Salman Akhtar September 30, 2001
#52 Posted by Fatimah on October 4, 2001 11:13:11 pm
Did i not say TERRORISM linked with U.S. Foreign POLICY ?
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/011004/6/bfeo.html
Women must work to temper U.S. `cowboy` response to terror crisis, says group
By STEPHEN THORNE
Click to enlarge photo
OTTAWA (CP) - Canadian women should focus on tempering America`s ``cowboy-inspired`` response to the terrorist attacks in the U.S. and push for justice through the courts, a major women`s group said Thursday.
The Canadian Women`s March Committee also defended the right of Sunera Thobani, a well-known feminist, to make a controversial link between the attacks and U.S. foreign policy. Thobani, former head of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women, told a conference on Tuesday that Canadian women should not be coerced into supporting a U.S. foreign policy that is ``soaked in blood.``
The March Committee emphasized that women have more pressing issues to address than blame.
``War is not the answer to the atrocious crime against humanity committed on Sept. 11, 2001,`` said the group, which says it represents a majority of women`s organizations across Canada.
NAC vice-president Denise Andrea Campbell said Thursday that Thobani broadened discussion on the issue and put some context to the attacks.
``We really support her right - and, actually, all Canadians` right - to ask: why is this happening?`` Campbell told a news conference.
``But on behalf of women across the country . . . we are certainly more interested in looking at the immediate issue at hand, which is: how do we respond to what has happened?``
The committee opposes what it calls U.S. President George W. Bush`s ``vengeful and war-mongering response`` to the attacks. It says the world should follow United Nations guidelines and seek justice in courts of law.
``We expect our governments to lead through compassion, justice and respect for the dignity of all people,`` said the committee declaration.
There is no justification for a full-scale military response to the attacks under UN-defined grounds of self-defence, said Andree Cote, director of law reform at the National Association of Women and the Law.
``It`s so very dangerous in times like this to have unilateral, cowboy-inspired actions that will create possibly a lot of deaths of innocent civilians and international unrest,`` said Cote.
Thobani, a women`s studies professor at University of British Columbia, called the United States ``the most dangerous and the most powerful global force unleashing horrific levels of violence`` in the world today.
Her remarks were condemned by politicians and others as outrageous.
Cote said the reaction to Thobani`s statements has been more troubling than the statements themselves.
``I think this is one of the reasons that we`re opposing war,`` said Cote.
``It creates a climate of intolerance; it creates a climate where basic civil liberties can be violated, where basic freedom of expression is put in jeopardy. We`re very worried by this type of thing.``
She said media and other responses to Thobani`s speech harkened back to the 1950s era of U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, who conducted a witchhunt for phantom communists, destroying many innocent lives in the process.
``We want to have a democratic discussion on how to solve this horrible crisis,`` said Cote.
Campbell described Canada`s response so far as an encouraging reinforcement of the country`s traditional values of humanitarianism and peace.
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/011004/6/bfeo.html
Women must work to temper U.S. `cowboy` response to terror crisis, says group
By STEPHEN THORNE
Click to enlarge photo
OTTAWA (CP) - Canadian women should focus on tempering America`s ``cowboy-inspired`` response to the terrorist attacks in the U.S. and push for justice through the courts, a major women`s group said Thursday.
The Canadian Women`s March Committee also defended the right of Sunera Thobani, a well-known feminist, to make a controversial link between the attacks and U.S. foreign policy. Thobani, former head of the National Action Committee on the Status of Women, told a conference on Tuesday that Canadian women should not be coerced into supporting a U.S. foreign policy that is ``soaked in blood.``
The March Committee emphasized that women have more pressing issues to address than blame.
``War is not the answer to the atrocious crime against humanity committed on Sept. 11, 2001,`` said the group, which says it represents a majority of women`s organizations across Canada.
NAC vice-president Denise Andrea Campbell said Thursday that Thobani broadened discussion on the issue and put some context to the attacks.
``We really support her right - and, actually, all Canadians` right - to ask: why is this happening?`` Campbell told a news conference.
``But on behalf of women across the country . . . we are certainly more interested in looking at the immediate issue at hand, which is: how do we respond to what has happened?``
The committee opposes what it calls U.S. President George W. Bush`s ``vengeful and war-mongering response`` to the attacks. It says the world should follow United Nations guidelines and seek justice in courts of law.
``We expect our governments to lead through compassion, justice and respect for the dignity of all people,`` said the committee declaration.
There is no justification for a full-scale military response to the attacks under UN-defined grounds of self-defence, said Andree Cote, director of law reform at the National Association of Women and the Law.
``It`s so very dangerous in times like this to have unilateral, cowboy-inspired actions that will create possibly a lot of deaths of innocent civilians and international unrest,`` said Cote.
Thobani, a women`s studies professor at University of British Columbia, called the United States ``the most dangerous and the most powerful global force unleashing horrific levels of violence`` in the world today.
Her remarks were condemned by politicians and others as outrageous.
Cote said the reaction to Thobani`s statements has been more troubling than the statements themselves.
``I think this is one of the reasons that we`re opposing war,`` said Cote.
``It creates a climate of intolerance; it creates a climate where basic civil liberties can be violated, where basic freedom of expression is put in jeopardy. We`re very worried by this type of thing.``
She said media and other responses to Thobani`s speech harkened back to the 1950s era of U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy, who conducted a witchhunt for phantom communists, destroying many innocent lives in the process.
``We want to have a democratic discussion on how to solve this horrible crisis,`` said Cote.
Campbell described Canada`s response so far as an encouraging reinforcement of the country`s traditional values of humanitarianism and peace.
#51 Posted by Fatimah on October 3, 2001 11:09:52 pm
Guerella war is poor nations or non nations Delta Force.
Dont get me wrong i mourn death of 9-11 tragedy ,just as mine
BUT I DO THE BURNT ALIVE VIETNAMESE,KOREAN,NAPALM OVER PALESTENIANS HOUSE,STARVING IRAQI WOMEN & CHILDREN TOO
Those who were also father,sister,mother,sons & daughters but not repeatedly flashed every 5 mins for 3 weeks.Do our mind need repititons to FEEL?
Ever since the United States Army massacred 300 Lakotas in 1890, American
forces have intervened elsewhere around the globe 100 times. Indeed the
United States has sent troops abroad or militarily struck other countries`
territory 216 times since independence from Britain. Since 1945 the United
States has intervened in more than 20 countries throughout the world.
Since World War II, the United States actually dropped bombs on 23
countries. These include: China 1945-46, Korea 1950-53, China 1950-53,
Guatemala 1954, Indonesia 1958, Cuba 1959-60, Guatemala 1960, Congo 1964,
Peru 1965, Laos 1964-73, Vietnam 1961-73, Cambodia 1969-70, Guatemala
1967-69, Grenada 1983, Lebanon 1984, Libya 1986, El Salvador 1980s,
Nicaragua 1980s, Panama 1989, Iraq 1991-1999, Sudan 1998, Afghanistan 1998,
and Yugoslavia 1999.
Post World War II, the United States has also assisted in over 20 different
coups throughout the world, and the CIA was responsible for half a dozen
assassinations of political heads of state.
The following is a comprehensive summary of the imperialist strategy of the
United States over the span of the past century:
Argentina - 1890 - Troops sent to Buenos Aires to
protect business interests.
Chile - 1891 - Marines sent to Chile and clashed with
nationalist rebels.
Haiti - 1891 - American troops suppress a revolt by
Black workers on United States-claimed Navassa Island.
Hawaii - 1893 - Navy sent to Hawaii to overthrow the
independent kingdom - Hawaii annexed by the United
States.
Nicaragua - 1894 - Troops occupied Bluefields, a city
on the Caribbean Sea, for a month.
China - 1894-95 - Navy, Army, and Marines landed
during the Sino-Japanese War.
Korea - 1894-96 - Troops kept in Seoul during the war.
Panama - 1895 - Army, Navy, and Marines landed in the
port city of Corinto.
China - 1894-1900 - Troops occupied China during the
Boxer Rebellion.
Philippines - 1898-1910 - Navy and Army troops landed
after the Philippines fell during the Spanish-American
War; 600,000 Filipinos were killed.
Cuba - 1898-1902 - Troops seized Cuba in the
Spanish-American War; the United States still
maintains troops at Guantanamo Bay today.
Puerto Rico - 1898 - present - Troops seized Puerto
Rico in the Spanish-American War and still occupy
Puerto Rico today.
Nicaragua - 1898 - Marines landed at the port of San
Juan del Sur.
Samoa - 1899 - Troops landed as a result over the
battle for succession to the throne.
Panama - 1901-14 - Navy supported the revolution when
Panama claimed independence from Colombia. American
troops have occupied the Canal Zone since 1901 when
construction for the canal began.
