Hiren K Bose October 3, 2005
#230 Posted by trishanku on February 6, 2006 6:23:36 pm
Nowhere during the process of casting slurs at Gandhi do we think of him as a human being.Some of us tend to find scapegoats for the failures experienced by us as a nation today, some of us do not even think that far and just think of his policies as the signs of an old man`s impotence. I too believe that Gandhi was not a Mahatma, because I do not believe in the sanctity of the word, and I too agree that Gandhi had no place in the India of today surrounded by hostile neighbours and arms races, he would have been a burden on the national decision makers, but for what it`s worth, I do think that Gandhi was a great man, he was one of the greatest contributors to forge a movement from a random motion, and he was true to his principles, besides being one of the greatest leader of men.If you can find one more person of that kind in Indian history, that would be the time to rewrite history.Gandhi bashing has become a sort of idle passtime for us, like swatting flies, cursing the government, we want blood, we want grenades, we want to hear of the bloody firangis being crushed like flies in the thundering rush of a charge led by the likes of Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose, but great men as they were, India did not, and does not have the power of self control necessary to sustain a violent freedom struggle, and even as we plagiarise Gandhi today, I see scrawled on the walls of my college slogans like `Netaji Subhash will return to save the nation` written by a band of boys high on mescaline, I am forced to think, is that the height of impotence and cowardice or not ? Subhash Chandra Bose did his bit, he is probably dead and ash now, he was a normal man and not Jesus to be resurrected, he will return to save the country, what are we doing meanwhile, are we some sort of passengers who do not have to pay for the ride ? Pick from your favourite freedom fighters, pick Bhagat Singh or Subhash Chandra Bose for their (imagined) bloodthirst and dialogue delivery, leave your judgement to the likes of RajKumar Santoshi, ask Leo Mattel to produce mass manufactured action figures for Khudiram Bose or Ram Prasad Bismil, and make Gandhi the butt of all our jokes. That is what we are reduced to today.
#229 Posted by discoverer on October 13, 2005 11:15:17 am
no where in your article you mention the reason behind `` Gandi`s esape from south africa``
if he was so non violent type of guy then why didn`t he protest and protected black africans of south africa just like nelson mandela or coz he was selfish and wanted the power of HIS people
if he was so non violent type of guy then why didn`t he protest and protected black africans of south africa just like nelson mandela or coz he was selfish and wanted the power of HIS people
#228 Posted by sri on October 7, 2005 5:31:26 pm
I am trying to understand the real reason for knee jerk anger at Gandhi shown by some of the mentally challenged posters on this board. Is it due to your feeling that Gandhi`s strategy of non-violent opposition is an ineffective approach or are there some other reasons for your anger at him. If it is the former, then I cannot tell you how retarded that line of thinking is. There are two major examples in modern history that show the effectiveness of his approach. I am talking of course about Civil rights movement in US and ANC struggle in south africa. How in the world would you guys miss these facts. For his given circumstances, Gandhi followed a very effective way to achieve his ``objectives``.
Now I agree that his tactics wouldn`t have worked against enemies such as Nazis or hordes of Muhammadan army running across hindu kush mountains.... and he himself admitted that fact in an interview. But his was definitely an effective technique against a less than maniacal enemies.
I only wish that idiotic jehadis take a cue from history`s examples and follow a pragmatic approach in Palestine and Iraq. But given the idiotic psuedo-macho culture and self induced semi-retardedness I know that will never happen. How sad.
#227 Posted by KaalChakra on October 7, 2005 11:01:27 am
He accepted it? Like, was there a crowning ceremony of sorts? :)
May be, you mean that he stopped protesting against it after a while.
May be, you mean that he stopped protesting against it after a while.
#224 Posted by MantoLives on October 7, 2005 6:31:10 am
Don`t need to ...
There was NO Mahatma.. only Gandhi.
#226 Posted by Netizen on October 7, 2005 6:53:09 am
Re: # 224
did you know, i found out that when tagore gave him that title he refused to acknowledge it, but later in 47 did accept it and all the problems associated with it.
did you know, i found out that when tagore gave him that title he refused to acknowledge it, but later in 47 did accept it and all the problems associated with it.
#225 Posted by Netizen on October 7, 2005 6:51:25 am
Re: # 224
what happened to those fiery replies and cut&paste ?
you are entitled to your views. fine with me.
anyway, did you find anything from naidu on gandhi (about women)
also, did you explain what see meant by ``millions spent to keep..``, just curious
what happened to those fiery replies and cut&paste ?
you are entitled to your views. fine with me.
anyway, did you find anything from naidu on gandhi (about women)
also, did you explain what see meant by ``millions spent to keep..``, just curious
#218 Posted by MantoLives on October 6, 2005 1:00:43 pm
Still no comparison between a 19 year old foul mouthed kid and a 40 year old Mahatma Barrister
#222 Posted by MantoLives on October 6, 2005 10:12:47 pm
Yes.. Soyasauce... more personal attacks because you can`t defend indefensible.
#223 Posted by Netizen on October 7, 2005 6:14:47 am
Re: # 222
manto
read 221, now you understand the difference in gandhi and mahatma.
manto
read 221, now you understand the difference in gandhi and mahatma.
#221 Posted by Netizen on October 6, 2005 8:19:11 pm
Re: # 218
GANDHI THE PRISONER
A comparison of prison experiences and conditions of
Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela in South Africa(1)
by Nelson Mandela
During his imprisonment in Pretoria, all his fellow prisoners were Africans (Natives as they were then referred to, even by ourselves), and they, seeing him so different from them, were curious to know what he was doing in prison. Had he stolen, or dealt in liquor?
He explained that he had refused to carry a pass. They understood that perfectly well. ``Quite right,`` they said to him, ``the white people are bad.`` Gandhi had been initially shocked that Indians were classified with Natives in prison; his prejudices were quite obvious, but he was reacting not to ``Natives``, but criminalised Natives.
He believed that Indians should have been kept separately. However, there was an ambivalence in his attitude for he stated,
``It was, however, as well that we were classed with the Natives. It was a welcome opportunity to see the treatment meted out to Natives, their conditions (of life in gaol), and their habits.``
All in all, Gandhi must be forgiven those prejudices and judged in the context of the time and the circumstances. We are looking here at the young Gandhi, still to become Mahatma, when he was without any human prejudice, save that in favour of truth and justice.
GANDHI THE PRISONER
A comparison of prison experiences and conditions of
Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela in South Africa(1)
by Nelson Mandela
During his imprisonment in Pretoria, all his fellow prisoners were Africans (Natives as they were then referred to, even by ourselves), and they, seeing him so different from them, were curious to know what he was doing in prison. Had he stolen, or dealt in liquor?
He explained that he had refused to carry a pass. They understood that perfectly well. ``Quite right,`` they said to him, ``the white people are bad.`` Gandhi had been initially shocked that Indians were classified with Natives in prison; his prejudices were quite obvious, but he was reacting not to ``Natives``, but criminalised Natives.
He believed that Indians should have been kept separately. However, there was an ambivalence in his attitude for he stated,
``It was, however, as well that we were classed with the Natives. It was a welcome opportunity to see the treatment meted out to Natives, their conditions (of life in gaol), and their habits.``
All in all, Gandhi must be forgiven those prejudices and judged in the context of the time and the circumstances. We are looking here at the young Gandhi, still to become Mahatma, when he was without any human prejudice, save that in favour of truth and justice.
#220 Posted by Netizen on October 6, 2005 7:08:32 pm
Re: # 218
manto:
can you produce gandhis racist attitude on blacks after he became mahatma, mind you he wasn`t one in 1908.
as specified previously, gandhi in africa was different than gandhi later, in india. thats what you are not comprehending (knowingly).
as several have told you gandhi evolved, his thought process changed. If he was not thrown out may be he would have never returned to india.
manto:
can you produce gandhis racist attitude on blacks after he became mahatma, mind you he wasn`t one in 1908.
as specified previously, gandhi in africa was different than gandhi later, in india. thats what you are not comprehending (knowingly).
as several have told you gandhi evolved, his thought process changed. If he was not thrown out may be he would have never returned to india.
#219 Posted by soysauce on October 6, 2005 1:11:17 pm
Re: # 218
Correction - foulmouthed, misogynist :)
Another correction - it was NOT a comparison
Are you going to be arguing in Urdu whe you pass the bar? I hope so. English doesn`t seem to serve you well.
Correction - foulmouthed, misogynist :)
Another correction - it was NOT a comparison
Are you going to be arguing in Urdu whe you pass the bar? I hope so. English doesn`t seem to serve you well.
#216 Posted by MantoLives on October 6, 2005 12:00:09 pm
PS: God forbid... I`d rather die than be compared to gandhi...
Please read the post again... I am arguing that since you are unwilling (quite justifiably) to forget that at age 19, I, no Mahatma, abused Hamidm`s wife... you infact want to debate it ...
And yet you ask me to forget that Gandhi espoused the most racist views at age 40, and views which he clearly did not dissociate himself from... and not discuss that?
You see the hypocrisy?
Please read the post again... I am arguing that since you are unwilling (quite justifiably) to forget that at age 19, I, no Mahatma, abused Hamidm`s wife... you infact want to debate it ...
And yet you ask me to forget that Gandhi espoused the most racist views at age 40, and views which he clearly did not dissociate himself from... and not discuss that?
You see the hypocrisy?
#217 Posted by soysauce on October 6, 2005 12:55:50 pm
Re: # 216
Yasser, I`m reminding you to see how you were/are a product of your environment. That goes for pretty much everyone.
On the racism charge, if you put the interests of your group ahead of everyone else`s that`s implied racism. I grant you that Gandhiji was blind to the sufferings of the native South Africans. He was attached to the indians there and saw himself as belonging to a quasi- ruling class by virtue of his educational and financial status. He got a rude lesson in how wrong he was when he was thrown out of the train compartment as a blackie.
Where he changed was in recognizing the common humanity of us all. Despite what Ambedkar had to say - and I can cite a lot of dalit leaders who agreed with Gandhiji - he was the most influential uppercaste hindu to militate against the oppression of the dalits. Could he have gone further? Surely. Did he go far? Certainly.
Yasser, I`m reminding you to see how you were/are a product of your environment. That goes for pretty much everyone.
On the racism charge, if you put the interests of your group ahead of everyone else`s that`s implied racism. I grant you that Gandhiji was blind to the sufferings of the native South Africans. He was attached to the indians there and saw himself as belonging to a quasi- ruling class by virtue of his educational and financial status. He got a rude lesson in how wrong he was when he was thrown out of the train compartment as a blackie.
Where he changed was in recognizing the common humanity of us all. Despite what Ambedkar had to say - and I can cite a lot of dalit leaders who agreed with Gandhiji - he was the most influential uppercaste hindu to militate against the oppression of the dalits. Could he have gone further? Surely. Did he go far? Certainly.
#215 Posted by MantoLives on October 6, 2005 11:44:21 am
Soyasauce....
So now it is a personal attack on me because you can`t defend Gandhi ? Its not about a 19 year old (here even 40 year old Indians abuse my entire family so lets not go there)... and what he said to Hamidm 6 years ago....
If Gandhi evolved... we have no evidence of that.. lets leave it at that.
So now it is a personal attack on me because you can`t defend Gandhi ? Its not about a 19 year old (here even 40 year old Indians abuse my entire family so lets not go there)... and what he said to Hamidm 6 years ago....
If Gandhi evolved... we have no evidence of that.. lets leave it at that.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- mohar11: Re: # 52 [...They do... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- tahmed32: hamidm: in fairness, 25%... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- kashkin: RAS, I remember reading "Three... Three Cups of Tea
- ajeya: #51 Posted by hamidm2 [...... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- hamidm2: Re: # 52 nkg mian, "The... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- pinku: now in bold so... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- pinku: #51 Posted by mohar11... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- MeiraJ08: Ras, good to see... Three Cups of Tea








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content