Rape and Exploitation - Pakistan’s Dilemma
Bina Shah September 18, 2005
#126 Posted by tahmed32 on September 19, 2005 4:23:59 pm
mr. t: Sir jee, i think you are ducking the question. :-)
reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content
#127 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 19, 2005 4:24:24 pm
Agar khuda ki marzi hai to fitteen ka naqab utar jaiga pehle ki tarha. :)
Shab Bakhair.
Shab Bakhair.
#128 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 4:25:18 pm
#126:
yes sir, that is one possibility
the other one is ..........:)
yes sir, that is one possibility
the other one is ..........:)
#130 Posted by tahmed32 on September 19, 2005 4:27:58 pm
#126 mr. t, aap kaa rootbaa bahut baland hai. you posts are riddles within riddles. no doubt hazrat sulaimaan would understand what you write... yeh ganga ram (i.e. tahmed) ki samajh maiN na ai!!
#131 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 4:29:42 pm
#130:
sirji:
janay diji`aye ... yeh sub ``sattire``ka fall out thaa
if you want to be serious check out what i wrote in #35
sirji:
janay diji`aye ... yeh sub ``sattire``ka fall out thaa
if you want to be serious check out what i wrote in #35
#132 Posted by tahmed32 on September 19, 2005 4:33:59 pm
#35 is a great post. having worked on microcredit projects at one time, i can say it is indeed true what you write. does anyone disagree with it?
#133 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 4:45:10 pm
tahmed: 132:
nahin sirji!
perhaps for two reasons...fore most...all and sundry( including me) are dumping on mushy and that `sattire` diversion
nahin sirji!
perhaps for two reasons...fore most...all and sundry( including me) are dumping on mushy and that `sattire` diversion
#134 Posted by tahmed32 on September 19, 2005 4:51:17 pm
i dont understand how #133 responds to the simple question i asked in #132.
as for dumping on musharaff - i dont think we are capable of dumping on musharaff, who walks around grandly in his uniform. at best, we can feebly voice our discontent on chowk at his taking over the country by force, reneging on promises to return to democracy, and now joking about serious issues like the rape of women. that is about all we can do.
as for dumping on musharaff - i dont think we are capable of dumping on musharaff, who walks around grandly in his uniform. at best, we can feebly voice our discontent on chowk at his taking over the country by force, reneging on promises to return to democracy, and now joking about serious issues like the rape of women. that is about all we can do.
#135 Posted by tahmed32 on September 19, 2005 4:55:32 pm
i must now beg leave, mr. t. see you around on chowk.
#136 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 4:59:19 pm
:)
u r right!
my reply is incomplete...
``nahin sirji`` should have been followed by ``...it was not discussed at all..``
rgds
t
u r right!
my reply is incomplete...
``nahin sirji`` should have been followed by ``...it was not discussed at all..``
rgds
t
#137 Posted by Saminasha on September 19, 2005 6:51:37 pm
Bina,
Great piece! Thanks for bringing Dr. Saigol`s work to our attention as well.
Great piece! Thanks for bringing Dr. Saigol`s work to our attention as well.
#138 Posted by Urstruly on September 19, 2005 7:00:41 pm
ANOTHER MUKHTARAN MAI THREATENS TO SELF-IMMULATE HERSELF
Jang Sep 19, 2005
#139 Posted by teshah on September 19, 2005 7:17:26 pm
Re: # 44
You are wonderful dear Salim. They are wary of publcizing indivividual rapes abroad but they publicize massive rape of Kashmiri women, calling it a sacrifice for freedom of
Kashmir. I don`t know what they mean by freedom. We have an Azad Kashmir but no Azad Pakistan. We had once an Azad Pakistan Party lead by Mian Iftikharudin marhoom. So can`t we have an Azad Pakistan through rapes. Musharraf may be fearing that Mukhtaran Mai, vested with Fatimah Jinnah Gold Medal, may challenge him in the next presidential elections.
You are wonderful dear Salim. They are wary of publcizing indivividual rapes abroad but they publicize massive rape of Kashmiri women, calling it a sacrifice for freedom of
Kashmir. I don`t know what they mean by freedom. We have an Azad Kashmir but no Azad Pakistan. We had once an Azad Pakistan Party lead by Mian Iftikharudin marhoom. So can`t we have an Azad Pakistan through rapes. Musharraf may be fearing that Mukhtaran Mai, vested with Fatimah Jinnah Gold Medal, may challenge him in the next presidential elections.
#140 Posted by Behram1 on September 19, 2005 7:32:55 pm
Anyone??
I heard that in Pakistani court, a rape victim has to provide four (4) eye witnesses who has actually seen the act. Can anyone tell me if this statement is true?
As usual, most humbly and respecfully submitted,
BBA
#141 Posted by hamidm2 on September 19, 2005 7:42:41 pm
......... i have nothing new to add except to reiterate that faujis should be sent back to their barracks and should never be allowed to speak in public .............
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- nkg: Re: # 378 DM... Brahmins are... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: Tahir Ji, We also know... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: Tahirji, Did prophet also annuled... Muslim Ghettoisation
- nkg: Regarding Urdooo... Urdooo is not... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: tahir Mamu ko thoda... Muslim Ghettoisation
- majumdar: Tahir mian, Truth et... Muslim Ghettoisation
- truth100: Muslim ghetoise so that... Muslim Ghettoisation
- mkamd: Re: # 30 Pakistan is... Who Sold the Centrifuges?
