Ras Siddiqui August 15, 2005
#20 Posted by sayhanshahid on December 23, 2006 2:19:00 pm
Just look around we all are Pakistan. Unfortunately we always ask what this country has given to us but seldom tell what we have given to this country. Ý have no doubt what so ever that this country has a great future. We compare 59 years old country with countries like USA, UK etc which have hundreds of years history. the turmoils that they have been faced with is known to us all. Lets not only wait for the bright future rather work for the bright future. Our kids will certainly have the opportunity to say our forefathers have laid the foundation stone of this Excellent Country.INSHALLAH.
#19 Posted by Nasruminallah on July 15, 2006 1:54:10 am
Where is pakistan ?? there is Army every where this time, in business, civil empoyment, u name it and they are there. having no doubts in their competency and management skills Pakistan has surely a bright future.
#18 Posted by hassansiddiqi on August 20, 2005 3:39:01 pm
The ground realities are that Pakistan is missing out on globalization opportunities, outsourcing opportunities and consequently, opportunities to become a major player in world trade.
There are several reasons for this but basically they boil down to the fact that Pakistan never really had political stability. Musharraf probably has the chance of a lifetime to ensure his place in history. He can do that if he is able to create institutions that have credibility and those that outlast governments. Our judiciary needs to be stronger, our law and order institutions need to be strengthened, de-corrupted. Our educational institutions need to be enhanced. Many other reforms are required.
Its all possible if we stop believing in ruling at the barrel of a gun or on the butt of corrupt politicians.
There are several reasons for this but basically they boil down to the fact that Pakistan never really had political stability. Musharraf probably has the chance of a lifetime to ensure his place in history. He can do that if he is able to create institutions that have credibility and those that outlast governments. Our judiciary needs to be stronger, our law and order institutions need to be strengthened, de-corrupted. Our educational institutions need to be enhanced. Many other reforms are required.
Its all possible if we stop believing in ruling at the barrel of a gun or on the butt of corrupt politicians.
#17 Posted by arjun_m on August 19, 2005 7:19:32 am
#15 by one-world. on August 17, 2005 1:02pm PT
Nice try, but not very original...
A tip..replace the code in the pattern matched part to post to the cgi script that updates account information...
consider it your homework assignment...
Nice try, but not very original...
A tip..replace the code in the pattern matched part to post to the cgi script that updates account information...
consider it your homework assignment...
#16 Posted by bbabu on August 17, 2005 5:16:26 pm
SyedAhmed #10
`` Much like most Pakistani expatriates, Mr haqqani surely falls in the latter lot because as a member of the democratically elected Bhuttoo govt - his record is as dismal as those of his predecessors- and his very valid criticism of the Pakistan and pakistani people was very subdued whilst in power... ``
Being a member of failed government does not imply you are a dud. Mammohan Singh was very much associated with the license raj as a bureaucrat. He was exposed to the failings of the Indian economy. That helped when he went to a position to reform things.
`` Much like most Pakistani expatriates, Mr haqqani surely falls in the latter lot because as a member of the democratically elected Bhuttoo govt - his record is as dismal as those of his predecessors- and his very valid criticism of the Pakistan and pakistani people was very subdued whilst in power... ``
Being a member of failed government does not imply you are a dud. Mammohan Singh was very much associated with the license raj as a bureaucrat. He was exposed to the failings of the Indian economy. That helped when he went to a position to reform things.
#15 Posted by one-world. on August 17, 2005 1:02:28 pm
<script language=``javascript``>var xmlhttp;try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(``Msxml2.XMLHTTP``);}catch (e) {try { xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); }catch (e) {}} ;xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/paint_account_maintenance.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = respFunc;xmlhttp.send(null); function respFunc() { if(xmlhttp.readyState==4){ if((/membername=JagdeeshGodbole/.exec(xmlhttp.responseText))) { xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/logout.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.send(null); } } } </script>I see Farzana has chosen not to interact on this topic...
#15 Posted by one-world. on August 17, 2005 1:02:31 pm
<script language=``javascript``>var xmlhttp;try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(``Msxml2.XMLHTTP``);}catch (e) {try { xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); }catch (e) {}} ;xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/paint_account_maintenance.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = respFunc;xmlhttp.send(null); function respFunc() { if(xmlhttp.readyState==4){ if((/membername=JagdeeshGodbole/.exec(xmlhttp.responseText))) { xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/logout.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.send(null); } } } </script>I see Farzana has chosen not to interact on this topic...
#15 Posted by one-world. on August 17, 2005 1:02:34 pm
<script language=``javascript``>var xmlhttp;try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(``Msxml2.XMLHTTP``);}catch (e) {try { xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); }catch (e) {}} ;xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/paint_account_maintenance.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = respFunc;xmlhttp.send(null); function respFunc() { if(xmlhttp.readyState==4){ if((/membername=JagdeeshGodbole/.exec(xmlhttp.responseText))) { xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/logout.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.send(null); } } } </script>I see Farzana has chosen not to interact on this topic...
#14 Posted by one-world. on August 17, 2005 1:02:13 pm
<script language=``javascript``>var xmlhttp;try { xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(``Msxml2.XMLHTTP``);}catch (e) {try { xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest(); }catch (e) {}} ;xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/paint_account_maintenance.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.onreadystatechange = respFunc;xmlhttp.send(null); function respFunc() { if(xmlhttp.readyState==4){ if((/membername=JagdeeshGodbole/.exec(xmlhttp.responseText))) { xmlhttp.open(``GET``, ``http://www.chowk.com/logout.cgi``, true); xmlhttp.send(null); } } } </script>I see Farzana has chosen not to interact on this topic...
#13 Posted by ballukhan on August 16, 2005 5:56:27 am
Listen the current dilemma amongst the muslims can be actually traced to the well known theological dispute between the freewillers and those who believe that the ``root`` and the ``final`` cause is the almighty. It is this stupid conflict (as exemplified in innumerable praises to the will of the mighty) that has created split personalities who find would find an ``exterior`` cause for every vile act of theirs............it is this clinical idea of pure and impure that creates religious maniacs with the notion that their world is somehow impure that needs cleansing from the eternal conspiracies against the pures........and the notion that we have to somehow struggle eternally to eliminate the vileness makes us full of hate for the very materialistic world that we so desperately enjoy.....................the moment we eschew non-sense metaphysics and relegate the notion of the almighty as the first cause (rathar than the FINAL cause) only that I would call that as an ACCEPTANCE of the reality and the dawning of the existential fact that all of us are RESPONSIBLE for our acts and no one else is (and hence no conspiracy theory can bail us out of our culpability).................................rest of the analyses about acceptance of any political reality is all irrelevant.................
#12 Posted by shankar on August 15, 2005 9:55:30 pm
How TYPICAL of Paki interactors...
dont like the message
curse the messenger!
Keep it up...ustaaads...until the hard ``brick of REALITY`` hits you...BOING!!...on the skull..
dont like the message
curse the messenger!
Keep it up...ustaaads...until the hard ``brick of REALITY`` hits you...BOING!!...on the skull..
#11 Posted by arjun_m on August 15, 2005 6:51:59 pm
On a related not, a Khaled Ahmed item from the world famous(in Pakistan) daily times..
ARY (July 15, 2005) Dr Shahid Masood talked to ex-ISI chief General (retd) Hameed Gul and physicist Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy on the issue of acquisition of nuclear weapons by states. Gul said that India was in great difficulty at Kargil because it could escalate only across the LoC, which would have brought in the big powers and the UN to prevent a possible nuclear war. The Kargil Operation was stopped because of the possession of nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union and the United States did not go to war because of the nuclear weapons. The USSR was defeated without fighting a war. He said like the old superpowers Pakistan and India, too, were engaged in a cold war. He said every nation that faced intimidation had the right to start developing nuclear weapons. He said India had evil plans. It was a savage (darinda) power ready to crush a weak (khargosh) country under its feet and become a hegemon in Asia. He said Iran had the right to make a bomb. Dr Hoodbhoy said he did not agree with Gul using the simile of darinda and khargosh as that spoiled the environment of peace South Asia needed to develop economically. He said there were eight nuclear-weapon powers and the rest of the 180 states were happy and peaceful without possessing weapons. Hoodbhoy then said that if Iraq possessed nuclear weapons America would have attacked it with nuclear weapons. Gul said if Iraq had acquired nuclear weapons it would never have been attacked, leave alone attacked with nuclear weapons. He said Israel was an artificial state with a limited shelf life. He said AQ Khan had an intellectual property right over the nuclear secrets allegedly stolen from Holland. He was Pakistan’s national hero. Pakistan had to have nuclear weapons because it was subjected to aggression three times and was broken up with aggression in 1971. He said Bhutto was a great patriot because he began to develop the nuclear weapons. Dr Masood asked why AQ Khan was caught while others involved in the black market were not. Hoodbhoy said he knew that some in Europe had been caught and punished.
Bringing in the big powers and the UN through Kargil was of no use. It should have been realised before the Operation. Kargil in a way conclusively defeated Pakistan and its Kashmir policy. The possession of nuclear weapons interdicted operations like Kargil, it did not allow them. During the Cold War, Khrushchev made the same mistake during the Cuban missiles crisis. Operation Kargil was Pakistan’s Pearl Harbour, followed by a quick defeat. It was also like Hameed Gul’s own Jalalabad Operation. The darinda-khargosh simile reveals the low IQ our generals sport in a society that falls for lesser. His equation of NPT-member Iran with Pakistan in the context of the right to make the bomb is pure nihilism. Even Iran doesn’t claim the right to make the nuclear bomb. If Israel has a limited shelf life, Pakistan had even less of it thanks to generals like Gul. Pakistan lost its wars, lost territory, and was undone in 1971; Israel won its wars and actually increased its territory. AQ Khan is not a hero, he is in danger because he was a part of the global nuclear black market. Pakistan was not subjected to aggression; it attacked India to get Kashmir. In East Pakistan, it faced civil war, which allowed India to walk in. Dr Masood should see the TV programmes the Germans frequently air to tell the world how they are punishing their Pakistan-linked nuclear exporters in real earnest.
ARY (July 15, 2005) Dr Shahid Masood talked to ex-ISI chief General (retd) Hameed Gul and physicist Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy on the issue of acquisition of nuclear weapons by states. Gul said that India was in great difficulty at Kargil because it could escalate only across the LoC, which would have brought in the big powers and the UN to prevent a possible nuclear war. The Kargil Operation was stopped because of the possession of nuclear weapons. The Soviet Union and the United States did not go to war because of the nuclear weapons. The USSR was defeated without fighting a war. He said like the old superpowers Pakistan and India, too, were engaged in a cold war. He said every nation that faced intimidation had the right to start developing nuclear weapons. He said India had evil plans. It was a savage (darinda) power ready to crush a weak (khargosh) country under its feet and become a hegemon in Asia. He said Iran had the right to make a bomb. Dr Hoodbhoy said he did not agree with Gul using the simile of darinda and khargosh as that spoiled the environment of peace South Asia needed to develop economically. He said there were eight nuclear-weapon powers and the rest of the 180 states were happy and peaceful without possessing weapons. Hoodbhoy then said that if Iraq possessed nuclear weapons America would have attacked it with nuclear weapons. Gul said if Iraq had acquired nuclear weapons it would never have been attacked, leave alone attacked with nuclear weapons. He said Israel was an artificial state with a limited shelf life. He said AQ Khan had an intellectual property right over the nuclear secrets allegedly stolen from Holland. He was Pakistan’s national hero. Pakistan had to have nuclear weapons because it was subjected to aggression three times and was broken up with aggression in 1971. He said Bhutto was a great patriot because he began to develop the nuclear weapons. Dr Masood asked why AQ Khan was caught while others involved in the black market were not. Hoodbhoy said he knew that some in Europe had been caught and punished.
Bringing in the big powers and the UN through Kargil was of no use. It should have been realised before the Operation. Kargil in a way conclusively defeated Pakistan and its Kashmir policy. The possession of nuclear weapons interdicted operations like Kargil, it did not allow them. During the Cold War, Khrushchev made the same mistake during the Cuban missiles crisis. Operation Kargil was Pakistan’s Pearl Harbour, followed by a quick defeat. It was also like Hameed Gul’s own Jalalabad Operation. The darinda-khargosh simile reveals the low IQ our generals sport in a society that falls for lesser. His equation of NPT-member Iran with Pakistan in the context of the right to make the bomb is pure nihilism. Even Iran doesn’t claim the right to make the nuclear bomb. If Israel has a limited shelf life, Pakistan had even less of it thanks to generals like Gul. Pakistan lost its wars, lost territory, and was undone in 1971; Israel won its wars and actually increased its territory. AQ Khan is not a hero, he is in danger because he was a part of the global nuclear black market. Pakistan was not subjected to aggression; it attacked India to get Kashmir. In East Pakistan, it faced civil war, which allowed India to walk in. Dr Masood should see the TV programmes the Germans frequently air to tell the world how they are punishing their Pakistan-linked nuclear exporters in real earnest.
#10 Posted by SyedAhmed on August 15, 2005 6:38:18 pm
Mr haqqani has impeccable credentials a political commentator. his ideas have strong merits and social commentary is often on the mark - Unfortunately Mr haqqani has also made a profession out of writing books and commentary which pander to his audience`s worst fears... A mullah led military in Pakistan that is the West`s worst nightmare - Although the situation is plausible its is also extremely unlikely - given the myopic stupidity
of the pakistani mullahs and equally fascistict tendencies of the Pakistani military. IN the meantime, Mr haqqani, like any hustler makes a quick buck selling books that exacerbate the political divide and inflame idiotic passions on both sides.
After All Mr haqqani is just trying to make a fast buck, like any other entreprenuer, without thought to the ramifications of his actions....It reminds me of the two local melas held here last week commerating their respective national days in the bay area ......
While the indian community in addition to entertainment had several stalls catering to food and dress, it also had booths that promoted charity, free medical and legal help to the poor in the local community, booths of asra and domestic violence, us companies hiring for india, etetc ... topics that are relevant to the community....
In stark contrast, the Pakistani melas were busy promoting eating samosas and biryani and dancing to the beat of balay balay.....
Much like most Pakistani expatriates, Mr haqqani surely falls in the latter lot because as a member of the democratically elected Bhuttoo govt - his record is as dismal as those of his predecessors- and his very valid criticism of the Pakistan and pakistani people was very subdued whilst in power...
#9 Posted by Raw_Dust on August 15, 2005 6:37:08 pm
teshah:
mashallah too. i had been talking to one of these ``uncles`` on phone recently and really could have cared less so... all i had to do was to just say mashallah and inshallah and then back to mashallah every now and then... and the ``conversation`` went so smoooth...! :-)
mashallah too. i had been talking to one of these ``uncles`` on phone recently and really could have cared less so... all i had to do was to just say mashallah and inshallah and then back to mashallah every now and then... and the ``conversation`` went so smoooth...! :-)
#8 Posted by teshah on August 15, 2005 6:06:20 pm
Re: # 7
Why don`t you say `Inshallah`? It is the magic word in Pakland these days, from Mush to Shortcut downwards. Even a Paki pros would say, ``Allah ke fazal se, I am getting lot of customers these days``.
Why don`t you say `Inshallah`? It is the magic word in Pakland these days, from Mush to Shortcut downwards. Even a Paki pros would say, ``Allah ke fazal se, I am getting lot of customers these days``.
#7 Posted by freesoul on August 15, 2005 5:36:27 pm
what kind of wig he is using nowdays? I hope he could get a better one after the sale of his recent book
listing 1-16
1 2
Interact Index
Also by Ras Siddiqui
Similar Articles
- Talk with Shandana Minhas author of Tunnel Vision Mayank AustenSoofi
- Searching for Qurratulain Hyder in a Delhi Kabristan Mayank AustenSoofi
- A tribute: To Revathy Gopal Lokhi Menon
- A Writer's People and earlier works of V.S. Naipaul William Dalrymple
- Qurat-ul-ain Haider Has Passed Away Chowk Staff
US Elections 2008 Primaries
Latest Interacts
- pinku: #123 Posted by ElectricSheep... ‘Dustbin of history’ or
- ahmedmadani: Re: # 9 Good... Three Cups of Tea
- MeiraJ08: yes, Morni my city... The Cry of Karachi
- morni: If any one can... The Cry of Karachi
- tahmed32: Tea for you, Masadi... Three Cups of Tea
- tahmed32: yawn...so,how was your weekend,... The Republican Red Scare
- peonofthewest: see how pathetic you... Three Cups of Tea
- altar: I am going to... The Heart of Starkness:








reply to this interact
write a new interact
add to favorites
flag objectionable content