Chowk Staff October 30, 2005
#350 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:25:00 am
do you need a day to mull over the questions asked of you tahmed chachu ? No problem. Take your time.
#349 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:22:49 am
tahmed chachy , do you categorically deny that you pimp your wife for money ?
#348 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:21:20 am
tahmed chachu...you claim that your wife is not a whore ? are you sure ?
#347 Posted by tahmed32 on November 2, 2005 11:20:06 am
Ranger aka avenger aka gujjubania aka prashant the programmer: the answer is no. how about your smelly, single-toe chappal wearing madrasi mom? no dont tell me - your chowk persona already provides me the answer.
btw, you were already a working programmer with wipro when you joined chowk a few years ago - i see you have grown younger since then and are now a schoolboy. another few years and i will become your grandchachu, no doubt.
btw, you were already a working programmer with wipro when you joined chowk a few years ago - i see you have grown younger since then and are now a schoolboy. another few years and i will become your grandchachu, no doubt.
#346 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:18:31 am
Romair...be a man and post your own photo so that it can be analysed at length by the folks here. It would certainly throw a better insight than any of your silly lenghty never ending posts on how and why pakis are fairer or whatever than Indians.
#345 Posted by arjun_m on November 2, 2005 11:15:42 am
#332 by Romair on November 2, 2005 10:22am PT
Over time, I have tried to figure out why our Indian colleagues on this site, dislike the Pakistanis so much. Dislike being too mild a word.
For the same reason people in the US hate Iran/Osama etc....you`all are terrorist supporting islamic fundamentalists....and you`re giving people from the Indian subcontinent a bad name with your involvement in terrorist activities in the US and UK..
It`s the Islamic terrorism, stupid....
Over time, I have tried to figure out why our Indian colleagues on this site, dislike the Pakistanis so much. Dislike being too mild a word.
For the same reason people in the US hate Iran/Osama etc....you`all are terrorist supporting islamic fundamentalists....and you`re giving people from the Indian subcontinent a bad name with your involvement in terrorist activities in the US and UK..
It`s the Islamic terrorism, stupid....
#344 Posted by Romair on November 2, 2005 11:13:39 am
Salim_Chauhan #339: `` understand that you are the model boy for the new Preparation G cream. I can just hear you howling and screaming all over Chowk until........``
Don`t shoot the messenger. I didn`t make the ad. I think the matching name was a pure coincidence. I don`t think they were talking about you. To the best of my knowledge you have never been in such an ad........
I think you may have me confused also. I prefer Ben Gay. Perparation G (or H) is not my style........
In any case, what are your views about the theory, jointly presented, by myself and Prof Bharat of Tata Institute............
Don`t shoot the messenger. I didn`t make the ad. I think the matching name was a pure coincidence. I don`t think they were talking about you. To the best of my knowledge you have never been in such an ad........
I think you may have me confused also. I prefer Ben Gay. Perparation G (or H) is not my style........
In any case, what are your views about the theory, jointly presented, by myself and Prof Bharat of Tata Institute............
#343 Posted by Aha_Snark on November 2, 2005 11:10:47 am
Re: # 281
re: godot:
Well, I`ve been here since 1997 so I`ve seen stuff like this happen tons of times. But. That does not detract from my point. The interactor in question has evaded every single one of my direct questions, has refused to engage on the grounds of logic and has used the filthiest terms of abuse. His posts stand exposed as baseless, indefensible ( i.e. his inability to defend what he says ) hate mongering.
To retaliate against such inarticulate invective in kind... what would that do ? What has your retaliation in kind (post # 158) achieved ? Apart from making your posts look offensive and childish ? The interactor in question is delighted to hear you abuse him - you abuse him. He abuses you. And so on.
It`s far more difficult to engage in clear and rational dialogue than it is to resort to xenophobia, racism, sexism or other forms of prejudice. And that`s amply borne out by the fact that on this board and on numerous other boards, I have cornered the interactor in question using clear logic and asked him to connect the dots or provide sources for his allegations. And I can`t remember a single time he has been able to do so.
Fascism and hate speech on this board will never be defeated by chowk staff. It will never be defeated by, as you say, ``holding your nose in front of the sewer``. It will be defeated if and only if ordinary chowkies do not indulge in violent speech, do provide sources to back up critical assertions, and do, quietly but determinedly oppose hate speech when they see it.
cheers,
Aha_Snark
re: godot:
Well, I`ve been here since 1997 so I`ve seen stuff like this happen tons of times. But. That does not detract from my point. The interactor in question has evaded every single one of my direct questions, has refused to engage on the grounds of logic and has used the filthiest terms of abuse. His posts stand exposed as baseless, indefensible ( i.e. his inability to defend what he says ) hate mongering.
To retaliate against such inarticulate invective in kind... what would that do ? What has your retaliation in kind (post # 158) achieved ? Apart from making your posts look offensive and childish ? The interactor in question is delighted to hear you abuse him - you abuse him. He abuses you. And so on.
It`s far more difficult to engage in clear and rational dialogue than it is to resort to xenophobia, racism, sexism or other forms of prejudice. And that`s amply borne out by the fact that on this board and on numerous other boards, I have cornered the interactor in question using clear logic and asked him to connect the dots or provide sources for his allegations. And I can`t remember a single time he has been able to do so.
Fascism and hate speech on this board will never be defeated by chowk staff. It will never be defeated by, as you say, ``holding your nose in front of the sewer``. It will be defeated if and only if ordinary chowkies do not indulge in violent speech, do provide sources to back up critical assertions, and do, quietly but determinedly oppose hate speech when they see it.
cheers,
Aha_Snark
#342 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:05:58 am
Do you pimp your wife for money tahmed chachu ? answer in simple yes or no. And dont take a whole day to do it. Thanks in advance.
#341 Posted by Romair on November 2, 2005 11:04:51 am
Ranger #336: ``its either a lame attempt at humor on your part , or you are just stupid.
.....If true , that would mean Indians are fairer than Pakis.......coz Indians are obviously superior , more powerful , influential........``
It is quite possible that I am stupid. So I will not debate that part with you. But my interests in this subject are purely scientific........Based on that, your comment does not hold up. Indians may be many things, in comparison to Pakistanis. But they certainly aren`t fairer. Even our darky Muhajirs from Karachi and Hyderabad, Sind are fairer than most Indians......
Secondly, I am pointing to the research from Prof Shallini Bharat, a socio-psychologist with the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. I was more than shocked to discover that an illustrious Indian researcher, like Prof. Bharat (the guy is named after the country) had reached the same conclusions, as I. Not to mention, an up and coming successful Indian company`s market research, furthur proving my point.......
Now my wife studied a lot of sociology. So I know that sociologists have nothing better to do with their time than study things like this. So I think this professor must have spent a lot of time researching this issue, before coming up with his conclusions............
.....If true , that would mean Indians are fairer than Pakis.......coz Indians are obviously superior , more powerful , influential........``
It is quite possible that I am stupid. So I will not debate that part with you. But my interests in this subject are purely scientific........Based on that, your comment does not hold up. Indians may be many things, in comparison to Pakistanis. But they certainly aren`t fairer. Even our darky Muhajirs from Karachi and Hyderabad, Sind are fairer than most Indians......
Secondly, I am pointing to the research from Prof Shallini Bharat, a socio-psychologist with the Tata Institute of Social Sciences. I was more than shocked to discover that an illustrious Indian researcher, like Prof. Bharat (the guy is named after the country) had reached the same conclusions, as I. Not to mention, an up and coming successful Indian company`s market research, furthur proving my point.......
Now my wife studied a lot of sociology. So I know that sociologists have nothing better to do with their time than study things like this. So I think this professor must have spent a lot of time researching this issue, before coming up with his conclusions............
#340 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 11:04:23 am
tahmed chachu....is your wife a whore ? answer in simple yes or no. And dont take a whole day to do it. Thanks in advance.
#339 Posted by Salim_Chauhan on November 2, 2005 11:00:24 am
Romair #332 {``The advert for the male cream shows a dark-skinned college boy (named Salim_Chauhan) relegated to the back seat and ignored by the girls (named Saminasha, ZahraJ, Zeena and Scout) until he uses the product. Soon enough, his complexion lightens and girls flock to him like moths to a flame. ``}
Romair Bhai,
It is haram to drink daroo and post on Chowk in a stupor during Ramzan. Thank you for trying to make me tall, dark, and handsome. Whether light-skinned or heavily-tanned, I will reject the moth-like advances of all of the mentioned females, except ZahraJ who I admire and respect quite a bit.
Now that I have done my part for advertising creams, it`s your turn.
I understand that you are the model boy for the new Preparation G cream. I can just hear you howling and screaming all over Chowk until Zeena graciously and slowly applies the ``ointment of love.``
Romair Bhai,
It is haram to drink daroo and post on Chowk in a stupor during Ramzan. Thank you for trying to make me tall, dark, and handsome. Whether light-skinned or heavily-tanned, I will reject the moth-like advances of all of the mentioned females, except ZahraJ who I admire and respect quite a bit.
Now that I have done my part for advertising creams, it`s your turn.
I understand that you are the model boy for the new Preparation G cream. I can just hear you howling and screaming all over Chowk until Zeena graciously and slowly applies the ``ointment of love.``
#338 Posted by tahmed32 on November 2, 2005 10:59:49 am
Godot: I know what you mean. However, let us be good sports and try to give even a mealy-mouthed scum like jay thakeray a chance to reflect and understand why everything he has been taught about dowry killings is wrong. So he has the rest of the day to cough out the simple straight answer.
#337 Posted by tahmed32 on November 2, 2005 10:56:35 am
Netizen #320 Thank you. Jay already tried once to answer it, and demonstrated his inability to give a straight yes or no answer to the question of whether dowry burnings is bad. I can see salim trying to help him cough out a straight answer as well. Anyway, he has till the rest of today to answer this simple question. I know he would rather spout his hatred for pakistanis and express his joy at the misery caused by the earthquake. But let it not be said that jay came to chowk and no one gave him a chance to prove that he was anything other than a domestic terrorist sympathizer.
#336 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 10:55:29 am
``Fairness is equated with superiority, power and influence, therefore the preference for lighter skin...`` Would that mean, in the South Asian context, Pakistanis are considered superior, influential and powerful?
If true , that would mean Indians are fairer than Pakis.......coz Indians are obviously superior , more powerful , influential and certainly rank higher on the hdi stakes.....
If true , that would mean Indians are fairer than Pakis.......coz Indians are obviously superior , more powerful , influential and certainly rank higher on the hdi stakes.....
#335 Posted by Ranger on November 2, 2005 10:51:43 am
Romair.....its either a lame attempt at humor on your part , or you are just stupid.
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- quin: Asif, I am glad... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: quin: thanks for your... Translation of a (Love)
- quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: I wrote 'love' in... Translation of a (Love)
- Naqshbandi: Tahir, I apologise for calling... Translation of a (Love)
- chaltahai: masadi, how would you... Translation of a (Love)
- mullah_toofani: Masadi baitay, You seem like... Translation of a (Love)
- masadi: g'night... Translation of a (Love)








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content