Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 02:20 pm
HP aka Hacked Penis...first you stop talking like a potty mouthed bubba and act your age for once...55+ whatever.
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
``However, while I do not dispute that the economy did well during the BJP rule, it simply continued with the policies started earlier and being more or less followed by the current government.``
Again you show your bias. The previous Congress government had no choice but to liberalise the economy in 1991 because failure to do so would mean a total collapse of the Indian economy which had imploded after 40 years of nehruvian socialism .
BJP did the right thing when it came to power and sped up the liberalisation process and did a lot more. In your eagerness to put down the Beej , you seem to give imply that Cong has some sort of a copyright over the process of globalisation/liberalisation....dude..you are one prejudiced old chappie...
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 01:04 pm
Dost-Mittar..take it easy old chap..I`m not too enamoured of you either. Its just that you talked of the BJP and its supporters in a condescending way and I couldn`t let it pass. Peace.``However, while I do not dispute that the economy did well during the BJP rule, it simply continued with the policies started earlier and being more or less followed by the current government.``
Again you show your bias. The previous Congress government had no choice but to liberalise the economy in 1991 because failure to do so would mean a total collapse of the Indian economy which had imploded after 40 years of nehruvian socialism .
BJP did the right thing when it came to power and sped up the liberalisation process and did a lot more. In your eagerness to put down the Beej , you seem to give imply that Cong has some sort of a copyright over the process of globalisation/liberalisation....dude..you are one prejudiced old chappie...
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 12:14 pm
Tahmed Chachu calling SC Bose names is like a famished ugly neutered street mongrel barking at the stars...
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 12:09 pm
ana..thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 12:02 pm
better a nazi bootlicker than a mullah+british ar$e licker (Jinnah)...
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:53 am
Dost-Mittar...whats wrong about being a BJP supporter ? For your information , 36% of India`s electorate voted for BJP led combination in the last election , although BJP lost. Also ,please note India registered its best years since independence in the 6 years of BJP rule , shedding off the baggage of 2-3% hindu rate of growth under socialist Congress to average economic growth rates of 6-7% under BJP. Highways were built , power plants were started , telecom lines were laid , IT became a reality etc. etc.
The Alternative Muslim Identity
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:46 am
ana aka ms.boring...whatever.
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:43 am
So FV-ji`s letter in Asian Age as registered quite a response from the newspaper reading junta. However the replies are too mild and too polite for my taste. Somebody should have had called a spade a bloody spade as address Ms.Versey as the cold blooded India hating Pakistan agent that she is......and the authorities should ideally send those like her into some stinky Indian jail for sedition .
The Alternative Muslim Identity
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:34 am
oops...sorry for that...wrong thread...
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Sir, With reference to Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), I am the one who had written the letter to the JKLF in 1989 to which Aditya Rangroo has alluded in Homeless Pandits (June 18). The ground realities unfolded by 15 years of externally supported and abetted terrorism in Kashmir leading to the selective killing of nearly a thousand members of the Kashmiri Pandits during the initial days when KLF (later on JKLF) raised religious slogans, have convinced the whole world that Kashmir terrorism is integral to the Wahhabi ideological movement. In fact, OIC has given the status of an observer to the religion-based secessionist Hurriyat and not to any popular group from Kashmir just because Pakistan pleaded that Kashmir is the unfinished task of partition. In pursuance of the above ideological goal, Kashmiri terrorists would not like missing the opportunity of taking on even the President of Pakistan who is also from the Army. The story of governor Jagmohan’s logistical support to the exodus of the Pandits is the old canard which even the most virulent of his opponents, namely Dr Farooq Abdullah, also contradicted, albeit later. The works of public welfare which Mr Jagmohan did for Kashmir during his tenure endeared him to the masses in Kashmir to the extent that Muslim women in Srinagar sang his praises as part of contemporary folklore (wanwun). Of course, while dealing with the anti-national elements, he saw that the law of the land reigned supreme. If anyone in Kashmir had a strong clout in the Indian ruling apparatus, it were the stalwarts of the Kashmir political platform like Sheikh Abdullah, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, G.M. Sadiq, Mir Qasim, Dr Farooq Abdullah and Mufti Muhammad Sayeed who enjoyed the best of both worlds. If the Pandits had any say, neither Article 370 would be there nor the fatal status quo clause in the Simla Agreement. And thus the Kashmir issue would have been non-existent. Finally, the successful ethnic cleansing of Pandits from Kashmir and the acceptance of Kashmir’s covert theocratic status by the ``secular`` Indian Union leave no chance for the small religious minority of the Pandits to have any political space in Kashmir.
K.N. Pandita, New York
Ignored
Sir, Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), made shocking reading for the hostile tone the writer adopted in it. No one is saying that Kashmir’s majority community is not dying from the militants’ bullets, but that cannot take away from the fact that the Pandits have suffered at the hands of the militants. That lakhs have fled Kashmir is a fact of life. That many of them are living in camps is also a fact. If the situation had been all right in the state, if the Pandits were not terrorised, if Kashmir was truly a paradise, they would not have left their homes. If the Hurriyat had been the conduit between Kashmir’s people and the governments of India and Pakistan, it would not have been scared to test the strength of its popularity through the ballot box. Let us also not glorify separatist elements like Yasin Malik, people who openly praise Pakistani ministers for running terrorist training camps. Jammu and Kashmir has a democratically elected government, something we are forgetting in all this media blitzkrieg about the Hurriyat’s visit to Pakistan. And it is also true that in our bid to make peace with Pakistan, in our attempt to build confidence building measures, we have forgotten about the Kashmiri Pandits.
Ananya Mahajan, Mahim, Mumbai
Sir, Farzana Versey makes the ridiculous claim in Ominous Signs (June 20) that the Kashmiri Pandits who fled their homeland under the threat of the gun are not refugees because ``they chose to leave.`` By that yardstick, since the Palestinians too ``chose to leave`` in the months before the creation of Israel in 1948, they cannot be classified as refugees.
Ramesh Kumar, Bangalore
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:33 am
Ground realitySir, With reference to Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), I am the one who had written the letter to the JKLF in 1989 to which Aditya Rangroo has alluded in Homeless Pandits (June 18). The ground realities unfolded by 15 years of externally supported and abetted terrorism in Kashmir leading to the selective killing of nearly a thousand members of the Kashmiri Pandits during the initial days when KLF (later on JKLF) raised religious slogans, have convinced the whole world that Kashmir terrorism is integral to the Wahhabi ideological movement. In fact, OIC has given the status of an observer to the religion-based secessionist Hurriyat and not to any popular group from Kashmir just because Pakistan pleaded that Kashmir is the unfinished task of partition. In pursuance of the above ideological goal, Kashmiri terrorists would not like missing the opportunity of taking on even the President of Pakistan who is also from the Army. The story of governor Jagmohan’s logistical support to the exodus of the Pandits is the old canard which even the most virulent of his opponents, namely Dr Farooq Abdullah, also contradicted, albeit later. The works of public welfare which Mr Jagmohan did for Kashmir during his tenure endeared him to the masses in Kashmir to the extent that Muslim women in Srinagar sang his praises as part of contemporary folklore (wanwun). Of course, while dealing with the anti-national elements, he saw that the law of the land reigned supreme. If anyone in Kashmir had a strong clout in the Indian ruling apparatus, it were the stalwarts of the Kashmir political platform like Sheikh Abdullah, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, G.M. Sadiq, Mir Qasim, Dr Farooq Abdullah and Mufti Muhammad Sayeed who enjoyed the best of both worlds. If the Pandits had any say, neither Article 370 would be there nor the fatal status quo clause in the Simla Agreement. And thus the Kashmir issue would have been non-existent. Finally, the successful ethnic cleansing of Pandits from Kashmir and the acceptance of Kashmir’s covert theocratic status by the ``secular`` Indian Union leave no chance for the small religious minority of the Pandits to have any political space in Kashmir.
K.N. Pandita, New York
Ignored
Sir, Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), made shocking reading for the hostile tone the writer adopted in it. No one is saying that Kashmir’s majority community is not dying from the militants’ bullets, but that cannot take away from the fact that the Pandits have suffered at the hands of the militants. That lakhs have fled Kashmir is a fact of life. That many of them are living in camps is also a fact. If the situation had been all right in the state, if the Pandits were not terrorised, if Kashmir was truly a paradise, they would not have left their homes. If the Hurriyat had been the conduit between Kashmir’s people and the governments of India and Pakistan, it would not have been scared to test the strength of its popularity through the ballot box. Let us also not glorify separatist elements like Yasin Malik, people who openly praise Pakistani ministers for running terrorist training camps. Jammu and Kashmir has a democratically elected government, something we are forgetting in all this media blitzkrieg about the Hurriyat’s visit to Pakistan. And it is also true that in our bid to make peace with Pakistan, in our attempt to build confidence building measures, we have forgotten about the Kashmiri Pandits.
Ananya Mahajan, Mahim, Mumbai
Sir, Farzana Versey makes the ridiculous claim in Ominous Signs (June 20) that the Kashmiri Pandits who fled their homeland under the threat of the gun are not refugees because ``they chose to leave.`` By that yardstick, since the Palestinians too ``chose to leave`` in the months before the creation of Israel in 1948, they cannot be classified as refugees.
Ramesh Kumar, Bangalore
The Alternative Muslim Identity
Ground reality
Sir, With reference to Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), I am the one who had written the letter to the JKLF in 1989 to which Aditya Rangroo has alluded in Homeless Pandits (June 18). The ground realities unfolded by 15 years of externally supported and abetted terrorism in Kashmir leading to the selective killing of nearly a thousand members of the Kashmiri Pandits during the initial days when KLF (later on JKLF) raised religious slogans, have convinced the whole world that Kashmir terrorism is integral to the Wahhabi ideological movement. In fact, OIC has given the status of an observer to the religion-based secessionist Hurriyat and not to any popular group from Kashmir just because Pakistan pleaded that Kashmir is the unfinished task of partition. In pursuance of the above ideological goal, Kashmiri terrorists would not like missing the opportunity of taking on even the President of Pakistan who is also from the Army. The story of governor Jagmohan’s logistical support to the exodus of the Pandits is the old canard which even the most virulent of his opponents, namely Dr Farooq Abdullah, also contradicted, albeit later. The works of public welfare which Mr Jagmohan did for Kashmir during his tenure endeared him to the masses in Kashmir to the extent that Muslim women in Srinagar sang his praises as part of contemporary folklore (wanwun). Of course, while dealing with the anti-national elements, he saw that the law of the land reigned supreme. If anyone in Kashmir had a strong clout in the Indian ruling apparatus, it were the stalwarts of the Kashmir political platform like Sheikh Abdullah, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, G.M. Sadiq, Mir Qasim, Dr Farooq Abdullah and Mufti Muhammad Sayeed who enjoyed the best of both worlds. If the Pandits had any say, neither Article 370 would be there nor the fatal status quo clause in the Simla Agreement. And thus the Kashmir issue would have been non-existent. Finally, the successful ethnic cleansing of Pandits from Kashmir and the acceptance of Kashmir’s covert theocratic status by the ``secular`` Indian Union leave no chance for the small religious minority of the Pandits to have any political space in Kashmir.
K.N. Pandita, New York
Ignored
Sir, Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), made shocking reading for the hostile tone the writer adopted in it. No one is saying that Kashmir’s majority community is not dying from the militants’ bullets, but that cannot take away from the fact that the Pandits have suffered at the hands of the militants. That lakhs have fled Kashmir is a fact of life. That many of them are living in camps is also a fact. If the situation had been all right in the state, if the Pandits were not terrorised, if Kashmir was truly a paradise, they would not have left their homes. If the Hurriyat had been the conduit between Kashmir’s people and the governments of India and Pakistan, it would not have been scared to test the strength of its popularity through the ballot box. Let us also not glorify separatist elements like Yasin Malik, people who openly praise Pakistani ministers for running terrorist training camps. Jammu and Kashmir has a democratically elected government, something we are forgetting in all this media blitzkrieg about the Hurriyat’s visit to Pakistan. And it is also true that in our bid to make peace with Pakistan, in our attempt to build confidence building measures, we have forgotten about the Kashmiri Pandits.
Ananya Mahajan, Mahim, Mumbai
Sir, Farzana Versey makes the ridiculous claim in Ominous Signs (June 20) that the Kashmiri Pandits who fled their homeland under the threat of the gun are not refugees because ``they chose to leave.`` By that yardstick, since the Palestinians too ``chose to leave`` in the months before the creation of Israel in 1948, they cannot be classified as refugees.
Ramesh Kumar, Bangalore
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:31 am
Pakistan sympathiser FV-ji seems to have elicited quite a reaction from the asian age reading junta....although the reactions are too mild and polite for my taste...Ground reality
Sir, With reference to Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), I am the one who had written the letter to the JKLF in 1989 to which Aditya Rangroo has alluded in Homeless Pandits (June 18). The ground realities unfolded by 15 years of externally supported and abetted terrorism in Kashmir leading to the selective killing of nearly a thousand members of the Kashmiri Pandits during the initial days when KLF (later on JKLF) raised religious slogans, have convinced the whole world that Kashmir terrorism is integral to the Wahhabi ideological movement. In fact, OIC has given the status of an observer to the religion-based secessionist Hurriyat and not to any popular group from Kashmir just because Pakistan pleaded that Kashmir is the unfinished task of partition. In pursuance of the above ideological goal, Kashmiri terrorists would not like missing the opportunity of taking on even the President of Pakistan who is also from the Army. The story of governor Jagmohan’s logistical support to the exodus of the Pandits is the old canard which even the most virulent of his opponents, namely Dr Farooq Abdullah, also contradicted, albeit later. The works of public welfare which Mr Jagmohan did for Kashmir during his tenure endeared him to the masses in Kashmir to the extent that Muslim women in Srinagar sang his praises as part of contemporary folklore (wanwun). Of course, while dealing with the anti-national elements, he saw that the law of the land reigned supreme. If anyone in Kashmir had a strong clout in the Indian ruling apparatus, it were the stalwarts of the Kashmir political platform like Sheikh Abdullah, Bakshi Ghulam Muhammad, G.M. Sadiq, Mir Qasim, Dr Farooq Abdullah and Mufti Muhammad Sayeed who enjoyed the best of both worlds. If the Pandits had any say, neither Article 370 would be there nor the fatal status quo clause in the Simla Agreement. And thus the Kashmir issue would have been non-existent. Finally, the successful ethnic cleansing of Pandits from Kashmir and the acceptance of Kashmir’s covert theocratic status by the ``secular`` Indian Union leave no chance for the small religious minority of the Pandits to have any political space in Kashmir.
K.N. Pandita, New York
Ignored
Sir, Farzana Versey’s letter Ominous Signs (June 20), made shocking reading for the hostile tone the writer adopted in it. No one is saying that Kashmir’s majority community is not dying from the militants’ bullets, but that cannot take away from the fact that the Pandits have suffered at the hands of the militants. That lakhs have fled Kashmir is a fact of life. That many of them are living in camps is also a fact. If the situation had been all right in the state, if the Pandits were not terrorised, if Kashmir was truly a paradise, they would not have left their homes. If the Hurriyat had been the conduit between Kashmir’s people and the governments of India and Pakistan, it would not have been scared to test the strength of its popularity through the ballot box. Let us also not glorify separatist elements like Yasin Malik, people who openly praise Pakistani ministers for running terrorist training camps. Jammu and Kashmir has a democratically elected government, something we are forgetting in all this media blitzkrieg about the Hurriyat’s visit to Pakistan. And it is also true that in our bid to make peace with Pakistan, in our attempt to build confidence building measures, we have forgotten about the Kashmiri Pandits.
Ananya Mahajan, Mahim, Mumbai
Sir, Farzana Versey makes the ridiculous claim in Ominous Signs (June 20) that the Kashmiri Pandits who fled their homeland under the threat of the gun are not refugees because ``they chose to leave.`` By that yardstick, since the Palestinians too ``chose to leave`` in the months before the creation of Israel in 1948, they cannot be classified as refugees.
Ramesh Kumar, Bangalore
Bunty aur Babli: The latest RSS-BJP tango
Haha yourself idiot. Pakistan is just small fry. Our real enemy has always been China. And its a really smart enemy. Never fires a bullet itself that one. Just exports nukes and missiles to monkey states like Pakistan full of money brained pukis to do its bidding.
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:13 am
``Pakistan is here to stay as the worst nightmare of the Indian chauvinists. ha! ha! ``Haha yourself idiot. Pakistan is just small fry. Our real enemy has always been China. And its a really smart enemy. Never fires a bullet itself that one. Just exports nukes and missiles to monkey states like Pakistan full of money brained pukis to do its bidding.
Dina Wadia Claims Jinnah House
And there you are wrong...`Suhail Qazi` aka `gujju/avenger etc.` only reacted and reacted in a typically aggressive manner when your boy manto said certain uncomplimentary things about `SuhailQazi`s mom.......ref #25.
So obviously Suhail Qazi retorted that such potty mouthed talk was nothing unexpected coming from a cuckolded fool who in all likelihood was busy wanking himself with the qaed`s photograph while his wife was getting impregnated by half of Lahore and all the tourists from India.
Cheerio !
Posted by
Mike
Jun 23, 2005 11:03 am
Ana : ``Suhail qazi (who if you didn`t know is also gujjubania and a load of other nicks) first came on and tried to rattle yasser`s cage vis-a-vis jinnah. and then when yasser responded, without referring to ``suhail`s`` family members, then suhail came back and made all sorts of insinuations about aisha``And there you are wrong...`Suhail Qazi` aka `gujju/avenger etc.` only reacted and reacted in a typically aggressive manner when your boy manto said certain uncomplimentary things about `SuhailQazi`s mom.......ref #25.
So obviously Suhail Qazi retorted that such potty mouthed talk was nothing unexpected coming from a cuckolded fool who in all likelihood was busy wanking himself with the qaed`s photograph while his wife was getting impregnated by half of Lahore and all the tourists from India.
Cheerio !
- Mike
- Interacts: 110
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 262
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Jun 23 2005
- Last signin: Jul 16 2005
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list
