sajal javid April 7, 2005
#244 Posted by Urstruly on April 14, 2005 7:13:24 am
Re: # 242
I fail to see the correlation between the two:
1. Who is Muslim or not
and
2. India/US/Pak relationship
I fail to see the correlation between the two:
1. Who is Muslim or not
and
2. India/US/Pak relationship
#250 Posted by hamidm2 on April 14, 2005 10:13:29 am
Re: # 244
``I fail to see the correlation between the two``.......... and therein lies the problem !
``I fail to see the correlation between the two``.......... and therein lies the problem !
#234 Posted by malikjahanzeb on April 14, 2005 12:34:08 am
nt:
i think KSA govt. has done a great job with the oil money by restricting certain ghost buster websites, in addition to stuffing their harams with all kinds of gems.
but i have noticed that i am shrewd enough to dodge them this time.
so, here`s emobryology explaination for dummies:
http://malikjahanzeb.netfirms.com/Embryology.htm
jazak-allah-kher
i think KSA govt. has done a great job with the oil money by restricting certain ghost buster websites, in addition to stuffing their harams with all kinds of gems.
but i have noticed that i am shrewd enough to dodge them this time.
so, here`s emobryology explaination for dummies:
http://malikjahanzeb.netfirms.com/Embryology.htm
jazak-allah-kher
#233 Posted by masanamuthu on April 13, 2005 8:07:04 pm
hamidm2:
I`m worried about you.. looks like ``prophet`` of allah had a special liking for ``apostates``
I was reading this.. from
www.faithfreedom.org
``Q.3:90
But those who reject Faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of Faith,- never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have gone astray.
Q.16: 106
Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.
One may think that the dreadful penalty mentioned here pertains to the next world. But Muhammad made sure that these people received their penalty in this world as well:
9.14
Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers,
There are also Hadiths that clearly says `` So, wherever you find them, kill them, for there will be a reward for their killers on the Day of Resurrection.``
Elsewhere we read:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260:
Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn `Abbas, who said, ``Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, `Don`t punish (anybody) with Allah`s Punishment.` No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, `If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.` ``
I found many tales of brutality of Muhammad like this story:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 261:
Eight men of the tribe of `Ukil came to the Prophet and then they found the climate of Medina unsuitable for them. So, they said, ``O Allah`s Apostle! Provide us with some milk.`` Allah`s Apostle said, ``I recommend that you sh ould join the herd of camels.`` So they went and drank the urine and the milk of the camels (as a medicine) till they became healthy and fat. Then they killed the shepherd and drove away the camels, and they became unbelievers after they were Muslims. When the Prophet was informed by a shouter for help, he sent some men in their pursuit, and before the sun rose high, they were brought, and he had their hands and feet cut off. Then he ordered for nails, which were heated and passed over their eyes, and they were left in the Harra (i.e. rocky land in Medina). They asked for water, and nobody provided them with water till they died.
I`m worried about you.. looks like ``prophet`` of allah had a special liking for ``apostates``
I was reading this.. from
www.faithfreedom.org
``Q.3:90
But those who reject Faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of Faith,- never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have gone astray.
Q.16: 106
Any one who, after accepting faith in Allah, utters Unbelief,- except under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in Faith - but such as open their breast to Unbelief, on them is Wrath from Allah, and theirs will be a dreadful Penalty.
One may think that the dreadful penalty mentioned here pertains to the next world. But Muhammad made sure that these people received their penalty in this world as well:
9.14
Fight them, and Allah will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers,
There are also Hadiths that clearly says `` So, wherever you find them, kill them, for there will be a reward for their killers on the Day of Resurrection.``
Elsewhere we read:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 260:
Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn `Abbas, who said, ``Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, `Don`t punish (anybody) with Allah`s Punishment.` No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, `If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.` ``
I found many tales of brutality of Muhammad like this story:
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 261:
Eight men of the tribe of `Ukil came to the Prophet and then they found the climate of Medina unsuitable for them. So, they said, ``O Allah`s Apostle! Provide us with some milk.`` Allah`s Apostle said, ``I recommend that you sh ould join the herd of camels.`` So they went and drank the urine and the milk of the camels (as a medicine) till they became healthy and fat. Then they killed the shepherd and drove away the camels, and they became unbelievers after they were Muslims. When the Prophet was informed by a shouter for help, he sent some men in their pursuit, and before the sun rose high, they were brought, and he had their hands and feet cut off. Then he ordered for nails, which were heated and passed over their eyes, and they were left in the Harra (i.e. rocky land in Medina). They asked for water, and nobody provided them with water till they died.
#232 Posted by temporal on April 13, 2005 7:09:59 pm
a raw nerve?
the writer writes about of rape in pakistan
the obfuscators, deniers, prevaricators ...the abdul-hates... talk of all places but pakistan
the writer writes about of rape in pakistan
the obfuscators, deniers, prevaricators ...the abdul-hates... talk of all places but pakistan
#231 Posted by dost_mittar on April 13, 2005 6:57:36 pm
teshah:
``Is it not an ample proof of what all the wise had been saying about the women, as epitomized in Manu Samriti so poignantly?
Pishu, dhol, ganwaar, shudar, naari (woman)
sub hein taarhan (beating) ke adhikaari (deserving}``
Shahji, Manu could not have written this. I am pretty sure he wrote in sanskrit whereas the above quote is in Hindi. I believe these lines were written by Tulsi Das, probably after his wife did not do what he wanted :-)
I am not following this thread, so the issue may have already been discussed.
Does anyone know what are the hadood laws when a non-muslim woman complains of rape/zabar/zina against a muslim man?
Is it a crime for a muslim to have a non-consensual sex with a non-muslim woman? If so, whose witness is admissible?
What is the punishment if the crime is proved?
What happens in the opposite case, namely, if it is a muslim woman and a non-muslim man?
Anyone?
``Is it not an ample proof of what all the wise had been saying about the women, as epitomized in Manu Samriti so poignantly?
Pishu, dhol, ganwaar, shudar, naari (woman)
sub hein taarhan (beating) ke adhikaari (deserving}``
Shahji, Manu could not have written this. I am pretty sure he wrote in sanskrit whereas the above quote is in Hindi. I believe these lines were written by Tulsi Das, probably after his wife did not do what he wanted :-)
I am not following this thread, so the issue may have already been discussed.
Does anyone know what are the hadood laws when a non-muslim woman complains of rape/zabar/zina against a muslim man?
Is it a crime for a muslim to have a non-consensual sex with a non-muslim woman? If so, whose witness is admissible?
What is the punishment if the crime is proved?
What happens in the opposite case, namely, if it is a muslim woman and a non-muslim man?
Anyone?
#283 Posted by teshah on April 15, 2005 5:12:14 pm
Re: # 231
Welcome dear mittar. Where have you been all the time? I had been missing you badly.
Here I got entangled with one Sajal whom I took as a male but who claims to be a female and even proud of being so. I just realized that there is no neutral pronoun in English to refer to her. As it is, subject to verification of her sex, I am constrained to assume her to be a woman as a matter of courtesy, subject to verification of her actual sex, if at all possible through internet. As, however, appears from her reaction to my post, she can be nothing else but a menopaused woman.
My peer-Ustad Mirza Ghalib had faced a similar situation once, which he described in
the following words:
Dhol dhapa us sarapa naaz ka shewa naheeN
Ham hi kar bethe the Ghalib pesh dasti ek din
But this is my weakness even in this age like my Ustad who says:
Chherh khoobaN se chali jae asad
Gar naheeN wasl to hasrat hi sahi
As regards the couplet I ascribed to Manu Samriti, I took this information from the Hindi film `The Bandit Queen` about Phoolan Devi. I presumed it to be a book and not a person. What, however, struck me in this respect is the agreement between Quran and Manu Samriti about the status of the woman and the treatment she deserved with a slight difference that whereas Quran prescribes beating only for a rebellious woman, Samriti makes no exception in this regard.
The questions you raised about the Hadood Laws when one of the party in a rape case is a non-Muslim are very important indeed. I think these laws apply to Muslims only. It is strange that we have not come across any such case where one of the party is non-Muslim. I am searching for the answer and would welcome information on this point from any chowky friend.
Welcome dear mittar. Where have you been all the time? I had been missing you badly.
Here I got entangled with one Sajal whom I took as a male but who claims to be a female and even proud of being so. I just realized that there is no neutral pronoun in English to refer to her. As it is, subject to verification of her sex, I am constrained to assume her to be a woman as a matter of courtesy, subject to verification of her actual sex, if at all possible through internet. As, however, appears from her reaction to my post, she can be nothing else but a menopaused woman.
My peer-Ustad Mirza Ghalib had faced a similar situation once, which he described in
the following words:
Dhol dhapa us sarapa naaz ka shewa naheeN
Ham hi kar bethe the Ghalib pesh dasti ek din
But this is my weakness even in this age like my Ustad who says:
Chherh khoobaN se chali jae asad
Gar naheeN wasl to hasrat hi sahi
As regards the couplet I ascribed to Manu Samriti, I took this information from the Hindi film `The Bandit Queen` about Phoolan Devi. I presumed it to be a book and not a person. What, however, struck me in this respect is the agreement between Quran and Manu Samriti about the status of the woman and the treatment she deserved with a slight difference that whereas Quran prescribes beating only for a rebellious woman, Samriti makes no exception in this regard.
The questions you raised about the Hadood Laws when one of the party in a rape case is a non-Muslim are very important indeed. I think these laws apply to Muslims only. It is strange that we have not come across any such case where one of the party is non-Muslim. I am searching for the answer and would welcome information on this point from any chowky friend.
#302 Posted by sajal on May 16, 2005 8:36:16 am
Re: # 283
after reading your post I am so grateful that Allah gave me such a loving father . In my family women are treated with the utmost respect but in yours I am even afraid to think if you have daughters what their fate is if their father is a such a big , sick pervert who only thinks women are not capeable of anything but sex. I am just blown away by your animosity towards women what did your mother do to you that you are grew up to be so sick. I am not surprised that your wife became your enemy , with your guttar mentality it was even remarkable if she loved you at one point in her life. You are an ungrateful man who is disrespecting the same woman who gave him life and taught him all he knows about this world and now he sees women as nothing .
I am a woman and believe me i do not need any confirmation from you and secondly if you wish to adress me , address me as a woman other wise please refrain to talk to me.
I do not and have never entertained jerks, perverts and a sick shrivelled up man who does not even know how to talk.
after reading your post I am so grateful that Allah gave me such a loving father . In my family women are treated with the utmost respect but in yours I am even afraid to think if you have daughters what their fate is if their father is a such a big , sick pervert who only thinks women are not capeable of anything but sex. I am just blown away by your animosity towards women what did your mother do to you that you are grew up to be so sick. I am not surprised that your wife became your enemy , with your guttar mentality it was even remarkable if she loved you at one point in her life. You are an ungrateful man who is disrespecting the same woman who gave him life and taught him all he knows about this world and now he sees women as nothing .
I am a woman and believe me i do not need any confirmation from you and secondly if you wish to adress me , address me as a woman other wise please refrain to talk to me.
I do not and have never entertained jerks, perverts and a sick shrivelled up man who does not even know how to talk.
#230 Posted by echoboom on April 13, 2005 6:57:10 pm
Meanwhile:
In the land of milk (them) and (make) money--the United Satana of America.
``Miraa koee naheeN hai teraay sivaa``--the yelps from the Cantonement and Colony Kennels reach a crescendo of orgasmic ecstacy.
According to a study conducted by the National Victim Center, 1.3 women (age 18 and over) in the United States are forcibly raped each minute. That translates to 78 per hour, 1,871 per day, or 683,000 per year.- Rape in America: A Report to the Nation, National Victim Center,1992.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, nearly 6 out of 10 rape/sexual assault incidents are reported by victims to have occurred in their own home or at the home of a friend, relative, or neighbor. - Sex Offenses and Offenders: An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault, Bureau of Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice, 1997.
51% of the sexual assault cases studied in the Women`s Safety Project survey were committed against young women between 16 and 21 years. old. - ``Sexual Violence in Women`s Safety Project, A Community-Based Survey,`` 1995.
In 29% of rapes, the offender used a weapon. - Violence Against Women, Bureau of Justic Statistics, U.S. Dept of Justice, 1994.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, an estimated 91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are female and 9% are male. Nearly 99% of the offenders they described in single-victim incidents are male. - Violence Against Women, Bureau of Justic Statistics, U.S. Dept of Justice, 1994.
Rape or sexual assault was the violent crime least often reported to law enforcement. - Crime Victimization 1999: Changes 1998-99 with Trends 1993-99, National Crime Victimization Survey, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Justice, 2000.
13.3% of college women indicated that they had been forced to have sex in a dating situation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, I. Johnson & R. Sigler, 2000.
Among developmentally disabled adults as many as 83% of the females and 32% of the males are victims of sexual assault. Sexual Assault Against Women with Disabilities, Disabled Women`s Network, 1991.
The National Violence Against Women Survey found that rape is a crime committed primarily against youth. Of the women who reported being raped sometime in their lives, 21.6% were younger than age 12, 32.4% were ages 12 to 17, 29% were ages 18 to 24, and 16.6 % were over 25 years old. Thus, 54% of women victims were under age 18 at the time of the first rape and 83% were under the age of 25. - ``Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey,`` National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice,1998.
In the land of milk (them) and (make) money--the United Satana of America.
``Miraa koee naheeN hai teraay sivaa``--the yelps from the Cantonement and Colony Kennels reach a crescendo of orgasmic ecstacy.
According to a study conducted by the National Victim Center, 1.3 women (age 18 and over) in the United States are forcibly raped each minute. That translates to 78 per hour, 1,871 per day, or 683,000 per year.- Rape in America: A Report to the Nation, National Victim Center,1992.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, nearly 6 out of 10 rape/sexual assault incidents are reported by victims to have occurred in their own home or at the home of a friend, relative, or neighbor. - Sex Offenses and Offenders: An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault, Bureau of Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice, 1997.
51% of the sexual assault cases studied in the Women`s Safety Project survey were committed against young women between 16 and 21 years. old. - ``Sexual Violence in Women`s Safety Project, A Community-Based Survey,`` 1995.
In 29% of rapes, the offender used a weapon. - Violence Against Women, Bureau of Justic Statistics, U.S. Dept of Justice, 1994.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, an estimated 91% of the victims of rape and sexual assault are female and 9% are male. Nearly 99% of the offenders they described in single-victim incidents are male. - Violence Against Women, Bureau of Justic Statistics, U.S. Dept of Justice, 1994.
Rape or sexual assault was the violent crime least often reported to law enforcement. - Crime Victimization 1999: Changes 1998-99 with Trends 1993-99, National Crime Victimization Survey, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Dept. of Justice, 2000.
13.3% of college women indicated that they had been forced to have sex in a dating situation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, I. Johnson & R. Sigler, 2000.
Among developmentally disabled adults as many as 83% of the females and 32% of the males are victims of sexual assault. Sexual Assault Against Women with Disabilities, Disabled Women`s Network, 1991.
The National Violence Against Women Survey found that rape is a crime committed primarily against youth. Of the women who reported being raped sometime in their lives, 21.6% were younger than age 12, 32.4% were ages 12 to 17, 29% were ages 18 to 24, and 16.6 % were over 25 years old. Thus, 54% of women victims were under age 18 at the time of the first rape and 83% were under the age of 25. - ``Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey,`` National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Dept. of Justice,1998.
#229 Posted by echoboom on April 13, 2005 6:30:16 pm
There is Ba Ba Blacksheep enlightenment and moderation in ``Islamic`` Pakistan and then there is justice swift and harsh where Mullahs applies Sharia--judiciously, of course.
But the silence of the lambs in ``tolerating`` blasphemers of the holy prophet nay, encouraging them by whispering sweet nothings like ``O how Rushdick you sound when you say that, my fellow muslim-hater``.
Iran to hang father and son for rape
14 April 2005
TEHRAN: A father and his 17-year-old son will be executed by hanging on Saturday after being convicted of raping four young girls and stealing from dozens of others, a state-run newspaper reported on Wednesday.
Mohammadi is due to be executed in public at dawn on Saturday while his son will be hanged at exactly the same time behind prison walls. Both are to receive 74 lashes before their hangings, the paper said.
Despite being a member of the United Nations convention on the Rights of the Child, Iran continues to issue death penalties to offenders under the age of 18.
Iran`s judiciary announced plans last year to outlaw the death penalty for juveniles under 18 but some lawyers say the plans are not strong enough because judges still have the power to change it if they deem the offender was mature enough when committing the crime.
This month, Amnesty International said in a report that Iran had executed 159 people in 2004, second worldwide after China.
Murder, rape, adultery, armed robbery, apostasy and drug trafficking are punishable by death in Iran.
But the silence of the lambs in ``tolerating`` blasphemers of the holy prophet nay, encouraging them by whispering sweet nothings like ``O how Rushdick you sound when you say that, my fellow muslim-hater``.
Iran to hang father and son for rape
14 April 2005
TEHRAN: A father and his 17-year-old son will be executed by hanging on Saturday after being convicted of raping four young girls and stealing from dozens of others, a state-run newspaper reported on Wednesday.
Mohammadi is due to be executed in public at dawn on Saturday while his son will be hanged at exactly the same time behind prison walls. Both are to receive 74 lashes before their hangings, the paper said.
Despite being a member of the United Nations convention on the Rights of the Child, Iran continues to issue death penalties to offenders under the age of 18.
Iran`s judiciary announced plans last year to outlaw the death penalty for juveniles under 18 but some lawyers say the plans are not strong enough because judges still have the power to change it if they deem the offender was mature enough when committing the crime.
This month, Amnesty International said in a report that Iran had executed 159 people in 2004, second worldwide after China.
Murder, rape, adultery, armed robbery, apostasy and drug trafficking are punishable by death in Iran.
#228 Posted by malikjahanzeb on April 13, 2005 5:20:23 pm
ntsyed,
7th century islam is not a light thing to take. it is a recipie for world domination. it`s a `go` signal. it is something which can only be ignited once, grow to it`s most destrictive form and is deemed to die out after that. even saw a match-stick burn?
7th century islam will never revive because people have experiemented with it. those who are still enthusiastic about it fall under two categories. ones who have retained the birth state of their brains or ones with a bug in their brain. fortunately, you fall under the second category. it`s a general trend to notice that most normal human beings see their fundamentalism curbed when they get educated and civilized (you are blessed to be saved from this evil trend). since people like you are small in number, we have every reason to believe that we are done with 7th century islam.
to keep you busy, i ask you to explain the murder of nearly 800 jews of banu quraiza by your favorite prophet. they were prisnors (not of war). they were taken out in chunks of a dezons and their throats were cut as goats and sheep. their women were taken as concubines and children slaves.
7th century islam is not a light thing to take. it is a recipie for world domination. it`s a `go` signal. it is something which can only be ignited once, grow to it`s most destrictive form and is deemed to die out after that. even saw a match-stick burn?
7th century islam will never revive because people have experiemented with it. those who are still enthusiastic about it fall under two categories. ones who have retained the birth state of their brains or ones with a bug in their brain. fortunately, you fall under the second category. it`s a general trend to notice that most normal human beings see their fundamentalism curbed when they get educated and civilized (you are blessed to be saved from this evil trend). since people like you are small in number, we have every reason to believe that we are done with 7th century islam.
to keep you busy, i ask you to explain the murder of nearly 800 jews of banu quraiza by your favorite prophet. they were prisnors (not of war). they were taken out in chunks of a dezons and their throats were cut as goats and sheep. their women were taken as concubines and children slaves.
#238 Posted by ntsyed on April 14, 2005 2:36:31 am
Re: # 228
MJ,
while I look up the website you`ve referred me to, and the 800 jews of banu quraiza. Please let me know why the ``moderate``, ``educated``, ``enlightened`` and ``progressed``, apparently graduated from the birth state of their brains or without a bug in it, continue to slaughter (in countless numbers) men, women, and chilren in Iraq, Palestine, Chechnia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Uigur, India, Pakistan, Kashmir, Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Chile, Uruguay, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Venezuela, Eygypt, Jordan...and many more countries. I`m sure you`ll have better answers than allowing ``moderate``, ``educated`` liberal men to satify their needs by dehumanizing women into prostitution.
Our numbers may be small, which you`ll be surprised to know how many actually they are, with a solid faith in Allah and His mercy, only 300 or so will reverse what the moderates have perverted in the last 1000 years. Just keep practicing the kalima for the day when you`ll see them all around you, including your own children.
MJ,
while I look up the website you`ve referred me to, and the 800 jews of banu quraiza. Please let me know why the ``moderate``, ``educated``, ``enlightened`` and ``progressed``, apparently graduated from the birth state of their brains or without a bug in it, continue to slaughter (in countless numbers) men, women, and chilren in Iraq, Palestine, Chechnia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Uigur, India, Pakistan, Kashmir, Uzbekistan, Indonesia, Chile, Uruguay, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Venezuela, Eygypt, Jordan...and many more countries. I`m sure you`ll have better answers than allowing ``moderate``, ``educated`` liberal men to satify their needs by dehumanizing women into prostitution.
Our numbers may be small, which you`ll be surprised to know how many actually they are, with a solid faith in Allah and His mercy, only 300 or so will reverse what the moderates have perverted in the last 1000 years. Just keep practicing the kalima for the day when you`ll see them all around you, including your own children.
#227 Posted by malikjahanzeb on April 13, 2005 4:37:05 pm
ntsyed sahib: this sattar2 is behind you like a scary nightmare. just like you are behind the moderates. this is rather funny for me.
echo: i am pissed to realize the pathetic urdu support on the web. we can`t even write simple sentences to each other without invoking 7 wonders of technology. sad that we are not upto the task of keeping up with other nations. i envy those oily sheikhs that a whole version of arabic windows is there for their use. even the chinease have done the task which is much more cumbersone as compared to us.
sattar: have you noticed the attitude of poeple towards us. isn`t it exactly as if you are trying to ride a bus and the driver is too afraid to see the huge baggage you have. you are crazy man. you are even wierder than the ntsyed.
#226 Posted by teshah on April 13, 2005 4:13:37 pm
178-Dear Sajal
I just read your comments carefully and sat down to reply the points raised by you one by one. Though I believe it is futile to argue with a woman yet like all men I love to talk to one whenever I get the chance as my `peer` Ghalib says:
Dil phir tawafe kooe malamat ko jae he
Pandaar ka sanam kadah weeraan kie hue.
Now to the points raised:
(1) ``see you assumed i was a man and i believe just like that you assume everything without knowing the facts``
You are quite correct. I took you as a man judging by your name. But I still wonder how to `verify` that you are a woman. The fact is that only the male is normally the stable form of all the living beings. As for the female it retains her sex characteristics only for a limited period. A woman normally becomes an MP (menopaused) at the age of 40 to 45. Which means she becomes physically sexless and unproductive like a barren field and mentally a sick person, whereas the man remains sexually functional male till his death at whatever his age. Some even say he remains so till his`Kul`. In Punjabi the female which goes MP {menopaused} is called a `Phandar`. A cow or hen reaching such a condition is slaughtered and eaten.
(2) ``Surah 30. Ar Rum Ayah 21
And one of His signs is that He created mates for you from yourselves
that you may find rest in them, and He put between you love and compassion;
most surely there are signs in this for a people who reflect et sec.``
Excuse me, you got off the track. We are discussing the gender issue and not the relationship and the relative rights of the husband and wife. I ask you only one question in this connection. How can a wife have equal rights with her husband in Islam when the husband can have as many wives and sex-slaves as he can manage? This is quite in accordance with the natural demands of each gender. This is indeed the natural justice of the `Deene Fitrat`. Don`t you agree?
``Men shall take full care of women, because Allah has given the one more
strength than the other, and because they support them from their means.
Qur`an [4 : 34]``
My God! Are you serious, dear? Please don`t play with Qurane Hakim. From where you got the words `full care` and `strength`? Verse 34 of Sura 4 is indeed the most important verse laying down the rules for the mutual relationship of the husband and wife/wives and their rights and obligations. Here is the translation of it by Pickthall, the most favourable one to women:
``Men are in charge of women because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom you fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge (punish severely) them.``
Does your `full care` and `strength` mean the performance by man of the function ordained by Allah in the portion underlined above?
When I reached here I recalled the language you used at the end of your post as reproduced below:
``Your post is utter Rubbish and frankly even replying to it I feel insulted.
You can take you ``Guttar mentality`` and keep it where it belongs in your mind!!!!!``
Is it not an ample proof of what all the wise had been saying about the women, as epitomized in Manu Samriti so poignantly?
Pishu, dhol, ganwaar, shudar, naari (woman)
sub hein taarhan (beating) ke adhikaari (deserving}
The very fact that I assumed you to be a man I wonder what was the reason for you to become personal in a discussion on a general issue of gender relation.
I just read your comments carefully and sat down to reply the points raised by you one by one. Though I believe it is futile to argue with a woman yet like all men I love to talk to one whenever I get the chance as my `peer` Ghalib says:
Dil phir tawafe kooe malamat ko jae he
Pandaar ka sanam kadah weeraan kie hue.
Now to the points raised:
(1) ``see you assumed i was a man and i believe just like that you assume everything without knowing the facts``
You are quite correct. I took you as a man judging by your name. But I still wonder how to `verify` that you are a woman. The fact is that only the male is normally the stable form of all the living beings. As for the female it retains her sex characteristics only for a limited period. A woman normally becomes an MP (menopaused) at the age of 40 to 45. Which means she becomes physically sexless and unproductive like a barren field and mentally a sick person, whereas the man remains sexually functional male till his death at whatever his age. Some even say he remains so till his`Kul`. In Punjabi the female which goes MP {menopaused} is called a `Phandar`. A cow or hen reaching such a condition is slaughtered and eaten.
(2) ``Surah 30. Ar Rum Ayah 21
And one of His signs is that He created mates for you from yourselves
that you may find rest in them, and He put between you love and compassion;
most surely there are signs in this for a people who reflect et sec.``
Excuse me, you got off the track. We are discussing the gender issue and not the relationship and the relative rights of the husband and wife. I ask you only one question in this connection. How can a wife have equal rights with her husband in Islam when the husband can have as many wives and sex-slaves as he can manage? This is quite in accordance with the natural demands of each gender. This is indeed the natural justice of the `Deene Fitrat`. Don`t you agree?
``Men shall take full care of women, because Allah has given the one more
strength than the other, and because they support them from their means.
Qur`an [4 : 34]``
My God! Are you serious, dear? Please don`t play with Qurane Hakim. From where you got the words `full care` and `strength`? Verse 34 of Sura 4 is indeed the most important verse laying down the rules for the mutual relationship of the husband and wife/wives and their rights and obligations. Here is the translation of it by Pickthall, the most favourable one to women:
``Men are in charge of women because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom you fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge (punish severely) them.``
Does your `full care` and `strength` mean the performance by man of the function ordained by Allah in the portion underlined above?
When I reached here I recalled the language you used at the end of your post as reproduced below:
``Your post is utter Rubbish and frankly even replying to it I feel insulted.
You can take you ``Guttar mentality`` and keep it where it belongs in your mind!!!!!``
Is it not an ample proof of what all the wise had been saying about the women, as epitomized in Manu Samriti so poignantly?
Pishu, dhol, ganwaar, shudar, naari (woman)
sub hein taarhan (beating) ke adhikaari (deserving}
The very fact that I assumed you to be a man I wonder what was the reason for you to become personal in a discussion on a general issue of gender relation.
#301 Posted by sajal on May 16, 2005 8:15:53 am
Re: # 226
I am sorry for not replying earlier but you Sir are a sick , twisted poor excuse of a man.
I am sorry for not replying earlier but you Sir are a sick , twisted poor excuse of a man.
#225 Posted by hamidm2 on April 13, 2005 3:53:02 pm
a long road .......
.......... i don`t know if rape is any more prevalent in pakistan than in other places even though muslim men might be more lecherous and depraved than others because of their traditional attitude towards women ........but that is not the problem .......... the problem is that in pakistan, as in many other islamic countries, the rapist is protected while the victim is persecuted, defamed and punished ........ and that problem cannot be fixed by implementing sharia or other such nonsense - it has to be dealt with by establishing a civil society and rule of law ......... man`s law, with no contradictions or ambiguities and without interference from god and his ambassadors on earth .......... but first we have to learn to obey traffic laws and not spit on the street - it is a long road to hoe ......
.......... i don`t know if rape is any more prevalent in pakistan than in other places even though muslim men might be more lecherous and depraved than others because of their traditional attitude towards women ........but that is not the problem .......... the problem is that in pakistan, as in many other islamic countries, the rapist is protected while the victim is persecuted, defamed and punished ........ and that problem cannot be fixed by implementing sharia or other such nonsense - it has to be dealt with by establishing a civil society and rule of law ......... man`s law, with no contradictions or ambiguities and without interference from god and his ambassadors on earth .......... but first we have to learn to obey traffic laws and not spit on the street - it is a long road to hoe ......
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nb: Too many points at... They Will Seal The
- majumdar: Kaal bhai, Now or Never... Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak:
- nkg: Re: # 133 Special provision... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- majumdar: Nkg moshai, What is wrong... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- nkg: Re: # 128 Dinaric... RSS is... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- nkg: Re: # 120 HP... The core... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- nkg: Re: # 98 hamidm2... " what... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- pinku: add to #133 Posted... ‘Dustbin of history’ or








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content