Where is Ibn-Sina of the 21st Century?

Name: Masadi
Age: Paleolithic
Sex: Never
Address: Tora Bora

Dx: primary: Gilles de la Tourette; secondary: enterobiasis

Rx
1)Haloperidol 10 mg/day (3 divided doses)

2)Mebendazole 100 mg (single dose - repeat 48 hrs)

...SR

SR (Super Retard) writes" A tree is know by its fruits."

Here is another Bible Thumping A. Wipe for you. He has no problem with causing physical harm to others as he was trying to do with Zeemax, but is all worked up about the morality behind someone exposing his bigotry regarding Islam, As you all saw, his knowledge both of the Quran and of comprehending simple prose is at an infantile level. As for the sob who is redflagging my every post, you F yourself...

SR writes "Now let me get this straight. Please answer with clear and uncomplicated language, without any hedging or double-speak"

All my answers are in clear uncomplicated language unlike your BS which is a deliberate distortion of the Quran for the purpose of soothing your bigotry. What is not explicitly disallowed by the Quran, and very few things are, is left to the discretion of the person. Now what part of this very simple, uncomplicated answer do you not understand?

Masadi sahib/SR sahib,

And are Muslim women allowed to marry the real useless fellows- the Hanuds, Boodhists, Sikhs, Jainis, Shintos, animists, Chinks and all that.

Regards

Re: # 172 masadi [ "...the second part, that verse says absolutely not a word about Muslim women not being able to marry among the ahl el Kitaab ...

Even today we see the ahl el kitaab, the shia and the sunni intermarry both men and women among each other..."]

masadi

My dear fellow, you really are an interesting character. Bless you.

Now let me get this straight. Please answer with clear and uncomplicated language, without any hedging or double-speak.

QUESTION: Are you saying that it is allowed for a Muslim woman to marry a Christian or a Jewish man? YES, or NO?

It appears from your answer that you are saying there is NO ban on Muslim women marrying 'People of the Book' -- the commonly interpreted meaning of the phrase 'People of the Book' is Christians and Jews. But you have thrown a twist in your next sentence by bring in sunni and shia and saying that they can intermarry... The inter-marriage of shia and sunni was never a question. Unless, of course, you consider one of them to be lesser-Muslims or non-Muslims.

As for your ugly manners, I do not mind. It is very common amongst the believers. If I didn't know better I would have assumed that Islam teaches ugliness and impoliteness. A tree is know by its fruits. Most strangers will judge Islam by looking at the way its champions conduct themselves and interact with others. A great job you seem to be doing of promoting the good name of Islam.

...SR

Chowk friends, since chowk staff is in the habit of banning me time and again, can you send me a message with your email addresses so that I can email my responses to you and you all can post them, if you desire to know my pov and find it beneficial. That way we can go around the censorship of the Chowk staff that is acting in pure dictatorial fashion like Musharraf the sos.

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts

a well-written, thought-provoking article - brilliantly argued

Re: # 167 hamaray hinduism kee jaan chor bhai,tum apnay islam ko thek kar

Re: # 78 tera maghaz jo choohay jitna hai...what kind of artificial man u r , a perception which is jaundiced and a comprehension like a kadoo.

Re: # 163
Is there anything called Hinduism? I really doubt. I have read Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata. Nowhere I have found the word Hindu.

Re: # 163
Is there anything called Hinduism? I really doubt. I have read Gita, Ramayana, Mahabharata. Nowhere I have found the word Hindu.

Re: # 143
The dogma is the reason for backwardness. Christianity and Islam has started that. History proves the harmful effects of Islam and Christianity on civilisation. Whether you treat Jesus as Son of God (or Muhammed is the last prophet) will decide, whether you are eligible for living. This thought is the worst enemy of humanity. That basically destroy the plurality of thoughts and thought process stops at some point. When the entire society is gripped with such fever, civilisation takes beating.
Large number of people are accepting Christianity and Islam in Asia etc...That does not justify that they are doing right. How that is contributing to humanity and civilisation that matters. A nice example of islam,
A large number of the recent recruiters by islamists end up becoming suicide bomber and killers. Does that implies, the people have taken correct decision?

Zeemax ji
This gentleman SR in spite of his grocery business (What is wrong with it by the way?) has always sounded more intelligent, analytical, balanced and controlled in his behaviour than you, a high flying banker. You are prone to go from one extreme (telling muhammad and his exploits as it was) to another of becoming jihad instigator. Why don't you learn to live a life of equilibrium? Mr. Kaalchakra can help you in it.
Regards

hamidm#135:

Lol!

Don't try to fathom Hinduism, it's like peeling onion skin after skin. For most of us Hindus, we do not try to understand our religion, it's enough to know that we are Hindus.

But seriously, I have always thought of the Hindu religion as a Buffet dinner, you pick and choose what you like and leave the rest.