Imran Khan the Politician

it is impossible to stay in politics when you are too much honest ............. simple specially in pakistan ......

Imran Khan’s interview with Simi Garewal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ijlGHnR64Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ij5j8tLGzI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIRhCORE9eU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxEaFNDbNXo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgDAkHXe4tQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8HZvemBhQs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xm_BhzrmrQA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McgL_IZAc6s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UudseGwmMMQ

#210 by majumdar

majumdar, a Wali Allah is someone who can clearly see beyond ... much beyond what you and I can see with our normal biological senses. Allama Iqbal was one, Abidi was another, and the biggest of them all was Mansour Hussain Al Hallaj. But all were contreversial, mistreated, and called Kafirs in their lifetimes. That`s the way of Wali Allahs`.

Zeemax sahib,

(Agha Hasan Abidi was a Wali Allah.)

Who is a Wali Allah.

Regards

soysauce writes <<< #207 masadi, for someone whose time is apparently so precious that he doesn`t want to waste it on his intellectual inferiors (pretty much everyone else), you do hang out here a lot. >>>

I don`t spend much time here, except for these past two weeks, I have hardly made a post here for the past 2 to 3 months. In any case my posts are not meant for people like you who argue for the sake or argumentation even when adequately answered

Then he writes <<< You seem like a confused ``intellectual`` who doesn`t know what empirical evidence means. You`d rather guess what the CONTEMPORARY attitude of whites towards indians must be based on history...>>

I am no intellectual and seriously doubt the claims of those who say they are, rather I can think straight and use facts and research to arrive at non-traditional, non-official conclusions. What you see is not always the truth and is a subset of what is going on out there, for which you need data, and ignoring history on how a particular situation came to be is not very intelligent.

#207 masadi, for someone whose time is apparently so precious that he doesn`t want to waste it on his intellectual inferiors (pretty much everyone else), you do hang out here a lot.
You seem like a confused ``intellectual`` who doesn`t know what empirical evidence means. You`d rather guess what the CONTEMPORARY attitude of whites towards indians must be based on history rather than open your eyes and look around.Who`d you rather believe - your lying eyes or your conspiratorial instincts?
I think you do make some good points on occasion but spoil it all by abusing your interlocuters and being paranoid in general. That`s my answer to your patronizing attitude towards everyone else here.

Re: 206, those that play with crayons like okhla, whose total intellectual ability is restricted to slogan mongering and whose entire political morality rests in supporting dictators is in no position to point fingers at anyone

Re: # 203

One would not completely agree with you on that, soysauce.

Masadi is neither ``misunderstood`` nor an ``intellectual``. He is an ordinary citizen of lululand with delusions of intellectual grandeur.

Happy New Year all.

soysauce writes <<< #201 So what is the global repurcussion of the attitude of whites towards indians ? >>>

Don`t waste my time with your ignorance. Read your history books and then pick up a world data sheet and check the mess that area is in as far as social development indicators go.

#201 So what is the global repurcussion of the attitude of whites towards indians ?

#201 poor masadi, the misunderstood intellectual, I`m beginning to wonder if you don`t deserve all the crap you`re getting here with your airs of superiority.

okhla writes <<< Dimwits. Masadi, dimwits.

That is what they all are >>>

And you okhla are the mama and papa of them all, second only in bs to the object of your worship, Musharraf, aptly described by me as a son of a bitch in the other thread...

soysauce writes <<< was responding to your pointed comments about the attitude of the whites towards indians & pakistanis >>>

If my posts are too difficult for you to understand let me know rather than respond with bs. This ``attitude`` produces results which no pindi person can achieve against a peshawar person, globally and has produced effects historically- that was my point- do you still not get it?

#191 by hamidm2

Hamid. Yes what you said about BCCI is the accepted opinion. But it`s wrong.

It is very difficult to defend BCCI. If you were a BCCI employee, you would know.

It is said BCCI had a $20 billion hole in it`s balance sheet. But no one lost any money by depositing with BCCI.

If as you say it was a Ponzi scheme, how come I`m still receiving cheques from my provident fund from the Luxembourg liquidators? My wife keeps a watch for them ... after 15 years of closure, BCCI had enough assets to meet liquidation expenses ... (loot mar), and still pay off 100% to the Hong Kong depositors, and everywhere else, except UK where it was not 100 % because of loot mar. Still I got back 70% of my provident fund from Luxembourg.

Hamid, please ..... Agha Hasan Abidi was a Wali Allah. If you ask me, I will tell you what BCCI was all about, but perhaps you will not be interested.

Enjoy your morning coffee.

Re: # 196


Dimwits. Masadi, dimwits.

That is what they all are. Nothing but a bunch of dimwits. Naqsh, Tahmed, Hamidm ,Okhla & the rest. All dimwits. I tell you...

#181 by zeemax on December 29, 2006 8:25am PT


just like the Goras found and excuse for the brownie BCCI.


Aww..you poor victim you....