unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Demining Starts Healing War-torn Northern Sri Lanka

Aniruddha Bahal December 3, 2004

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all

#6 Posted by nikki7777 on December 9, 2004 10:33:17 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by Justice4All on December 8, 2004 10:01:54 pm
Aniruddha Bahal, if you think you can see peace in SL then you are dreaming, wait till your only neighbor starts creating problems for you. For peace in SL (or any part of south Asia) there is only one requirement - that is unconditional disintegration of India. For as long as India stays united it will keep these mini-wars going in the neighborhood to justify its bankrupted nationalistic ideology. I have no hope that we will see peace in S. Asia till that evil empire is completely destroyed.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by nikki7777 on December 5, 2004 1:11:07 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by SR on December 4, 2004 8:35:33 pm
This was written and circulated by my friend Freddie, a Vietnam veteran and a journalist... He now lives in Mexico, in self imposed exile...SR


WARS AND THEIR AFTERMATH

Things Seldom Spoken Of


The observant will have noticed that we hear little from the troops in Iraq and see almost nothing of the wounded. Why, one might wonder, does not CNN put an enlisted Marine before a camera and, for fifteen minutes without editing, let him say what he thinks? Is he not an adult and a citizen? Is he not engaged in important events on our behalf?

Sound political reasons exist. Soldiers are a risk PR-wise, the wounded a liability. No one can tell what they might say, and conspicuous dismemberment is bad for recruiting. An enlisted man in front of a camera is dangerous. He could wreck the governmental spin apparatus in five minutes. It is better to keep soldiers discreetly out of sight.

So we do not see much of the casualties, ours or theirs. Yet they are there, are somewhere, with missing legs, blind, becoming accustomed to groping at things in their new darkness, learning to use the wheelchairs that will be theirs for fifty years. Some face worse fates than others. Quadriplegics will be warehoused in VA hospitals where nurses will turn them at intervals, like hamburgers, to prevent bedsores. Friends and relatives will soon forget them. Suicide will be a frequent thought. The less damaged will get around.

For a brief moment perhaps the casualties will believe, then try desperately to keep believing, that they did something brave and worthy and terribly important for that abstraction, country. Some will even expect thanks. There will be no thanks, or few, and those quickly forgotten. It will be worse. People will ask how they lost the leg. In Iraq, they will say, hoping for sympathy, or respect, or understanding. The response, often unvoiced but unmistakable, will be, “What did you do that for?” The wounded will realize that they are not only crippled, but freaks.

The years will go by. Iraq will fade into the mist. Wars always do. A generation will rise for whom it will be just history. The dismembered veterans will find first that almost nobody appreciates what they did, then that few even remember it. If—when, many would say—the United States is driven out of Iraq, the soldiers will look back and realize that the whole affair was a fraud. Wars are just wars. They seem important at the time. At any rate, we are told that they are important.

Yet the wounds will remain. Arms do not grow back. For the paralyzed there will never be girlfriends, dancing, rolling in the grass with children. The blind will adapt as best they can. Those with merely a missing leg will count themselves lucky. They will hobble about, managing to lead semi-normal lives, and people will say, “How well he handles it.” An admirable freak. For others it will be less good. A colostomy bag is a sorry companion on a wedding night.

These men will come to hate. It will not be the Iraqis they hate. This we do not talk about.

It is hard to admit that one has been used. Some of the crippled will forever insist that the war was needed, that they were protecting their sisters from an Islamic invasion, or Vietnamese, or Chinese. Others will keep quiet and drink too much. Still others will read, grow older and wiser—and bitter. They will remember that their vice president, a man named Cheney, said that during his war, the one in Asia, he “had other priorities.” The veterans will remember this when everyone else has long since forgotten Cheney.

I once watched the first meeting between a young Marine from the South, blind, much of his face shot away, and his high school sweetheart who had come from Tennessee to Bethesda Naval Hospital to see him.

Hatred comes easily.

There are wounds and there are wounds. A friend of mine spent two tours in Asia in that war now little remembered. He killed many people, not all of them soldiers. It is what happens in wars. The memory haunts him. Jack is a hard man from a tough neighborhood, quick with his fists, intelligent but uneducated—not a liberal flower vain over his sensitivity. He lives in Mexican bars few would enter and has no politics beyond an anger toward government.

He was not a joyous killer. He remembers what he did, knows now that he was had. It gnaws at him. One is wise to stay away from him when he is drinking.

People say that this war isn’t like Viet Nam. They are correct. Washington fights its war in Iraq with no better understanding of Iraq than it had of Viet Nam, but with much better understanding of the United States. The Pentagon learned from Asia. This time around it has controlled the press well. Here is the great lesson of Southeast Asia: The press is dangerous, not because it is inaccurate, which it often is, but because it often isn’t.

So we don’t much see the caskets—for reasons of privacy, you understand.

The war in Iraq is fought by volunteers, which means people that no one in power cares about. No one in the mysteriously named “elite” gives a damn about some kid from a town in Tennessee that has one gas station and a beer hall with a stuffed buck’s head. Such a kid is a redneck at best, pretty much from another planet, and certainly not someone you would let your daughter date. If conscription came back, and college students with rich parents learned to live in fear of The Envelope, riots would blossom as before. Now Yale can rest easy. Thank God for throwaway people.

The nearly perfect separation between the military and the rest of the country, or at least the influential in the country, is wonderful for the war effort. It prevents concern. How many people with a college degree even know a soldier? Yes, some, and I will get email from them, but they are a minority. How many Americans have been on a military base? Or, to be truly absurd, how many men in combat arms went to, say, Harvard?

Ah, but they have other priorities.

In fifteen years in Washington I knew many, many reporters and intellectuals and educated people. Almost none had worn boots. So it is. Those who count do not have to go, and do not know anyone who has gone, and don’t interest themselves. There is a price for this, though not one Washington cares about. Across America, in places where you might not expect it—in Legion halls and VFW posts, among those who carry membership cards from the Disabled American Veterans—there are men who hate. They don’t hate America. They hate those who sent them. Talk to the wounded from Iraq in five years.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by UmerMurtaza on December 4, 2004 7:01:31 am
Aniruddha,

Thanks for the writing, mate. What are your opinions on the Ottawa Treaty? I feel sometimes that it doesn’t go far enough but it is a good start. For example, cluster bombs are not recognised as mines. Technically speaking, they are in the right but a sizeable proportion of cluster bombs do not explode and remain on the ground, theirby behaving like a landmine.

Kaura,

The day a mine explodes in the fields of Jallunder and kills your mujh is the day I`ll be laughing very hard.

Umer M
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by kaurasach on December 3, 2004 5:23:50 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content

Interact Index

    #6 nikki7777
    #5 Justice4All
    #4 nikki7777
    #3 SR
    #2 UmerMurtaza
    #1 kaurasach

Also by Aniruddha Bahal

  • Lahore Diary
  • The Iraqi Elections: an Important Watershed
  • Jared Diamond’s latest book Collapse
more »

Similar Articles

  • On the Waziristan Operation Mehroz Sadruddin
  • Peace The Final Frontier Taji M
  • Half Alive Again: An Evening At Zawia Dahmaani Prashant Bhatt
  • Zombie Nation - Random Thoughts! Ali Chishti
  • Reima's Taj Mahal Shakuntala Rao
more »

Swat: Paradise Lost

  • Swat Calls For Civil Society to Act
  • In Search of Political Will: Fight Against Militants in Swat
  • In memory of the Swat valley
  • The Nightmare Must End
  • In Honor of the Heroes of Swat
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • harish_hyd: Today's Pakistan IS Jinnah's... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • harish_hyd: If Karzai is a... Crowning of a Crony
  • Pardesi: #36 - Your health... Uneven Democracy : The
  • harish_hyd: #16 Posted by Goldfinger I... The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • SPY: Re: # 49 ahmedmadani:... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • bhs75: well if NAB was... NRO Is Just a
  • bhs75: Re: # 96 let me... The Strange Case of
  • SPY: Re: # 50 ahmedmadani:... I Want Jinnah's Pakistan

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • The Strange Case of the Indian Channels That Did Not Air the 26/11 Documentary
  • I Want Jinnah's Pakistan
  • Why MQM Wants To Enter Punjab?
  • Uneven Democracy : The Cry from Chhattisgarh
  • The Jehadi Frankenstein
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Imran Khan: Pakistan’s Next PM?
  • Pokhran-Chaghi audit: Winners and losers
  • The Coca-Cola Cup Final at Sharjah
  • Semi Final of the World Cup 1999
  • Kargil Issue

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2009 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited