Ozer Khalid May 7, 2005
#7 Posted by OzerKhalid on May 8, 2005 10:21:15 am
Re: # 6
Arjun
Despite your signalling radar, what you should be detecting is a ``tinge of praise`` for the boys of Bangalore.
Arjun
Despite your signalling radar, what you should be detecting is a ``tinge of praise`` for the boys of Bangalore.
#6 Posted by arjun_m on May 8, 2005 5:57:58 am
#4 by ozerkhalid on May 8, 2005 5:05am PT
Surely Chowk is too mature a forum
you`re new here, aren`t you?
Surely Chowk is too mature a forum
you`re new here, aren`t you?
#5 Posted by arjun_m on May 8, 2005 5:56:43 am
Not dissimilar to the Green Card scheme heralded by Germany for the shining cyber-boys of Bangalore.
Do I detect a tinge of envy?
#4 Posted by OzerKhalid on May 8, 2005 5:05:09 am
Re: # 3
Cayenne
Let us refrain from “Eminemishly” tit-for-tatting at one another. Surely Chowk is too mature a forum for school-boy scoundrel antics to be deployed. Too facile a game to play.
A few corrections are in order. From where did your cerebral cortex assume that I claim myself to be “superiour” to you? Or anyone else for that matter? Stop throwing assumptions from thin air.
For they wither like the aged leaves of autumn.
This is not an ego-battle on an 8 mile road. The problem with your “plain-speak” is that it is raw over-simplification ebbed in error. Let’s be pedantic: Britain’s population is not 50 million as you conveniently conjecture but 60 million. Asians form not 2% of the entire British population but 3.2%, including multi-cultural variants such as myself.
Your maladroit history lecture suggests a 19th century Golden Age for Britannia, when, let me enlighten you, British dexterity flaunted its muscle in the 20th century !! Get those facts straight-wired into your cranium.
You anxiously quote American prowess, which I never deny: however whilst so doing you hasten your over-stretched belt to cite MG Rover. That is meager and portrays a faddish example of you name-dropping “one firm” just because you pressingly picked up an FT and doggedly browsed it after a couple of years in the lurch.
Your naïveté overlooks the verity that for every MG Rover there is an Enron Corp., Tyco International Ltd. and WorldCom Inc, degradingly entangled in accounting scrape despite the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
There exist a plethora of British firms who are fiscally sound, solvent, exhibit profitability, liquidity and a healthy capital structure.
Stop playing the “Self-Victimization” card. I will no longer waste my time. I have bigger fish to fry in the ocean of life. For the record labeling “Britain as an irrelevant island full of irrelevant people” IS RACIST to anyone possessing an atom of IQ.
Cayenne this is not an EGO-GAME. If you do childishly want to flaunt your final word go ahead and brazenly sooth that entrapped insecurity.
For it too one day will melt in a molten sky.
Cayenne
Let us refrain from “Eminemishly” tit-for-tatting at one another. Surely Chowk is too mature a forum for school-boy scoundrel antics to be deployed. Too facile a game to play.
A few corrections are in order. From where did your cerebral cortex assume that I claim myself to be “superiour” to you? Or anyone else for that matter? Stop throwing assumptions from thin air.
For they wither like the aged leaves of autumn.
This is not an ego-battle on an 8 mile road. The problem with your “plain-speak” is that it is raw over-simplification ebbed in error. Let’s be pedantic: Britain’s population is not 50 million as you conveniently conjecture but 60 million. Asians form not 2% of the entire British population but 3.2%, including multi-cultural variants such as myself.
Your maladroit history lecture suggests a 19th century Golden Age for Britannia, when, let me enlighten you, British dexterity flaunted its muscle in the 20th century !! Get those facts straight-wired into your cranium.
You anxiously quote American prowess, which I never deny: however whilst so doing you hasten your over-stretched belt to cite MG Rover. That is meager and portrays a faddish example of you name-dropping “one firm” just because you pressingly picked up an FT and doggedly browsed it after a couple of years in the lurch.
Your naïveté overlooks the verity that for every MG Rover there is an Enron Corp., Tyco International Ltd. and WorldCom Inc, degradingly entangled in accounting scrape despite the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
There exist a plethora of British firms who are fiscally sound, solvent, exhibit profitability, liquidity and a healthy capital structure.
Stop playing the “Self-Victimization” card. I will no longer waste my time. I have bigger fish to fry in the ocean of life. For the record labeling “Britain as an irrelevant island full of irrelevant people” IS RACIST to anyone possessing an atom of IQ.
Cayenne this is not an EGO-GAME. If you do childishly want to flaunt your final word go ahead and brazenly sooth that entrapped insecurity.
For it too one day will melt in a molten sky.
#3 Posted by cayenne on May 8, 2005 4:07:27 am
#2 by ozerkhalid on May 8, 2005 3:06am PT
Re: # 1
``all the muslims and south asians`` as you so grandiosely put it , my friend, make up about 2% of the total population of 50 plus million.There is no racist xenophobia on my part.Infact there is every reason for me to accuse you of the same.Just because you are in the Uk, and that you work hard( all laudable qualities), does not in any way make you a Briton, or an european or `superior` to your fellow south asians, that you cannot accept `plain-speak` from one of them, in this case, moi.
I do not deny and respect british prowess during the nineteenth century.We`re in the 21st.Things change.Britain is irrelavent now.Period.If not for american money, britain would have gone bankrupt decades ago.Just like MG Rover.
Re: # 1
``all the muslims and south asians`` as you so grandiosely put it , my friend, make up about 2% of the total population of 50 plus million.There is no racist xenophobia on my part.Infact there is every reason for me to accuse you of the same.Just because you are in the Uk, and that you work hard( all laudable qualities), does not in any way make you a Briton, or an european or `superior` to your fellow south asians, that you cannot accept `plain-speak` from one of them, in this case, moi.
I do not deny and respect british prowess during the nineteenth century.We`re in the 21st.Things change.Britain is irrelavent now.Period.If not for american money, britain would have gone bankrupt decades ago.Just like MG Rover.
#2 Posted by OzerKhalid on May 8, 2005 3:06:37 am
Re: # 1
Cayenne
Your sweepingly grandiose myopia such as “Britain is an irrelevant island full of irrelevant people” smacks of racist xenophobia. You are single-handedly tarring the brush of all the Muslims and South Asians with dual identity who live on this island. Who bequeath themselves with a British as well as an Asian background, and form an imperative entrepreneurial backbone to the spine of the UK .
Admittedly not all of Great Britain`s policies are well-perceived or garnered in equilibrium, but cease living in an Elysium. Which country, in the comity of international relations is perfect?
Cayenne
Your sweepingly grandiose myopia such as “Britain is an irrelevant island full of irrelevant people” smacks of racist xenophobia. You are single-handedly tarring the brush of all the Muslims and South Asians with dual identity who live on this island. Who bequeath themselves with a British as well as an Asian background, and form an imperative entrepreneurial backbone to the spine of the UK .
Admittedly not all of Great Britain`s policies are well-perceived or garnered in equilibrium, but cease living in an Elysium. Which country, in the comity of international relations is perfect?
#1 Posted by cayenne on May 8, 2005 12:16:58 am
Real bore.Who cares.Britain is an irrelevant island full of irrelevant peoples.If not for american money and investment the British would have to clean toilets and fold bedsheets for the rich arabs to make a living.I give them credit for the past.No doubt.But we live in the now, and the now for the british is pathetic.God save the Queen!.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- anil: Re: # 111 Kaal: "...they call... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- quin: Re: # 52 thanks... Translation of a (Love)
- quin: I would like to... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: The hadith are the... Translation of a (Love)
- dost_mittar: Eklavya#118: "The other option is... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- guru: Vedas(knoweldge of manifest) and... Dhokha and Being a
- guru: Many of the Hindu... Dhokha and Being a
- guru: Namaskar: My humble pranams to... Dhokha and Being a








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content