.
25 millions Hindu killed in Pakistan and the Indian government just kept quiet!
Get a life. Liar!
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nb: I didn't know that,... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: Re: # 182; nb thanks... The Correct Turn
- nb: Cheema, hing is asafoetida... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: Re: # 180 yaar nb... The Correct Turn
- nb: HP, if it was... The Correct Turn
- akcheema: dost_mittar and hamidm sahibaan,... The Correct Turn
- ahmedmadani: When we who write... Politics of PPP and
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 46 Zeena... Politics of PPP and








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content