Enigma of the Defence Budget

kudos to Ms Rehman on this article..she is an excellent writer and turned into an excellent MNA...if she focuses more effort into democratising her own party she`d win even more praise ..let (s)he without sin cast the first stone etc..anyway I believe the total net worth of the Fauji assets is at the level of $1.5 billion dollars!

#15 by khamkhwa. on June 29, 2005 9:25pm PT


what was the rank you retired as.


His rank is captain...captain clueless...

He retired as the grand poohbah of everything under the sun.

I`m a little antsy over the Indo-US defence pact.


India and US sign defence accord

Mr Mukherjee and Mr Rumsfeld signed the agreement
India and US have signed a 10-year agreement to strengthen defence ties between the two countries.
The landmark agreement will help facilitate joint weapons production, co-operation on missile defence and the transfer of technology.

Indian Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee and US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld signed the agreement.

Or maybe, india is the success story of the subcontinent and we`re the only ones who have the size, clout and resources to stand up to anybody in the region.So, the US wants to get in on the action and get a piece of the indian pie.How times are a changing?

Re: # 3 The revised figures of 272 B are clearly a 40% rise int the initially allocated last year`s budget of Rs 193 B. And also it is certainly a 14 % rise as compared to the `revised`+concealed budget ` of Rs 242 B from last year. May be you got confused with the figures somewhere.
regards

This is why pakis are the way they are - ruled by tinpots. The lady wrote a good article on Paki Army`s shenanigans which is no secret. She may have got some numbers wrong - but her point is still valid. But look at how other pakis react - some accuse her as PPP stooge, some say she is didn`t do ``research`` ... some guy wants her to return ill-gotten divoce alimony.

May be all these allegations against her are true, that shouldn`t matter - pakis should overlook each other faults and be united for a greater cause and fight a greater evil, which is paki army. But no - instead, pakis just behave as pakis and shred each other. None of Ms Rehman did could be as damaging as what Paki Army has been doing all this time.

hey mohar, this is pakistan issue...retarded, ill-bred indians are not welcome here...kindly get the hell out.

Re: # 30 fais

Nah - I will stay. Democracy in pakiland will be good for people all around. The criminal enterprise called Paki Army have to be defanged .....

Also - by being a snake-pit of international terrorism - you pakis have partly lost your claim to sovereignity and your excuse for ``internal matters``. So now everybody should have a say in what goes on inside land of pure. You can blow your fuse - but there is nothing you can do about it now.

Reading various posts, it seems normally a country has an army, whereas in Pakistan the army has a country.

Re # 30

sadike,

Tere Baap ki amanat hai kya Chowk? Faltu dadagiri nahi chalegi, yeh Pakistan nahi hai.
Tameez say baat karna seekh.

shipshape...
he did use ``kindly``...;)

shipshape...
..what is `sadike`...??

[Tere Baap ki amanat hai kya Chowk]

...correction...Chowk Tere Baap ki Jageer hai kya?

Re # 35

Must I say it? OK, I took out first three letters.

FaisalUno, I am sorry, this is just Chowk, I should contain such silly outbursts.
Once again, I apologize profusely to you. Hope you are kind enough to accept it.

Re: # 30

We`re poifectly matched then, you in-bred and devious, we ill-bred and retarded.Cousin??.

shipshape...
hehehehehe...you`r a good guy...fret not...chowk will toughen you in no time...;)

hahaha...mohar man, thats quite a brilliant strategy you have come up with...by flooding a website no one has heard about in pak, you will definately defang pak army...and too bad for you lot that chowk was not around a thousand years ago....otherwise imagine all the armies you would have been able to defang...and did you notice how pakistanis have stopped commenting on the article after you posted here....if that does not prove tnt, i dont know what will.