International Law: Applicability and Real Politik in the Middle East
pakistan army got its ass kicked in kargil right? pakistani elite SSG commandos ran across the border covering their ass, right? eat this. never mess with the pakistan army.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll...show/724898.cms
`Key peak still in Pakistani occupation`
IANS[ MONDAY, JUNE 07, 2004 09:28:32 PM ]
CHANDIGARH : A former Indian Army officer has claimed a few strategic peaks in the Kargil sector of Jammu and Kashmir , including the crucial Point 5353, were still under occupation by Pakistani forces.
Brig. Surinder Singh, who was dismissed from service in June 2001, also claimed the Indian defence establishment had misled the country by claiming it had gained control on the peaks in Kargil, where India and Pakistan fought a brief border conflict in 1999.
Singh was sacked after being embroiled in a controversy with his superiors about alleged lapses and intelligence failures that led to Pakistan-backed intruders occupying strategic features along a 140-km stretch of the Line of Control.
He asserted he had proof that Point 5353, a hill in the Drass sector of north Kashmir , was still under Pakistani occupation.
``I have evidence of this claim including satellite images,`` he told reporters.
Singh said the alleged inaction of the defence and political leadership during the Kargil conflict was only the tip of the iceberg.
``The defence establishment had misled the nation about getting every intruder out of the Kargil sector. I can give proof of this to whatever committee the new government at the centre sets up,`` Singh said, noting he had written about the matter to Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
Singh said he had asked Mukherjee to order a thorough probe into the Kargil conflict and issues that were deliberately hidden by the previous coalition government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Jul 23, 2004 09:44 pm
pakistan army got its ass kicked in kargil right? pakistani elite SSG commandos ran across the border covering their ass, right? eat this. never mess with the pakistan army.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll...show/724898.cms
`Key peak still in Pakistani occupation`
IANS[ MONDAY, JUNE 07, 2004 09:28:32 PM ]
CHANDIGARH : A former Indian Army officer has claimed a few strategic peaks in the Kargil sector of Jammu and Kashmir , including the crucial Point 5353, were still under occupation by Pakistani forces.
Brig. Surinder Singh, who was dismissed from service in June 2001, also claimed the Indian defence establishment had misled the country by claiming it had gained control on the peaks in Kargil, where India and Pakistan fought a brief border conflict in 1999.
Singh was sacked after being embroiled in a controversy with his superiors about alleged lapses and intelligence failures that led to Pakistan-backed intruders occupying strategic features along a 140-km stretch of the Line of Control.
He asserted he had proof that Point 5353, a hill in the Drass sector of north Kashmir , was still under Pakistani occupation.
``I have evidence of this claim including satellite images,`` he told reporters.
Singh said the alleged inaction of the defence and political leadership during the Kargil conflict was only the tip of the iceberg.
``The defence establishment had misled the nation about getting every intruder out of the Kargil sector. I can give proof of this to whatever committee the new government at the centre sets up,`` Singh said, noting he had written about the matter to Defence Minister Pranab Mukherjee.
Singh said he had asked Mukherjee to order a thorough probe into the Kargil conflict and issues that were deliberately hidden by the previous coalition government led by the Bharatiya Janata Party.
International Law: Applicability and Real Politik in the Middle East
moreover, your comparison of muslim rule in south asia and israeli occupation of palestine is disturbing. perhaps you should read more edward said and joseph massad. i cannot recall incidents of hindus under muslim rule being treated as third rate citizens, as having their homes demolished because muslims believe that the land was given to them by God, or being caged into their villages at night (yes, a palestinian town, is actually locked from the outside by israeli defence forces at night). and please dont forget that the Crusades were wars thrust upon the muslims, not wars of aggression. your detachment from historical truths shows your knowledge to be that of a high schooler, at best. i would recommend you separate fact from fiction before you decide to post.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Jul 22, 2004 01:27 am
very well, rahul. but that doesnt change the fact that under the BJP india`s foreign policy toward the israeli-palestinian conflict saw a complete reversal. india completely sold out in exchange for a lousy AWACS system based on 1980`s technology and limited help during the kargil ass-kicking. pakistan has maintained that it is willing to consider a change in ties. musharraf has repeated that he will not negotiate with israel until it finds a just solution, one based on 242 and 338 no doubt. and yes, the only time that jews lived peacefully alongside muslims was under muslim rule, as in the case of islamic spain and later the ottoman turks. we all see now what happens when those roles are reversed. moreover, your comparison of muslim rule in south asia and israeli occupation of palestine is disturbing. perhaps you should read more edward said and joseph massad. i cannot recall incidents of hindus under muslim rule being treated as third rate citizens, as having their homes demolished because muslims believe that the land was given to them by God, or being caged into their villages at night (yes, a palestinian town, is actually locked from the outside by israeli defence forces at night). and please dont forget that the Crusades were wars thrust upon the muslims, not wars of aggression. your detachment from historical truths shows your knowledge to be that of a high schooler, at best. i would recommend you separate fact from fiction before you decide to post.
Untitled
When ever has Qazi Hussain advocated flogging disobedient women?? Ever? Get your facts straight Paracha. Damn weedsmoker.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Apr 9, 2004 06:15 am
When ever has Qazi Hussain advocated flogging disobedient women?? Ever? Get your facts straight Paracha. Damn weedsmoker.
V. S. Naipaul
A.R Rahman isnt a hindu with a muslim name romair?!! what`re you talking about? he`s a devout muslim. he`s a hindu convert yes, but once someone brings the faith to islam, their bond with their old religion is finished forever. he didnt keep his fathers name, true. even doing that would not make him a hindu.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Mar 22, 2004 10:22 pm
A.R Rahman isnt a hindu with a muslim name romair?!! what`re you talking about? he`s a devout muslim. he`s a hindu convert yes, but once someone brings the faith to islam, their bond with their old religion is finished forever. he didnt keep his fathers name, true. even doing that would not make him a hindu.
History, Culture and the Mullahs
rsaxena, i will happily go to guantanamo bay if it means standing up for what i believe in, unlike your scared a$$. i am not a terrorist, so spare me the polemics. the fact of the matter is that no one can ever in their entire life hurt this religion or its Prophet. try all you want.
rsridhar- thank you for wasting everyone`s time with your endless post. i already knew all of that. you fail to realize that you are talking about 7th century arabia, where marriage was determined by puberty. the bible and torah are replete with stories of girls getting married at that age. and remind me how many wives lord Ram had? you`re shit-laden skull obviously cannot comprehend the distinction between 21st century and 7th century. sorry dude.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Feb 9, 2004 12:39 pm
rsaxena, i will happily go to guantanamo bay if it means standing up for what i believe in, unlike your scared a$$. i am not a terrorist, so spare me the polemics. the fact of the matter is that no one can ever in their entire life hurt this religion or its Prophet. try all you want.
rsridhar- thank you for wasting everyone`s time with your endless post. i already knew all of that. you fail to realize that you are talking about 7th century arabia, where marriage was determined by puberty. the bible and torah are replete with stories of girls getting married at that age. and remind me how many wives lord Ram had? you`re shit-laden skull obviously cannot comprehend the distinction between 21st century and 7th century. sorry dude.
History, Culture and the Mullahs
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Feb 8, 2004 11:00 am
rsridhar- keep your monkey worshipping bulls%$$ to yourself. long live the true mullah! btw, who was the insolent ass to mention the word prophet and `pedophile` in the same sentence? say it again and i`ll rip your head off.
History, Culture and the Mullahs
Oh please. This is the most vile of all arguments. The fact remains that Basant is essentially a Hindu festival which crazed fanatics of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad also celebrate across the border. Are those the people we want to be sharing a festival with? Have we completely lost our `cultural` pride as a Muslim nation? Would the Prophet approve of Muslims sharing festivals with a people who have taken on the responsibility of exterminating Muslims? Damn all of you. The leader of VHP last year gloated that Indian and Hindu culture had been accepted by Pakistan. Lahore can go to hell. No one gives a shit what its historic value is. And yes, Yasser, no one can take you seriously. This is a guy who has cried in public because someone dared to speak the truth about Pakistan by criticizing it. Wake up everyone. We dont need Hindu festivals.
Posted by
taqat-e-parvaaz
Feb 7, 2004 06:18 pm
Oh please. This is the most vile of all arguments. The fact remains that Basant is essentially a Hindu festival which crazed fanatics of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad also celebrate across the border. Are those the people we want to be sharing a festival with? Have we completely lost our `cultural` pride as a Muslim nation? Would the Prophet approve of Muslims sharing festivals with a people who have taken on the responsibility of exterminating Muslims? Damn all of you. The leader of VHP last year gloated that Indian and Hindu culture had been accepted by Pakistan. Lahore can go to hell. No one gives a shit what its historic value is. And yes, Yasser, no one can take you seriously. This is a guy who has cried in public because someone dared to speak the truth about Pakistan by criticizing it. Wake up everyone. We dont need Hindu festivals.
- taqat-e-parvaaz
- Interacts: 87
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 814
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Feb 7 2004
- Last signin: Sep 13 2005
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


