unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Church Lures Gujarat Tribals to Christ

Sunil K Poolani November 15, 2005

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all
listing 144-160   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

#55 Posted by dost_mittar on November 15, 2005 6:10:57 pm
tahmed32:

I have said in my earlier post that I am all for missionaries of all kinds doing something for the uplift of the downtrodden even if they sell the snake oil of religion in the process. However, your and ali-1`s interacts seem to suggest that the only way of salvation for poor Hindus is to get out of their religion. Would you give the same prescription to thousands of Mukhtaran Mais of Pakistan or haris who suffer every bit as much humiliation and persecution as the lower castes in India? Or to all Muslim women who do not get equal status under Islamic law? I wouldn`t be surprised if the thought has never occurred to you, and rightly so. The solution to the social problem is social awakening, religious reform and political empowerment, not religious conversions; any other course would be inconsistent with your claim of all religions being basically good. For this purpose, if the problem is the caste system, then it should be one`s duty to fight that system, not religious conversion. I might have agreed with your prescription if the converted Hindus from the lowest castes were able to improve their socio-economic status in the society, which is not the case in india. In fact, this does not seem to be the case in Pakistan either where low-caste Hindus who converted to Christianity at the time of Partition are still derisively referred to as Choorhas and Bhangis, even by some Pakistani elite at chowk.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#54 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 5:59:28 pm
samosa #52 If someone is willing to be ``bribed`` into changing religions, that is his or her choice. If someone is lied into converting, then he/she is free to change back when he/she discovers the lie. And can you any example of such a lie??
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#53 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 5:55:35 pm
jang: Robertson rails against Islam at least as much - and probably much more so - than hinduism. So what? This is what freedom of speech is all about. That is no reason to discourage missionary activity - and if some people believe what he says and become christians, what goes it of you (to resort to the vernacular)?? :-)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#52 Posted by samosa on November 15, 2005 5:55:28 pm
Re: # 50
tahmed32, I do not mind if a hindus becomes christian and follow any other religion. I am against conversion process that start with lies and bribes. And that is what most of the missionaries do.
Chowkies who post poverty stricken pictures of pakistan or indians are not really mocking the people but poverty. Usually that kind of diatribe starts with I am better than you and the other shows no you are not. But no one in desi communities hates any downtrodden people from either country. while you take this an example for labelling the whole desi community but you forget the selfless charity performed by desis during tsunami, gujarat earthquake and even during kashmir earthquake where pakistani doctors from US, US and Canada went to Kashmir to treat the victims.
You might find robertson a nutcase but he depicts an average evangelist person viewpoint.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#51 Posted by jang on November 15, 2005 5:30:05 pm
#50 tahmed, robertson is not a nutcase.. he raises BILLIONS of dollars and is a main-stream moral-majority christian. baptists (religion of bill clinton and jimmy carter) routinely publish pamplets on occasions like diwali..

``More than 900 million people are lost in the hopeless darkness of Hinduism…Pray that Hindus who celebrate the festival of lights would become aware of the darkness in their hearts that no lamp can dispel.``

``Mumbai is a city of spiritual darkness. Eight out of every ten people are Hindus, slaves bound by fear and tradition to false gods…Satan has retained his hold on Calcutta through Kali and other gods and goddesses of Hinduism. It’s time for Christ’s salvation to come to Calcutta.``

you being you will prolly think this is not denigrating..(rolling eye icon)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#50 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 5:08:13 pm
samosa: the fact that you have to point to a nut like Robertson shows you dont have any basis for claiming that christian missionaries mock hinduism. And suppose (for the sake of argument) they did. so what? hindus mock islam, and muslims mock hindus every day on chowk.

what is it so damned important to you that some hindu does not become a christian? what business is it of yours anyway?


and the fact is that christian missionaries are dedicated to making life a little easier for the downtrodden in india. while hindu and muslim extremists (the ones most opposed to these christian missionaries) are dedicated to making life miserable for those unfortunate enough to be their targets - like the communal killings in india, the sectarian killings in pakistan, the burning of two churches a few days ago in pakistan.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#49 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 4:57:16 pm
samosa: i already gave you an example of desis looking down on the downtrodden - mukhtaran mai.

here is another example - on chowk, you will see indians mocking pakistanis by posting pictures of poverty stricken people in pakistan, and pakistanis mocking indians by posting pictures of poverty stricken people in india. does this indicate any sympathy for the downtrodden - the same kind of downtrodden people whom christian missionaries try to help? i dont think so.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#48 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 4:52:55 pm
krishna #45 good. i am glad we agree here.

#46 so a christian missionary tried to convince you to become a christian. why is that wrong?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#47 Posted by samosa on November 15, 2005 2:34:10 pm
Re: # 44 tahmed
Christian groups maintain website if not individual missionaries. Do some google and you will ultimately get your proof. Meanwhile I still havent found out how you found about that desi community looks down on weakest member of society in India.
Just one small example of views of a missionary.

To begin, Robertson`s experiences in Rajahmundry are described by a narrator. The scene is of a poverty-stricken people, bathing in the river at the head of which rests a statue of Lord Siva. Water is pouring out of Siva`s head and a snake is wrapped around his head as well. Robertson and his son are found in the midst of the scene, observing and mocking the early morning prayers of Hindus.

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#46 Posted by avkrishna on November 15, 2005 2:23:01 pm
# 43 and # 44,
So the burden of proof you are asking from me is to point out the websites of missionaries. I am sorry and you might think this is cop out, but I dont intend to prove it that way...

Not only that I don`t have time to spend Googling this now..

The proof I have is the personal (first hand and second hand) experiences I had, while growing up, with some of the Missionaries/Christians who tried to preach their religion to me..

Thanks,
Avkrishna
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#45 Posted by avkrishna on November 15, 2005 2:12:38 pm
# 42,

Yes, Unequivocally.

Thanks,
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#44 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 2:03:20 pm
and on #43, if you dont have proof - then that is proof that it is you who is defaming these missionaries.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#43 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 2:02:03 pm
krishna: you accuse these missionaries of denigrating your religion - do you have any proof of it? anything on the web put up by these missionaries? I realize there is plenty of garbage on the web by extremists of all kinds - hindus, muslims, christians - but do you know of even a single missionary who maintains such a website?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#42 Posted by tahmed32 on November 15, 2005 1:59:23 pm
#35 krishna ``as well as supporting Hindu groups who fight the Chirstian missionaries on the same turf i.e. reconversion``

some hindus burnt a missionary and his two young sons to death some years ago. you make no mention of that action. do you condemn that as being a cowardly, criminal murder by hindu extremists?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#41 Posted by samosa on November 15, 2005 1:34:18 pm
Re: # 39
Indians priest do not go to proselytize. India does control the number of missionaries but many comes to india as tourist and are engaged in proselytizing.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#40 Posted by Romair on November 15, 2005 1:19:40 pm
Dost-mittar #37: ``as a state which is proud of its secular credentials.``

I have never quite been able to figure out this line of thinking. Could you explain, why someone should be, ``proud`` of their secular credentials. Or their religious credentials. Or their capatilist credentials. Or their socialist credentials. Or any other kind of credentials, including their Hindu or Muslim credentials that they may possess..........

When people start becoming, ``proud`` of some kind of credential, aren`t they declaring their superiority over others, for no reason? Isn`t it better to simply have credentials, without being proud of them? And just live like decent human beings, and just be nice to each other. Without highlighting one`s credentials........

I have met so many people who are unnecessarily proud of their Hindu or Muslim or secular or athiest credentials. Including many on this site. And yet I have found jerks amongst all such groups, individually and at a group level........In fact, when I go to some country or meet some, I try not to look at their credentials, and just judge them by how nice they are to me...........

I think it is the being, ``proud`` part that is the problem, not the credential part...........
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
listing 144-160   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Interact Index

