Jaane kahan gaye voh din!
Posted by
deja_who?
Mar 22, 2007 04:05 pm
I bet old foggies in 1960s were also bemoaning the death of music in Indian films at that time.. ``Hamare zamane main Saigal kya gaata tha. Ye Barman warman kaun hai bhai?``
Vanity is My Favorite Sin
By that token, you should ignore yourself. There! I just told you the secret of a blissful life !
Posted by
deja_who?
Jun 10, 2005 11:04 pm
Never pay any attention to any interactors who do not use their full name and instead use meaningless or abbreviated terms or just (real or made-up) initials!!! By that token, you should ignore yourself. There! I just told you the secret of a blissful life !
Vanity is My Favorite Sin
This is a good piece, I like the social comments it makes. However, it needs some work. A topic like this can be handled in two ways. One, you can write a long and serious article on people`s tendency to be pompous and how it negatively affects the society, how the poor are getting poorer while the reach are getting richer, etc. However, that would be a pretty boring piece. Also, it has been done.
Instead, you can follow the comedic angle of people flaunting their _inherited_ wealth and feeling superior solely because they happen to have a rich uncle / aunt / grandmother etc. That can be riotously funny and very biting satire.
Your piece, dear author, falls somewhere in between. IMO, you started out trying to write a satire, but then lost your way somewhere trying to be rather serious. This is a pitfall you should try to avoid next time. You do write well, only you need to organize the thought process a little better.
Cheers and good luck for your next literary venture!
Posted by
deja_who?
Jun 10, 2005 09:02 am
A note to the author -This is a good piece, I like the social comments it makes. However, it needs some work. A topic like this can be handled in two ways. One, you can write a long and serious article on people`s tendency to be pompous and how it negatively affects the society, how the poor are getting poorer while the reach are getting richer, etc. However, that would be a pretty boring piece. Also, it has been done.
Instead, you can follow the comedic angle of people flaunting their _inherited_ wealth and feeling superior solely because they happen to have a rich uncle / aunt / grandmother etc. That can be riotously funny and very biting satire.
Your piece, dear author, falls somewhere in between. IMO, you started out trying to write a satire, but then lost your way somewhere trying to be rather serious. This is a pitfall you should try to avoid next time. You do write well, only you need to organize the thought process a little better.
Cheers and good luck for your next literary venture!
Vanity is My Favorite Sin
How much money do YOU have to pay to chowk-staff in order to get your ``english`` interacts published?
You say in #9 ``I still hold my grounds of pointing the loop-holes and the composure it is badly lacking and the worn out norms it is blindly stressing.``
I did not notice you pointing out any loopholes in the article. Nor do you explain what ``norms`` you think the article is ``blindly`` stressing. All you did was ask a snarky question, and when someone challenged you, you tried to wiggle your way out of explaining your post. Even in #9, where you do have the opportunity to explain your criticism, you did not. Instead you launched into a long-winded and incoherent defense of Islamabad.
If I feel sufficiently bored, I will analyse your #9 line by line and prove what a shitty writer you are.
Posted by
deja_who?
Jun 10, 2005 08:48 am
A word to Nadia Zehra - How much money do YOU have to pay to chowk-staff in order to get your ``english`` interacts published?
You say in #9 ``I still hold my grounds of pointing the loop-holes and the composure it is badly lacking and the worn out norms it is blindly stressing.``
I did not notice you pointing out any loopholes in the article. Nor do you explain what ``norms`` you think the article is ``blindly`` stressing. All you did was ask a snarky question, and when someone challenged you, you tried to wiggle your way out of explaining your post. Even in #9, where you do have the opportunity to explain your criticism, you did not. Instead you launched into a long-winded and incoherent defense of Islamabad.
If I feel sufficiently bored, I will analyse your #9 line by line and prove what a shitty writer you are.
The SAT Scam
Posted by
deja_who?
May 21, 2005 11:31 am
dont they video tape the whole exam? they do in India
Dusk
Posted by
deja_who?
May 15, 2005 08:30 am
This article and the responses to it remind me of the legendary writer of chowk unplugged ``Salim Chauhan``
Dusk
Posted by
deja_who?
May 14, 2005 12:26 pm
This whole piece is so much mumbo-jumbo and little else.
- deja_who?
- Interacts: 7
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 296
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: May 13 2005
- Last signin: Jul 13 2007
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