Honduras - 1903 - Marines landed to intervene during a
revolution.
Dominican Rep 1903-04 - Troops landed to protect
American interests during a revolution.
Korea - 1904-05 - Marines landed during the
Russo-Japanese War.
Cuba - 1906-09 - Troops landed during an election.
Nicaragua - 1907 - Troops landed and a protectorate
was set up.
Honduras - 1907 - Marines landed during Honduras` war
with Nicaragua.
Panama - 1908 - Marines sent in during Panama`s
election.
Nicaragua - 1910 - Marines landed for a second time in
Bluefields and Corinto.
Honduras - 1911 - Troops sent in to protect American
interests during Honduras` civil war.
China - 1911-41 - Navy and troops sent to China during
continuous flare-ups.
Cuba - 1912 - Troops sent in to protect American
interests in Havana.
Panama - 1912 - Marines landed during Panama`s
election.
Honduras - 1912 - Troops sent in to protect American
interests.
Nicaragua - 1912-33 - Troops occupied Nicaragua and
fought guerrillas during its 20-year civil war.
Mexico - 1913 - Navy evacuated Americans during
revolution.
Dominican Rep 1914 - Navy fought with rebels over
Santo Domingo.
Mexico - 1914-18 - Navy and troops sent in to
intervene against nationalists.
Haiti - 1914-34 - Troops occupied Haiti after a
revolution and occupied Haiti for 19 years.
Dominican Rep 1916-24 - Marines occupied the Dominican
Republic for eight years.
Cuba - 1917-33 - Troops landed and occupied Cuba for
16 years; Cuba became an economic protectorate.
World War I - 1917-18 - Navy and Army sent to Europe
to fight the Axis powers.
Russia - 1918-22 - Navy and troops sent to eastern
Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution; Army made five
landings.
Honduras - 1919 - Marines sent during Honduras`
national elections.
Guatemala - 1920 - Troops occupied Guatemala for two
weeks during a union strike.
Turkey - 1922 - Troops fought nationalists in Smyrna.
China - 1922-27 - Navy and Army troops deployed during
a nationalist revolt.
Honduras - 1924-25 - Troops landed twice during a
national election.
Panama - 1925 - Troops sent in to put down a general
strike.
China - 1927-34 - Marines sent in and stationed for
seven years throughout China.
El Salvador - 1932 - Naval warships deployed during
the FMLN revolt under Marti.
World War II - 1941-45 - Military fought the Axis
powers: Japan, Germany, and Italy.
Yugoslavia - 1946 - Navy deployed off the coast of
Yugoslavia in response to the downing of an American
plane.
Uruguay - 1947 - Bombers deployed as a show of
military force.
Greece - 1947-49 - United States operations insured a
victory for the far right in national ``elections.``
Germany - 1948 - Military deployed in response to the
Berlin blockade; the Berlin airlift lasts 444 days.
Philippines - 1948-54 - The CIA directed a civil war
against the Filipino Huk revolt.
Puerto Rico - 1950 - Military helped crush an
independence rebellion in Ponce.
Korean War - 1951-53 - Military sent in during the
war.
Iran - 1953 - The CIA orchestrated the overthrow of
democratically elected Mossadegh and restored the Shah
to power.
Vietnam - 1954 - The United States offered weapons to
the French in the battle against Ho Chi Minh and the
Viet Minh.
Guatemala - 1954 - The CIA overthrew the
democratically elected Arbenz and placed Colonel Armas
in power.
Egypt - 1956 - Marines deployed to evacuate foreigners
after Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal.
Lebanon - 1958 - Navy supported an Army occupation of
Lebanon during its civil war.
Panama - 1958 - Troops landed after Panamanians
demonstrations threatened the Canal Zone.
Vietnam - 1950s-75 - Vietnam War.
Cuba - 1961 - The CIA-directed Bay of Pigs invasions
failed to overthrow the Castro government.
Cuba - 1962 - The Navy quarantines Cuba during the
Cuban Missile Crisis.
Laos - 1962 - Military occupied Laos during its civil
war against the Pathet Lao guerrillas.
Panama - 1964 - Troops sent in and Panamanians shot
while protesting the United States presence in the
Canal Zone.
Indonesia - 1965 - The CIA orchestrated a military
coup.
Dominican Rep- 1965-66 - Troops deployed during a
national election.
Guatemala - 1966-67 - Green Berets sent in.
