Men\'s Liberation...Better Late Than Never
It reminds me of Jaws, where the innocent play on the shallow waters, not realising the dangers the lurks closeby. Indian males are oblivious to the dangers of 'life after lust'.
Males have always been known for their pampering of females. Witness our very own Taj Mahal. There are, in fact, males who are actually feminists full time, thinking they are morally superior since it is their job to protect the 'weaker' of the species.
In those days, the female got lighter work at home, while the male slogged it out throughout the day to protect his 'family'. And household 'chores' that feminists scream about, were not comparitively as 'hard' as what they appear to be today. Todays feminist ego today will not even let her allow a male to say he 'looks after' his family!
These days however, when BPO jobs have become the easier work, it is still the females who get preference there. If you are at an interview and the interviewer is male, it is the female who gets preference. God save you even if it is a female interviewer! Either way you are screwed! Nothing has changed, you might say. The males still do the dangerous physical, non-rewarding jobs - like guarding the frontlines.
What has changed however, is that, with females getting more opportunities, they are walking out of marriages, as seen in the no-fault divorce states in the USA where 73% of divorces are female-initiated, even without any financial incentive! Blaming, like is their second nature, their spouses. And scorned scumbags like minister Renuka are seeing to it that young males get abused legally too. Feminism is not the cause, but certainly a catalyst to the increasing divorce rates. Financial incentives in the form of 'maintainence' makes you think that it is a MIRACLE that females want to stay within marriages if at all - as a status symbol, you might say!
Indian males are not immune from how feminism is, and will, change society. Getting laid is NO big deal. And so is divorce. Not that marriage is an ideal solution. It was invented by religion and tradition and may die a natural death. But what revolts is the leverage that females seek to have at divorce. It is only when the law hits innocent people like you that you will wake up to the realities.
However, with stats such as these : divorce rates set to touch 40% ( current Mumbai levels ) at LEAST ( meaning 40% of females leading unattached, but 'maintained' lives ) and with 63% BPO employees working late night shifts being FEMALES ( Vs 37% males ), feminist hysteria is soon set to become a major force to reckon with for males.
Hence awareness of feminism, and a little more organisation among males will help.
Those who are convinced, please sign the petition.
http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Those who are still not convinced however, may ponder over the timeless poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) ... " First they came for the Jews..."
www.498a.org
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 28, 2008 06:28 am
The Indian male still thinks of sex in terms of romance and lust. He is still in the days of Dharmendra, while the female has moved on to higher 'standards' and western 'styles'.It reminds me of Jaws, where the innocent play on the shallow waters, not realising the dangers the lurks closeby. Indian males are oblivious to the dangers of 'life after lust'.
Males have always been known for their pampering of females. Witness our very own Taj Mahal. There are, in fact, males who are actually feminists full time, thinking they are morally superior since it is their job to protect the 'weaker' of the species.
In those days, the female got lighter work at home, while the male slogged it out throughout the day to protect his 'family'. And household 'chores' that feminists scream about, were not comparitively as 'hard' as what they appear to be today. Todays feminist ego today will not even let her allow a male to say he 'looks after' his family!
These days however, when BPO jobs have become the easier work, it is still the females who get preference there. If you are at an interview and the interviewer is male, it is the female who gets preference. God save you even if it is a female interviewer! Either way you are screwed! Nothing has changed, you might say. The males still do the dangerous physical, non-rewarding jobs - like guarding the frontlines.
What has changed however, is that, with females getting more opportunities, they are walking out of marriages, as seen in the no-fault divorce states in the USA where 73% of divorces are female-initiated, even without any financial incentive! Blaming, like is their second nature, their spouses. And scorned scumbags like minister Renuka are seeing to it that young males get abused legally too. Feminism is not the cause, but certainly a catalyst to the increasing divorce rates. Financial incentives in the form of 'maintainence' makes you think that it is a MIRACLE that females want to stay within marriages if at all - as a status symbol, you might say!
Indian males are not immune from how feminism is, and will, change society. Getting laid is NO big deal. And so is divorce. Not that marriage is an ideal solution. It was invented by religion and tradition and may die a natural death. But what revolts is the leverage that females seek to have at divorce. It is only when the law hits innocent people like you that you will wake up to the realities.
However, with stats such as these : divorce rates set to touch 40% ( current Mumbai levels ) at LEAST ( meaning 40% of females leading unattached, but 'maintained' lives ) and with 63% BPO employees working late night shifts being FEMALES ( Vs 37% males ), feminist hysteria is soon set to become a major force to reckon with for males.
Hence awareness of feminism, and a little more organisation among males will help.
Those who are convinced, please sign the petition.
http://www.petitiononline.com/dowry/petition.html
Those who are still not convinced however, may ponder over the timeless poem by Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892-1984) ... " First they came for the Jews..."
www.498a.org
Between Sanity and Insanity
Mercifully, it is not so complicated.
Ban Religion! And Celebrate Life!
It is as simple as that!
Posted by
parthaab
Feb 25, 2008 11:46 pm
Mercifully, it is not so complicated.
Ban Religion! And Celebrate Life!
It is as simple as that!
Search for Origins of Mahayana Buddhism
RELIGION!
Edmund Burke : All it needs for evil to succeed is for the good to remain silent.
Posted by
parthaab
Dec 5, 2007 09:54 pm
RELIGION!
Edmund Burke : All it needs for evil to succeed is for the good to remain silent.
Can Religious Leaders Redeem the Future of the World?
BAN BRAINWASHING!
CELEBRATE TRUTH!
Posted by
parthaab
Oct 15, 2007 09:19 pm
BAN BRAINWASHING!
CELEBRATE TRUTH!
Rise of Hindu Right Wing Ideology
BAN RELIGION!
CELEBRATE LIFE!
Posted by
parthaab
Aug 18, 2007 06:41 am
BAN RELIGION!
CELEBRATE LIFE!
Preventing More Lal Masjids
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 12, 2007 12:04 am
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
Preventing More Lal Masjids
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 12, 2007 12:03 am
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
Preventing More Lal Masjids
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 11, 2007 07:07 pm
BAN RELIGION!
Its too dangerous!
( I have said that before, and I ll say that again ... and again... )
What Lies Beneath: Dispatch from the Frontlines of the Burqa Brigades
If religion were just a private club for loonies and the misguided and those being taken advantage of, carrying on its practices behind closed doors with its incense and its candles and its dressing up and its peculiar rituals and its collections, that would be okay, more or less.
But it isn`t just a private club. It has taken custody of ``good``. Religion claims the right to determine what is good, and what is bad/evil, and it appropriates unto itself the right to tell the rest of us what to think and how to think on various subjects, and what `being bad` is.
Look at our youngsters. Children are the most easily influenced and that is why most religions target children to ingrain their blind beliefs, which become hard to erase later in life.
Religion is dangerous.
To claim to speak with authority on behalf of a `god` on various subjects when the reality seems to be that they are just making it up on the back of an old envelope on a whim and they grab any old text and claim that text is the word of a god is fundamentally dishonest.
If religion can`t say, hand on heart, ``this is definitely what a god thinks, he told us so``, then they should shut up and stop making it up.
We are put in this club or that (Muslim, Christian, Protestant, Church of the Yellow Rabbit) before we can think for ourselves. There, often, we tend to stay, even once we can think for ourselves. The music may be rather nice. The social gatherings may be rather nice. What being religious (and therefore righteous?) says about us may be rather nice. Too nice to leave, whatever we believe.
One has to distinguish between (a) being in a particular club (a matter of social convenience and status) and (b) believing what the club pretends to believe (an entirely different issue).
At a guess, probably most members of any particular religion don`t actually believe what the religion pretends to believe, but that isn`t a bar to attendance or membership. The more the merrier. So the farce that religion is, continues.
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 7, 2007 10:37 pm
If religion were just a private club for loonies and the misguided and those being taken advantage of, carrying on its practices behind closed doors with its incense and its candles and its dressing up and its peculiar rituals and its collections, that would be okay, more or less.
But it isn`t just a private club. It has taken custody of ``good``. Religion claims the right to determine what is good, and what is bad/evil, and it appropriates unto itself the right to tell the rest of us what to think and how to think on various subjects, and what `being bad` is.
Look at our youngsters. Children are the most easily influenced and that is why most religions target children to ingrain their blind beliefs, which become hard to erase later in life.
Religion is dangerous.
To claim to speak with authority on behalf of a `god` on various subjects when the reality seems to be that they are just making it up on the back of an old envelope on a whim and they grab any old text and claim that text is the word of a god is fundamentally dishonest.
If religion can`t say, hand on heart, ``this is definitely what a god thinks, he told us so``, then they should shut up and stop making it up.
We are put in this club or that (Muslim, Christian, Protestant, Church of the Yellow Rabbit) before we can think for ourselves. There, often, we tend to stay, even once we can think for ourselves. The music may be rather nice. The social gatherings may be rather nice. What being religious (and therefore righteous?) says about us may be rather nice. Too nice to leave, whatever we believe.
One has to distinguish between (a) being in a particular club (a matter of social convenience and status) and (b) believing what the club pretends to believe (an entirely different issue).
At a guess, probably most members of any particular religion don`t actually believe what the religion pretends to believe, but that isn`t a bar to attendance or membership. The more the merrier. So the farce that religion is, continues.
Whence Then is Evil?
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning. Not only youngsters, but now educated people are willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense and superstition called religion.
We should recognise religious brainwashing in madrasas, which must be investigated by Indian intelligence agencies and destroyed with an iron hand NOW!
If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh, christian or hindu, THIS IS IT! It is high time we banned religion.
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable offence with immediate effect.
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 6, 2007 06:00 pm
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning. Not only youngsters, but now educated people are willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense and superstition called religion.
We should recognise religious brainwashing in madrasas, which must be investigated by Indian intelligence agencies and destroyed with an iron hand NOW!
If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh, christian or hindu, THIS IS IT! It is high time we banned religion.
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable offence with immediate effect.
Whence Then is Evil?
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning. Not only youngsters, but now
educated people are willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense
and superstition called religion.
We should recognise religious brainwashing in madrasas, which must be
investigated by Indian intelligence agencies and destroyed with an
iron hand NOW!
If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh,
christian or hindu, THIS IS IT! It is high time we banned religion.
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable
offence with immediate effect.
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 6, 2007 07:14 am
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning. Not only youngsters, but now
educated people are willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense
and superstition called religion.
We should recognise religious brainwashing in madrasas, which must be
investigated by Indian intelligence agencies and destroyed with an
iron hand NOW!
If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh,
christian or hindu, THIS IS IT! It is high time we banned religion.
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable
offence with immediate effect.
Whence Then is Evil?
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning with doctors turning religious fanatics. Not just youngsters, but educated people are now willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense and superstition called religion.
It is high time we recognised the need to ban religion. If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh, christian or Hindu, this is it!
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable offence with immediate effect.
http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20070703&fname=raman&sid=2
Posted by
parthaab
Jul 4, 2007 02:53 pm
Brainwashing has taken a new meaning with doctors turning religious fanatics. Not just youngsters, but educated people are now willing to be brainwashed and `educated` in nonsense and superstition called religion.
It is high time we recognised the need to ban religion. If ever there was a blaring call to ban religion - muslim, jew, sikh, christian or Hindu, this is it!
Religious brainwashing of youngsters should be made a punishable offence with immediate effect.
http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20070703&fname=raman&sid=2
Fake Killings: People as Trophies
Thanks for bringing up the Rajan case once more.
Rajans murder by the police was as horrendous, abhorent and revolting as Soharabuddins or Kausar Bis. The similarities however, end there.
The Gujarat police, were carrying out a `supari` killing, with the full intention to give the murder communal overtones. Political capital was thus sought to be derived from the `encounter` itself. Also, there has been fairly elaborate build-up to Sohrabuddins murder, while in Rajans case, like in Kausar Bis, the muder was in haste and fairly hurried through, with the customary cover-up.
Through Sohrabuddins `encounter`, political mileage was demanded by the states Chief Minister. Words fail me to describe both the killings.
Posted by
parthaab
May 16, 2007 10:26 pm
Re: # 125Thanks for bringing up the Rajan case once more.
Rajans murder by the police was as horrendous, abhorent and revolting as Soharabuddins or Kausar Bis. The similarities however, end there.
The Gujarat police, were carrying out a `supari` killing, with the full intention to give the murder communal overtones. Political capital was thus sought to be derived from the `encounter` itself. Also, there has been fairly elaborate build-up to Sohrabuddins murder, while in Rajans case, like in Kausar Bis, the muder was in haste and fairly hurried through, with the customary cover-up.
Through Sohrabuddins `encounter`, political mileage was demanded by the states Chief Minister. Words fail me to describe both the killings.
Fake Killings: People as Trophies
Nila,
<< However the answer to the above is DEFINITELY NOT a swift two week investigation by Tehelka. Please. >>
Agreed one hundred percent. It does nt need a tehelka really to establish that corruption really exists in India. We all know it. And yet, we need journalists like tehelka to establish what we all know.
Corruption in the police for supari killings were not unknown to Gujaratis. Gujaratis dint need a tehelka investigation to know that people went missing after being taken from their homes by the state police. And yet, the mainstream media would nt talk about it, until Vanzara.
Tehelkas reports in the past two weeks are shocking the conscience of the nation.
http://tehelka.com/
Posted by
parthaab
May 13, 2007 06:54 pm
Re: # 120Nila,
<< However the answer to the above is DEFINITELY NOT a swift two week investigation by Tehelka. Please. >>
Agreed one hundred percent. It does nt need a tehelka really to establish that corruption really exists in India. We all know it. And yet, we need journalists like tehelka to establish what we all know.
Corruption in the police for supari killings were not unknown to Gujaratis. Gujaratis dint need a tehelka investigation to know that people went missing after being taken from their homes by the state police. And yet, the mainstream media would nt talk about it, until Vanzara.
Tehelkas reports in the past two weeks are shocking the conscience of the nation.
http://tehelka.com/
Fake Killings: People as Trophies
BREAKING NEWS :
MODIS HAND IN FAKE KILLING
The story is shocking but it is true. It is sordid, but then it is the grisly truth. In Gujarat — in Narendra Modi’s Gujarat, to be precise — it can get worse than Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Kausar Bi. A swift, two-week Tehelka investigation conclusively proves that the cold-blooded killing of Sohrabuddin and his wife was no aberration and that, in fact, there are more Sohrabuddins. The investigation also proves that the infamous encounter cop DG Vanzara was no loose cannon — in the business of fake kills for the lure of money — but had a powerful lobby of backers. Backers who Tehelka discovered went right up to the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO).
On October 1, 2002, incidentally observed as anti-terrorist day by the BJP, the Crime Branch of the Ahmedabad Police announced that they had arrested a Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist called Sameer Khan. Khan was a small-time criminal wanted for the alleged murder of a police constable and had been absconding since 1996. Vanzara, who was then DCP Crime, said that they had arrested Khan from outside ST bus stand on the afternoon of September 27. For the next four days, however, the police kept him in unlawful custody, violating the legal provision of producing an accused in court within 24 hours of arrest. On the night of September 30, the Crime Branch finally showed Khan as arrested under a newly-registered FIR. What is shocking is that the police chose not to arrest him under the already existing FIR, filed for the constable’s murder, but waited four days before they registered a new FIR spun around a conspiracy alleged to have been hatched by the ISI and Jaish-e-Mohammed to assassinate Modi, Togadia and Advani.
The police also claimed to have recovered some e-mails received by Sameer from Pakistan, instructing him to assassinate BJP leaders. They claimed that there were seven more old cases against Sameer but never gave the details as to what these cases were. The fact is that the police could reveal details of just one case of a constable’s murder, and in that too Sameer could never be tried. After spending 14 days in police remand, Sameer was sent to judicial custody on October 14. On October 21, the Crime Branch moved an application for a transfer warrant in court. The police said they wanted to interrogate Sameer in the constable murder case. Sahrista Khan, Sameer’s cousin who was also made a co-accused in the Modi conspiracy, told Tehelka that Sameer had told him during judicial custody that Crime Branch officers were threatening to kill him.
Yes, in Modi’s official chamber, fake encounters are called desh bhakti. In the CMO, confidential, official letters marked ‘Top Secret’ — issued from the desk of the officiating Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad — are manipulated. Original letters are replaced and pressure is brought to bear on top cops. The subversion is masterminded not by some low-level clerk but at the level of the CM’s principal secretary. Simply put, it means this: fake encounters have official sanction.
Posted by
parthaab
May 13, 2007 07:39 am
www.tehelka.comBREAKING NEWS :
MODIS HAND IN FAKE KILLING
The story is shocking but it is true. It is sordid, but then it is the grisly truth. In Gujarat — in Narendra Modi’s Gujarat, to be precise — it can get worse than Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Kausar Bi. A swift, two-week Tehelka investigation conclusively proves that the cold-blooded killing of Sohrabuddin and his wife was no aberration and that, in fact, there are more Sohrabuddins. The investigation also proves that the infamous encounter cop DG Vanzara was no loose cannon — in the business of fake kills for the lure of money — but had a powerful lobby of backers. Backers who Tehelka discovered went right up to the Chief Minister’s Office (CMO).
On October 1, 2002, incidentally observed as anti-terrorist day by the BJP, the Crime Branch of the Ahmedabad Police announced that they had arrested a Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist called Sameer Khan. Khan was a small-time criminal wanted for the alleged murder of a police constable and had been absconding since 1996. Vanzara, who was then DCP Crime, said that they had arrested Khan from outside ST bus stand on the afternoon of September 27. For the next four days, however, the police kept him in unlawful custody, violating the legal provision of producing an accused in court within 24 hours of arrest. On the night of September 30, the Crime Branch finally showed Khan as arrested under a newly-registered FIR. What is shocking is that the police chose not to arrest him under the already existing FIR, filed for the constable’s murder, but waited four days before they registered a new FIR spun around a conspiracy alleged to have been hatched by the ISI and Jaish-e-Mohammed to assassinate Modi, Togadia and Advani.
The police also claimed to have recovered some e-mails received by Sameer from Pakistan, instructing him to assassinate BJP leaders. They claimed that there were seven more old cases against Sameer but never gave the details as to what these cases were. The fact is that the police could reveal details of just one case of a constable’s murder, and in that too Sameer could never be tried. After spending 14 days in police remand, Sameer was sent to judicial custody on October 14. On October 21, the Crime Branch moved an application for a transfer warrant in court. The police said they wanted to interrogate Sameer in the constable murder case. Sahrista Khan, Sameer’s cousin who was also made a co-accused in the Modi conspiracy, told Tehelka that Sameer had told him during judicial custody that Crime Branch officers were threatening to kill him.
Yes, in Modi’s official chamber, fake encounters are called desh bhakti. In the CMO, confidential, official letters marked ‘Top Secret’ — issued from the desk of the officiating Commissioner of Police, Ahmedabad — are manipulated. Original letters are replaced and pressure is brought to bear on top cops. The subversion is masterminded not by some low-level clerk but at the level of the CM’s principal secretary. Simply put, it means this: fake encounters have official sanction.
Fake Killings: People as Trophies
Re: # 98
Extra judicial killings provide the extreme example where outsiders trample with the law and order machinery.
It is the extension of the common man`s ignorance of law, just as that of the politician`s, coupled with the arrogance and criminal mentality of those weilding poer and position.
The ultimate culprits are of course the investigative agencies who cannot prove a crime beyond doubt, and the judiciary which delays handing out justice to the point of it being denied.
Even ordinay law abiding citizens are forced to take law into their hands, made all the more fashionable by the filmy heroes.
For starters I think we need to develop a situation where no politician can put forth his theory as to how something happened till it is finalised in court. Where the press is asked to speak to concerned officials and not politicians as to the why and how of things.
Some how we have to increase the credibilty of investigative ``Banerjees``, who have come out with fantastic theories of Tornados overturning whole trains into rivers on a relatively quiet July afternoon. >>
I agree fully. Its unfortunate that the world we live in, is not ideal.
Posted by
parthaab
May 13, 2007 02:38 am
#114 by nila Re: # 98
Extra judicial killings provide the extreme example where outsiders trample with the law and order machinery.
It is the extension of the common man`s ignorance of law, just as that of the politician`s, coupled with the arrogance and criminal mentality of those weilding poer and position.
The ultimate culprits are of course the investigative agencies who cannot prove a crime beyond doubt, and the judiciary which delays handing out justice to the point of it being denied.
Even ordinay law abiding citizens are forced to take law into their hands, made all the more fashionable by the filmy heroes.
For starters I think we need to develop a situation where no politician can put forth his theory as to how something happened till it is finalised in court. Where the press is asked to speak to concerned officials and not politicians as to the why and how of things.
Some how we have to increase the credibilty of investigative ``Banerjees``, who have come out with fantastic theories of Tornados overturning whole trains into rivers on a relatively quiet July afternoon. >>
I agree fully. Its unfortunate that the world we live in, is not ideal.
- parthaab
- Interacts: 533
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 704
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Nov 12 2002
- Last signin: Oct 10 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


