unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Nachiketas
  • Intro & Favorites
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Interacts
  • latest
  • most viewed
  • random
Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance
Posted by Nachiketas Mar 2, 2006 09:55 am
I wonder how Farzana Veresy can trivialize percptions of those calling themselves `Hindus` about the depicting their gods or faith objects, in `nude`. If creating fuss over that was bukwas (which may be), then the huge violence and raving and rantings by Muslims on that Danish cartoon of depicting the Allah was thousands time more bukwas! Same about Christian or Jew sensibilities. But the conventional secularist-modernist seem to be selective in this matter. Like the `community identity` of the Muslims, other communities also can have the same `privilege`. We must not have double standards. At this juncture again you bring out Kama Sutra and Khajuraho temples etc. to justify what Hussain does and to ridicule his opponents. That is a chicanery. Someone may also bring the Arabian Nights, escapades of Mughal or similst feudal era and all that to justify `sacrilege` of Allah and the faith objects of Muslims. We have to have some discipline in arguments. Heere what we can have the general common agrement is to disaprove the physical violence as a means of protest aggainst any work of art. If the artist is given the freedom of expression, can we deny similar freedom of expression ( and only expression and not physical realization of that!) to others who have different opinions than the artist. The artist is not crating something for the `people` or rather aptly for the `market` - so let him follow the rules of that business. Artist cannot claim the best of both the worlds. Nor his supporters.

Nachiketas
Husain, Hinduism, Hindustan: Testing Tolerance
Posted by Nachiketas Mar 2, 2006 09:40 am
I wonder how Farzana Veresy can trivialize percptions of those calling themselves `Hindus` about the depicting their gods or faith objects, in `nude`. If creating fuss over that was bukwas (which may also be), then how we can justify the huge violence and raving and rantings on that Danish cartoon of depicting the Allah? We must not have double sandards. At this juncture again you bring out Kama Sutra and Khajuraho temples etc. That is a chicanery? Someone may also bring the Arabian Nights and all that to justify `sacrilege` of Allah and the faith objects of Muslims. We have to have some discipline in arguments.

Nachiketas

  • Nachiketas
  • Interacts: 2
  • iLogs: 1
  • Gallery: 0
  • Page views: 593
  • Last visitor: guest
  • Member since: Mar 2 2006
  • Last signin: Mar 2 2006
  • Send a message
  • Add as friend
  • Add to ignore list
  • Add to block list

Featured iLogs

  • Nachiketas
  • Nachiketas
  • Nachiketas

Top 5 Articles This Week

  • Popular
  • Why Zardari Should Be President!
  • US Commando Strike in Waziristan
  • Save Me From Charismatic Leaders!
  • Free to Breed
  • There is no ‘honour’ in killing
  • Featured
  • There are a Lot of Monkeys
  • White Charade
  • Words of a Woman
  • FOX News and the Smelly Shoes
  • Dilemmas of Creative Children
  • 10 Years Ago
  • I Know Why the Caged Frog Croaks
  • The Beggar Boy
  • A Bachelor Comes of Age
  • Iqbal: Selected Verse I
  • Recollections of my Grandfather

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited