unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

F-16s to Pakistan—Why Now?

Karamatullah K Ghori April 5, 2005

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#65 Posted by ntsyed on April 6, 2005 4:18:27 am
Re: #48,

Romair, my man!

I`ve heard so much about you... you`re definitely worth all the praises coming your way!

M`as-salaam
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#66 Posted by ntsyed on April 6, 2005 4:19:37 am
Re: #49

Well put, sajal!

Peace
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#67 Posted by ntsyed on April 6, 2005 4:26:39 am
Re: # 54

Asfand...baby... my MAN... CHILL dude!

You`re gonna chase `em away with your blistering insights.

Let them play with fire if they don`t believe it can hurt them... they`ll know soon.

M`as-salaam!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#68 Posted by HaroonEllahi on April 6, 2005 4:28:08 am
yaar, the idea behind the Pakistani Jf-17 is to provide us with a jet to replace the ageing jets in our fleet. The current f-16 batch and the new one will be the sophisticated core of the air force and the JF-17 will be the `unsophisticated` core of the air force. It will replacce our aging migs, f-7`s, etc.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#69 Posted by Faruk on April 6, 2005 6:24:59 am
Re: Romair & bbabu variour
Gentelmen!
Please don’t quarrel about the insignificant. We have to work hard to enrich the white man :)

Regards,

Faruk
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#70 Posted by Urstruly on April 6, 2005 7:20:00 am


The basic premise of this article is non-sensical although Mr. Ghauri has always been a no-non-sense guy.

The basic premise that America is propping up India as a superpower to counter China is non-Sense. China CANNOT be countered through a military threat of any size; because the nature of threat is not militaristic in nature but it is economic. Why would America help create a competitor that shows no inhibitions about becoming great. But the times have changed. The colonial era, when economics were controlled through military power has passed a century ago. Americans are learning this lesson the hard way in Afghnistan and Iraq.

The issue of supplying weapons to India is not as big as you have made it out to be. In my opinion there are two reasons for that:

1. Europeans have started re-selling weapons to China despite a US imposed sanction. They have told Americans to shove their sanctions where sun doesn`t rise. That leaves no option for Americans to sell its weapons elsewhere like India and Pakistan (potentially hot markets) or risk its manufacturers going out of business.

2. I think the Americans are trying their best from keeping India from buying oil from Iran (thru pipeline or even thru the sea), where Iran has promised to supply oil to only those who would buy it with Euros instead of US dollars. Iranians would supply oil cheaper than market rate and along with Iran, Russia and South America, especially Venzuella are opting for this option. That would sink the American economy to the abyss with in 5 years. The common sense, however, tells hindu baniya that even if he is given American technology and manufacturing liscences he would still need oil to support its economy. Irony of this whole situation is that, the Hindu baniya has become the Shylock who wants his pound of flesh too.


Trust me, I am no fan of India and I don`t see any potential of India becoming any kind of power in next 50 years at least. The most they will do will be to start manufacturing toys and dollar-store stuff while chinese will move into more sophisticated manufacturing arena.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#71 Posted by vivek on April 6, 2005 7:34:09 am
drlokraj #64,
The USA is concerned about its place in the world just like any other country should. The status of other countries does not worry the USA unless it affects the USA`s position in the world. That`s how diplomacy of every country should be. India`s diplomacy is thankfully now moving in that direction. Only our development and our place in the world should matter to the Indian govt. Diplomacy is not about charity to other countries but about progress of only your own country.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#72 Posted by tahmed32 on April 6, 2005 8:55:48 am
One need not be particularly bright to see what is going on: China has an economic shadow that that firmly encompasses the far east and australia and is also becomng significant as far away as latin america. It seeks to extend its military presence pari passu by building up a navy to challenge the US in the pacific.

India seeks something similar, although at a smaller scale, in the Indian Ocean. Pakistan seeks to counter this by building up its own naval strength.

Seen in this light, the recent Sino-Pak agreements (reported in yesterday`s and today`s Dawn) fit into this like a piece of jigsaw: China has helped build the new port at Gwadar, and just signed the agreement to further enhance it, and also to strengthen pakistan`s navy by providing four new frigates among other things - and in return (as the US suspects, per some reports) will probably get rights for chinese subs. Pakistan is happy because it has (once again) countered Indian attempts at extending its military reach. China is happy because it has both a potential commercial outlet for its goods as well as military presence at the world`s oil lifeline. Pakistan is also happy because it can play off China with the US (which gives it F-16s and naval planes). Pakistan is even more happy because India does not like all this at all.

Meanwhile, poor abdul and his wife worry about the next meal and medicine for their sick kid. While the Big Boys play their Big Games of Statecraft. And with all due respect they are clueless where all this is leading to - since the day of the Nation-States is over anyway, as the planet shrinks to a global village.

(OK, thru ranting).
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#73 Posted by HisExcellency on April 6, 2005 9:39:59 am
The timing of F-16 sale has more to do with Bush`s resounding win in 2004 elections, than anything else. The Democrats, who are more pro-India than Republicans, are too demoralised now to effectively challenge Bush`s decision in Congress and Senate.

According to some of my friends in the PAL-C (a Pakistani lobby in Washington D.C.), President Bush had already agreed to the F-16s sale during the last Musharraf visit to Camp David. If Bush had announced that decision back then, he would have faced tremendous flak from the vociferous Democrats. The Democrats were already accusing Bush of supporting dictatorships in middle East, Pakistan and Egypt.

The F-16 is primarily a political stunt aimed at convincing the Pakistani public that America is a sincere friend of Pakistan. In the short run, it will bolster the PAF considerably but in the longer run, PAF is going to benefit most from the JF-17.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#74 Posted by dost_mittar on April 6, 2005 11:21:13 am
It is time for India and Pakistan to look beyond CBMs and even beyond Kashmir. They should think strategically of a future in which the hostility between the two is not exploited by others. That the US move to sell F-16s to Pakistan and much more to India is designed to help its ailing aircraft manufacturers is a no-brainer. Why these two countries would so eagerly fall into this trap, where an outsider is taking advantage of their mutual hostility to line its own pockets is the real question? And it`s not just the US, China too is a willing player to exploit the hostility between the two. At least India has been smart vis-a-vis China and is not letting the Americans dictate its relationship with that country. Even Iran at times is able to exploit the differences between the two estranged siblings whenever it suits its purpose. Its time for Indian and Pakistani strategic thinkgers to devise a strategic alliance of its own, so that they can become players rather than mere mohras in the international game of chess.

Urstruly#70:
``The most they will do will be to start manufacturing toys and dollar-store stuff while chinese will move into more sophisticated manufacturing arena.``

Your contempt for the hindu is making you overlook some obvious facts. The reality is quite the opposite. India has been much more able to develop a niche in the knowledge-based industries than China.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#75 Posted by sajal on April 6, 2005 12:21:18 pm
Re: # 66

thankyou
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#76 Posted by sajal on April 6, 2005 12:23:41 pm
Re: # 48

well put Romair
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#77 Posted by arjun_m on April 6, 2005 12:26:34 pm
#74 by dost-mittar on April 6, 2005 11:21am PT

What you`re saying will never happen...The Pakis want Indian Kashmir...The Indians aren`t going to give it up..The pakis want Kashmir...rinse repeat...you can see where this gets into an infinite loop...
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#78 Posted by cayenne on April 6, 2005 12:34:44 pm
The stability of pakistan is essential to the development of south asia in general.We indians can trust that the US, out of its` own self interest will always have a hand in the affairs of pakistan.Things will never get out of hand.What india should do in my opinion, humble as it is, is just mind its` own business and concentrate on putting its` own house in order.We indians need to believe in ourselves, our future and our destiny.The rest as they say, will then , be history.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#79 Posted by mohar11 on April 6, 2005 1:32:49 pm
Re: # 74 DM
//....Its time for Indian and Pakistani strategic thinkgers to devise a strategic alliance of its own, so that they can become players ...//

Indian and Pakistani strategic thinkers ??? There are no such beasts called ``strategic thinkers`` anywhere in india or pakiland.

What you find in India are intellectually-challenged dimwits who cannot break-out of a paper-bag even if their lives depend upon it..... And you expect them to become ``Players``?? All they know is how to whine.

And if anybody could be worse than them - then you would be looking at paki ``strategic thinkers``. Pakis would actually willingly walk into the paper-bag from which they can`t walk out of. For them ``strategic thinking`` means brown-nosing to some big-daddy in order to be able to needle the hinuds.

But then nothing better is expected from pakis. But one really wonders why the indians are the way they are. Stupid morons - it`s unbelievable they way the Indians have been doing their ``strategic thinking``.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#80 Posted by KaalChakra on April 6, 2005 4:41:15 pm
re: cayenne # 1

There is nothing we Indians want more than to see our abilities reach a global status. :)

(I share all those vanities. It`s just fun to look at them and be able to poke fun at them once in a while)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 64-80   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #182 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #181 cayenne
    #180 rsridhar
    #179 arjun_m
    #178 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #177 cayenne
    #176 arjun_m
    #175 cayenne
    #174 tahmed32
    #173 rsridhar
    #172 rsridhar
    #171 rsridhar
    #170 rsridhar
    #169 arjun_m
    #168 harimau
    #167 vivek
    #166 einsteinwallah
    #165 rsridhar
    #164 rsridhar
    #163 rsridhar
    #162 harish_hyd
    #161 rsridhar
    #160 rsridhar
    #159 rsridhar
    #158 rsridhar
    #157 cayenne
    #156 arjun_m
    #155 arjun_m
    #154 arjun_m
    #153 cayenne
    #152 Dalit
    #151 vivek
    #150 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #149 vivek
    #148 CoolAL
    #147 vivek
    #146 CoolAL
    #145 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #144 vivek
    #143 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #142 CoolAL
    #141 vivek
    #140 arjun_m
    #139 arjun_m
    #138 vivek
    #137 vivek
    #136 rsridhar
    #135 HisExcellency
    #134 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #133 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #132 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #131 arjun_m
    #130 KaalChakra
    #129 arjun_m
    #128 arjun_m
    #127 bbabu
    #126 bbabu
    #125 vivek
    #124 KaalChakra
    #123 stuka
    #122 dost_mittar
    #121 tahmed32
    #120 cayenne
    #119 vivek
    #118 harish_hyd
    #117 harish_hyd
    #116 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #115 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #114 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #113 CoolAL
    #112 CoolAL
    #111 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #110 dost_mittar
    #109 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #108 HisExcellency
    #107 arjun_m
    #106 arjun_m
    #105 bbabu
    #104 bbabu
    #103 Romair
    #102 dost_mittar
    #101 tahmed32
    #100 arjun_m
    #99 Romair
    #98 cayenne
    #97 Romair
    #96 bbabu
    #95 bbabu
    #94 cayenne
    #93 arjun_m
    #92 dost_mittar
    #91 vivek
    #90 bbabu
    #89 Romair
    #88 rsridhar
    #87 rsridhar
    #86 rsridhar
    #85 rsridhar
    #84 arjun_m
    #83 cayenne
    #82 harish_hyd
    #81 taqat-e-parvaaz
    #80 KaalChakra
    #79 mohar11
    #78 cayenne
    #77 arjun_m
    #76 sajal
    #75 sajal
    #74 dost_mittar
    #73 HisExcellency
    #72 tahmed32
    #71 vivek
    #70 Urstruly
    #69 Faruk
    #68 HaroonEllahi
    #67 ntsyed
    #66 ntsyed
    #65 ntsyed
    #64 drlokraj
    #63 PHOENIX
    #62 ballukhan
    #61 ballukhan
    #60 bbabu
    #59 bbabu
    #58 vivek
    #57 CoolAL
    #56 vivek
    #55 vivek
    #54 asfand
    #53 mohar11
    #52 vivek
    #51 mohar11
    #50 Romair
    #49 sajal
    #48 Romair
    #47 SR
    #46 ntsyed
    #45 ntsyed
    #44 CoolAL
    #43 CoolAL
    #42 ntsyed
    #41 cayenne
    #40 bbabu
    #39 bbabu
    #38 bbabu
    #37 arjun_m
    #36 arjun_m
    #35 HaroonEllahi
    #34 Romair
    #33 vivek
    #32 vivek
    #31 CoolAL
    #30 Romair
    #29 bbabu
    #28 vivek
    #27 ntsyed
    #26 Romair
    #25 mohar11
    #24 kaurasach
    #23 bongdongs
    #22 bongdongs
    #21 mohar11
    #20 vivek
    #19 ferozk
    #18 temporal
    #17 ballukhan
    #16 aquaris
    #15 ballukhan
    #14 arjun_m
    #13 Naqshbandi
    #12 ballukhan
    #11 Naqshbandi
    #10 vagabond78
    #9 Dash_Dot
    #8 Dash_Dot
    #7 HaroonEllahi
    #6 nazarhayatkhan
    #5 harish_hyd
    #4 HaroonEllahi
    #3 ntsyed
    #2 harish_hyd
    #1 cayenne

Latest Interacts

  • quin: Asif, I am glad... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: quin: thanks for your... Translation of a (Love)
  • quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: I wrote 'love' in... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: Tahir, I apologise for calling... Translation of a (Love)
  • chaltahai: masadi, how would you... Translation of a (Love)
  • mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)
  • masadi: g'night... Translation of a (Love)

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Dhokha and Being a Muslim in India
  • Why is Karachi Turning Into a Sell-Out?
  • Government Wins Manmohan Singh Loses
  • Time for Musharraf to Quit
  • Fields Of Joy
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • The Bitter Taste of Milk: A Novel
  • Your Rusted Knight
  • Education in Pakistan, Part I
  • The New Education Policy
  • Iqbal: Selected Verse I

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited