unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
where paths intersect
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Article
  • Interact
  • read writer comments
  • add to favorites
  • get rss feeds
  • print
  • email this link

Brand Worshipper

farheen zehra October 20, 2004

Latest comments   flat   threaded   latest   oldest   all

#14 Posted by snail on October 24, 2004 6:11:15 am
``You have to decide how this article makes you think about brands. ``

You yourself dont seem quite all that convinced about what you are writing. You know you have sounded half-baked.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#13 Posted by nasah on October 23, 2004 7:39:14 am
October 23, 2004
Why Are Some American Christians So Bloodthirsty?
Understanding Pro-war Christians` Indifference to Civilian Deaths

by Dr. Teresa Whitehurst

It`s been going on for years now. Almost daily we read that another child, another parent, another sister or brother, another grandpa or aunt, is killed in Afghanistan or Iraq by U.S. weaponry in Mr. Bush`s ``war on terror.``

Sometimes it`s a wedding party, or a bunch of kids, or a family of six. Sometimes it`s a journalist, or a whole group of journalists, who may even be killed on camera in real time for all the world to see and hear.

But no matter how bad it gets, nothing seems to change Americans` support for war, which for some reason is stiffest among Christian supporters of the Bush administration.

``Stuff happens in a war zone.`` ``Don`t worry because God is in control.`` With these and other slogans, I`ve been reassured by countless pro-war Christians that, as long as civilians aren`t intentionally targeted, taking their lives is okay, maybe even predestined, God`s will.

Recently a Christian from Australia wrote to ask, ``Why are American Christians so bloodthirsty?

Why do they support the war in Iraq, no matter how many innocent people are made to suffer? We just don`t understand why they`re willing to kill other people so that they can feel more safe – it`s so selfish!``

She`s right, and she`s wrong.

She`s right about the fact that many Christians in America will blindly support whichever war their president promotes, with the assumption that his much-advertised praying guarantees us that God approves of all those bombs and missiles, and even the inevitable collateral damage.

This ``don`t worry, be happy`` stance of pro-war Christians can make those of us who suffer at the news of civilian deaths almost green with envy: How do they go blithely to church, pray and give an offering, then go eat some nice mashed potatoes and gravy at Cracker Barrel with nary a worry about the families being bombed or shot or crushed by their own military at that very moment?

But she`s wrong in her assumption that all Christians in the U.S. find civilian deaths an acceptable price to (let someone else) pay for Mr. Bush`s ultimate goals.

Many, including those in the evangelical community, were raised to obey Jesus` teachings above any other, and suffer mightily whenever they learn that more innocent people have lost their lives to this terrorizing ``war on terror.``

She`s also wrong about the seemingly bloodthirsty attitude of pro-war Christians; most of them are nice people on a personal basis.

They love their kids and their fellow Americans, and would never have supported the bombing of, say, Oklahoma City`s malls and suburbs in an effort to target a Timothy McVeigh.

And they certainly don`t go around saying they hope a lot more civilians are killed by U.S. bombs and guns. They`ve been trained to deny it`s happening or downplay its importance, thinking instead about Iraq`s future democracy, the next life, or the ``big picture.``.......

--
religion is a great killer of innocent men women and children -- it`s also a great pain killer......
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#12 Posted by DRUMZ on October 22, 2004 7:32:26 am
Good article.

Its funny That we blindly follow the same people who we admire ONLY because they go against the grain.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#11 Posted by DoubleC on October 21, 2004 11:24:31 am
#4 by kamrans on October 20, 2004 6:34pm PT

See who`s talking dude. ;)
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#10 Posted by tintingem on October 21, 2004 9:22:34 am
I guess some explanation of this article is required.

Or maybe not.

This is just one of the ways I view brands. And this is not an outpour against brands or the entire concept of branding.

You have to decide how this article makes you think about brands.
(if it does, that is!).

Farheen Zehra
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#9 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on October 21, 2004 9:22:30 am
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#8 Posted by Nass on October 21, 2004 8:03:34 am
You did write this somewhere else as well farheen didnt you? Anyway a nice read and very clear.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#7 Posted by Nadia_Zehra on October 21, 2004 6:19:23 am
.
.
.
You are a fool.

You are a hypocrite.

Yet, you are too, a brand worshipper. ..
...

[Fabey aye ala Rabaikuma Tukazeban] :)

reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#6 Posted by JagDeCat on October 21, 2004 6:19:23 am
``How do smart people like you fall for it?`` asks a radio announcer, referring to branding. Branding is often perceived as a manipulation of the mind, perhaps even a corruption of the soul. Is it?

Misleading or hard-selling something that nobody needs or wants is questionable practice. That said, branding does not belong to the dark side of management. To the contrary, branding is an effective way of communicating between two busy parties: the buyers and the sellers.

Today`s buyers are increasingly overwhelmed with data, information and choices. In the US, for example, the average household receives 100 TV channels and some digital cables distribute several times that offering; supermarkets carry 15,000 to 25,000 SKUs; the number of titles handled by the average magazine wholesaler has doubled in 10 years to about 5,000; over 40 billion web pages are linked to the Internet. How can the mind reasonably process that outpouring of data? The answer is that it can`t! That is precisely why branding has become so helpful.

Branding acts like an indexed dictionary in the mind of the buyer. Rather than looking at every product, zapping every TV channel, flipping every page published daily in the press, we seek short cuts to the information we need.

Moreover, this mental dictionary is rather specialized: The brain stores information in categories—e.g., food, flowers, f-words—and retrieves it in the same way.

Finally, as every word of our dictionary receives a definition, every brand name leads to an association of memories, creating a brand image in our mind. Conversely, when all the attributes of that image are assembled, the mind may recall the initial brand. Thus, if you seek a masculine cigarette that makes you feel independent and free, Marlboro will probably pop into your mind.

Therefore, it is the task of branders to have their brand name remembered on the top of the list—or the top of the mind—when the individual is in the market to buy. This is precisely where branding meets marketing.

For example, if you decide to buy a new car, VW would hope that you will consider it first, among the dozens of great car makes that dealerships have to offer. Volkswagen`s ``da-da-da`` campaign achieved exactly that among young buyers. The brand was perceived as being cool, inclusive and reliable, which was relevant for the audience that Volkswagen wanted to appeal to. Consequently, the results jumped off the chart.

As such, branding is more than just a promise of what the product or service will provide. It is a dialog between two trading groups who need to communicate effectively in a highly noisy environment.

In truth, this dialog is not always as romantic and dramatic as the verses between Romeo and Juliet. Particularly in the mass market—i.e., basically, most of the consumer products—the voice of the customer is too often heard through the distorting filters of market research, sales force feedback, and complaint letters. In turn, the brand communicates with the artificial warmth of a retail environment, a product, or an ad campaign. In sum, there is little of the face-to-face interaction that makes us human.

Some marketing communication is nonetheless creative enough to touch the heart. Some stores, for instance, have managed to become weekend destinations, like Ikea, Barnes & Noble, or Toys `R` Us.

For marketers and customers, the advantage of communicating through brands is its efficiency. Rather than being a cold definition, as in the fictional dictionary mentioned earlier, the brand embodies an entire story, complete with functional and emotional considerations. People who buy Lacoste jerseys, for example, will frequently share the same anecdote: Their younger children wear the jerseys that have become too small for their big brothers. There is no need for long explanations and justifications; it is luxury that does not wear out or go out of fashion. Even in crowded department stores, Lacoste`s message will therefore be heard, conveying what it stands for with no more than a crocodile display.

The importance of brands and branding is growing because the complexity of our lives has grown. There was a time when people sat, over a hot drink, with the village mechanics to discuss the merit of this or that engine design. Not only would we not take the time to do so anymore, but neighborhood mechanics barely understand how modern cars run. Therefore, we have come to trust—and sometimes distrust—brands.

We can debate at length the kind of society we want. Some will look with nostalgia at the community of trusted shopkeepers and craftsmen of yesteryear. Others will concentrate on the broader choice and lower prices that mass retail has brought. But we should not shoot summarily at branding as the illness of our changing society. It is only the messenger.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#5 Posted by hamidm2 on October 20, 2004 9:34:33 pm
what is this nonsense ? ........ did mbz isphahani write this in an unusual fit of relative sanity ?
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#4 Posted by KamranS on October 20, 2004 6:34:08 pm
in essence, we are all brandname whores! :P
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#3 Posted by M.B.Z.Isphahani on October 20, 2004 12:34:11 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#2 Posted by kaurasach on October 20, 2004 12:34:11 pm
=== Interact Filtered ===
view this users filtered interacts
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content
#1 Posted by Urstruly on October 20, 2004 11:38:18 am

not so bad.
reply to this interact write a new interact add to favorites flag objectionable content

Interact Index

    #14 snail
    #13 nasah
    #12 DRUMZ
    #11 DoubleC
    #10 tintingem
    #9 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #8 Nass
    #7 Nadia_Zehra
    #6 JagDeCat
    #5 hamidm2
    #4 KamranS
    #3 M.B.Z.Isphahani
    #2 kaurasach
    #1 Urstruly

Also by farheen zehra

  • I, Consumer
  • Lines, Sections, Boxes and Circles
  • Schumi No More!
more »

Similar Articles

  • The Lament of Master Yoda Shandana Minhas
  • The Iftaar Party Scene A Ali
  • Brand Worshipper farheen zehra
  • Know Your Enemy Shandana Minhas
  • Bravo! Nadeem F Paracha
more »

US Elections 2008 Primaries

  • Hillary Clinton a Better Presidential Candidate
  • Leaders, Heroes and Mountains
  • Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and New American Dreams
  • Pakistan Elections 2008 - An analysis
  • Political Issues Ahead of Pakistan Elections
more »
get rss feed Get Chowk RSS Feed

Get Chowk Newsletter

Latest Interacts

  • pinku: #123 Posted by ElectricSheep... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
  • ahmedmadani: Re: # 9 Good... Three Cups of Tea
  • MeiraJ08: yes, Morni my city... The Cry of Karachi
  • morni: If any one can... The Cry of Karachi
  • tahmed32: Tea for you, Masadi... Three Cups of Tea
  • tahmed32: yawn...so,how was your weekend,... The Republican Red Scare
  • peonofthewest: see how pathetic you... Three Cups of Tea
  • altar: I am going to... The Heart of Starkness:

THEMES

  • Pakistan's Struggle for Democracy
  • The Indian Story
  • Indo-Pak Relations
  • Personal Narratives
  • Religion Today
  • War on Terror
  • Role of Media
  • Call for Social Change
  • Hold Them Accountable
  • Environment and Us
  • Way of Life
more »

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • ‘Dustbin of history’ or ‘history of sorts’
  • Terrorism Accused: Is Legal Aid Justified?
  • Rape Survivor Families Struggle Against Odds
  • Love at Shara Zawia
  • Better Times
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • There is Still Time
  • Sound Invasion - - Pakistan invades India!!
  • Afghanistan: The Next War
  • A Letter to the Prime Minister of Pakistan
  • The Woman

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited