Filtered Posts
Imran Khan at LUMS
Prophetboy: by saying hamid gul should be arrested, you're clearly implying that HE is solely responsible for the taliban. The fact of the matter is that you know very well that the whole paki security establishment was involved in creating the taliban..yet we don't see you demanding they be arrested.
So if you want the creators of the talipakis to be arrested, are you then calling for the whole paki security establishment to be arrested? Or are you going to beat around the bush like the time you refused to demand the prosecution of any paki army man for the murders in 1971?
Posted by
arjun7
Nov 6, 2007 05:24 pm
#138 Posted by tahmed32 on November 6, 2007 11:46:05 amProphetboy: by saying hamid gul should be arrested, you're clearly implying that HE is solely responsible for the taliban. The fact of the matter is that you know very well that the whole paki security establishment was involved in creating the taliban..yet we don't see you demanding they be arrested.
So if you want the creators of the talipakis to be arrested, are you then calling for the whole paki security establishment to be arrested? Or are you going to beat around the bush like the time you refused to demand the prosecution of any paki army man for the murders in 1971?
Imran Khan at LUMS
For decades, pureland followed a policy of supporting islamic terrorism to fight it's wars in afghanistan and kashmir..no way that could have led to the jihadi problem..no siree..
Posted by
arjun7
Nov 6, 2007 08:13 am
yup..if pakis are jihadis or jihadi lovers, it's someone else's fault for making them that way.For decades, pureland followed a policy of supporting islamic terrorism to fight it's wars in afghanistan and kashmir..no way that could have led to the jihadi problem..no siree..
- arjun7
- Interacts: 23
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 146
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Nov 1 2007
- Last signin: Jul 26 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


