Wapsi (The Returning)

Re: # 185
Dear sir,

I see that as usual in right royal Indian fashion you`ve introduced a personal angle to it.

I know it is hard for you to understand coming from the backward patriarchal society that you do but my wife is an individual in her own right... who knows well how to defend herself. I actually thought it was unnecessary as the person is, like any typical Indian, an abusive coward whose target are usually women.

As for Jinnah Sahab, he doesn`t need defending, least of all from me, against some idiotic wild allegations that some call center employee who by his own admission is the self appointed defender of ``Mahatma`` Gandhi`s honor, while misusing company computer facilities.

Good luck explaining that to your boss.

#184 by Mantolives

[YAWN ... man you are a broken record of same old lies and lame comebacks.]

Another wasted post. No answers?

When you, with your incompetence, couldn`t defend your wife forcing her to fend for herself, it is futile to expect that you will successfully defend Jinnah.

Re: # 182

YAWN ... man you are a broken record of same old lies and lame comebacks.

#71 by Yasser

Man, it is clear you are desperate. 38 posts and still counting.

No answers yet?

#71 by Yasser

Man, it is clear you are desperate. 38 posts and still counting.

No answers yet?

Re: # 179

three posts about call centers? Like I said even cold calling is above your league given your level of immaturity.

In civilized societies insults abuse and personal attacks don`t make for good arguments... but then again in civilized societies crowds don`t start throwing things after their teams lose.

Re: # 176

Yawn... whats this obsession with balls? And if you have so many of them, why did you run from the other board ?

As for the wrong guess... I suppose even cold calling is above your league given that the level of immaturity you display on these boards.

#175 by Mantolives

[BTW does your Amriki boss know that you are defending Gandhi`s honor instead of making those cold calls in a fake American accent?]

Call center employees don`t make cold calls when Americans are sleeping. But since when have logic and facts bothered you? Continue blabbering if that can ease your desperation.

PS: I`d take a call center job any day over being an unemployed lawyer.

``That film is also about exodus of non-Muslims and ends up insisting on resolving the as yet unresolved trauma of Partition, so that Kashmir and all other problems between India and Pakistan can be solved. ``

Ayaz Amir came up on a TV show and made an ar$e of himself by showing himself as another bigoted in the making.......he talked about the petty ``Chalakiyan`` over Kashmir that the (Hindu) Indians have been making ........OTH Mush was very different and realistic this time.............and imagine how some of these Paki journalists talk about the `unfinished business` of partition that Kashmir is........as if the question as to whether the IM-s in 2005 want to go to Pakistan is still not finally settled forever and as if this partition business is an ongoing process which the IM-s would be forced to confront whenever the Pakis want to raise the issue of `unfinished` business of partition!!!

This is the reality of the pathetic Pakistani din-e-fasaad!!! ...............

#175 by Mantolives

[Yawn, more insults, more abuse, more lies.... still trying to find face saving for the other board I see?]

Yet another wasted post. Chowkies now realize that you don`t have the balls to answer the question that I asked.

[BTW does your Amriki boss know that you are defending Gandhi`s honor instead of making those cold calls in a fake American accent?]

Wrong guess! But what else can be expected from a failed lawyer who is a liar to boot?

Re: # 174

Yawn, more insults, more abuse, more lies.... still trying to find face saving for the other board I see?

BTW does your Amriki boss know that you are defending Gandhi`s honor instead of making those cold calls in a fake American accent?

[I am afraid I can`t take responsibility for your bigotry and biases.]

Dear Yasser,

In those two posts of yours, you had the opportunity and would have done some justice to Jinnah had you tried to honestly answer my question, but as usual, you blah blah-ed without so much as touching upon the question. Instead, you ask me to go back and look for the non-existent answers.

In all this, you have only exposed yourself once again. It is clear that your reading of history is skewed and anyone who doesn`t agree with you is wrong. Wolpert, who wrote that Muslims thugs started the violence, all of a sudden becomes a paraiah, after being your favorite for years. The Time report from which you cleverly culled out extracts that painted Jinnah in a favorable light, becomes a journalese when I provided extracts that blamed Jinnah for the riots. Margaret Bourke-White is merely a photo-journalist, so she cannot be honest. Phew!!

Like I said earlier, if you had the balls, you would have answered the question. It is now certain that you don`t.

PS: Harish Hyd:

For future reference:

The link to the board where you ran after you couldn`t answer the questions asked:

http://www.chowk.com/show_article.cgi?aid=00004938&channel=gulberg#interact

Dear Harish Hyd,

That post was not addressed to you. It was addressed to rsidhar. I wasted enough of my time with you. Had you read the Stuka board with an open mind, you would see how wrong you were. This need you have to repeat the things that have been discussed with you on several different boards shows to me that you`ve been beaten comprehensively and trying to find some sort of face saving. As far as I am concerned I am done with my discussion with you.... since you refused to answer direct questions asked on several occasions (Don`t give me the nonsense about the question you asked: If you would only read you would find an answer)

Now I will go back to what I said to you 4 weeks ago and have said several times: You have your own reading of history and I have mine. If you think Jinnah was an evil man, then be happy with this information... I don`t and nothing you`ve said (and you haven`t said much except throw insults and abuse at me) has convinced me otherwise.

I am afraid I can`t take responsibility for your bigotry and biases.

Sincerely

Yasser Latif Hamdani

#160 by Yasser

[If you recall Jinnah, the unbendable, was trying to save Gandhi statue in India.]

This is the funniest comment I have heard in nearly 3 years on Chowk. Just a year ago, in 1946, Jinnah called for the Direct Action Day that led to brutal massacres of both Hindus and Muslims, and now, he was saving Gandhi`s statues. What a noble gesture!! Like his hero, Yasser believes in symbolism and not substance. Calling for murder is AOK, but saving statues, wow, Jinnah deserves the Nobel Peace Prize (posthumously of course) for this singular act of courage and contribution to peace between Hindus and Muslims.

[I think I adequately proved it on the other board whether Harish Hyd likes to admit it or not.]

If you have the balls, answer this question so everyone can see the dishonesty that has been your hallmark. What did Jinnah do to stop the violence that was started by Muslim hoodlums in response to his call for Direct Action? If you can`t answer this here and now, like innumerable times before, you will be exposed once again for the liar that you are.