Cambodia - 1969-75 - Military sent in after the
Vietnam War expanded into Cambodia.
Oman - 1970 - Marines landed to direct a possible
invasion into Iran.
Laos - 1971-75 - Americans carpet-bomb the countryside
during Laos` civil war.
Chile - 1973 - The CIA orchestrated a coup, killing
President Allende who had been popularly elected. The
CIA helped to establish a military regime under
General Pinochet.
Cambodia - 1975 - Twenty-eight Americans killed in an
effort to retrieve the crew of the Mayaquez, which had
been seized.
Angola - 1976-92 - The CIA backed South African rebels
fighting against Marxist Angola.
Iran - 1980 - Americans aborted a rescue attempt to
liberate 52 hostages seized in the Teheran embassy.
Libya - 1981 - American fighters shoot down two Libyan
fighters.
El Salvador - 1981-92 - The CIA, troops, and advisers
aid in El Salvador`s war against the FMLN.
Nicaragua - 1981-90 - The CIA and NSC directed the
Contra War against the Sandinistas.
Lebanon - 1982-84 - Marines occupied Beirut during
Lebanon`s civil war; 241 were killed in the American
barracks and Reagan ``redeployed`` the troops to the
Mediterranean.
Honduras - 1983-89 - Troops sent in to build bases
near the Honduran border.
Grenada - 1983-84 - American invasion overthrew the
Maurice Bishop government.
Iran - 1984 - American fighters shot down two Iranian
planes over the Persian Gulf.
Libya - 1986 - American fighters hit targets in and
around the capital city of Tripoli.
Bolivia - 1986 - The Army assisted government troops
on raids of cocaine areas.
Iran - 1987-88 - The United States intervened on the
side of Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War.
Libya - 1989 - Navy shot down two more Libyan jets.
Virgin Islands - 1989 - Troops landed during unrest
among Virgin Island peoples.
Philippines - 1989 - Air Force provided air cover for
government during coup.
Panama - 1989-90 - 27,000 Americans landed in
overthrow of President Noriega; over 2,000 Panama
civilians were killed.
Liberia - 1990 - Troops entered Liberia to evacuate
foreigners during civil war.
Saudi Arabia - 1990-91 - American troops sent to Saudi
Arabia, which was a staging area in the war against
Iraq.
Kuwait - 1991 - Troops sent into Kuwait to turn back
Saddam Hussein.
Somalia - 1992-94 - Troops occupied Somalia during
civil war.
Bosnia - 1993-95 - Air Force jets bombed ``no-fly zone``
during civil war in Yugoslavia.
Haiti - 1994-96 - American troops and Navy provided a
blockade against Haiti`s military government. The CIA
restored Aristide to power.
Zaire - 1996-97 - Marines sent into Rwanda Hutus`
refugee camps in the area where the Congo revolution
began.
Albania - 1997 - Troops deployed during evacuation of
foreigners.
Sudan - 1998 - American missiles destroyed a
pharmaceutical complex where alleged nerve gas
components were manufactured.
Afghanistan - 1998 - Missiles launched towards alleged
Afghan terrorist training camps.
Yugoslavia - 1999 - Bombings and missile attacks
carried out by the United States in conjunction with
NATO in the 11 week war against Milosevic.
Iraq - 1998-2001 - Missiles launched into Baghdad and
other large Iraq cities for four days. American jets
enforced ``no-fly zone`` and continued to hit Iraqi
targets since December 1998.
These * *100 * * instances of American military
intervention did not include times when the United
States:
(1) deployed military police overseas;
(2) mobilized the National Guard;
(3) sent Navy ships off the coast of numerous
countries as a show of strength;
(4) sent additional troops to areas where Americans
were already stationed;
(5) carried out covert actions where American forces
were not under the direct rule of an American command;
(6) used small hostage rescue units;
(7) used American pilots to fly foreign planes;
(8) carried out military training and advisory
programs which did not involve direct combat.
