The Psychology of Mothering
Dr. Sohail, Your affinity for feminism is now explained by your affinity to the two young girls you are looking after. Fathers of girls have this natural affinity for females.
Thats my bit of psychology for you!
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 09:40 am
Re: # 83Dr. Sohail, Your affinity for feminism is now explained by your affinity to the two young girls you are looking after. Fathers of girls have this natural affinity for females.
Thats my bit of psychology for you!
The Psychology of Mothering
Please do believe anyone if they tell you the feminism exists only in the west. Far from it! Thousands of males are now in jail due to biased laws in India today!
www.498a.org
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 09:38 am
Re: # 76Please do believe anyone if they tell you the feminism exists only in the west. Far from it! Thousands of males are now in jail due to biased laws in India today!
www.498a.org
The Psychology of Mothering
In America, men are forced to pay around 40% of their income to ex-wives, regardless of wrongdoing on the woman's parts (often called "no-fault" alimony). She could commit adultery and beat her husband or kids, and none of it will influence the court's decision.
More shockingly still, a woman can simply accuse her husband of sexual or physical abuse (or simply express a fear of it) and instantly win a restraining order forcing him away from his home and children, without so much as a hearing. In fact, most divorce lawyers will advise a woman to do this, and those who do not can be sued for legal malpractice.
And once she has the kids, the family court will be loath to enforce visitation rights for the father.
More than 50% of all marriages in the U.S. result in divorce -- men's rights are being increasingly overlooked to the benefit of women. Consider this: statistically, the first person to file for divorce usually wins. While 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, 85 to 90% of custody awards go to the women.
While hard-core feminism has grown by leaps and bounds, 'masculinism' is pretty much unheard off. Feminist magazines, gyms, even buses! To understand why Feminism has developed 'naturally' while 'Masculinism' has not, one needs to understand early society. While the females grouped with other females and cooked and looked after the kids together, the men went out to hunt, competing for food, and learning to mistrust other males.
Why is it women are more eager to break out of the marriage? Is it because of the opportunity it gives her to repair her 'ego'? Or the ample opportunities for 'maintainence' and the usage of law to break her spouse financially? Or simply because in our society, the male does the competitive courting and all she has to do is to lie back and wait for the next idiot to come along?
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 02:15 am
There are many 'male feminists' who think that theirs is the duty to defend extremist feminism. This, however, is unfortunate. Males have always been known for their pampering of females. Witness our very own Taj Mahal. There are, in fact, males who are actually feminists full time, thinking they are morally superior since it is their job to protect the 'weaker' of the species.In America, men are forced to pay around 40% of their income to ex-wives, regardless of wrongdoing on the woman's parts (often called "no-fault" alimony). She could commit adultery and beat her husband or kids, and none of it will influence the court's decision.
More shockingly still, a woman can simply accuse her husband of sexual or physical abuse (or simply express a fear of it) and instantly win a restraining order forcing him away from his home and children, without so much as a hearing. In fact, most divorce lawyers will advise a woman to do this, and those who do not can be sued for legal malpractice.
And once she has the kids, the family court will be loath to enforce visitation rights for the father.
More than 50% of all marriages in the U.S. result in divorce -- men's rights are being increasingly overlooked to the benefit of women. Consider this: statistically, the first person to file for divorce usually wins. While 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, 85 to 90% of custody awards go to the women.
While hard-core feminism has grown by leaps and bounds, 'masculinism' is pretty much unheard off. Feminist magazines, gyms, even buses! To understand why Feminism has developed 'naturally' while 'Masculinism' has not, one needs to understand early society. While the females grouped with other females and cooked and looked after the kids together, the men went out to hunt, competing for food, and learning to mistrust other males.
Why is it women are more eager to break out of the marriage? Is it because of the opportunity it gives her to repair her 'ego'? Or the ample opportunities for 'maintainence' and the usage of law to break her spouse financially? Or simply because in our society, the male does the competitive courting and all she has to do is to lie back and wait for the next idiot to come along?
The Psychology of Mothering
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 01:51 am
Dr. Sohail, If I may get personal, do you have sons - or daughters?
The Psychology of Mothering
www.womensinfidelity.com
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 01:47 am
More and more divorces are being caused by high sexual drive by the female these days. Makes you wonder what maintainence is for!www.womensinfidelity.com
Sex Education For the Next Generation
Poor hubby! Now will have to pay 'maintainence' for a mistake by hiw wife!
More and more divorces are being caused by high sexual drive by the female these days. Makes you wonder what maintainence is for!
www.womensinfidelity.com
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 01:42 am
Re: # 362Poor hubby! Now will have to pay 'maintainence' for a mistake by hiw wife!
More and more divorces are being caused by high sexual drive by the female these days. Makes you wonder what maintainence is for!
www.womensinfidelity.com
The Psychology of Mothering
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 01:42 am
www.womensinfidelity.com
The Psychology of Mothering
Posted by
parthaab
Apr 16, 2008 01:41 am
www.498a.org
Is Decline of the Fourth-Estate Here and Happening?
Alimony is as bad as dowry-giving. Alimony is to divorce what dowry is to marriage. Alimony is an invitation to divorce.
In this scenario, the world - wide attention of females drooling at the fantastic sums of money extorted from Mr. McCartney of the UK is harmful to marriages worldwide.
http://www.petitiononline.com/alimony/petition.html
Please sign this petition, protesting the UK courts decision and in support of our brothers in the UK. It takes only 2 minutes.
Kindly make this a success by getting as many signatures as possible. We will submit the petition to the British Commissions in India.
Posted by
parthaab
Mar 18, 2008 07:42 pm
Alimony is as bad as dowry-giving. Alimony is to divorce what dowry is to marriage. Alimony is an invitation to divorce.
In this scenario, the world - wide attention of females drooling at the fantastic sums of money extorted from Mr. McCartney of the UK is harmful to marriages worldwide.
http://www.petitiononline.com/alimony/petition.html
Please sign this petition, protesting the UK courts decision and in support of our brothers in the UK. It takes only 2 minutes.
Kindly make this a success by getting as many signatures as possible. We will submit the petition to the British Commissions in India.
Is Decline of the Fourth-Estate Here and Happening?
Females are growing up through generations of pampering, and still expecting to be pampered as a ‘higher caste’ even in this day of empowerment, infidelity, and high divorce rates. This 'Womens Day' rose is not all perfume, but is laced with poison meant for you.
Already, we have draconian laws by which females can get their spouses and their families arrested. This, even though females in fact Prefer living alone and getting divorced - as seen in the 70%-female-initiated divorce in ‘no-fault-divorce US states’ - and inspite of CDC findings that domestic violence is EQUAL among both males and females.
And to top it all, the law requires that the male remain ‘indebted’ to her even after divorce, by paying ‘maintenance’! This, is inspite of a 40% and rising, divorce rate - encouraged by feminists who do not like women in the family being treated ‘equally’. While dowry should ideally not be a form of inheritance, minister Renuka has made ‘anti-dowry’ laws, making males easy prey for feminists wanting divorce. Thus at divorce too, females get ‘revenge’ by getting their males arrested and harassing them with unjust and lopsided laws.
These extremist feminists in the guise of demanding ‘equal’ opportunities, seek to destroy equality. Many males do justify their demands due to negative media male-stereotyping. But this sympathy is misplaced and is being misused by feminists. Complacency and inaction can destroy you, your sons and their sons too.
The government is already thinking of bringing legislation to reserve 33% seats for females. For just being a female! Already, they are preferred in jobs. 80% of all newly created jobs in the EU since 2000 AD, were given to females! And in our country, females have higher tax slabs, and even enjoy discounts for Rail travel, though the employment in BPOs is only 37% for males! Just for being female!
Males need to group together now; otherwise they must expect to be run all over by females. What should you do?
Please sign the petition http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Join male-rights clubs in your neighbourhood
Raise your voice by writing to the media and your politicians, and talk to your other male friends
Posted by
parthaab
Mar 8, 2008 07:05 am
All Males, Arise and Awake!Females are growing up through generations of pampering, and still expecting to be pampered as a ‘higher caste’ even in this day of empowerment, infidelity, and high divorce rates. This 'Womens Day' rose is not all perfume, but is laced with poison meant for you.
Already, we have draconian laws by which females can get their spouses and their families arrested. This, even though females in fact Prefer living alone and getting divorced - as seen in the 70%-female-initiated divorce in ‘no-fault-divorce US states’ - and inspite of CDC findings that domestic violence is EQUAL among both males and females.
And to top it all, the law requires that the male remain ‘indebted’ to her even after divorce, by paying ‘maintenance’! This, is inspite of a 40% and rising, divorce rate - encouraged by feminists who do not like women in the family being treated ‘equally’. While dowry should ideally not be a form of inheritance, minister Renuka has made ‘anti-dowry’ laws, making males easy prey for feminists wanting divorce. Thus at divorce too, females get ‘revenge’ by getting their males arrested and harassing them with unjust and lopsided laws.
These extremist feminists in the guise of demanding ‘equal’ opportunities, seek to destroy equality. Many males do justify their demands due to negative media male-stereotyping. But this sympathy is misplaced and is being misused by feminists. Complacency and inaction can destroy you, your sons and their sons too.
The government is already thinking of bringing legislation to reserve 33% seats for females. For just being a female! Already, they are preferred in jobs. 80% of all newly created jobs in the EU since 2000 AD, were given to females! And in our country, females have higher tax slabs, and even enjoy discounts for Rail travel, though the employment in BPOs is only 37% for males! Just for being female!
Males need to group together now; otherwise they must expect to be run all over by females. What should you do?
Please sign the petition http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Join male-rights clubs in your neighbourhood
Raise your voice by writing to the media and your politicians, and talk to your other male friends
The Naval War College Bomb Blasts
Females are growing up through generations of pampering, and still expecting to be pampered as a ‘higher caste’ even in this day of empowerment, infidelity, and high divorce rates. This 'Womens Day' rose is not all perfume, but is laced with poison meant for you.
Already, we have draconian laws by which females can get their spouses and their families arrested. This, even though females in fact Prefer living alone and getting divorced - as seen in the 70%-female-initiated divorce in ‘no-fault-divorce US states’ - and inspite of CDC findings that domestic violence is EQUAL among both males and females.
And to top it all, the law requires that the male remain ‘indebted’ to her even after divorce, by paying ‘maintenance’! This, is inspite of a 40% and rising, divorce rate - encouraged by feminists who do not like women in the family being treated ‘equally’. While dowry should ideally not be a form of inheritance, minister Renuka has made ‘anti-dowry’ laws, making males easy prey for feminists wanting divorce. Thus at divorce too, females get ‘revenge’ by getting their males arrested and harassing them with unjust and lopsided laws.
These extremist feminists in the guise of demanding ‘equal’ opportunities, seek to destroy equality. Many males do justify their demands due to negative media male-stereotyping. But this sympathy is misplaced and is being misused by feminists. Complacency and inaction can destroy you, your sons and their sons too.
The government is already thinking of bringing legislation to reserve 33% seats for females. For just being a female! Already, they are preferred in jobs. 80% of all newly created jobs in the EU since 2000 AD, were given to females! And in our country, females have higher tax slabs, and even enjoy discounts for Rail travel, though the employment in BPOs is only 37% for males! Just for being female!
Males need to group together now; otherwise they must expect to be run all over by females. What should you do?
Please sign the petition http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Join male-rights clubs in your neighbourhood
Raise your voice by writing to the media and your politicians, and talk to your other male friends.
Posted by
parthaab
Mar 7, 2008 08:45 pm
MALES, ARISE AND AWAKE!Females are growing up through generations of pampering, and still expecting to be pampered as a ‘higher caste’ even in this day of empowerment, infidelity, and high divorce rates. This 'Womens Day' rose is not all perfume, but is laced with poison meant for you.
Already, we have draconian laws by which females can get their spouses and their families arrested. This, even though females in fact Prefer living alone and getting divorced - as seen in the 70%-female-initiated divorce in ‘no-fault-divorce US states’ - and inspite of CDC findings that domestic violence is EQUAL among both males and females.
And to top it all, the law requires that the male remain ‘indebted’ to her even after divorce, by paying ‘maintenance’! This, is inspite of a 40% and rising, divorce rate - encouraged by feminists who do not like women in the family being treated ‘equally’. While dowry should ideally not be a form of inheritance, minister Renuka has made ‘anti-dowry’ laws, making males easy prey for feminists wanting divorce. Thus at divorce too, females get ‘revenge’ by getting their males arrested and harassing them with unjust and lopsided laws.
These extremist feminists in the guise of demanding ‘equal’ opportunities, seek to destroy equality. Many males do justify their demands due to negative media male-stereotyping. But this sympathy is misplaced and is being misused by feminists. Complacency and inaction can destroy you, your sons and their sons too.
The government is already thinking of bringing legislation to reserve 33% seats for females. For just being a female! Already, they are preferred in jobs. 80% of all newly created jobs in the EU since 2000 AD, were given to females! And in our country, females have higher tax slabs, and even enjoy discounts for Rail travel, though the employment in BPOs is only 37% for males! Just for being female!
Males need to group together now; otherwise they must expect to be run all over by females. What should you do?
Please sign the petition http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Join male-rights clubs in your neighbourhood
Raise your voice by writing to the media and your politicians, and talk to your other male friends.
Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
Enhanced tax slabs for females is not in consonance with the fact that more females ( 63% ) appointed in BPOs are females. 80% of the appointees to all jobs in the EU since 2000 are female! On top of the difficulty in finding a job in the 21st century, the male uses the money for the family, unlike the female whose income is 'additional'.
There is now 50% discount for females above 60 on trains! Are they all somehow disabled in some sort of way by being a female? Do old males somehow have to have 'more' disability to qualify as 'equal to a just-as-old female'? Internationally, males die younger too. And I have nt heard of absurd measures like these internationally.
That Renuka discussed the budget with the Finance Minister before its finalisation, while other cabinet colleagues could not, only shows the 'woman' power that she wields ( probably encouraged by Sonia, herself a feminist ), in the Union Cabinet.
This comes on top of the Congressi feminist laws against Indian sons-in-law!
While all Indian parties are competing for female votes, the ones to suffer their loss of dignity, all in the guise of 'equality', will be males.
Males need to be aware of this casteism in the making. Unless they group together for their own sake, they can expect to be run all over.
Posted by
parthaab
Mar 1, 2008 06:08 pm
The key thing that becomes obvious in this budget, is the Emergence of the 'anti- male' in Indian Politics Enhanced tax slabs for females is not in consonance with the fact that more females ( 63% ) appointed in BPOs are females. 80% of the appointees to all jobs in the EU since 2000 are female! On top of the difficulty in finding a job in the 21st century, the male uses the money for the family, unlike the female whose income is 'additional'.
There is now 50% discount for females above 60 on trains! Are they all somehow disabled in some sort of way by being a female? Do old males somehow have to have 'more' disability to qualify as 'equal to a just-as-old female'? Internationally, males die younger too. And I have nt heard of absurd measures like these internationally.
That Renuka discussed the budget with the Finance Minister before its finalisation, while other cabinet colleagues could not, only shows the 'woman' power that she wields ( probably encouraged by Sonia, herself a feminist ), in the Union Cabinet.
This comes on top of the Congressi feminist laws against Indian sons-in-law!
While all Indian parties are competing for female votes, the ones to suffer their loss of dignity, all in the guise of 'equality', will be males.
Males need to be aware of this casteism in the making. Unless they group together for their own sake, they can expect to be run all over.
Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
hurricane
It is highly suggestive and ridiculous to say that it is only feminists who are promoting 'peace'. Why do you think all other points of view are not worthy?
This attitude has a lot in common with suppression, and inability to understand, anti-religious views.
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 28, 2008 11:27 pm
Re: # 27, hurricane
It is highly suggestive and ridiculous to say that it is only feminists who are promoting 'peace'. Why do you think all other points of view are not worthy?
This attitude has a lot in common with suppression, and inability to understand, anti-religious views.
Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
Dear Dr sahib,
As a psychologist, I have read your articles and found many of them readable. I would wish you would stick to the subject of your specialisation, since your opinions there would be weighty. Unfortunately, your subject is one of specialisation and cannot be generalised to society. That would be intruding into the sphere of a sociologist.
There are many 'male feminists' who think that theirs is the duty to defend extremist feminism. This, however, is unfortunate. Males have always been known for their pampering of females. Witness our very own Taj Mahal. There are, in fact, males who are actually feminists full time, thinking they are morally superior since it is their job to protect the 'weaker' of the species.
In America, men are forced to pay around 40% of their income to ex-wives, regardless of wrongdoing on the woman's parts (often called "no-fault" alimony). She could commit adultery and beat her husband or kids, and none of it will influence the court's decision.
More shockingly still, a woman can simply accuse her husband of sexual or physical abuse (or simply express a fear of it) and instantly win a restraining order forcing him away from his home and children, without so much as a hearing. In fact, most divorce lawyers will advise a woman to do this, and those who do not can be sued for legal malpractice.
And once she has the kids, the family court will be loath to enforce visitation rights for the father.
More than 50% of all marriages in the U.S. result in divorce -- men's rights are being increasingly overlooked to the benefit of women. Consider this: statistically, the first person to file for divorce usually wins. While 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, 85 to 90% of custody awards go to the women.
While hard-core feminism has grown by leaps and bounds, 'masculinism' is pretty much unheard off. Feminist magazines, gyms, even buses! To understand why Feminism has developed 'naturally' while 'Masculinism' has not, one needs to understand early society. While the females grouped with other females and cooked and looked after the kids together, the men went out to hunt, competing for food, and learning to mistrust other males.
Why is it women are more eager to break out of the marriage? Is it because of the opportunity it gives her to repair her 'ego'? Or the ample opportunities for 'maintainence' and the usage of law to break her spouse financially? Or simply because in our society, the male does the competitive courting and all she has to do is to lie back and wait for the next one to come along?
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 28, 2008 06:14 pm
Re: # 17Dear Dr sahib,
As a psychologist, I have read your articles and found many of them readable. I would wish you would stick to the subject of your specialisation, since your opinions there would be weighty. Unfortunately, your subject is one of specialisation and cannot be generalised to society. That would be intruding into the sphere of a sociologist.
There are many 'male feminists' who think that theirs is the duty to defend extremist feminism. This, however, is unfortunate. Males have always been known for their pampering of females. Witness our very own Taj Mahal. There are, in fact, males who are actually feminists full time, thinking they are morally superior since it is their job to protect the 'weaker' of the species.
In America, men are forced to pay around 40% of their income to ex-wives, regardless of wrongdoing on the woman's parts (often called "no-fault" alimony). She could commit adultery and beat her husband or kids, and none of it will influence the court's decision.
More shockingly still, a woman can simply accuse her husband of sexual or physical abuse (or simply express a fear of it) and instantly win a restraining order forcing him away from his home and children, without so much as a hearing. In fact, most divorce lawyers will advise a woman to do this, and those who do not can be sued for legal malpractice.
And once she has the kids, the family court will be loath to enforce visitation rights for the father.
More than 50% of all marriages in the U.S. result in divorce -- men's rights are being increasingly overlooked to the benefit of women. Consider this: statistically, the first person to file for divorce usually wins. While 70% of all divorces are initiated by women, 85 to 90% of custody awards go to the women.
While hard-core feminism has grown by leaps and bounds, 'masculinism' is pretty much unheard off. Feminist magazines, gyms, even buses! To understand why Feminism has developed 'naturally' while 'Masculinism' has not, one needs to understand early society. While the females grouped with other females and cooked and looked after the kids together, the men went out to hunt, competing for food, and learning to mistrust other males.
Why is it women are more eager to break out of the marriage? Is it because of the opportunity it gives her to repair her 'ego'? Or the ample opportunities for 'maintainence' and the usage of law to break her spouse financially? Or simply because in our society, the male does the competitive courting and all she has to do is to lie back and wait for the next one to come along?
Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
That feminist scoundrel, minister Renuka is at it again!
She has always been anti-MALE (!) in her views and has made her obnoxious views against son-in-laws' in the country pretty obvious to all with anti-son-in-law laws. She now wants to punish male clients instead of female prostitutes.
So now, females who provoke males into having sex are no more at fault. While males who give in to sexual desires will 'pay' with jail! Meaning more police and judicial harassment.
To these extremists, females provoking males to have sex is 'natural', and males accepting such advances is 'unnatural'!
While professional prostitutes and pimps will go scotfree, those who belong to society, doing other respectable jobs will be punished, only because of their gender.
Will smugglers, drug peddlers and VCD manufacturers go scot free, now on, while buyers of their products will be punished?
This feminist-vadi government has gone way too far in its anti-MALE ideology and needs to stop NOW!
http://wordpress.com/tag/renuka-chaudhary/
http://feminazisofindia.wo rdpress.com/2007/09/18/renuka-chowdhury-the-champion-of-cat-fights/
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 28, 2008 07:34 am
That feminist scoundrel, minister Renuka is at it again!
She has always been anti-MALE (!) in her views and has made her obnoxious views against son-in-laws' in the country pretty obvious to all with anti-son-in-law laws. She now wants to punish male clients instead of female prostitutes.
So now, females who provoke males into having sex are no more at fault. While males who give in to sexual desires will 'pay' with jail! Meaning more police and judicial harassment.
To these extremists, females provoking males to have sex is 'natural', and males accepting such advances is 'unnatural'!
While professional prostitutes and pimps will go scotfree, those who belong to society, doing other respectable jobs will be punished, only because of their gender.
Will smugglers, drug peddlers and VCD manufacturers go scot free, now on, while buyers of their products will be punished?
This feminist-vadi government has gone way too far in its anti-MALE ideology and needs to stop NOW!
http://wordpress.com/tag/renuka-chaudhary/
http://feminazisofindia.wo rdpress.com/2007/09/18/renuka-chowdhury-the-champion-of-cat-fights/
Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
When a person who has NOT committed any crime, begins to fear punishment under the provisions of a law, it is not a law anymore - it is state sponsored terrorism. www.498a.org
Violence against females is overreported. A CDC study showed that women were the perpetrators in 70% of nonreciprocal violence. Women are also just as likely to initiate reciprocal violence.
It is the portrayal of males on media such as TV serials, that has led to stereotyping of males as dirty, double speaking, double crossing, money and sex hungry beasts, that has led to such over-hyped respectability for womens 'movements' in India.
Womens 'lib' is one thing. But outright OBLITERATING mens rights through gender-biased laws is totally another.
While the first is all very well and gels with the natural hysteria and female inferiority complex, the other is about a scumbag, minister Renuka, victimising all males to avenge for her OWN divorce as well as her daughters.
Asking for equal rights for males is NOT the same as asking that females be DENIED their rights.
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 28, 2008 06:34 am
When a person who has NOT committed any crime, begins to fear punishment under the provisions of a law, it is not a law anymore - it is state sponsored terrorism. www.498a.org
Violence against females is overreported. A CDC study showed that women were the perpetrators in 70% of nonreciprocal violence. Women are also just as likely to initiate reciprocal violence.
It is the portrayal of males on media such as TV serials, that has led to stereotyping of males as dirty, double speaking, double crossing, money and sex hungry beasts, that has led to such over-hyped respectability for womens 'movements' in India.
Womens 'lib' is one thing. But outright OBLITERATING mens rights through gender-biased laws is totally another.
While the first is all very well and gels with the natural hysteria and female inferiority complex, the other is about a scumbag, minister Renuka, victimising all males to avenge for her OWN divorce as well as her daughters.
Asking for equal rights for males is NOT the same as asking that females be DENIED their rights.
- parthaab
- Interacts: 533
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 697
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Nov 12 2002
- Last signin: Oct 10 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


