Godot January 24, 2005
#82 Posted by echoboom on January 24, 2005 6:03:35 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#81 Posted by hamidm2 on January 24, 2005 5:57:38 pm
echo,
....... why are you so angry ?.......... it is not our fault that you were abused at the madrassa ........
....... why are you so angry ?.......... it is not our fault that you were abused at the madrassa ........
#80 Posted by bbabu on January 24, 2005 5:40:05 pm
I ignore posts from certain folks because they are predictable. I ignore posts from certain folks because they cannot write sentences in legible English. I think as a poster I need to have the choice of reading or not reading certain posts.
#79 Posted by amit on January 24, 2005 5:11:53 pm
Re:jay#78
Holy Cow!! First urstruly at 3 and now jay at 2. Looks like we are living in bizarro world here :-)
Holy Cow!! First urstruly at 3 and now jay at 2. Looks like we are living in bizarro world here :-)
#78 Posted by jay on January 24, 2005 4:41:42 pm
Chowk staff
I have noticed with dismay, the number of interacts plummeting on chowk. It is not due to the presence of obnoxious posts, it is rather due to the absense of provocative posts. This is chowk, a typical south asian street with its chaos, confusion and the variety, not a street with dress codes and behavioural norms.
By this rating system, you are killing chowk, at best addressing a non-existing problem.
Finally a rating system that rates hamidm lower than urstruly does not reflect the expectations of chowkies. This rating system may be a great programming gimmick, but can only stifle chowk.
I have noticed with dismay, the number of interacts plummeting on chowk. It is not due to the presence of obnoxious posts, it is rather due to the absense of provocative posts. This is chowk, a typical south asian street with its chaos, confusion and the variety, not a street with dress codes and behavioural norms.
By this rating system, you are killing chowk, at best addressing a non-existing problem.
Finally a rating system that rates hamidm lower than urstruly does not reflect the expectations of chowkies. This rating system may be a great programming gimmick, but can only stifle chowk.
#77 Posted by teshah on January 24, 2005 4:17:19 pm
I think the first casuality of a dogmatic religion is morality. How can you expect civil behaviour from those whoes God himself preaches hatred of his own creation through messengers who condone lynching of those who are accused of blasphemy against them instead of believing in Allah Who is `Rehman and Raheem` and the Prophet (PBUH) who is `Rehmatulaalimeen`.
#76 Posted by amit on January 24, 2005 4:06:49 pm
Re:echoboom#75
So you are not a Ba Ba Blacksheep? What are you then - a mountain mujahid or a kabaab vendor?
It is easy to sit at your terminal in the comforts of the west, sip Starbucks and type absurd stuff in support of your so-called Islamic ideal. Why dont you put your money where your mouth is? If you have any intellectual honesty, put your own worthless neck on the line and join a jehadi outfit to fight for your cause. Dont expect others to do all the dirty work while you just sit here and say - wah, wah.
So you are not a Ba Ba Blacksheep? What are you then - a mountain mujahid or a kabaab vendor?
It is easy to sit at your terminal in the comforts of the west, sip Starbucks and type absurd stuff in support of your so-called Islamic ideal. Why dont you put your money where your mouth is? If you have any intellectual honesty, put your own worthless neck on the line and join a jehadi outfit to fight for your cause. Dont expect others to do all the dirty work while you just sit here and say - wah, wah.
#75 Posted by echoboom on January 24, 2005 3:52:39 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#74 Posted by subroto on January 24, 2005 3:46:40 pm
I am guessing the most happy people are the Chowk programming team :-)
#73 Posted by subroto on January 24, 2005 3:44:57 pm
Set reading option to ``level=-1`` to see all interacts, otherwise I may have missed out on:
``#8 by kaurasach on January 24, 2005 9:14am PT Score=0
I came to CHOWK because of its liberal policies. Had other websites where I could interact. This site exposed me to secular diversity. It gave me the opportunity to confront opposing views.
However, the latest ``scoring`` system is biased and irrational. A single moderator decides the value of your content. This is a devious design to channel a particular way of thinking. All I can say is the idealism flinched. And I don`t know if at least the ``Front Page`` is worth visiting anymore.
Peer rating may be more appropriate, yet peers often rate on likes and dislikes agreements and disagreement not necessarily the value.
CHOWK please rethink this bad system - to preserve the credibility of this site. ``
``#8 by kaurasach on January 24, 2005 9:14am PT Score=0
I came to CHOWK because of its liberal policies. Had other websites where I could interact. This site exposed me to secular diversity. It gave me the opportunity to confront opposing views.
However, the latest ``scoring`` system is biased and irrational. A single moderator decides the value of your content. This is a devious design to channel a particular way of thinking. All I can say is the idealism flinched. And I don`t know if at least the ``Front Page`` is worth visiting anymore.
Peer rating may be more appropriate, yet peers often rate on likes and dislikes agreements and disagreement not necessarily the value.
CHOWK please rethink this bad system - to preserve the credibility of this site. ``
#71 Posted by shankar on January 24, 2005 3:35:58 pm
hamidm,
i`ll gladly exchange my level with you,
but dont you dare leave!
i`ll gladly exchange my level with you,
but dont you dare leave!
#70 Posted by MaheshG2 on January 24, 2005 3:34:57 pm
After editing my profile, I like the new system.
Especially, because the interaction will be real time from now on.
I have set my interaction level to the lowest so that I can catch all posts.
#69 Posted by shankar on January 24, 2005 3:34:06 pm
ha ha!
the rude 20-something Indian jokers are filtered out! But then how do mullahji urstruly & his bhatija ali_1 filter through!?
the rude 20-something Indian jokers are filtered out! But then how do mullahji urstruly & his bhatija ali_1 filter through!?
#68 Posted by Saminasha on January 24, 2005 2:48:18 pm
Re: # 57
really hamid...you know everyone loves your posts (eyes rolling)...
really hamid...you know everyone loves your posts (eyes rolling)...
#67 Posted by kaurasach on January 24, 2005 2:47:59 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- _arjun38: 20k more dandas up... The Correct Turn
- dost_mittar: Joe: I think that India... The Indian Obama!
- _arjun38: HP is commenting on... The Correct Turn
- laddu: Hamidm, You would deserve the... The Correct Turn
- jang: we have an obama... The Indian Obama!
- MatloobZaman: http://www.chowk.com/unplugged/t/60360... The Indian Obama!
- laddu: Re: # 111 Vaibhav, You did... The Muslim Protagonist and
- PKSZ_shadbad: Of course Saudis want... Hop Aboard the Interfaith








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content