unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

The Ultimate Betrayal

sajal javid May 26, 2005

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 112-128   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#113 Posted by Saminasha on May 28, 2005 11:57:24 am
HP,

With all due respect, well meaning ``uncles`` are the most widespread and pervasive form of incest AND molestation in sa communities.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#114 Posted by ShoreSahib on May 28, 2005 11:59:38 am
Re:105

Mahashey Nt ``FAKE`` Syed,

The only smoke you are observing is the one you are blowing up my ass.

Have a nice life.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#115 Posted by amrita on May 28, 2005 12:02:48 pm
Re: # 110
HP - the girl in this story is a pre-pubescent daughter awaiting her father`s nocturnal visit with dread in her heart. She then gets her period and listens to her father shuffle into her little sister`s room.

This is CSA not adult consensual incest [which is a whole another story as you say]. Most people on this board are cognizant of the difference and have either mentioned that understanding specifically or have mentioned CSA when posting links.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#116 Posted by HP on May 28, 2005 12:10:21 pm
#113 b
Saminasha

With utmost respect, well meaning “Uncles” don’t qualify for incestuous relationship. Child molestation may be. People just keep mixing up issues and throw fake numbers to prove their non existing point!

Child molestation is fairly common in every society but that to me is a different subject.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#117 Posted by ana on May 28, 2005 12:38:49 pm
i am also intrigued (for lack of a better word) by the labelling that we`ve used here -- those of us who have questioned various posts are put in the ``liberal`` category, or the ``abdul-hates/insecuristas`` category, and there might be those of us in dialogue here who belong in neither, and who might just be a little bothered by such categorizations.

i have to give props to those who have enriched this dialogue by not falling into the trap of using these labels, and wanting more in terms of explanation from those who have. it is so much easier for us to make judgments, and judgment is unavoidable especially when it comes to the issues we`re discussing. we are not all going to be in agreement as to what this story represents, but the dialogue has been valid in terms of challenging ourselves to have intelligent discussions, and to remember that while some might not read this as child abuse, we should not lose perspective of those who have been in this situation and have suffered greatly because of it.

for me, personally, there is nothing in ``the ultimate betrayal`` that indicates pleasure on the part of the children, and much that indicates power and isolation on the part of shakeel: ``this is their special secret``, ``his professing to love her more than anything in the world.`` the paragraph which begins, ``please dear god, save me. . .`` this story is being told with the voice of a child, and the thoughts of a child, but in the paragraph i just mentioned, i notice a slight shift in voice, and wonder if this is still the voice of the child.

thank you all (or most of you) for making this discussion so informative and meaningful. shoresahib, i hope to communicate with you via email as soon as i get my 15 page paper and presentation out of the way. sajal, keep writing!

best,
--ana
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#118 Posted by silly on May 28, 2005 12:38:53 pm
For all those who are thinking that child abuse is white man`s problem, you are absolutely wrong. With in a span of 2 weeks there was news in one of the online English news papers from Hyderabad (India) reported 2 cases where the girls father`s were abusing them. Incidentally in both the cases, the victim`s were muslim. It was reported in www.deccan.com. Wondering if anyone else read the same news? I cannot provide the links as the online news paper does not maintain archives section.

I read a similar case from UP. I read sometime back a wife killing her husband because he was sexually abusing the daughter after getting drunk ( he was hindu atleast from the name).

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#119 Posted by Saminasha on May 28, 2005 12:46:42 pm
HP,

I think ``uncles`` are a good example of the kind of slipperiness of what you are trying to make neat and tidy.

Uncles who are friends of fams in some ways are as part of that fam`s fabric as blood uncles. The former are expected to be shown respect, treated like fam, participate in fam events, and of course, are trusted as fam...

Almost every desi woman I know has either been assaulted or knows someone in her immediate fam who has been assaulted by in a uncle.

In very god fearing middle class fams.


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#120 Posted by rahul_capri on May 28, 2005 12:46:52 pm
Nice article Sajal.Here is an article by Shandana on the same topic.
I think these are the following things that can be done(I have posted some links in the Shandana article)-
1- Currently laws regarding csa(In India) are not adequate. There is a lot of work that can be done in that direction.
2- Doctors/counsellors are not equipped well enough to handle csa victims.
3-Children are not well equipped enough to recognize csa,specially from a parent. It is very necessary for the state to step up here and make education by which a child can recognize abuse, compulsory.Or better, a question answer session with a child psychiatrist(and yes, as per #2, there aren`t enough of them) just like an yearly visit to the doctor should be in place.
4- Statistics collecting services should aggressively pursue and report such cases.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#121 Posted by temporal on May 28, 2005 12:47:04 pm
mirium:

on another board i think we have exchanged our views ... me with emphasis on education and you with your macro-economis solutions...with regards to women`s empowerment... education not being a panacea to all that illsdesiland but as a first step in the uphil journey...and yes, i recall your example of grameen bank and the women lender`s abilty to pay back loans...

in the desi totem pole women are at the lowest rung...mullah-army-feudal-indutrail kakistocracy at the top...only with education and economic betterment will those groups at the bottom can ever hope to challenge the k(h)akistocrats
more power to mdg and other such bodies

khamy:
there is truth in your irreverence

nts:
you sir are irrelevant..to this discussion...

amrita:
sensible posts...

HP:
stats are welcome...but do you suggest we cannot discuss this without them?...the sexual abuse of the young wards in madresahs is well known and reported in the press....where are the pederasty stats?

ana:

labels noted...just a taste of their medicine back to them...no offence intended or meant to those not in them categories..

rgds

t
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#122 Posted by rahul_capri on May 28, 2005 12:59:41 pm
A word about the value systems. If somebody makes a cursory glance of secular jurisprudence ,(not that it is labelled in this way, but just to differentiate from Islamic jurisprudence of Quran and Sunnah) , religion,custom,tradition and norms are actually the biggest source of laws. So, the basic mistake being made here is thinking of secular value system as totally exclusive from religion. Secular value systems are more concerned about equity, that is ironing out those aspects of religion from its canon that differentiate between followers of different religion or different sexes. So, it will more be concerned with the deltas rather than the core mesage of a religion, that is, if the core issue of a religion is not misogyny or differentiating from other religions.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#123 Posted by miriamk on May 28, 2005 1:19:49 pm
HP:

With regards to the numbers comment:

Ana was kind enough to provide a link several posts ago, I’m re-pasting it here:

http://www.unescap.org/esid/hds/sexual/pakistan.pdf

Especially relevant are pages 13 and 14. Please keep in mind that more than half of the children didn’t disclose the relationship of their molesters. Now if you have trouble with the fact that the UN authored this study then that`s your prerogative.

This topic is not an easy one to discuss. I’m sure most of us are having trouble keeping our heads on straight at the mere thought of such abuse.

Statistics are fine and they can at a glance provide reassurance to us in a detached format. But we also know why these statistics don’t exist. Widespread studies of sexual abuse are simply not conducted in Pakistan. And when and if they are, the “survivors” are unlikely to be truthful either out of fear or just not knowing better.

But on the flip side statistics can also dehumanize serious issues like this one. How widespread does such abuse have to be before we consider it a problem? In my humble opinion, one girl or boy abused by a father or a brother is one too many.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#124 Posted by Dash_Dot on May 28, 2005 2:08:59 pm
Re: # 100
so finally your so called liberal ass is itching...maybe you just got a pocketfull of crabs...no go hang yourself from the nearest yardarm.

Look at yourself : you are saying this is a story...go ahead and shout it out...then it is nothing but pornography for the paedophiles. And you are nothing but a pimp encouraging paedophilia.

And for your kind information, people in the US and the UK and many parts of this world have been ARRESTED FOR HAVING SUCH STORIES on THEIR HARDDRIVES. There was abig operation sometime back involving the FBI the Scotland Yard, and is still on going.

And you are not insulting me - you are insulting yourself by your ignorance of this particular fact. So dont get so uppity and shout. Learn to distinguish between a piece of fiction making a statement and a piece of pornography.

So dont become a pimp for paedophiles with your attitude.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#125 Posted by ShoreSahib on May 28, 2005 3:49:03 pm
Re: # 124
Congratulations on my psychoanalysis.
Thanks.
Now go Fuck yourself.
You are on ignore!
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#126 Posted by ana on May 28, 2005 4:05:53 pm
Re: # 124 & 125

were those outbursts really necessary? neither was shore`s earlier one, but i`ve read this again, and again, and all i see is pain, and fear, and revulsion, and confusion in this. how does this classify as pornography? or perhaps someone needs to remind me what the definition of pornography is? how is this story encouraging paedophilia? where is it doing so? is it here:

Please, Dear God, Save me! was all she could mutter in silent prayers with tears streaming down her cheeks. With the passing of time since the first encounter with him, he had grown bolder and more self assured and comfortable with her body. It was as if he wasn’t afraid of anyone, even God. He did whatever he wanted with her while her weak protests and screams were ignored and stifled by vague promises of his love.

does a description of someone forcing himself on a child encourage paedophilia? perhaps in their world, yes. but to many of us here who have read this, the women and the men, this is hardly titilating, we can distinguish between what is titilating and what is rape. what precedes this paragraph is her wish not to be touched anymore. again, if a pedophile were to read that, this will make no difference in his/her world. it will most likely reify the world he/she occupies, but if we read this as therapists, social workers, survivors of sexual abuse or physical/psychological abuse, and those who have never experienced such, as some of the interactors, would more than a few of us not recognize this as childhood sexual abuse. sara is not screaming and crying because she wants it. it is painful and her father doesn`t give a damn about her pain. some of the readers here, do.

this piece wasn`t written to entice paedophiles, --,,. if we have fictional stories about genocide, which also involve rape are those written to encourage genocidal maniacs and rapists? this is written rather simply yes, but the issues here are complex, and if you think that this does not serve the purpose of highlighting childhood sexual abuse, then you don`t. but stories written in this vein have been published before, and are not considered pornographic. this is a really depressing story, about a child who was made thoroughly confused as to what love from a parent is and once she hits puberty, realizes that her sister is about to be the recipient of that same ``love``. and this is a story which draws from the real world. you`ve made some really good points on this board. could you tell us what you mean by this being nothing but ``pornography for the paedophiles``?


reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#127 Posted by AlephNull on May 28, 2005 4:14:59 pm
OSO #19

“Otherwise yes, this piece is mildly pronographic but also sickening.”

OSO #42, #58, etc.

OSO, you seem to have had an unusually intense reaction to this piece – you are not your usual debonair self. You clearly feel extremely strongly about this subject.

I’m interested in your opinion that this piece is pornographic. I say a piece has pornographic effect if it induces titillation, prurient desire, attraction towards the scene that it depicts, a wish perhaps to be an actor in a similar scene, to experience the same feelings as one of the protagonists. At the other extreme, a piece could be emetic, inducing feelings of disquiet, distress, revulsion, repulsion. The classification is subjective to the extent that it is determined by a particular individual’s responses. It is objective to the extent that it represents an average over a particular population.

I imagine that the hypothetical person of median sensual inclinations would find this piece emetic – those who commented on this board overwhelmingly found it disturbing. Now since it’s written from the point of view of the victim, describing her fear, distress and confusion, I’d suppose that it would make a person of pedophile inclinations uncomfortable – unless that person also delighted in inflicting pain and distress. Is that in fact the case with most pedophiles – i.e. are they also sadists? I honestly do not know – I am trying to get inside such a person’s cranium – but I would have guessed not.

I would surmise, in total ignorance of the science, that the typical non-violent pedophile would be cunningly manipulative and self-deluding by turns, concocting justifications for his behaviour and contriving to not see and foresee its effects, if necessary using threats to get his way; but not necessarily sadistic. He would not care for his image in the mirror that this piece holds up to him, therefore he would not find it pornographic. Am I wrong?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#128 Posted by rahul_capri on May 28, 2005 4:30:57 pm
Re: # 127
Typically in situations of rape and abuse, it is something about the manifestation of power; the power that the perpetrator holds over the victim.What the victim feels is of no particular consequence, because care for the victims` feelings is anithetical to the notion of power.They may not enjoy the victims pain, but they will enjoy their helplessness, and in that sense they are sadists.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 112-128   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #380 WaleedShah
    #379 qawali
    #378 qawali
    #377 qawali
    #376 AlephNull
    #375 ntsyed
    #374 NewKid
    #373 dost_mittar
    #372 Raw_Dust
    #371 NewKid
    #370 Raw_Dust
    #369 jang
    #368 Romair
    #367 slan
    #366 jang
    #365 dost_mittar
    #364 slan
    #363 Romair
    #362 jang
    #361 dost_mittar
    #360 arstoo
    #359 Romair
    #358 jang
    #357 Raw_Dust
    #356 Romair
    #355 slan
    #354 slan
    #353 ana
    #352 sajal
    #351 Raw_Dust
    #350 slan
    #349 ana
    #348 Romair
    #347 jang
    #346 Romair
    #345 slan
    #344 sajal
    #343 amrita
    #342 ana
    #341 ana
    #340 tahmed32
    #339 dionysus
    #338 sajal
    #337 sajal
    #336 ana
    #335 miriamk
    #334 HP
    #333 Romair
    #332 amrita
    #331 hindvi
    #330 jang
    #329 miriamk
    #328 tahmed32
    #327 Romair
    #326 tahmed32
    #325 HP
    #324 jang
    #323 hamidm2
    #322 miriamk
    #321 ntsyed
    #320 tahmed32
    #319 hindvi
    #318 ntsyed
    #317 ntsyed
    #316 ntsyed
    #315 Humsab
    #314 dionysus
    #313 Dash_Dot
    #312 dionysus
    #311 queen_cut_paste
    #310 ntsyed
    #309 amrita
    #308 dionysus
    #307 dionysus
    #306 HP
    #305 dionysus
    #304 BeeJay
    #303 Romair
    #302 Romair
    #301 Romair
    #300 shishapa
    #299 shankar
    #298 shankar
    #297 temporal
    #296 rahul_capri
    #295 tahmed32
    #294 tahmed32
    #293 dost_mittar
    #292 tahmed32
    #291 dost_mittar
    #290 miriamk
    #289 jang
    #288 temporal
    #287 Romair
    #286 Raw_Dust
    #285 Raw_Dust
    #284 cayenne
    #283 ana
    #282 ana
    #281 temporal
    #280 temporal
    #279 dionysus
    #278 HP
    #277 miriamk
    #276 temporal
    #275 ana
    #274 tahmed32
    #273 dionysus
    #272 tahmed32
    #271 temporal
    #270 dionysus
    #269 Raw_Dust
    #268 dionysus
    #267 temporal
    #266 Romair
    #265 hamidm2
    #264 Romair
    #263 hamidm2
    #262 tahmed32
    #261 hamidm2
    #260 tahmed32
    #259 Romair
    #258 temporal
    #257 miriamk
    #256 tahmed32
    #255 tahmed32
    #254 dost_mittar
    #253 shishapa
    #252 Romair
    #251 hamidm2
    #250 hamidm2
    #249 ntsyed
    #248 ntsyed
    #247 ntsyed
    #246 Romair
    #245 hamidm2
    #244 ana
    #243 vagabond78
    #242 HP
    #241 Dash_Dot
    #240 ana
    #239 temporal
    #238 temporal
    #237 rahul_capri
    #236 Romair
    #235 hamidm2
    #234 miriamk
    #233 Romair
    #232 temporal
    #231 Romair
    #230 ana
    #229 ana
    #228 temporal
    #227 Romair
    #226 temporal
    #225 Romair
    #224 ana
    #223 Urstruly
    #222 rahul_capri
    #221 tahmed32
    #220 hamidm2
    #219 BeeJay
    #218 ana
    #217 hamidm2
    #216 HP
    #215 hamidm2
    #214 miriamk
    #213 ntsyed
    #212 ntsyed
    #211 HP
    #210 ana
    #209 HP
    #208 ana
    #207 temporal
    #206 HP
    #205 amrita
    #204 Raw_Dust
    #203 temporal
    #202 temporal
    #201 ana
    #200 ana
    #199 Raw_Dust
    #198 Raw_Dust
    #197 HP
    #196 miriamk
    #196 ana
    #195 Raw_Dust
    #194 temporal
    #193 Raw_Dust
    #192 Dash_Dot
    #191 Dash_Dot
    #190 temporal
    #189 Raw_Dust
    #188 HP
    #187 ana
    #186 slan
    #185 Urstruly
    #184 KaalChakra
    #183 kisan
    #182 ana
    #181 Urstruly
    #180 ntsyed
    #179 ntsyed
    #178 kisan
    #177 Urstruly
    #176 ana
    #175 khamkhwa.
    #174 khamkhwa.
    #173 Dash_Dot
    #172 Dash_Dot
    #171 HP
    #170 hamidm2
    #169 ana
    #168 hamidm2
    #167 khamkhwa.
    #166 khamkhwa.
    #165 HP
    #164 ntsyed
    #163 ana
    #162 hamidm2
    #161 miriamk
    #160 kisan
    #159 temporal
    #158 hamidm2
    #157 temporal
    #156 amrita
    #155 temporal
    #154 Raw_Dust
    #153 ntsyed
    #152 rahul_capri
    #151 ShoreSahib
    #150 ntsyed
    #149 ntsyed
    #148 ana
    #147 temporal
    #146 Saminasha
    #145 rahul_capri
    #144 ShoreSahib
    #143 ShoreSahib
    #142 ntsyed
    #141 ntsyed
    #140 ntsyed
    #139 Saminasha
    #138 subroto
    #137 Dash_Dot
    #136 ShoreSahib
    #135 Dash_Dot
    #134 Dash_Dot
    #133 nb
    #132 escapist
    #131 rahul_capri
    #130 rahul_capri
    #129 AlephNull
    #128 rahul_capri
    #127 AlephNull
    #126 ana
    #125 ShoreSahib
    #124 Dash_Dot
    #123 miriamk
    #122 rahul_capri
    #121 temporal
    #120 rahul_capri
    #119 Saminasha
    #118 silly
    #117 ana
    #116 HP
    #115 amrita
    #114 ShoreSahib
    #113 Saminasha
    #112 khamkhwa.
    #111 Saminasha
    #110 HP
    #109 Saminasha
    #108 amrita
    #107 HP
    #106 ana
    #105 ntsyed
    #104 miriamk
    #103 miriamk
    #102 ShoreSahib
    #101 ana
    #100 ShoreSahib
    #99 temporal
    #98 Saminasha
    #97 Dash_Dot
    #96 ana
    #95 temporal
    #94 Saminasha
    #93 Saminasha
    #92 Saminasha
    #91 Dash_Dot
    #90 temporal
    #89 Saminasha
    #88 ShoreSahib
    #87 ShoreSahib
    #86 miriamk
    #85 ShoreSahib
    #84 miriamk
    #83 ntsyed
    #82 ana
    #81 miriamk
    #80 ntsyed
    #79 iron_mask
    #78 amrita
    #77 KaalChakra
    #76 miriamk
    #75 temporal
    #74 slan
    #73 Urstruly
    #72 Dash_Dot
    #71 Dash_Dot
    #70 Urstruly
    #69 HP
    #68 Dash_Dot
    #67 HP
    #66 Urstruly
    #65 ana
    #64 kaurasach
    #63 Dash_Dot
    #62 Dash_Dot
    #61 temporal
    #60 temporal
    #59 HP
    #58 Dash_Dot
    #57 hindvi
    #56 sajal
    #55 sajal
    #54 ShoreSahib
    #53 Urstruly
    #52 HP
    #51 temporal
    #50 amrita
    #49 miriamk
    #48 amrita
    #47 ShoreSahib
    #46 amrita
    #45 Dash_Dot
    #44 Urstruly
    #43 kaurasach
    #42 Dash_Dot
    #41 kaurasach
    #40 amrita
    #39 ntsyed
    #38 ntsyed
    #37 temporal
    #36 HP
    #35 temporal
    #34 scout
    #33 ShoreSahib
    #32 Urstruly
    #31 miriamk
    #30 miriamk
    #29 sajal
    #28 Saminasha
    #27 Dash_Dot
    #26 Naqshbandi
    #25 Naqshbandi
    #24 drlokraj
    #23 amrita
    #22 KaalChakra
    #21 amrita
    #20 syke
    #19 Dash_Dot
    #18 vagabond78
    #17 KaalChakra
    #16 Dash_Dot
    #15 amrita
    #14 temporal
    #13 Urstruly
    #12 Saminasha
    #11 shobig_sifar
    #10 miriamk
    #9 kaurasach
    #8 jang
    #7 Urstruly
    #6 ShoreSahib
    #5 temporal
    #4 Urstruly
    #3 temporal
    #2 Urstruly
    #1 winterpk

Latest Interacts

  • Dinaric: #289#290 "decide it on your... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • tahmed32: 1Safe #62 well said.... Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak:
  • ajeya: #273 Posted by akcheema... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: Re #288 Posted by... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • pinku: Whose mind is... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • hamidm2: guys, ......... quick check ....... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
  • laddu: kaale khan, you got it... Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak:
  • sheelajaywant: Yes, many doctors are... They Will Seal The

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Muhammad Aslam Khan Khattak: A Man for All Seasons
  • Three Cups of Tea & Pennies for Peace
  • Losing the Battle, Losing the Faith
  • Not to Forget the Devastation of October 8, 2005 Earthquake
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • Giving Way to Intolerance
  • When flowers Fall
  • Changing of the Guard
  • Status of Parents in Al-Quran
  • Shwot

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited