Bina Shah September 18, 2005
#63 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 19, 2005 2:04:59 pm
Folks,
This is exactly why I am so disappointed with Paki society. In addition to the education crisis, Pakis suffer from an unexplained weakness of losing common sense when facing perceived emotional insults. Their handicap in education enhances their perception of imagined insults. This in turn leads them to react totally irrationally, thus impairing their ability to learn from their mistakes. And all this can happen without religion. Once Islam is in danger, then all bets are off - we are now in 1947 zone.
Look at the facts:
1. The Panchayat in Paki Punjab sentenced an innocent woman to get raped by men of an influential family.
2. The police and authorities did nothing to halt the criminal and cruel act
3. Thanks to some swift action by the Government, the men were convicted in court
4. The Lahore Court, upon their appeal, released the rapists and those who sanctioned the raPE.
5. The President of Pakistan, the very sensitive and intelligent Gen. Musharraf, makes a stupid, insensitive, and totally ridiculous comment about the relationship of rape to foreign visas.
6. Salim Chauhan attacks Paki society and ridicules its president for the rapes and the comments about the rapes
7. Mr. Temporal asks Chowk Staff to remove the sattire because his dull mind perceives it as ``insensitive``
Are we in Alice in Wonderland or what?
Welcome to Pakistan and the plight of the Paki diaspora.
This is exactly why I am so disappointed with Paki society. In addition to the education crisis, Pakis suffer from an unexplained weakness of losing common sense when facing perceived emotional insults. Their handicap in education enhances their perception of imagined insults. This in turn leads them to react totally irrationally, thus impairing their ability to learn from their mistakes. And all this can happen without religion. Once Islam is in danger, then all bets are off - we are now in 1947 zone.
Look at the facts:
1. The Panchayat in Paki Punjab sentenced an innocent woman to get raped by men of an influential family.
2. The police and authorities did nothing to halt the criminal and cruel act
3. Thanks to some swift action by the Government, the men were convicted in court
4. The Lahore Court, upon their appeal, released the rapists and those who sanctioned the raPE.
5. The President of Pakistan, the very sensitive and intelligent Gen. Musharraf, makes a stupid, insensitive, and totally ridiculous comment about the relationship of rape to foreign visas.
6. Salim Chauhan attacks Paki society and ridicules its president for the rapes and the comments about the rapes
7. Mr. Temporal asks Chowk Staff to remove the sattire because his dull mind perceives it as ``insensitive``
Are we in Alice in Wonderland or what?
Welcome to Pakistan and the plight of the Paki diaspora.
#64 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 2:06:56 pm
to all the participants here except salim
…some subjects should be above ridicule and i let my better judgement take a back seat ..for this i apologize
…what happens to women in desilands should be matter of concern and shame not ridicule and satire
…some subjects should be above ridicule and i let my better judgement take a back seat ..for this i apologize
…what happens to women in desilands should be matter of concern and shame not ridicule and satire
#65 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 2:09:19 pm
mohar11 # 60:
if all are free to comment why should that curtesy not apply to me? how come me expressing my views becomes playing nanny?
if all are free to comment why should that curtesy not apply to me? how come me expressing my views becomes playing nanny?
#67 Posted by khamkhwa. on September 19, 2005 2:17:11 pm
....i do not understand how you people can take salim chauhan seriously...he is the lowest of the low...scum of the earth...look what he says about women on unplugged...just ignore the insect...
Quote:
#2 by premwalla on August 7, 2005 3:41pm PT
#1, Hey Asshole Cuntscout,
It was fun meeting you on the Cross Bronx Expressway.
How is your companion?
#85 I am begging on my knees(ouch...) to Salim/Sameena.
on July 18, 2005 10:27am PT
SemenAsha,
So deletion is the only way you win?
Fucking Feminazi Whore.
#84 Sadna, please stay on UP
on July 18, 2005 10:49am PT
SemenAsha, You know, hijRay, before we all saw your ugly picture, there may have been an element of mystery about you. Maybe, just maybe, there may have been a reason for your insistence on being right all the time. Maybe, just maybe, you were possibly some ``beautiful`` spoilt ``princess.`` But now, thanks to Mr. Chusni, we all know what you look like. Now, there is absolutely no excuse for you to behave the way you do. There is NOTHING that is even slightly appealing about you. So, suffer, wench, suffer. You have neither looks, nor physique, nor brains. Just a few lesbo friends. UNQUOTE.
Quote:
#2 by premwalla on August 7, 2005 3:41pm PT
#1, Hey Asshole Cuntscout,
It was fun meeting you on the Cross Bronx Expressway.
How is your companion?
#85 I am begging on my knees(ouch...) to Salim/Sameena.
on July 18, 2005 10:27am PT
SemenAsha,
So deletion is the only way you win?
Fucking Feminazi Whore.
#84 Sadna, please stay on UP
on July 18, 2005 10:49am PT
SemenAsha, You know, hijRay, before we all saw your ugly picture, there may have been an element of mystery about you. Maybe, just maybe, there may have been a reason for your insistence on being right all the time. Maybe, just maybe, you were possibly some ``beautiful`` spoilt ``princess.`` But now, thanks to Mr. Chusni, we all know what you look like. Now, there is absolutely no excuse for you to behave the way you do. There is NOTHING that is even slightly appealing about you. So, suffer, wench, suffer. You have neither looks, nor physique, nor brains. Just a few lesbo friends. UNQUOTE.
#70 Posted by khamkhwa. on September 19, 2005 2:46:04 pm
Re: # 69
... the person who loves to denigrate women at the drop of a hat...calls them feminazi and other choice names, because they do not agree with his point of view ... is shedding crocodile tears on mukhtaran mai...stop this `nautanki` as sadna says ... shame on you salim chauhan...
kaba kiss mun se jao ge Ghalib
sharm tum ko magar nahiN aati
... the person who loves to denigrate women at the drop of a hat...calls them feminazi and other choice names, because they do not agree with his point of view ... is shedding crocodile tears on mukhtaran mai...stop this `nautanki` as sadna says ... shame on you salim chauhan...
kaba kiss mun se jao ge Ghalib
sharm tum ko magar nahiN aati
#69 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 19, 2005 2:29:53 pm
To anyone I may have offended with my sattire:
I apologize if I miscommunitated (or you misunderstood) my true viewpoint concerning the MukhtaraN Mai tragedy. Speaking very seriously, I abhor the criminal act of rape in general and this particualr act of sanctioned savage rape by a figure of authority, such as the Panchayat. I think that President General Pervez Musharraf`s comments relating rapes to foregin visas is at the best stupid and most probably insensitive, ludicrous, and not fit for a head of any state. Again, I express my anger at the judicial system in Pakistan, the police, and religious institutions for not protecting the rights of vulnerable citizens like MukhtaraN Mai. I also find it disgusting that there are elements in Pakistan and abroad who are finding this tragic incident as a heaven-sent opportunity to advance their predetermined agenda.
Salim
I apologize if I miscommunitated (or you misunderstood) my true viewpoint concerning the MukhtaraN Mai tragedy. Speaking very seriously, I abhor the criminal act of rape in general and this particualr act of sanctioned savage rape by a figure of authority, such as the Panchayat. I think that President General Pervez Musharraf`s comments relating rapes to foregin visas is at the best stupid and most probably insensitive, ludicrous, and not fit for a head of any state. Again, I express my anger at the judicial system in Pakistan, the police, and religious institutions for not protecting the rights of vulnerable citizens like MukhtaraN Mai. I also find it disgusting that there are elements in Pakistan and abroad who are finding this tragic incident as a heaven-sent opportunity to advance their predetermined agenda.
Salim
#71 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 19, 2005 2:51:04 pm
#70, There you go again - stealing others` poetry.
You are just jealous that I don`t extend the same concern for khamkhwahi people like you.
You are just jealous that I don`t extend the same concern for khamkhwahi people like you.
#153 Posted by MantoLives on September 20, 2005 1:27:51 am
Re: # 144
Anil...
With all due respect... every word of Musharraf`s is discussed, deliberated and criticized upon by the 10 or so Private channels- and the opposition as usual has been very very vocal... so I am afraid your theory that he did this for Pakistani consumption is not true...
He just made a fool out of him internationally- thats all... he didn`t think before making the statement or before denying it...
Anil...
With all due respect... every word of Musharraf`s is discussed, deliberated and criticized upon by the 10 or so Private channels- and the opposition as usual has been very very vocal... so I am afraid your theory that he did this for Pakistani consumption is not true...
He just made a fool out of him internationally- thats all... he didn`t think before making the statement or before denying it...
#159 Posted by mohar11 on September 20, 2005 6:29:18 am
Re: # 144 anil
//....I also think that Musharaff is a sincere and professional soldier....//
Really? Do ``sincere and professional`` soldiers trample the constitution they have promised to protect and take over the country willy-nilly?
It`s one thing for Pakis to sing paens to this Mushy fool - but time and again I am surprised with stupidity of people from this side of the border....Actually, this is very symptomatic of why India has not been able to handle these paki pests for so long ... forever Indians are making false reading of paki establishment and the generals .... what they are and what they stand for...
//....I also think that Musharaff is a sincere and professional soldier....//
Really? Do ``sincere and professional`` soldiers trample the constitution they have promised to protect and take over the country willy-nilly?
It`s one thing for Pakis to sing paens to this Mushy fool - but time and again I am surprised with stupidity of people from this side of the border....Actually, this is very symptomatic of why India has not been able to handle these paki pests for so long ... forever Indians are making false reading of paki establishment and the generals .... what they are and what they stand for...
#144 Posted by anil on September 19, 2005 9:01:55 pm
Re: # 72
Dost-Mitter:
I also think that Musharaff is a sincere and professional soldier. He is neither a politician, nor a statesman. But he is trying to ride several horses at the same time. The spotaniety of his remark and responses is a reflection of a collective psyche and sub-conscious first reflection of the mindset of machoism in a Pakistani General and his other Lt. Generals in defensive position.
The question is can he or other Lt.. Generals who support him continue to be the leaders to lead a nation like Pakistan. They certainly have by creating confusion. I am sure, in Wasington DC, London, Israel and even in Delhi (including APHC)defense analyst and policy planners will analyze and undersand the capability of Pakistani leadership to make public fool out of themselves, first to speak their sub-conscious mindset, and then lie equally openly. I am sure the Time correspondents in front of whom he spoke the denial, must have this act by the head of a state very amusing.
The bigger question is can anyone trust such a leadership of a Nation? Paul Wolfowitz and his gang, Rumsfeld and his gang, Rice and her gang are quite smart, and so are Blair and his gang. They`ll keep it in mind as a factor to decide, and smart Alecs may even exploit these additional testasterone and machoism Pakistan`s military leadership showed.
He might have gained to create ``confusion`` in domestic Pakistani media.
Today, both Pakistan and Mushraff lost more by denial.
After I had read the Washington Post (WP) report by another reporter that WP has tape and the tape has has been examined to confirm that the comments are from Musharaff.
Clearly, Musharaff and his advisors knew this fact before he denied speaking these words. They must have understood that that any denial will make WP to examine the tape and confirm or apologize.
The only reason I came up for Musharaff to speak a straight face lie to deny and say that he was there and had heard someone else speaking those words, was that it was for Paksitani consumption.
Everyone knows Musharaff in Paksitan. His supporters can say that he said the deial in front of euqlly respected American magazine that where he challenged WP that he was there and had heard someone else speak.
This is what will reverberate in Pakistani media, and not what WP has said how many in Pakistan know or care about WP. Pakistani opposition and democratic institutions are non-existant to challenge him, unlike in India. Domestic consumption of contradiction, confusion, and controversy good damage control and denial is good enough, so that pro-Musharaff Pakistani media and ``anti-statement`` Media will have many field days to duke it out. After that who really cares? This serves the purpose of Pakistani domestic consumption.
Anil
Dost-Mitter:
I also think that Musharaff is a sincere and professional soldier. He is neither a politician, nor a statesman. But he is trying to ride several horses at the same time. The spotaniety of his remark and responses is a reflection of a collective psyche and sub-conscious first reflection of the mindset of machoism in a Pakistani General and his other Lt. Generals in defensive position.
The question is can he or other Lt.. Generals who support him continue to be the leaders to lead a nation like Pakistan. They certainly have by creating confusion. I am sure, in Wasington DC, London, Israel and even in Delhi (including APHC)defense analyst and policy planners will analyze and undersand the capability of Pakistani leadership to make public fool out of themselves, first to speak their sub-conscious mindset, and then lie equally openly. I am sure the Time correspondents in front of whom he spoke the denial, must have this act by the head of a state very amusing.
The bigger question is can anyone trust such a leadership of a Nation? Paul Wolfowitz and his gang, Rumsfeld and his gang, Rice and her gang are quite smart, and so are Blair and his gang. They`ll keep it in mind as a factor to decide, and smart Alecs may even exploit these additional testasterone and machoism Pakistan`s military leadership showed.
He might have gained to create ``confusion`` in domestic Pakistani media.
Today, both Pakistan and Mushraff lost more by denial.
After I had read the Washington Post (WP) report by another reporter that WP has tape and the tape has has been examined to confirm that the comments are from Musharaff.
Clearly, Musharaff and his advisors knew this fact before he denied speaking these words. They must have understood that that any denial will make WP to examine the tape and confirm or apologize.
The only reason I came up for Musharaff to speak a straight face lie to deny and say that he was there and had heard someone else speaking those words, was that it was for Paksitani consumption.
Everyone knows Musharaff in Paksitan. His supporters can say that he said the deial in front of euqlly respected American magazine that where he challenged WP that he was there and had heard someone else speak.
This is what will reverberate in Pakistani media, and not what WP has said how many in Pakistan know or care about WP. Pakistani opposition and democratic institutions are non-existant to challenge him, unlike in India. Domestic consumption of contradiction, confusion, and controversy good damage control and denial is good enough, so that pro-Musharaff Pakistani media and ``anti-statement`` Media will have many field days to duke it out. After that who really cares? This serves the purpose of Pakistani domestic consumption.
Anil
#187 Posted by PewResearch on September 21, 2005 5:38:11 pm
Re: # 72, Dost Mittar:
``I don`t think that the man means bad.``
Do you know the difference between errors of commission and errors of omission? When CEO Mushraff is President, COAS, Head of State, all rolled in one, can the bar be lowered by condoning his behavior like you did? Cheers
``I don`t think that the man means bad.``
Do you know the difference between errors of commission and errors of omission? When CEO Mushraff is President, COAS, Head of State, all rolled in one, can the bar be lowered by condoning his behavior like you did? Cheers
#72 Posted by dost_mittar on September 19, 2005 2:54:38 pm
Hi Bina:
I think that Musharraf needs someone like you to coach him in proper manners and etiquettes wrt women`s issues. I think that he means well but he has this foot-in-the-mouth disease. He also probably still doesn`t understand what he said was wrong.
I don`t think that the man means bad. He is just clueless and insensitive to the current mode of thought on women`s issues.
I think that Musharraf needs someone like you to coach him in proper manners and etiquettes wrt women`s issues. I think that he means well but he has this foot-in-the-mouth disease. He also probably still doesn`t understand what he said was wrong.
I don`t think that the man means bad. He is just clueless and insensitive to the current mode of thought on women`s issues.
#73 Posted by soysauce on September 19, 2005 2:59:35 pm
For what it`s worth, Mushy`s predicate that it is alleged that accusations of rape are made for personal profit allows him some room for plausible deniability.
What he said is very characteristic of loose talk that politicians in our part of the world engage in - it`s right up there with Rajiv Gandhi`s ``when a giant tree falls..`` comment.
What he said is very characteristic of loose talk that politicians in our part of the world engage in - it`s right up there with Rajiv Gandhi`s ``when a giant tree falls..`` comment.
#74 Posted by temporal on September 19, 2005 3:03:50 pm
khamkhwa # 67:
please clarify:
1: what you quoted in #67 are by the same person who wrote #44 ( salim chauhan)?
2: are the quotes in #67 also ‘satire’?
rgds
t
please clarify:
1: what you quoted in #67 are by the same person who wrote #44 ( salim chauhan)?
2: are the quotes in #67 also ‘satire’?
rgds
t
#75 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 19, 2005 3:04:47 pm
DM Sahib and Soysauce,
I agree with your analyses. Others who are having a feeding frenzy at Mushy`s stupidity don`t realize that we can see right through them. Mr. Temporal is so obvious in his venom against Mushy that he would do cartwheels if Mushy ever got caught selling drugs to infants in the nursery. Doesn`t matter how demeaning the circus is to the victims, as long as Temporal can gloat over his enemy`s demise.
Laanat he aisey shairoN par. Do jumlay to joR nahiN patey or nikley heN Mirza Ghalib ki talash meN.
I agree with your analyses. Others who are having a feeding frenzy at Mushy`s stupidity don`t realize that we can see right through them. Mr. Temporal is so obvious in his venom against Mushy that he would do cartwheels if Mushy ever got caught selling drugs to infants in the nursery. Doesn`t matter how demeaning the circus is to the victims, as long as Temporal can gloat over his enemy`s demise.
Laanat he aisey shairoN par. Do jumlay to joR nahiN patey or nikley heN Mirza Ghalib ki talash meN.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- hamidm2: Re: # 44 naeem mian, ........ US Commando Strike in
- tahmed32: A dose of reality... US Commando Strike in
- shabha: can anybody please find... Why Zardari Should Be
- naeemchaudry: We the Pakistanis would... US Commando Strike in
- mohar11: see - the "good"... US Commando Strike in
- mohar11: Re: # 41 [...This does... US Commando Strike in
- Faruk: hamdim2 #various If and there... Why Zardari Should Be
- cliftonbridge: HP I agree that... There is no ‘honour’








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content