    #199 Salim_Chauhan
    #198 KaalChakra
    #197 KaalChakra
    #196 rsridhar
    #195 ajeya
    #194 dost_mittar
    #193 tahmed32
    #192 tahmed32
    #191 tahmed32
    #190 tahmed32
    #189 jang
    #188 harimau
    #187 Netizen
    #186 sattar2
    #185 dost_mittar
    #184 dost_mittar
    #183 sattar2
    #182 dullabhatti
    #181 samosa
    #180 HP
    #179 Urstruly
    #178 Urstruly
    #177 sattar2
    #176 jang
    #175 mohar11
    #174 jang
    #173 dost_mittar
    #172 dost_mittar
    #171 tahmed32
    #170 tahmed32
    #169 tahmed32
    #168 tahmed32
    #167 Sanatani
    #166 Sanatani
    #165 poolani
    #164 harish_hyd
    #163 tahmed32
    #162 dullabhatti
    #161 dullabhatti
    #160 dullabhatti
    #159 samosa
    #158 pmishra2
    #157 tahmed32
    #156 tahmed32
    #155 dullabhatti
    #154 jang
    #153 avkrishna
    #152 tahmed32
    #151 tahmed32
    #150 chaltahai
    #149 samosa
    #148 samosa
    #147 SN
    #146 samosa
    #145 dullabhatti
    #144 Urstruly
    #143 dullabhatti
    #142 avkrishna
    #141 dost_mittar
    #140 parthaab
    #139 tahmed32
    #138 tahmed32
    #137 wahi_to
    #136 parthaab
    #135 parthaab
    #134 parthaab
    #133 samosa
    #132 parthaab
    #131 samosa
    #130 jang
    #129 dullabhatti
    #128 dullabhatti
    #127 dullabhatti
    #126 parthaab
    #125 parthaab
    #124 sattar2
    #123 soysauce
    #122 parthaab
    #121 samosa
    #120 tahmed32
    #119 tahmed32
    #118 Urstruly
    #117 tahmed32
    #116 jang
    #115 dost_mittar
    #114 Urstruly
    #113 poolani
    #112 dost_mittar
    #111 Urstruly
    #110 dullabhatti
    #109 kaurasach
    #108 dullabhatti
    #107 tahmed32
    #106 tahmed32
    #105 tahmed32
    #104 dullabhatti
    #103 pmishra2
    #102 tahmed32
    #101 dullabhatti
    #100 harimau
    #99 dullabhatti
    #98 Romair
    #97 avkrishna
    #96 Urstruly
    #95 dost_mittar
    #94 sattar2
    #93 kaurasach
    #92 kaurasach
    #91 kaurasach
    #90 dost_mittar
    #89 tahmed32
    #88 tahmed32
    #87 Urstruly
    #86 jang
    #85 tahmed32
    #84 tahmed32
    #83 tahmed32
    #82 harimau
    #81 tahmed32
    #80 kaurasach
    #79 tahmed32
    #78 tahmed32
    #77 tahmed32
    #76 Urstruly
    #75 kaurasach
    #74 avkrishna
    #73 boogie2000
    #72 Schukler
    #71 Schukler
    #70 samosa
    #69 tahmed32
    #68 tahmed32
    #67 tahmed32
    #66 samosa
    #65 dost_mittar
    #64 dost_mittar
    #63 tahmed32
    #62 tahmed32
    #61 dost_mittar
    #60 tahmed32
    #59 avkrishna
    #58 samosa
    #57 samosa
    #56 tahmed32
    #55 dost_mittar
    #54 tahmed32
    #53 tahmed32
    #52 samosa
    #51 jang
    #50 tahmed32
    #49 tahmed32
    #48 tahmed32
    #47 samosa
    #46 avkrishna
    #45 avkrishna
    #44 tahmed32
    #43 tahmed32
    #42 tahmed32
    #41 samosa
    #40 Romair
    #39 dost_mittar
    #38 samosa
    #37 dost_mittar
    #36 samosa
    #35 avkrishna
    #34 tahmed32
    #33 tahmed32
    #32 avkrishna
    #31 samosa
    #30 soysauce
    #29 tahmed32
    #28 samosa
    #27 soysauce
    #26 soysauce
    #25 Romair
    #24 ali_1
    #23 stuka
    #22 tahmed32
    #21 Netizen
    #20 Netizen
    #19 stuka
    #18 stuka
    #17 jang
    #16 soysauce
    #15 rozaiba
    #14 avkrishna
    #13 tahmed32
    #12 soysauce
    #11 avkrishna
    #10 tahmed32
    #9 avkrishna
    #8 dilip.chitre
    #7 stuka
    #6 poolani
    #5 Layman
    #4 hindvi
    #3 poolani
    #2 rozaiba
    #1 KaalChakra

Latest Interacts

  • truth100: Muslim ghetoise so that... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • mkamd: Re: # 30 Pakistan is... Who Sold the Centrifuges?
  • truth100: Re: # 395: First ime... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • tahir: Re: # 389 Uncouth-101 "Some... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • mkamd: Re: # 31 'Ask... Who Sold the Centrifuges?
  • tahir: Re: # 372 Bobby "Can... Muslim Ghettoisation
  • mkamd: Re: # 19 I will... Who Sold the Centrifuges?
  • truth100: Re: # 27, On a... Who Sold the Centrifuges?

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Muslim Ghettoisation
  • Solving Amarnath: A New Hope in Kashmir
  • Yet Another Immigrant Story
  • Aamir - A Film Review
  • Diabetes: Wrestling with a Twenty-First Century Monster
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • So, Are You Pakistan?
  • The Exploding Cities of the Developing World
  • Should We Still have a Lunar Calendar?
  • Momin: Selected Verse I
  • Abdus Salam

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited