Nighat Yasmeen September 20, 2005
#33 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2005 2:50:50 pm
Kulharee: FIrst, you can stop pretending you are a Pakistani. Pandit-Hates-in-Disguise can be spotted a mile away, and are about the only specimen on earth who are more pathetic than the Pandit-Hates.
Second, get your facts straight. A 1000 times more muslims in India than Pakistan means there are 1.5 billion Indians in India.
Third, stop avoiding unpleasant facts - like the cesspool that is India when it comes to the plight of women (as I mentioned in my previous post).
Second, get your facts straight. A 1000 times more muslims in India than Pakistan means there are 1.5 billion Indians in India.
Third, stop avoiding unpleasant facts - like the cesspool that is India when it comes to the plight of women (as I mentioned in my previous post).
#34 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2005 2:59:55 pm
Mr. Salim: you write : Idon`t agree with Temporal, though, that rape is a cornerstone of the military dictatorship`s domestic policy.`` If Mr. T said that, then I agree that he went too far. Not seeing the exact quote of what he said, I shall reserve further comment.
you add `` I voiced - disgust at the sanctioned rape of MukhtaraN Mai, stupidity of Mushy`s comment`` agreed. You continue ``and regret at people such as Temporal making a circus out of rapes in Pakistan to advance their own insidious political agenda.`` Disagree. I dont think Mr. T has any political ax to grind. If he did, he would be not spend so much time on chowk.
you add: ``As far as relations with India are concerned, I am hopeful.`` Agreed. The only sensible way to live is in peace.
you continue: `` The hatred expressed by Indians here on Chowk is unfortunately not unlike the hatred people in Pakistan have for each other, just because of the uniform de jour.`` Disagreed. I dont think there is a single Pakistani poster who is as obsessed with his hatreds as the Pandit-Hates of India. There is no Pakistani arjun, or jay thakeray, or ajeya.
Anyway, wish you a good evening too, Mr. Chauhan. Hope all is well in Qustuntuniya. :-)
you add `` I voiced - disgust at the sanctioned rape of MukhtaraN Mai, stupidity of Mushy`s comment`` agreed. You continue ``and regret at people such as Temporal making a circus out of rapes in Pakistan to advance their own insidious political agenda.`` Disagree. I dont think Mr. T has any political ax to grind. If he did, he would be not spend so much time on chowk.
you add: ``As far as relations with India are concerned, I am hopeful.`` Agreed. The only sensible way to live is in peace.
you continue: `` The hatred expressed by Indians here on Chowk is unfortunately not unlike the hatred people in Pakistan have for each other, just because of the uniform de jour.`` Disagreed. I dont think there is a single Pakistani poster who is as obsessed with his hatreds as the Pandit-Hates of India. There is no Pakistani arjun, or jay thakeray, or ajeya.
Anyway, wish you a good evening too, Mr. Chauhan. Hope all is well in Qustuntuniya. :-)
#35 Posted by dullabhatti on September 20, 2005 3:03:04 pm
#33, to be fair Kulharee said, 1000 times more stayed than migrate to Pakistan...he is exaggerating but his basic premise that more muslims on what was to be India on Aug 16/47 stayed behind than move to Pakistan. To make it simple it is ratio of all muslims in India which is 140million divided by Mohajirs in Pakistan. in 1947 terms, approximately 6 million crossed to pakistan while some 30-40 million stayed.
secondly it may be unpleasant for you to accept but he is a Pakistani..as pure and authentic as you. So I suggest you say whatever to him, it is your right but atleast don`t call him Indian...would you like to be called Indian? ..I know answer is No.:):) so why insult poor kulharee;)
secondly it may be unpleasant for you to accept but he is a Pakistani..as pure and authentic as you. So I suggest you say whatever to him, it is your right but atleast don`t call him Indian...would you like to be called Indian? ..I know answer is No.:):) so why insult poor kulharee;)
#36 Posted by dullabhatti on September 20, 2005 3:17:02 pm
guys, I think it was Bertrand Russel who said India lives in many centuries at the same time or something to that effect...Unfortunately it will be true for India and its by producst for a very very long time. I can imagine when 100 years from now we have a maglev trains running between Rawalpindi and New Delhi, our great grand kids when they visit to see their ancestoral homeland will be able to spot, TaTTi and half naked men and women below the railway tracks....and although maglev will not stop at faaTaks, they will be able to se Rickshaws being driver by dhoti clad men on streets crossing below the tracks....and they won`t be able to tell when they crossed the border.:)
#37 Posted by tahmed32 on September 20, 2005 7:20:14 pm
#35 Even if one counts only the muhajirs (6 million), 1000 times that is still 6 billion!! This kind of exaggeration can only be Made in India, consistent with the other nonsense one reads on chowk from Great Indian Thinkers like Arjun and Ajeya. And while he claims to be Pakistani, kulharee betrays who he is by doing the Pandit-Hate-speak (e.g. being incapable of referring to muslims without adding some ridicule to it; talking big about India as if it is USA-east when in fact the rest of the world is just happy that it is getting out of what had become a joke among development economists, namely the ``hindu rate of growth`` of 4%).
And why, may I ask, is it so important for you to defend the Pandit-Hates of India? I dont see pakistanis jumping to defend urstruly or echoboom when they start ranting.
And why, may I ask, is it so important for you to defend the Pandit-Hates of India? I dont see pakistanis jumping to defend urstruly or echoboom when they start ranting.
#38 Posted by ballukhan on September 20, 2005 11:38:31 pm
Re: # 32
You are right on the spot..actually Mush has picked this up from the Paki elite circles...and he is convinced that much of it is true.....that is why he narrated this with conviction as if it is a very plausible explanation for the rapes.......................I had predicted that this fauzi rascal is going to form an alliance with the dominant cartel of business houses in Pakistan- the so called elites........obtain huge donations and support from them in order to assist them in creating hard entry conditions and barriers in their respective business domains............ensure that these cartels do not fact any competition...............favour them in government contracts................thereby kick up the Paki economy...................but ensure that the poor remain where they are..............ensure that the lower class pests remain enslaved in the farms..............ensure that the distribution of riches become even more skewed..............ensure that economy becomes a slave to his martial law politics...................I can predict that he is going to destroy not merely the economy of Pakistan when he goes unless and until he is replaced by another dictator who can continue these alliances...........I can predict that in the end he would ensure that the position of the women and poor worsens................
You are right on the spot..actually Mush has picked this up from the Paki elite circles...and he is convinced that much of it is true.....that is why he narrated this with conviction as if it is a very plausible explanation for the rapes.......................I had predicted that this fauzi rascal is going to form an alliance with the dominant cartel of business houses in Pakistan- the so called elites........obtain huge donations and support from them in order to assist them in creating hard entry conditions and barriers in their respective business domains............ensure that these cartels do not fact any competition...............favour them in government contracts................thereby kick up the Paki economy...................but ensure that the poor remain where they are..............ensure that the lower class pests remain enslaved in the farms..............ensure that the distribution of riches become even more skewed..............ensure that economy becomes a slave to his martial law politics...................I can predict that he is going to destroy not merely the economy of Pakistan when he goes unless and until he is replaced by another dictator who can continue these alliances...........I can predict that in the end he would ensure that the position of the women and poor worsens................
#39 Posted by arjun_m on September 21, 2005 7:45:59 am
Aww..prophet tahmed(peace be unto his self-righteous left butt cheek) is mad about the hateful indians who transform peace loving pakis into subway bombing jihadis...
pakis had no problem dishing it out all these years...now when their ass is getting deported en-masse because they`ve been supporting jihad , they`re claiming to be innocent victims...
pakis had no problem dishing it out all these years...now when their ass is getting deported en-masse because they`ve been supporting jihad , they`re claiming to be innocent victims...
#40 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2005 8:27:56 am
arjun #39 Is that what you read into my post?? ha! ha! There is clearly no need for an inkblot test to demonstrate that you are a completely insane.
#41 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 21, 2005 8:54:04 am
Tahmed Sahib #34 {``you add `` I voiced - disgust at the sanctioned rape of MukhtaraN Mai, stupidity of Mushy`s comment`` agreed. You continue ``and regret at people such as Temporal making a circus out of rapes in Pakistan to advance their own insidious political agenda.`` Disagree. I dont think Mr. T has any political ax to grind. If he did, he would be not spend so much time on chowk.
...you continue: `` The hatred expressed by Indians here on Chowk is unfortunately not unlike the hatred people in Pakistan have for each other, just because of the uniform de jour.`` Disagreed. I dont think there is a single Pakistani poster who is as obsessed with his hatreds as the Pandit-Hates of India. There is no Pakistani arjun, or jay thakeray, or ajeya. ``}
Tahmed Sahib, Slam Alaikum, :)
Things are just wonderful in that city of Constantine. :)
Sir, My point about Mr. T having a feast with the tragedy and injustice suffered by Pakistani women is his narrow focus of concern. He has yet to utter a single note of compassion for the rapes of Bengali women, of the rapes of Bosnian women, or the rapes of Muslim women by Muslim men in Darfur, Sudan. Yet, he doesn`t miss a single opportunity to shed his tears for the abuse of Pakistani women and then immediately blame everything on Mushy. I don`t want to defend any two-bit dictator, but I have a problem with insidious people ganging up on one person for any excuse just to advance their own agenda. A lot of people spend time on Chowk and that in itself is neither proof of honesty nor wickedness.
My friend, I think you misunderstood my point about the hatred of Paki-bashing Indians as compared to intra-Paki bashing. Both you and I are victims of this from such patriots as Khamkhwa, Atif, Dr. Israr Ahmed aka Atif, and a few others. In my case, you can add Faisaluno, Scout, Saminasha, Sobia, and a few more. I have received far more obscene and insulting hatred from them than from any Indian, with the exception of JG. Anyway, that has been my experience.
On a constructive note, I think that the best way to help achieve women`s rights is to dismantle gender segregation as much as possible. Once women have equal participation in the day-to-day life of Pakistan, men will stop seeing them as mere objects of vulnerability of their adversaries.
Have a wonderful evening.
...you continue: `` The hatred expressed by Indians here on Chowk is unfortunately not unlike the hatred people in Pakistan have for each other, just because of the uniform de jour.`` Disagreed. I dont think there is a single Pakistani poster who is as obsessed with his hatreds as the Pandit-Hates of India. There is no Pakistani arjun, or jay thakeray, or ajeya. ``}
Tahmed Sahib, Slam Alaikum, :)
Things are just wonderful in that city of Constantine. :)
Sir, My point about Mr. T having a feast with the tragedy and injustice suffered by Pakistani women is his narrow focus of concern. He has yet to utter a single note of compassion for the rapes of Bengali women, of the rapes of Bosnian women, or the rapes of Muslim women by Muslim men in Darfur, Sudan. Yet, he doesn`t miss a single opportunity to shed his tears for the abuse of Pakistani women and then immediately blame everything on Mushy. I don`t want to defend any two-bit dictator, but I have a problem with insidious people ganging up on one person for any excuse just to advance their own agenda. A lot of people spend time on Chowk and that in itself is neither proof of honesty nor wickedness.
My friend, I think you misunderstood my point about the hatred of Paki-bashing Indians as compared to intra-Paki bashing. Both you and I are victims of this from such patriots as Khamkhwa, Atif, Dr. Israr Ahmed aka Atif, and a few others. In my case, you can add Faisaluno, Scout, Saminasha, Sobia, and a few more. I have received far more obscene and insulting hatred from them than from any Indian, with the exception of JG. Anyway, that has been my experience.
On a constructive note, I think that the best way to help achieve women`s rights is to dismantle gender segregation as much as possible. Once women have equal participation in the day-to-day life of Pakistan, men will stop seeing them as mere objects of vulnerability of their adversaries.
Have a wonderful evening.
#42 Posted by tahmed32 on September 21, 2005 9:21:06 am
Mr. Chauhan: Glad to learn that all is well in the Great City of Constantine and the Golden Horn.
With respect to Mr t not condemning places outside pakistan where women have been similarly raped - I think it is safe to assume that he is as much appalled by those crimes as he is with the one in Pakistan. And in any case, if cursing could fix things, we on chowk would have probably have fixed everthing by now. But as they say, better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness - and, so as I said, all we can do on chowk is to voice our feeble exception to injustice.
Regarding the issue of whether you and I have been abused more by fellow pakistanis than by Indians - who cares, my friend. They can abuse all they like, but this says nothing about the supposed recipient of the abuse, and speaks volumes of the environment that has shaped the character of these individuals who write abusive language from the safety of the internet. And anyway, as is written on the tomb at Avon, ``sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.`` :-) Let us instead form our views on solid principles of right and wrong and on facts as best as we understand them. Thus, I remain fully in favor of good relations with India (despite the freaks we see on chowk) since that is the only sensible way to live with one`s neighbors. However, chowk has indicated a vast undercurrent of hatred for pakistanis and muslims and grudges for perceived wrongs of past centuries (!!) among educated indians - and this merely helps understand why Pakistan was founded as a separate nation. And why it needs to maintain its guard, and seek friendship only from a position of military parity.
Hope this makes sense.
With respect to Mr t not condemning places outside pakistan where women have been similarly raped - I think it is safe to assume that he is as much appalled by those crimes as he is with the one in Pakistan. And in any case, if cursing could fix things, we on chowk would have probably have fixed everthing by now. But as they say, better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness - and, so as I said, all we can do on chowk is to voice our feeble exception to injustice.
Regarding the issue of whether you and I have been abused more by fellow pakistanis than by Indians - who cares, my friend. They can abuse all they like, but this says nothing about the supposed recipient of the abuse, and speaks volumes of the environment that has shaped the character of these individuals who write abusive language from the safety of the internet. And anyway, as is written on the tomb at Avon, ``sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.`` :-) Let us instead form our views on solid principles of right and wrong and on facts as best as we understand them. Thus, I remain fully in favor of good relations with India (despite the freaks we see on chowk) since that is the only sensible way to live with one`s neighbors. However, chowk has indicated a vast undercurrent of hatred for pakistanis and muslims and grudges for perceived wrongs of past centuries (!!) among educated indians - and this merely helps understand why Pakistan was founded as a separate nation. And why it needs to maintain its guard, and seek friendship only from a position of military parity.
Hope this makes sense.
#43 Posted by dullabhatti on September 21, 2005 9:50:03 am
Tahmed bhai, I understand your frustration with Ajeya and Arjun Makhanwala .....but it is disappointing to see that you have started reacting in the same way they do...they are bigots and narrow minded but what is your excuse to bring India and generalize all Indians just like they do to Paks?
Further, just because kulharee does not agree with you, you start accusing him of being Indian? My defense of kulharee would be akin to Paks supporitng or giving halla-sheri to ..say Farzana V..... Is that uncommon? I am only pointing out that he is Pakistani...trust me on that...now if due to your disagreement with him you still call him Indian or Pandit-hate that proves that any pakistani that does not agree with you is a traitor. Also by using the terms like Pandit-Hate, you are mirroring the terms used by people whom you accuse of being bigots.
Further, just because kulharee does not agree with you, you start accusing him of being Indian? My defense of kulharee would be akin to Paks supporitng or giving halla-sheri to ..say Farzana V..... Is that uncommon? I am only pointing out that he is Pakistani...trust me on that...now if due to your disagreement with him you still call him Indian or Pandit-hate that proves that any pakistani that does not agree with you is a traitor. Also by using the terms like Pandit-Hate, you are mirroring the terms used by people whom you accuse of being bigots.
#44 Posted by Kulharee on September 21, 2005 10:28:46 am
Re: # 43
Bhatti Sahib, thanks for clarifying my position, and yes I am a Pakistani (not very proud of it, but I have no choice, I was born with it, just like my statistically challenged friend Tahmed32 is a born Paki, may be he is not as ashamed of it as I am). If you ask me, Pakistanis are a walking talking contradiction… our leader wanted an “Islamic Republic” while he enjoyed his Scotch and ate Ham. Meanwhile, if you are a non-Muslim (constitutionally that is), you can be persecuted for saying Asalam-o-Lakum to someone. Your Passport is the way for you to find out what religion you belong to. I feel so bad for Pakistanis that don’t have passports. They don’t know what religion they belong to. It’s really very sad.
Tahmed32 Sahib, where I live (on earth that is) 1000 times is an expression of speech implying “a lot by comparison”, just like a Pakistani mom saying to her kid “oye Ullu Kay Kan, Hazar dafa kaha hey key Sher ki dhoi maiN ungal mat dou” (translation: Oye stupid kid, I have told you a 1000 times not to ram your finger up a lion’s butt”). Does it make any sense now?
Bhatti Sahib, thanks for clarifying my position, and yes I am a Pakistani (not very proud of it, but I have no choice, I was born with it, just like my statistically challenged friend Tahmed32 is a born Paki, may be he is not as ashamed of it as I am). If you ask me, Pakistanis are a walking talking contradiction… our leader wanted an “Islamic Republic” while he enjoyed his Scotch and ate Ham. Meanwhile, if you are a non-Muslim (constitutionally that is), you can be persecuted for saying Asalam-o-Lakum to someone. Your Passport is the way for you to find out what religion you belong to. I feel so bad for Pakistanis that don’t have passports. They don’t know what religion they belong to. It’s really very sad.
Tahmed32 Sahib, where I live (on earth that is) 1000 times is an expression of speech implying “a lot by comparison”, just like a Pakistani mom saying to her kid “oye Ullu Kay Kan, Hazar dafa kaha hey key Sher ki dhoi maiN ungal mat dou” (translation: Oye stupid kid, I have told you a 1000 times not to ram your finger up a lion’s butt”). Does it make any sense now?
#45 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 21, 2005 10:32:04 am
Tahmed Sahib #42, {``Thus, I remain fully in favor of good relations with India (despite the freaks we see on chowk) since that is the only sensible way to live with one`s neighbors``}
Well said, Sir. Let`s hope that one day, Inshallah, we have true friendship and real peace with our important neighbor and relative to the east. Ameen.
On the issue of intra-Pak hatreds on Chowk, I have seriously reached the conclusion that, in general, Indians tend to be more tolerant and laissez-faire than many people from Pakistan, especially when it comes to tolerance for dissent among their own. Through all the cruel and abusive treatment I have received at the hands of some Pakis on Chowk, only you and a handful of other fellow Pakistanis have stood up for fairness. Almost all demonstration of kindness, support for fairness, and concern for my life (on Chowk :) ) has been limited to Indians - even the most anti-Paki ones.
And that is why I really appreciate your genuine and sincere record of objectivity. You are a tribute to Punjab, to Pakistan, to Islam, and to humanity. One should be able to point at you as a unique exception to the general environment of hatred and prejudice.
Thanks,
Well said, Sir. Let`s hope that one day, Inshallah, we have true friendship and real peace with our important neighbor and relative to the east. Ameen.
On the issue of intra-Pak hatreds on Chowk, I have seriously reached the conclusion that, in general, Indians tend to be more tolerant and laissez-faire than many people from Pakistan, especially when it comes to tolerance for dissent among their own. Through all the cruel and abusive treatment I have received at the hands of some Pakis on Chowk, only you and a handful of other fellow Pakistanis have stood up for fairness. Almost all demonstration of kindness, support for fairness, and concern for my life (on Chowk :) ) has been limited to Indians - even the most anti-Paki ones.
And that is why I really appreciate your genuine and sincere record of objectivity. You are a tribute to Punjab, to Pakistan, to Islam, and to humanity. One should be able to point at you as a unique exception to the general environment of hatred and prejudice.
Thanks,
#46 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on September 21, 2005 10:42:08 am
Kulharee Sahib #44, {``and yes I am a Pakistani (not very proud of it, but I have no choice, I was born with it ...``}
Kulharee Bhai (Dear Axeman! :) )
If you say you are Pakistani, I believe you. After all, there was much speculation about my credentials and even today people have their doubts about my origins, my ethnicity, my religion, my citizenship, my domicile, and even my martial status. When certain people can`t debate or discuss serious matters successfully, they resort to personal insults, abuse of spouses and other family members, questions regarding legality of one`s birth, and so on. You know you have succeeded with these imbeciles once you have degraded them into such a state. They have conceded victory to your point of view by descending into the domain of the illiterate and the backward. You must agree that rednecks, ganNwars, fools, idiots, and the uneducated can only discuss things at the most basic level. ``Where`s he from?`` ``What`s his relijjun?`` ``Is he one of `em?`` ``Did you see his hooked nose?`` ``Where does he live?`` ``Did his parents ever get married?`` and so on.
Be who you are and stick to issues, positions, facts, and viewpoints. Let the professional anthropologists and sociologists of Chowk worry about basic human identifications. What I am really saying is that we should ignore such personally inquisitive people.
Kulharee Bhai (Dear Axeman! :) )
If you say you are Pakistani, I believe you. After all, there was much speculation about my credentials and even today people have their doubts about my origins, my ethnicity, my religion, my citizenship, my domicile, and even my martial status. When certain people can`t debate or discuss serious matters successfully, they resort to personal insults, abuse of spouses and other family members, questions regarding legality of one`s birth, and so on. You know you have succeeded with these imbeciles once you have degraded them into such a state. They have conceded victory to your point of view by descending into the domain of the illiterate and the backward. You must agree that rednecks, ganNwars, fools, idiots, and the uneducated can only discuss things at the most basic level. ``Where`s he from?`` ``What`s his relijjun?`` ``Is he one of `em?`` ``Did you see his hooked nose?`` ``Where does he live?`` ``Did his parents ever get married?`` and so on.
Be who you are and stick to issues, positions, facts, and viewpoints. Let the professional anthropologists and sociologists of Chowk worry about basic human identifications. What I am really saying is that we should ignore such personally inquisitive people.
#47 Posted by mohar11 on September 21, 2005 10:49:53 am
Re: # 45
//...are a tribute to Punjab, to Pakistan, to Islam, and to humanity....//
ClosetMullah32 is a ``tribute`` to humanity??....Get a grip on yourself....we know you have had rough times with pakis in here and we sympathize with that - but you don`t have to sing paeans to this jacka$$.... :)))
//...are a tribute to Punjab, to Pakistan, to Islam, and to humanity....//
ClosetMullah32 is a ``tribute`` to humanity??....Get a grip on yourself....we know you have had rough times with pakis in here and we sympathize with that - but you don`t have to sing paeans to this jacka$$.... :)))
#48 Posted by freesoul on September 21, 2005 10:55:33 am
If u know how to read urdu, read this
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/miscellaneous/story/2005/09/050921_manzur_anger.shtml
Mushy pees in his pants in front of white or black masters/mistress from USA/UK, but in front of his own brown suboordinates, he just refuses to listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/miscellaneous/story/2005/09/050921_manzur_anger.shtml
Mushy pees in his pants in front of white or black masters/mistress from USA/UK, but in front of his own brown suboordinates, he just refuses to listen.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- laddu: Re: # 375 guruji, The reason... Dhokha and Being a
- masadi: Hadith were a great... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: Anil writes "Please show... Why is Karachi Turning
- mkamd: Re: # 120 'The west... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 66 Mr... Why is Karachi Turning
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 64 Mr.... Why is Karachi Turning
- _arjun13: #109 Posted by... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
- tahmed32: eklavya bhai #118: why... Government Wins Manmohan Singh








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content