Musharraf the Out-smarter
In Jafri’s perverted world:
Prostitution is just a trade. The only minor difference is that it is all about trade of human flesh.
Pimping is a business like any other. There is one buyer one seller one middle man what is wrong about it. No compulsion, just a triangular deal.
Paedophilia is nothing but a deviating hobby. It is for the well being of kids one undertakes such activities.
Incest is just a non-conventional and practical way of showing affection to your children and sibling.
Rape is aggressive and kinky sex, gang-rape of a woman trick to get Canadian visa.
Rape and gang-rape of country = enlightened moderation.
For Jafri treason is smartness, cheating and fraud are patriotism. In his world deception is pragmatism and corruption is asset management.
For the sake of honesty, I readily admit that the above-mentioned is equally true for most of power holders in our part of world.
Sher Afgans, Malik Qayyums, Chaudry (Amir, Shujaat) Hussians, Khalid Ranjhas, Javed Hamids, Kamal Shahs, Nadeem Tajs, Hameed Dogars, all of them are colleagues of Jafris of Pakistan.
So I wonder can one argue/debate people like him. Can someone convince Musharraf and his 400 thieves that solely for his personal gains and private interests he is literally putting the entire nation on fire. Due to the whims one person and his cohorts the very survival of the nation is on stake. And there comes Jafri bragging about smartness.
May Allah Almighty Save Pakistan.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Sep 26, 2007 12:40 am
In Jafri’s perverted world:
Prostitution is just a trade. The only minor difference is that it is all about trade of human flesh.
Pimping is a business like any other. There is one buyer one seller one middle man what is wrong about it. No compulsion, just a triangular deal.
Paedophilia is nothing but a deviating hobby. It is for the well being of kids one undertakes such activities.
Incest is just a non-conventional and practical way of showing affection to your children and sibling.
Rape is aggressive and kinky sex, gang-rape of a woman trick to get Canadian visa.
Rape and gang-rape of country = enlightened moderation.
For Jafri treason is smartness, cheating and fraud are patriotism. In his world deception is pragmatism and corruption is asset management.
For the sake of honesty, I readily admit that the above-mentioned is equally true for most of power holders in our part of world.
Sher Afgans, Malik Qayyums, Chaudry (Amir, Shujaat) Hussians, Khalid Ranjhas, Javed Hamids, Kamal Shahs, Nadeem Tajs, Hameed Dogars, all of them are colleagues of Jafris of Pakistan.
So I wonder can one argue/debate people like him. Can someone convince Musharraf and his 400 thieves that solely for his personal gains and private interests he is literally putting the entire nation on fire. Due to the whims one person and his cohorts the very survival of the nation is on stake. And there comes Jafri bragging about smartness.
May Allah Almighty Save Pakistan.
60 Years of American DogHood
I am a Punjabi myself and I can ensure you that it is Punjabis that see least of all things in ethnic prism. Unfortunately, it is people like Altaf who do business on dead bodies, language and ethnicity.
Tell me who was ZAB? I think not a Punjabi.
Who was Jinnan, not a Punjabi, I think? Who is BB? Who is Liaqat Ali Khan? Except Nawaz Sharif when was a Punjabi at the helm of affairs? Did Punjab come out for a Punjabi CJ?
Most important of all, did Punjab not distribute mithai on the arriva of Mush?
The simple fact is that Mush is taking the country for ride now, Punjabis non-Punjabis alike. He is interested only and only his perpetuation. He would sell his (yours and my) daughter, his (yours and my) mother for that no matter they are Mohajir or Punjabi. Remember yours and my sons and brothers, he has already been selling in open market.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Aug 15, 2007 02:27 am
IB I am impressed by your observation … had Musharraf been judged by ethnicity he would have not gone, he would have been a dead man long time back. I am a Punjabi myself and I can ensure you that it is Punjabis that see least of all things in ethnic prism. Unfortunately, it is people like Altaf who do business on dead bodies, language and ethnicity.
Tell me who was ZAB? I think not a Punjabi.
Who was Jinnan, not a Punjabi, I think? Who is BB? Who is Liaqat Ali Khan? Except Nawaz Sharif when was a Punjabi at the helm of affairs? Did Punjab come out for a Punjabi CJ?
Most important of all, did Punjab not distribute mithai on the arriva of Mush?
The simple fact is that Mush is taking the country for ride now, Punjabis non-Punjabis alike. He is interested only and only his perpetuation. He would sell his (yours and my) daughter, his (yours and my) mother for that no matter they are Mohajir or Punjabi. Remember yours and my sons and brothers, he has already been selling in open market.
Pak Armed Forces vs. Pakistan
Earlier in the year, the Human Rights Commission was given only limited access to the Kohlu area, which is at the heart of the current insurgency, and its findings disclose not only a chilling list of disappearances, but also a catalogue of deaths, described as a result of “indiscriminate bombing and strafing” by 20 Cobra helicopter gunships and four squadrons of fighter planes, including F-16 fighter jets, resulting in 215 civilian dead and hundreds more wounded, many of them women and children. ***
Balochistan after Bugti
By Sherry Rehman
http://www.dawn.com/2006/09/09/ed.htm#4
Posted by
H-Ikram
Sep 9, 2006 03:17 pm
*** According to US intelligence sources, more than six Pakistani army brigades, plus paramilitary forces totalling some 25,000 men, have been battling Baloch Liberation Army guerillas in the Kohlu mountains and the surrounding areas.Earlier in the year, the Human Rights Commission was given only limited access to the Kohlu area, which is at the heart of the current insurgency, and its findings disclose not only a chilling list of disappearances, but also a catalogue of deaths, described as a result of “indiscriminate bombing and strafing” by 20 Cobra helicopter gunships and four squadrons of fighter planes, including F-16 fighter jets, resulting in 215 civilian dead and hundreds more wounded, many of them women and children. ***
Balochistan after Bugti
By Sherry Rehman
http://www.dawn.com/2006/09/09/ed.htm#4
Pak Fauj ke NaPak Generals
Great.
I would have rather opted: NaPak Fauj ke NaPak Generals. No harm in saying the truth. Keep up the good work.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Aug 11, 2006 02:12 am
I love the title. Great.
I would have rather opted: NaPak Fauj ke NaPak Generals. No harm in saying the truth. Keep up the good work.
Pak Armed Forces vs. Pakistan
*****************************
<
According to Dr. Buttar, Mr. Shah started by defending the president`s record on women`s rights. But then, alluding to a planned visit by Mukhtar to New York, he added: ``We can do anything. ... We can just pay a little money to some black guys in New York and get people killed there.`` >>
Courage in Pakistan
A Heroine Walking in the Shadow of Death
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: April 4, 2006
******************************
I have never understood that why we Pakistanis who are so fond of waging Jihad all over the Earth never have the courage to crush ba$tards like Ijaz Shah in our own courtyard. I think it would be the highest form of Jihad to hang him along with every single member of his kutta family at Minar-e-Pakistan. Imagine such despicable filthy pigs are close buddies of our commando general and imagine that people like this son of b itch can get to the rank of brigadier in Pak army.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Apr 6, 2006 01:57 am
*****************************
<
Courage in Pakistan
A Heroine Walking in the Shadow of Death
By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
Published: April 4, 2006
******************************
I have never understood that why we Pakistanis who are so fond of waging Jihad all over the Earth never have the courage to crush ba$tards like Ijaz Shah in our own courtyard. I think it would be the highest form of Jihad to hang him along with every single member of his kutta family at Minar-e-Pakistan. Imagine such despicable filthy pigs are close buddies of our commando general and imagine that people like this son of b itch can get to the rank of brigadier in Pak army.
Rape of another Kind
... Is this the way (by getting raped) Musharraf`s family members have got citizenships in the North America. Musharraf`s comments must be representing his family experiences.
There is a lesson for the people trying to defend these filthy creatures that our generals are more disgusting than a common man`s imagination. It is only ignorance, lack of information or deep personal interests that make one parrot praise songs for the military.
What a disgusting military high command we have, it is truly incredible.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Sep 18, 2005 11:43 pm
People are saying, asking and wondering ... ... Is this the way (by getting raped) Musharraf`s family members have got citizenships in the North America. Musharraf`s comments must be representing his family experiences.
There is a lesson for the people trying to defend these filthy creatures that our generals are more disgusting than a common man`s imagination. It is only ignorance, lack of information or deep personal interests that make one parrot praise songs for the military.
What a disgusting military high command we have, it is truly incredible.
Dereliction of Duty
Margaret Thatcher is rumoured to have said that she is the only man in her Cabinet.
I have no problems in admitting that Nighat Yasmeen is one of the very few men left in Pakistan.
It is really disgusting to see all the bloody paper tiger generals being urinated on by the Mush and none of them have the courage to squeak let alone stand up and slap him back.
What a nasty lot we have got.
Well, to be fair ? their predecessors were not any better either.
If one has to choose between Cancer and AIDS, or Mush and Zia, I am sure not many will think twice while opting for Mush.
And if it took 11 years for our generals to finally put mangoes in the *** of that pig then the current lot might be excused.
After all many of them started their careers in the atmosphere created by Zia where everything decent was strictly banned.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Apr 14, 2005 05:10 am
Margaret Thatcher is rumoured to have said that she is the only man in her Cabinet.
I have no problems in admitting that Nighat Yasmeen is one of the very few men left in Pakistan.
It is really disgusting to see all the bloody paper tiger generals being urinated on by the Mush and none of them have the courage to squeak let alone stand up and slap him back.
What a nasty lot we have got.
Well, to be fair ? their predecessors were not any better either.
If one has to choose between Cancer and AIDS, or Mush and Zia, I am sure not many will think twice while opting for Mush.
And if it took 11 years for our generals to finally put mangoes in the *** of that pig then the current lot might be excused.
After all many of them started their careers in the atmosphere created by Zia where everything decent was strictly banned.
Neither Enlightened nor Moderate
AoA!
The writer talks about doing cost-benefit analysis of the current messianic tenure.
Here underneath I post one part of it.
Then, to the interlocutors who demanded a counter list of invisible positive features of the democratic dispensation before putting up one such list for the moderate enlightenment, I would like to say:
Dear brothers, we all already know very well the real worth of civilians in general and politicians in particular. This lesson has been forced into both our conscious and sub-conscious for last 40 years through our 9 holes. Its time to put the record straight vis a vis generals.
Exactly like Saddam Hussein vs. USA. We know that Saddam Hussein always had his torture cells. What the USA never admitted before nor want to confess now is that even the U.S. too have its many Abu Ghraibs, custodial deaths etc.
Can you see the difference? Are you getting my point? Those sitting on high pedestals must come up with a slightly better standard.
Please, make up your mind … are we comparing thieves with thieves, kuttas with kuttas (politicians vs. generals) OR is it a match between robbers and saints.
If both are equal than there is nothing to argue about … but please, don’t claim sainthood while pimping. Ok!!??
Musharraf’s 41 foreign visits until 2004 cost over Rs 658m
By Ansar Abbasi
http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/mar2005-daily/22-03-2005/metro/i8.htm
ISLAMABAD: President Gen Musharraf has undertaken 41 official visits abroad, touring at least 71 countries since June 2000 till December 2004. This has cost taxpayers more than Rs 658 million.
According to information available with the Foreign Ministry, expectedly, the United States has been the most toured country by the president — Musharraf visited the country nine times during four-and-a-half years. However, there are no details available with regard to the purpose of these visits or objectives achieved.
The information shows that during the last seven months of the year 2000, Musharraf proceeded on six foreign visits, including seven countries. The break-up: Iran and Oman from June 9-12 with a 20-member entourage, costing the national exchequer Rs 6.2m; Saudi Arabia from June 17-19 with an eight-member entourage costing Rs 0.54m; US from September 9-14 with a 23-member party costing Rs 12m; Kazakhstan from November 6-7 with a 20-member entourage costing Rs 6.1m; Qatar from November 11-24 with a 26-member delegation costing Rs 3.3m; United Arab Emirates on December 11 with a seven-member entourage costing Rs 0.4m.
In 2001, Musharraf made eight foreign trips, including 13 countries. The break-up: Jordan, Syria and Lebanon from January 7-10 with a 23-member entourage costing Rs 8.1m; Egypt from February 24-26 with a 24-member party, costing Rs 8.2m; Saudi Arabia from February 28 to March 7 with a 22-member outfit, costing Rs 8.2m; Myanmar and Hanoi from May 1-5 with a 2- member delegation, costing Rs 10.3m; India from July 14-16, with a 31-member entourage, costing Rs 8.5m; US for the UN Summit from September 19-28 with a 25-member entourage (expenditure not shown); United Kingdom, US/France from November 7-12 with a 22-member entourage costing Rs 45m; and visit to China from December 20-24 with 29- member party costing Rs 13.1m.
In 2002, the president paid 12 official visits covering 18 world capitals. These include Nepal from January 3-4 with a 21-member entourage costing the public kitty Rs 35.6m; US from February 9-14 with a 32-member outfit, costing Rs 19.3m; Japan from March 12-15 with a 26-member entourage, costing Rs 25.8m; Afghanistan on April 2 with 26-member delegation costing Rs 34,189; Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco from May 15-21 with a 26-member party (expenditure not shown); Tajikistan and Kazakhstan from June 2-5 with a 3-member delegation, costing Rs 14.2m; UAE and Saudi Arabia from June 10-12 with a 26-member outfit costing Rs 8.6m; Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and China from July 29 to August 2 with a 31- member entourage, costing Rs 26.3m; US from November7-18 with a 21- member party, costing Rs 43.2m; Turkey from October 13-15 with a 20- member delegation, costing Rs 9.7m; Saudi Arabia from October 29-30 with a 22-member outfit, costing Rs 7.8m; and Turkmenistan from December 26-27 with a seven-member delegation (expenditure not shown).
In 2003, Musharraf undertook eight official foreign visits including 15 countries. The break-up: Russian Federation (Moscow) from February 4-6 with a 26-member entourage, costing Rs 21.1m; Malaysia from February20-25 with a 32-member entourage costing Rs 22.7m; Saudi Arabia from June 11-13 with a 23-member party, costing Rs 7.4m; the US, the UK, Germany and France from June 17 to July 4 with 33 members, costing Rs 17.2m; Tunisia, Algeria and Rabat from July 14-19 with 28 members, costing Rs 28.3m; the US and Canada from September 20-25 with 28 members, costing Rs 38.4m; Malaysia to attend OIC Summit from October15-19 with 47 members, costing Rs 33.4m; and China and Korea from November 1-7 with 35 members (expenditure not shown).
Last year, Musharraf proceeded on seven official visits, including 19 countries. The break-up: Turkey and Switzerland from January 19-24 with a 42-member entourage, costing Rs 29.2m; Saudi Arabia from March 6-7with a 33-member party, costing Rs 12.8m; Sweden, Finland, Azerbaijan and Turkey from July 4-12 with a 38-member entourage, costing Rs 31m; US, The Netherlands and Italy from September 19-30 with a 41-member entourage costing Rs 60.7m; UAE on November 3 with a 23- member party costing Rs 5.1m; Afghanistan on November 6 with a 30- member outfit, costing Rs 35,272; and Morocco, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, the UK, France and the US from November 26 to December 9 with a 48- member entourage, costing Rs 30.7m.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Mar 22, 2005 12:34 am
AoA!
The writer talks about doing cost-benefit analysis of the current messianic tenure.
Here underneath I post one part of it.
Then, to the interlocutors who demanded a counter list of invisible positive features of the democratic dispensation before putting up one such list for the moderate enlightenment, I would like to say:
Dear brothers, we all already know very well the real worth of civilians in general and politicians in particular. This lesson has been forced into both our conscious and sub-conscious for last 40 years through our 9 holes. Its time to put the record straight vis a vis generals.
Exactly like Saddam Hussein vs. USA. We know that Saddam Hussein always had his torture cells. What the USA never admitted before nor want to confess now is that even the U.S. too have its many Abu Ghraibs, custodial deaths etc.
Can you see the difference? Are you getting my point? Those sitting on high pedestals must come up with a slightly better standard.
Please, make up your mind … are we comparing thieves with thieves, kuttas with kuttas (politicians vs. generals) OR is it a match between robbers and saints.
If both are equal than there is nothing to argue about … but please, don’t claim sainthood while pimping. Ok!!??
Musharraf’s 41 foreign visits until 2004 cost over Rs 658m
By Ansar Abbasi
http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/mar2005-daily/22-03-2005/metro/i8.htm
ISLAMABAD: President Gen Musharraf has undertaken 41 official visits abroad, touring at least 71 countries since June 2000 till December 2004. This has cost taxpayers more than Rs 658 million.
According to information available with the Foreign Ministry, expectedly, the United States has been the most toured country by the president — Musharraf visited the country nine times during four-and-a-half years. However, there are no details available with regard to the purpose of these visits or objectives achieved.
The information shows that during the last seven months of the year 2000, Musharraf proceeded on six foreign visits, including seven countries. The break-up: Iran and Oman from June 9-12 with a 20-member entourage, costing the national exchequer Rs 6.2m; Saudi Arabia from June 17-19 with an eight-member entourage costing Rs 0.54m; US from September 9-14 with a 23-member party costing Rs 12m; Kazakhstan from November 6-7 with a 20-member entourage costing Rs 6.1m; Qatar from November 11-24 with a 26-member delegation costing Rs 3.3m; United Arab Emirates on December 11 with a seven-member entourage costing Rs 0.4m.
In 2001, Musharraf made eight foreign trips, including 13 countries. The break-up: Jordan, Syria and Lebanon from January 7-10 with a 23-member entourage costing Rs 8.1m; Egypt from February 24-26 with a 24-member party, costing Rs 8.2m; Saudi Arabia from February 28 to March 7 with a 22-member outfit, costing Rs 8.2m; Myanmar and Hanoi from May 1-5 with a 2- member delegation, costing Rs 10.3m; India from July 14-16, with a 31-member entourage, costing Rs 8.5m; US for the UN Summit from September 19-28 with a 25-member entourage (expenditure not shown); United Kingdom, US/France from November 7-12 with a 22-member entourage costing Rs 45m; and visit to China from December 20-24 with 29- member party costing Rs 13.1m.
In 2002, the president paid 12 official visits covering 18 world capitals. These include Nepal from January 3-4 with a 21-member entourage costing the public kitty Rs 35.6m; US from February 9-14 with a 32-member outfit, costing Rs 19.3m; Japan from March 12-15 with a 26-member entourage, costing Rs 25.8m; Afghanistan on April 2 with 26-member delegation costing Rs 34,189; Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco from May 15-21 with a 26-member party (expenditure not shown); Tajikistan and Kazakhstan from June 2-5 with a 3-member delegation, costing Rs 14.2m; UAE and Saudi Arabia from June 10-12 with a 26-member outfit costing Rs 8.6m; Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and China from July 29 to August 2 with a 31- member entourage, costing Rs 26.3m; US from November7-18 with a 21- member party, costing Rs 43.2m; Turkey from October 13-15 with a 20- member delegation, costing Rs 9.7m; Saudi Arabia from October 29-30 with a 22-member outfit, costing Rs 7.8m; and Turkmenistan from December 26-27 with a seven-member delegation (expenditure not shown).
In 2003, Musharraf undertook eight official foreign visits including 15 countries. The break-up: Russian Federation (Moscow) from February 4-6 with a 26-member entourage, costing Rs 21.1m; Malaysia from February20-25 with a 32-member entourage costing Rs 22.7m; Saudi Arabia from June 11-13 with a 23-member party, costing Rs 7.4m; the US, the UK, Germany and France from June 17 to July 4 with 33 members, costing Rs 17.2m; Tunisia, Algeria and Rabat from July 14-19 with 28 members, costing Rs 28.3m; the US and Canada from September 20-25 with 28 members, costing Rs 38.4m; Malaysia to attend OIC Summit from October15-19 with 47 members, costing Rs 33.4m; and China and Korea from November 1-7 with 35 members (expenditure not shown).
Last year, Musharraf proceeded on seven official visits, including 19 countries. The break-up: Turkey and Switzerland from January 19-24 with a 42-member entourage, costing Rs 29.2m; Saudi Arabia from March 6-7with a 33-member party, costing Rs 12.8m; Sweden, Finland, Azerbaijan and Turkey from July 4-12 with a 38-member entourage, costing Rs 31m; US, The Netherlands and Italy from September 19-30 with a 41-member entourage costing Rs 60.7m; UAE on November 3 with a 23- member party costing Rs 5.1m; Afghanistan on November 6 with a 30- member outfit, costing Rs 35,272; and Morocco, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, the UK, France and the US from November 26 to December 9 with a 48- member entourage, costing Rs 30.7m.
Sui Incident: A PR Disaster
The mishandling of the Sui incident by military authorities was, to use the phrase that Napoleon`s foreign minister Talleyrand is often credited with coining, ``worse than a crime; it was a blunder.``
And it was so casually mishandled because of just one painful fact: for the time being unavailability of viable instruments to take army to task.
I have definitely no love lost for any lousy BLA but one thing they must try to do. Direct their rockets exclusively to generals’ palaces. Attacking and killing poor foot soldiers serve no purpose. These miskeens are as hapless, oppressed and subjugated as rest of 80 % Pakistanis. BLA should target only the exploiting layer: generals, top politicians, and their families. Why killing and maiming each other and ordinary souls.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Mar 17, 2005 10:07 pm
The mishandling of the Sui incident by military authorities was, to use the phrase that Napoleon`s foreign minister Talleyrand is often credited with coining, ``worse than a crime; it was a blunder.``
And it was so casually mishandled because of just one painful fact: for the time being unavailability of viable instruments to take army to task.
I have definitely no love lost for any lousy BLA but one thing they must try to do. Direct their rockets exclusively to generals’ palaces. Attacking and killing poor foot soldiers serve no purpose. These miskeens are as hapless, oppressed and subjugated as rest of 80 % Pakistanis. BLA should target only the exploiting layer: generals, top politicians, and their families. Why killing and maiming each other and ordinary souls.
Chain of Command
I think I have cracked the code and found the ultimate answer. Here comes the solution to Pakistan’s countless problems.
Please, observe.
We have tried both male and female prime ministers representing a wide range of IQ, political colours and inclinations, religious rigidity, professions, ages, anatomical dimensions and social backgrounds, without any success.
We have had land-owning feudal, urban industrialists, leftist intellectuals, lawyers as well as professional politicians as [nominal] head of governments – still nothing remarkable to show. Likewise, neither engineered heavy mandate nor genuine electorate approval could give Pakistan much needed stability.
Similarly, from obsequious non-entities like Jamali to maverick Nawaz Sharif to gentleman Junejo to rudderless Benazir Bhutto, none have thus far succeeded satisfying the concerned quarters and met the same fate.
Where shall we go from here? What options are we left with? What more can be done?
Well, as far as gender is concerned we have yet to try a member of the third sex. And among vocational qualifications the only remaining section left to take this (dis)honour is the upper strata of the military.
Thus, why shouldn’t we try a eunuch this time? Or a serving four-star general? To be on a safe side, and to kill two birds with one stone: why not a eunuch general? The key to salvation seems to lie in trying this last alternative. No other way out.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Jul 25, 2004 07:38 am
Eunuch GeneralI think I have cracked the code and found the ultimate answer. Here comes the solution to Pakistan’s countless problems.
Please, observe.
We have tried both male and female prime ministers representing a wide range of IQ, political colours and inclinations, religious rigidity, professions, ages, anatomical dimensions and social backgrounds, without any success.
We have had land-owning feudal, urban industrialists, leftist intellectuals, lawyers as well as professional politicians as [nominal] head of governments – still nothing remarkable to show. Likewise, neither engineered heavy mandate nor genuine electorate approval could give Pakistan much needed stability.
Similarly, from obsequious non-entities like Jamali to maverick Nawaz Sharif to gentleman Junejo to rudderless Benazir Bhutto, none have thus far succeeded satisfying the concerned quarters and met the same fate.
Where shall we go from here? What options are we left with? What more can be done?
Well, as far as gender is concerned we have yet to try a member of the third sex. And among vocational qualifications the only remaining section left to take this (dis)honour is the upper strata of the military.
Thus, why shouldn’t we try a eunuch this time? Or a serving four-star general? To be on a safe side, and to kill two birds with one stone: why not a eunuch general? The key to salvation seems to lie in trying this last alternative. No other way out.
Open Letter to Prime Minister Jamali
PST 2238 June 27, 2004
The ”Halala” Musharraf is shoving up the arse of the nation (Shujaat taking over for the moment and then Shaukat will replace him in a month or so) will become his biggest mistake yet.
It is just a matter of time that Musharraf will have serious difficulties finding place to drown himself. WCs of the Parliament house too small for him, Restrooms of the GHQ out of bound.
It will be a fun. Hoh, I long to see him running for the cover. By that time Bush too will have gone. Houston with Bilal, wouldn’t be a dream option either.
The only game Na-Pak fauj is good at: Musical chairs. The only political philosophy, the only enlightened moderating vision Army House has is to keep politicians on rotation. Never ever getting anyone strong enough to take the country forward or defy the yoke of military.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Jun 27, 2004 11:19 am
Take my words for it. PST 2238 June 27, 2004
The ”Halala” Musharraf is shoving up the arse of the nation (Shujaat taking over for the moment and then Shaukat will replace him in a month or so) will become his biggest mistake yet.
It is just a matter of time that Musharraf will have serious difficulties finding place to drown himself. WCs of the Parliament house too small for him, Restrooms of the GHQ out of bound.
It will be a fun. Hoh, I long to see him running for the cover. By that time Bush too will have gone. Houston with Bilal, wouldn’t be a dream option either.
The only game Na-Pak fauj is good at: Musical chairs. The only political philosophy, the only enlightened moderating vision Army House has is to keep politicians on rotation. Never ever getting anyone strong enough to take the country forward or defy the yoke of military.
Another Attempt on Musharraf
May I take this opportunity to remind that the in-built countdown in democracy, where foes and friends alike know from the very first day the final date of departure of the incumbent power holders, provided not re-elected in a free and fair elections, is considered an effective life saving security valve by saner folks the world over. When squatters steadfastly refuse to leave gracefully, dislodging them is the only option left. Methods which are not always customer-friendly.
As talking about and/or with kuttas serves no purpose, we should leave the resident kutta of chowk in peace.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Dec 28, 2003 07:25 am
May I take this opportunity to remind that the in-built countdown in democracy, where foes and friends alike know from the very first day the final date of departure of the incumbent power holders, provided not re-elected in a free and fair elections, is considered an effective life saving security valve by saner folks the world over. When squatters steadfastly refuse to leave gracefully, dislodging them is the only option left. Methods which are not always customer-friendly.
As talking about and/or with kuttas serves no purpose, we should leave the resident kutta of chowk in peace.
Another Attempt on Musharraf
Therefore, the high intensity bombs that a short while ago wrecked the bridge near 10-Corps Headquarters just moments after Emperor Musharraf`s motorcade crossed it while on its way to Army House from Chaklala airport was a cowardly act and must be denounced without any reservation.
But, at the same time, one cannot avoid noticing some gross inconsistencies regarding official projection of the first episode, and for that reason needs to be examined closely. The latest one, nonetheless, seems to be quite genuine.
For example:
Officially, five sophisticated devices of a type never before seen in Pakistan were used. Containing half a ton of explosives, bombs ripped a section of the bridge seconds after Musharraf’s procession crossed it, throwing debris half a mile from the blast site. Yet, not rapping even the very last vehicle in that long caravan.
Security officials are always in position along the entire length of the emperor’s route from the airport to the army house whenever the emperor treads out of his high security shell. His schedule details and route is never confirmed due to obvious security reasons. Whenever the emperor’s convoy moves from one location to another, all bridges on the way are thoroughly searched well in advance of the regal motorcade’s arrival. In fact, the bridges located on the VVIP routes are always considered highly sensitive and are strictly guarded. Interestingly, the well-informed, high-tech culprits who could penetrate multi layers of security arrangements, identify the convoy the emperor was travelling in among several decoys, still missed him by few seconds.
Official line: Those who had planted the bomb took advantage of inclement weather as it becomes difficult for law enforcement agencies to properly check each and every inch of the VVIP route used by the emperor. The only problem is that the highly sensitive sensors used to detect explosives and/or noses of bomb-detective dogs don’t demand ideal climatic conditions for executing their job.
Moreover, it should be noted that the “attempt” didn’t happen in the remote, rugged and restive tribal areas. The “plotters” somehow managed to plant the bomb less than a kilometre from the headquarters of the Pakistan Army’s strike 10th Corps, right in the middle of military’s nerve centre, swarming with faujis, round the clock. The sophisticated laying of explosives below the culvert would have easily taken at least an hour, yet the terrorist did that without being spotted by anyone in this purely military neighbourhood.
Technically, the large bombs were denoted either through remote-control mechanisms or operated as pre-programmed devices. Musharraf’s itinerary is never publicly disclosed and decoy cars and aeroplanes routinely escort him on all road and air journeys. If remote-controlled, why did the perpetrators wait till the entire regal cavalcade passed the bridge safely. And if time bombs were used, how could they be programmed in advance when due to bad weather not even Musharraf knew his own arrival time.
Likewise, the latest spin of radio-jamming device averting nefarious designs doesn’t sound very plausible either. No such gadget worth its name has the operational range of just few meters. Remember, bombs took off seconds after Musharraf had passed the bridge. Does it seem probable that “terrorists” see the target disappearing and even then proceed on with their original programme – only to expose themselves and their expertise?
Come on. Sorry, if I am little bit suspicious.
It appears that all this is nothing but a yet another pathetic PR gimmick orchestrated by media advisers of the emperor showing how fearlessly he is risking his life fighting terrorists without ever mentioning that his favourite cover – extremists, are none but old and close associates of Pak military establishment. Easily understandable that having witnessed the unceremonious exit of Mr Shevernadze in Georgia and exhuming of Mr Saddam in Iraq, Musharraf is desperate to improve his increasingly dismal score card. Anyhow, one should keep in mind that he is the man who in real life doesn’t dare to face few dozens unarmed unruly legislatures or have spine to address the parliament?
Having said that I wouldn’t deny that there are many people around, in khaki and mufti alike, who would love to see Musharraf depart, politically as well as physically. But this particular scheme however doesn’t seem to be planned by his foes.
Very possible, my apprehensions are nothing more than wild fantasies at best and wishful thinking at worst. Let it be so. Otherwise, it would be a matter of grave concern. A country where supreme commander of the armed forces is not safe and where his enemies have infiltrated so deeply, its security is seriously threatened. Actually, I hope and pray that it is a staged drama as I suspect.
Anyway, at the same time, one must not deny Musharraf a due credit by not observing the huge improvement this incident is reflective of. An ordinary, average Pakistani general would have blown up an airport, if not a big city to demonstrate his value and indispensability. Musharraf let only one old bridge demolish, that’s too without any loss of human life, presumably for constructing a new better one. Instead of appreciating him, some people talk nonsense. Pakistan is moving forward. Mashallah.
PS.
Naqshbhandi, I am an apolitical sunni Pakistani from Punjab. Discussion about assassination attempts on Musharraf aside, disgusting sectarian d*gs like u, so-called thekedars of religion should be dealt with sternly first and foremost. Really hard to decide that is it military or politicians who are wreaking more damage to the country or b@$tards putting stinking titles like Mujaddidis, Qadiris, Jilanis? In any case the latter’s destruction goes much beyond geographical boundaries of Pakistan. For God’s sake spare us with your poison.
Posted by
H-Ikram
Dec 25, 2003 01:06 pm
In politics, even in uncivilized world, killing or attempting to physically eliminate people at the helm -- regardless they get there through ballot or bullet in the first place -- no matter one employs judicial venues or TNT, is utterly abhorrent and unconditionally condemnable. Therefore, the high intensity bombs that a short while ago wrecked the bridge near 10-Corps Headquarters just moments after Emperor Musharraf`s motorcade crossed it while on its way to Army House from Chaklala airport was a cowardly act and must be denounced without any reservation.
But, at the same time, one cannot avoid noticing some gross inconsistencies regarding official projection of the first episode, and for that reason needs to be examined closely. The latest one, nonetheless, seems to be quite genuine.
For example:
Officially, five sophisticated devices of a type never before seen in Pakistan were used. Containing half a ton of explosives, bombs ripped a section of the bridge seconds after Musharraf’s procession crossed it, throwing debris half a mile from the blast site. Yet, not rapping even the very last vehicle in that long caravan.
Security officials are always in position along the entire length of the emperor’s route from the airport to the army house whenever the emperor treads out of his high security shell. His schedule details and route is never confirmed due to obvious security reasons. Whenever the emperor’s convoy moves from one location to another, all bridges on the way are thoroughly searched well in advance of the regal motorcade’s arrival. In fact, the bridges located on the VVIP routes are always considered highly sensitive and are strictly guarded. Interestingly, the well-informed, high-tech culprits who could penetrate multi layers of security arrangements, identify the convoy the emperor was travelling in among several decoys, still missed him by few seconds.
Official line: Those who had planted the bomb took advantage of inclement weather as it becomes difficult for law enforcement agencies to properly check each and every inch of the VVIP route used by the emperor. The only problem is that the highly sensitive sensors used to detect explosives and/or noses of bomb-detective dogs don’t demand ideal climatic conditions for executing their job.
Moreover, it should be noted that the “attempt” didn’t happen in the remote, rugged and restive tribal areas. The “plotters” somehow managed to plant the bomb less than a kilometre from the headquarters of the Pakistan Army’s strike 10th Corps, right in the middle of military’s nerve centre, swarming with faujis, round the clock. The sophisticated laying of explosives below the culvert would have easily taken at least an hour, yet the terrorist did that without being spotted by anyone in this purely military neighbourhood.
Technically, the large bombs were denoted either through remote-control mechanisms or operated as pre-programmed devices. Musharraf’s itinerary is never publicly disclosed and decoy cars and aeroplanes routinely escort him on all road and air journeys. If remote-controlled, why did the perpetrators wait till the entire regal cavalcade passed the bridge safely. And if time bombs were used, how could they be programmed in advance when due to bad weather not even Musharraf knew his own arrival time.
Likewise, the latest spin of radio-jamming device averting nefarious designs doesn’t sound very plausible either. No such gadget worth its name has the operational range of just few meters. Remember, bombs took off seconds after Musharraf had passed the bridge. Does it seem probable that “terrorists” see the target disappearing and even then proceed on with their original programme – only to expose themselves and their expertise?
Come on. Sorry, if I am little bit suspicious.
It appears that all this is nothing but a yet another pathetic PR gimmick orchestrated by media advisers of the emperor showing how fearlessly he is risking his life fighting terrorists without ever mentioning that his favourite cover – extremists, are none but old and close associates of Pak military establishment. Easily understandable that having witnessed the unceremonious exit of Mr Shevernadze in Georgia and exhuming of Mr Saddam in Iraq, Musharraf is desperate to improve his increasingly dismal score card. Anyhow, one should keep in mind that he is the man who in real life doesn’t dare to face few dozens unarmed unruly legislatures or have spine to address the parliament?
Having said that I wouldn’t deny that there are many people around, in khaki and mufti alike, who would love to see Musharraf depart, politically as well as physically. But this particular scheme however doesn’t seem to be planned by his foes.
Very possible, my apprehensions are nothing more than wild fantasies at best and wishful thinking at worst. Let it be so. Otherwise, it would be a matter of grave concern. A country where supreme commander of the armed forces is not safe and where his enemies have infiltrated so deeply, its security is seriously threatened. Actually, I hope and pray that it is a staged drama as I suspect.
Anyway, at the same time, one must not deny Musharraf a due credit by not observing the huge improvement this incident is reflective of. An ordinary, average Pakistani general would have blown up an airport, if not a big city to demonstrate his value and indispensability. Musharraf let only one old bridge demolish, that’s too without any loss of human life, presumably for constructing a new better one. Instead of appreciating him, some people talk nonsense. Pakistan is moving forward. Mashallah.
PS.
Naqshbhandi, I am an apolitical sunni Pakistani from Punjab. Discussion about assassination attempts on Musharraf aside, disgusting sectarian d*gs like u, so-called thekedars of religion should be dealt with sternly first and foremost. Really hard to decide that is it military or politicians who are wreaking more damage to the country or b@$tards putting stinking titles like Mujaddidis, Qadiris, Jilanis? In any case the latter’s destruction goes much beyond geographical boundaries of Pakistan. For God’s sake spare us with your poison.
- H-Ikram
- Interacts: 13
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 237
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Dec 25 2003
- Last signin: Sep 26 2007
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