U. S. Government Assassination Plots
Following is a list of prominent foreign leaders whose assassination
(or planning for same) the United States has been involved in since
the end of Second World War. The list does not include several
assassinations in various parts of the world carried out by anti-Castro
Cubans employed by CIA and headquartered in the United States:
LIST A: NON MUSLIMS
1949 - KIm Koo, Korean opposition leader
1950`s - CIA/Neo-Nazi hit list of numerous political figures in
West Germany
1955 - Jose` Antonio Remon, President of Panama
1950`s Chou En-lai, Prime Minister of China, several attempts
on his life
1951 - Kim Il Sung, Premiere of North Korea
1950s (mid) - Claro M. Recto, Philippines opposition leader
1955 - Jawar Lal Nehru, Prime Minister of India
1959 and 1963 - Norodom Sihanouk, leader of Cambodia
1950s-70s - Jose Figueres, President of Costa Rica,
two attempts on his life
1961 - Francois ``Papa Doc``Duvalier, leader of Haiti
1961 - Patrice Lumumba , Prime Minister of Congo (Zaire)
1961 - Gen. Rafael Trujillo, leader of Dominican Republic
1963 - Ngo Dinh Diem, President of South Vietnam
1960s - Fidel Castro, President of Cuba, more than
15 attempts on his life
1960s - Raul Castro, high official in government of Cuba
1965 - Francisco Caamanao, Dominican Republic opposition leader
1965 - Pierre Ngendandumwe, Prime Minister of Burundi
1965-6 - Charles de Gaulle, President of France
1967 - Che Guevara, Cuban leader
1970 - Salvadore Allende, President of Chile
1970 - General Rene Schneider, Commander-in-Chief of Army, Chile
1970s and 1981 - Gen. Omar Torrijos, leader of Panama
1972 - General Manuel Noriega, Chief of Panama Intelligence
1975 - Mobutu Sese Seko, President of Zaire
1976 - Michael Manley, Prime Minister of Jamaica
1983 - Miguel d`Escoto, Foreign Minister of Nicaragua
1984 - The nine commandantes of the Sandanista
National Directorate
1980`s - Dr. Gerald Bull, Canadian Ballistics Scientist
assassinated by Mossad in Belgium.
Partial List of Muslim Leaders Assassinated or
Attempted Assassinations
1950`s Sukarno, President of Indonesia
1957 Gamal Abdul Nasser, President of Egypt
1960 Brigadier General, Abdul Karim Kassem, Leader of Iraq
1980-86 Muammar Qaddafi, Leader of Libya, several plots and
attempts upon his life
1982 Ayatullah Khomeini, Leader of Iran
1983 General Ahmed Dlimi, Moroccan army Commander
1985 Sheikh Mohammed Hussein Fadllallah, Lebanese Shiite Leader
(80 people killed in that attempt)
1991 Saddam Hussein, Leader of Iraq
Reference: Blum, William, ``KILLING HOPE - U.S. Military and
CIA Interventions Since World War II,`` Appendix III
U.S. Government Assassination Plots, page 453,
Common Courage Press, Monroe, Maine 1995. ISBN 1-56751-052-3
Very likely Victims :
April 4, 1979 - Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, Leader of Pakistan, for pursuing making
of
Nuclear Bomb.
August, 1988. General Ziaul Haq, Military Leader of Pakistan.
1995 - Murtaza Bhutto, Son of ZUlfiqar Ali Bhutto, Anti-American
would-be Leader - Pakistan.
March 25, 1975 - King Faisal of Saudi Arabia through his Nephew, Saudi
Arabia
for imposing 1973 Oil Embargo.
August 24, 1999. Mullah Mohammad Omar, in Kandhar, Afghanistan.
|
``À``List of Known Assassination Plots
1950`s Sukarno, President of Indonesia
1957 Gamal Abdul Nasser, President
2001 Since early this year more than 40 Palestinian leaders assassinated
through surrogate Israel.
#50 Posted by scout on October 3, 2001 7:45:04 pm
sadna #48,
we were having a peaceful discussion until you got all defensive and put your claws out.
and yeah, you`re right, there`s no point in discussing anything now. take it easy and stay out of trouble.
we were having a peaceful discussion until you got all defensive and put your claws out.
and yeah, you`re right, there`s no point in discussing anything now. take it easy and stay out of trouble.
#49 Posted by scout on October 3, 2001 7:45:04 pm
sadna #47, 48,
what personal attacks? so i tell you not to be so biased, quit with the one sided cut`n`pastes, and you go all b#tchy on me? what`s up with that?
might I recommend some extra strength Midol.
what personal attacks? so i tell you not to be so biased, quit with the one sided cut`n`pastes, and you go all b#tchy on me? what`s up with that?
might I recommend some extra strength Midol.
#48 Posted by sadna on October 3, 2001 12:30:10 pm
PS:
And since I know you are incapable of sticking to the subject at hand and would rather discuss me and my antecedents, do kindly make use of this thread for that purpose.
And since I know you are incapable of sticking to the subject at hand and would rather discuss me and my antecedents, do kindly make use of this thread for that purpose.
#47 Posted by sadna on October 3, 2001 12:09:10 pm
scout #45
For the millionth time, I donot intend to stop posting my comments on articles on chowk because of your personal attacks. Either stick to the subject at hand or find someone else to abuse.
For the millionth time, I donot intend to stop posting my comments on articles on chowk because of your personal attacks. Either stick to the subject at hand or find someone else to abuse.
#46 Posted by scout on October 3, 2001 11:54:43 am
sadna #45,
Can`t digest what you dish out all the time?
And I thought I was quite sparing with the portions.
Can`t digest what you dish out all the time?
And I thought I was quite sparing with the portions.
#45 Posted by sadna on October 3, 2001 1:08:11 am
scout #42
Which cut-and-paste? Why does everything have to be about your precious opinion about my character flaws ? I was explaining my comments on Musharraf and Pakistani policies of jihad, but as far as I am concerned, not any more.
Which cut-and-paste? Why does everything have to be about your precious opinion about my character flaws ? I was explaining my comments on Musharraf and Pakistani policies of jihad, but as far as I am concerned, not any more.
#44 Posted by Cemendtaur on October 3, 2001 12:32:35 am
Who did they hit?
People have correctly observed that the US media keeps focusing on people of European descent affected by the events of September 11. This morning I watched Diane Sawyer interview Jerry Seinfeld and Chris Rock. That interview had certain subtleties that were interesting to observe. It did not matter how Jerry felt about the tragedy: Jerry belongs to the group of victims, his loyalty is beyond question. It was more important to find out how Chris felt, how Blacks of this country--in general--are feeling. The camera was focused on Chris’s face for the longest time. Chris said he thought it was ``terrible.`` With flinching eyes Diane kept looking at Chris. She did not actually say, but for a moment it looked as if she was going to ask him: Is that how you really felt?
American media`s coverage of the September 11 tragedy makes people believe it was one small group of people who got attacked that day. They were not the twin towers of the WTC with people from over 60 countries working there that were attacked, it was the pride of the white race that came crumbling down. Behind this portrayal could be a belief that what got attacked on September 11 were the technological marvels of the people of European descent, a way of life of the white folks: they are the ones who are running the show, making things happen in the world, others are just coming along. Consequently, all Non-European Americans have to prove their loyalty to this country. After all they could be secretly happy to see the dominating group being humiliated over the destruction.
Cemendtaur
10/02/01
People have correctly observed that the US media keeps focusing on people of European descent affected by the events of September 11. This morning I watched Diane Sawyer interview Jerry Seinfeld and Chris Rock. That interview had certain subtleties that were interesting to observe. It did not matter how Jerry felt about the tragedy: Jerry belongs to the group of victims, his loyalty is beyond question. It was more important to find out how Chris felt, how Blacks of this country--in general--are feeling. The camera was focused on Chris’s face for the longest time. Chris said he thought it was ``terrible.`` With flinching eyes Diane kept looking at Chris. She did not actually say, but for a moment it looked as if she was going to ask him: Is that how you really felt?
American media`s coverage of the September 11 tragedy makes people believe it was one small group of people who got attacked that day. They were not the twin towers of the WTC with people from over 60 countries working there that were attacked, it was the pride of the white race that came crumbling down. Behind this portrayal could be a belief that what got attacked on September 11 were the technological marvels of the people of European descent, a way of life of the white folks: they are the ones who are running the show, making things happen in the world, others are just coming along. Consequently, all Non-European Americans have to prove their loyalty to this country. After all they could be secretly happy to see the dominating group being humiliated over the destruction.
Cemendtaur
10/02/01
#43 Posted by scout on October 3, 2001 12:32:35 am
soysauce #38,
aren`t you stretching it a bit too much?
did I say the General is an angel?
As an ordinary Pakistani, I`m expressing my opinions. Why bring religion into it?
aren`t you stretching it a bit too much?
did I say the General is an angel?
As an ordinary Pakistani, I`m expressing my opinions. Why bring religion into it?
#42 Posted by scout on October 3, 2001 12:32:35 am
sadna #30, ``You seem to forget Musharraf is the PAKISTANI President, and where does Vajpayee come in?``
My dear, you were the one who said you ``don`t believe what Musharraf says.`` I replied that I wouldn`t believe Vajpayee either. Like you say, Musharraf is our President not yours. You have the right to be as skeptical about his views as I can be of Vajpayees. That`s all.
``btw, politicians in power also try to get away with platitudes, but they are under scrutiny of their political rivals(who keep looking for opportunity to criticise or topple them), the press(who is out to create sensation) and the public. The benefit of doubt lasts as long as they donot goof up. Army generals in power have it much easier.``
Right or wrong, the coup was necessary for Pakistan. It was the only quick way to get rid of a corrupt politician. Not the utopian way, but the best that we can do. As far as the Indian goverment is concerned, they are no angels and are one of the most corrupt in the world (remember Tehelka?)
``We have to stop thinking that churning out pious hypocritical platitudes will do it. I will believe that things are changing when I see it actually happening. The bombing of the J&K assembly building killing 30 people by a Pakistani shows nothing has changed.``
Like I said, things won`t change overnight, in the same way that India`s woes or any other country`s won`t change overnight. It`s very easy to ``cut and paste.`` I myself can find countless articles over the internet on the brutality of Indian people, but I`m not as narrow minded as others and I don`t equate negative incidents with entire races and religions.
My dear, you were the one who said you ``don`t believe what Musharraf says.`` I replied that I wouldn`t believe Vajpayee either. Like you say, Musharraf is our President not yours. You have the right to be as skeptical about his views as I can be of Vajpayees. That`s all.
``btw, politicians in power also try to get away with platitudes, but they are under scrutiny of their political rivals(who keep looking for opportunity to criticise or topple them), the press(who is out to create sensation) and the public. The benefit of doubt lasts as long as they donot goof up. Army generals in power have it much easier.``
Right or wrong, the coup was necessary for Pakistan. It was the only quick way to get rid of a corrupt politician. Not the utopian way, but the best that we can do. As far as the Indian goverment is concerned, they are no angels and are one of the most corrupt in the world (remember Tehelka?)
``We have to stop thinking that churning out pious hypocritical platitudes will do it. I will believe that things are changing when I see it actually happening. The bombing of the J&K assembly building killing 30 people by a Pakistani shows nothing has changed.``
Like I said, things won`t change overnight, in the same way that India`s woes or any other country`s won`t change overnight. It`s very easy to ``cut and paste.`` I myself can find countless articles over the internet on the brutality of Indian people, but I`m not as narrow minded as others and I don`t equate negative incidents with entire races and religions.
#41 Posted by Ras Siddiqui on October 2, 2001 10:35:28 pm
The Indians on CHOWK will LOVE this one...
From The News International (Jang Group) today..
Opinion by M.B. Naqvi
http://www.jang-group.com/thenews/index.html
#40 Posted by AAmir on October 2, 2001 7:37:43 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
view this users filtered interacts
#39 Posted by Mehdavi on October 2, 2001 7:37:43 pm
Reply # 32
THE PROMISED MEHDI has nothing to do with
QADIYANIS. Muslims who believe that THE PROMISED
MEHDI has come and gone, also believe that
prophet Mohammed (P.B.U.H) is the last prophet of
Allah (s.w.t), whereas Qadiyanis do not.
THE PROMISED MEHDI has nothing to do with
QADIYANIS. Muslims who believe that THE PROMISED
MEHDI has come and gone, also believe that
prophet Mohammed (P.B.U.H) is the last prophet of
Allah (s.w.t), whereas Qadiyanis do not.
#38 Posted by soysauce on October 2, 2001 7:37:43 pm
#29 scout
In other words, forget the evidence but BELIEVE!
Is this some new religion with Musharraf as god?
In other words, forget the evidence but BELIEVE!
Is this some new religion with Musharraf as god?
#37 Posted by soysauce on October 2, 2001 7:37:43 pm
#29 scout
In other words, forget the evidence but BELIEVE!
Is this some new religion?
In other words, forget the evidence but BELIEVE!
Is this some new religion?
Interact Index
Latest Interacts
- sadna: Yeah kaalchakra, multiple bar... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: Sadna, what is the... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: Look, its like telling... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: corr: To have legal... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- sadna: nb I agree with you... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- morni: A word is dead... Fathers and Daughters
- nb: Sadna, Mushirul Hasan has... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal
- KaalChakra: The key to supporting... Terrorism Accused: Is Legal








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content