Angelic Saint of Calcutta
Posted by
Warlus
May 30, 2004 03:24 pm
gujjubania you are a piss talker. That`s all I have to say here.
Graffiti Christ II: The Resurrection
Nass, what do you mean he should not have another breakdown? As I see it NFP is always suffering from a breakdown ...
No offence but I seriously think he gets his flashes of brilliance evrytime he`s having a mental meltdown, am I right Paracha? BTW thought both titles were a blast dude. So the Paracha theatre of the absured goes on ....
Posted by
Warlus
May 30, 2004 03:24 pm
This was Wicked. Nass, what do you mean he should not have another breakdown? As I see it NFP is always suffering from a breakdown ...
No offence but I seriously think he gets his flashes of brilliance evrytime he`s having a mental meltdown, am I right Paracha? BTW thought both titles were a blast dude. So the Paracha theatre of the absured goes on ....
The Importance of NADRA’s Swipe-able ID Card
Posted by
Warlus
May 15, 2004 07:06 am
nadya is this such a big issue that you had to write a whole article on it? Trivial stuff this is. Sorry.
The Prophecies of Nosydamanus
Posted by
Warlus
Apr 30, 2004 07:34 am
Dhamka Paracha! That`s what you should be called, dude. This was that typically hilarious and bizzare NFP piece. Loved it all.
Untitled
Posted by
Warlus
Apr 10, 2004 11:07 am
My, my, yet another Paracha article generating a vicious battle between the Reds and the Greens. I`m sure he enjoys it very much. Btw, great article Mr. Paracha and the Pop Quiz was pretty hilarious too. More wanted.
Standing in the Fields
Posted by
Warlus
Apr 10, 2004 11:07 am
Bina I sure wish you be writing more articles than poems, but good effort nonetheless.
The Cloning of Father Ramzan
Posted by
Warlus
Apr 10, 2004 11:07 am
Nice, nice. An entertaining read indeed.
Graffiti Christ
Posted by
Warlus
Feb 24, 2004 06:34 am
Theatre Of The Absured, that`s the word! Thanks nooralain. Harold Pintr style stuff. So far youre`s been the best critique of this piece.
Graffiti Christ
Posted by
Warlus
Feb 24, 2004 12:15 am
Agree with you bobo. This piece`s bizzarness and madness has a purpose, no matter how peverted.
The Third Pasture
Reminds me of that old Simon & garfunkel song, ``Still crazy after all these years.`` Or should I say, ``Still angery after all these years?`` 34 years old and still raging your wars against the ``powers that be.`` Agree with yellow3, impressive.
Posted by
Warlus
Feb 8, 2004 12:16 pm
NFPReminds me of that old Simon & garfunkel song, ``Still crazy after all these years.`` Or should I say, ``Still angery after all these years?`` 34 years old and still raging your wars against the ``powers that be.`` Agree with yellow3, impressive.
Snarl!
Warlus:
commies, athiests, unmuslimish, and foreignish are no longer significant. You guys have fallen through the cracks. You are no more--except in marginalised & ghettoised publications.
Sweeping statement. Sounds like a jihadi speech, echo. Anyways, what`s so wrong about marginalised and ghettoised(??) publications? Such publications have played huge roles in many major social & political revolutions. We rather not choose to be in magasized publications like GQ, Cosmo, Time and, of course, Pakistan`s sensationalist jiadi rag, Ummat. These you can enjoy.
btw, chowk`s anything but marginalised. We are here aren`t we? And your fave communist/anarchist/ahtiest/et al seems to be one of its few leading writers. What say...dude?
Posted by
Warlus
Jan 14, 2004 01:21 pm
#85 by echoboom on January 14, 2004 10:16am PTWarlus:
commies, athiests, unmuslimish, and foreignish are no longer significant. You guys have fallen through the cracks. You are no more--except in marginalised & ghettoised publications.
Sweeping statement. Sounds like a jihadi speech, echo. Anyways, what`s so wrong about marginalised and ghettoised(??) publications? Such publications have played huge roles in many major social & political revolutions. We rather not choose to be in magasized publications like GQ, Cosmo, Time and, of course, Pakistan`s sensationalist jiadi rag, Ummat. These you can enjoy.
btw, chowk`s anything but marginalised. We are here aren`t we? And your fave communist/anarchist/ahtiest/et al seems to be one of its few leading writers. What say...dude?
Snarl!
echoboom
Good rethoric, dude. Hollow nonetheless. You are NOT holier than us. So cut down on the attitude. I`m still using reason with you, hoping you will not ridicule yourself again.
Posted by
Warlus
Jan 14, 2004 07:27 am
#81echoboom
Good rethoric, dude. Hollow nonetheless. You are NOT holier than us. So cut down on the attitude. I`m still using reason with you, hoping you will not ridicule yourself again.
What is the Matrix?
Posted by
Warlus
Jan 12, 2004 11:08 am
this is actually quite wonderful. Seems like the fundos and the capies are really geting it bad here at chowk.
Snarl!
The scarf and other relegious attire is sceduled to be baned in all state and government institutions as well. But I guess paracha is happy they are being baned in schools is because schools have very impressionable and easly convinced minds.
ahmedzai
saris? The mullahs would love baning that! :-)
Ralph
Shut up, already.
Posted by
Warlus
Jan 12, 2004 11:08 am
#60 digitThe scarf and other relegious attire is sceduled to be baned in all state and government institutions as well. But I guess paracha is happy they are being baned in schools is because schools have very impressionable and easly convinced minds.
ahmedzai
saris? The mullahs would love baning that! :-)
Ralph
Shut up, already.
Snarl!
Are you suggesting that the mullahs are right in saying that ``it`s a crusade?`` And the person asking the with-us-or-against-us question is no secularist. He`s no better than a born-again Christian. However, the person disagreeing with him and baning the hijab, cross and all in school IS a secularist. That`s all.
Posted by
Warlus
Jan 10, 2004 11:58 am
Urstruly#32Are you suggesting that the mullahs are right in saying that ``it`s a crusade?`` And the person asking the with-us-or-against-us question is no secularist. He`s no better than a born-again Christian. However, the person disagreeing with him and baning the hijab, cross and all in school IS a secularist. That`s all.
- Warlus
- Interacts: 43
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 1728
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 22 2003
- Last signin: Dec 15 2004
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


