Pakistans Permanent Revolution
It is remarkable that you insist I am a hindu, which I am not, not that there is anythting wrong with that. The funny thing is that you slander, resort to name calling and insults but people like you freak out when other`s do that to Muslims. Typical hypocrisy and pitiful ghetto mentality that is suprsingly similar to other disenfranchised and usually hopeless groups.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 31, 2007 02:16 pm
Abu,It is remarkable that you insist I am a hindu, which I am not, not that there is anythting wrong with that. The funny thing is that you slander, resort to name calling and insults but people like you freak out when other`s do that to Muslims. Typical hypocrisy and pitiful ghetto mentality that is suprsingly similar to other disenfranchised and usually hopeless groups.
Pakistans Permanent Revolution
Thank you for displaying your limited intellectual faculties for eveyone to see.
Fortunately the likes of gazankahn give all people hope that reason and basic human decency triumph over blind adherence to dogma. Those limited IQ ``rejects`` who couldn`t cut it in more competitive societies like Abu need to hide behind their mom`s burqas.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 31, 2007 02:12 pm
Re: # 179Thank you for displaying your limited intellectual faculties for eveyone to see.
Fortunately the likes of gazankahn give all people hope that reason and basic human decency triumph over blind adherence to dogma. Those limited IQ ``rejects`` who couldn`t cut it in more competitive societies like Abu need to hide behind their mom`s burqas.
Pakistans Permanent Revolution
The ``white mans`` system of oppression? Who are you kidding? Do you think Arab imperialism was so enlightened and progessive? How about the wonderful Ottoman empire where the consorts of the rulers were abducted women, ever heard of the Janisseries? Sick concept of orphaned christian boys militarized and taught to hate and become a merciless fighting machine (aka Taliban). Or how about those Arabs, only got around to making slavery illegal in 1976. Or the wonderful caste/apartheid system...is that the white man`s doing? Or how about the rape of Nanking by the Japanese?
Please wake up take you head out of the sands of Arabia and see the world for what is is.
Today a muslims is most likely oppressed/killed/persecuted by another MUSLIM than by a white man, Indian or jew. Until this fact is accpeted, digested and some reform in the backward, closeminded, intolerant Islamic world occurs the Muslim community has nowhere to go but down. I see very few people on this site who understand the urgency of this problem , they just utter empty phrases for the Ummah etc... Urstruly, Tahmed, Zeemax being the worst malefactors.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 31, 2007 11:20 am
Re: # 170The ``white mans`` system of oppression? Who are you kidding? Do you think Arab imperialism was so enlightened and progessive? How about the wonderful Ottoman empire where the consorts of the rulers were abducted women, ever heard of the Janisseries? Sick concept of orphaned christian boys militarized and taught to hate and become a merciless fighting machine (aka Taliban). Or how about those Arabs, only got around to making slavery illegal in 1976. Or the wonderful caste/apartheid system...is that the white man`s doing? Or how about the rape of Nanking by the Japanese?
Please wake up take you head out of the sands of Arabia and see the world for what is is.
Today a muslims is most likely oppressed/killed/persecuted by another MUSLIM than by a white man, Indian or jew. Until this fact is accpeted, digested and some reform in the backward, closeminded, intolerant Islamic world occurs the Muslim community has nowhere to go but down. I see very few people on this site who understand the urgency of this problem , they just utter empty phrases for the Ummah etc... Urstruly, Tahmed, Zeemax being the worst malefactors.
Pakistans Permanent Revolution
Are you aware of the fact that the 34000 converst to Islam are largely from the prison population and other backward, disaffected groups? John Walker Lindh, the convert associated witht he 7/7 bombing. Same thin in Europe. Islam does not inspire the best and brightest to come into their folds whether it is from Asia, Europe or the States. Reading your posts its is abundantly clear as to why that is. Spare me the usual spewing of hatred.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 31, 2007 11:10 am
Re: # 160Are you aware of the fact that the 34000 converst to Islam are largely from the prison population and other backward, disaffected groups? John Walker Lindh, the convert associated witht he 7/7 bombing. Same thin in Europe. Islam does not inspire the best and brightest to come into their folds whether it is from Asia, Europe or the States. Reading your posts its is abundantly clear as to why that is. Spare me the usual spewing of hatred.
A Nation Reborn
Hahahaha! Hamidm, this munafiq thinks you are so funny! Looking forward to hell if guys like you are around
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 21, 2007 11:37 am
Re: # 25Hahahaha! Hamidm, this munafiq thinks you are so funny! Looking forward to hell if guys like you are around
Raiwind IX
Q; If children are suicide bombers like these:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070320/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqmilitary_070320203409
R they considered martyrs?
I frankly don`t find it suprising at all that you post such photos...that`s exactly what most people expect from the likes of you. Have any cool beheading photos? How about pics of a nine year old giving a 54 yr old guy a blow job. Pretty normal stuff to you I bet.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 20, 2007 05:17 pm
Re: # 302Q; If children are suicide bombers like these:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070320/wl_mideast_afp/usiraqmilitary_070320203409
R they considered martyrs?
I frankly don`t find it suprising at all that you post such photos...that`s exactly what most people expect from the likes of you. Have any cool beheading photos? How about pics of a nine year old giving a 54 yr old guy a blow job. Pretty normal stuff to you I bet.
A Nation Reborn
This is you chance Pakistan, imagaine all the attnand overnight it will ring true;
``Make Love Not War``.
Bet even Hamidm will hanker to rush back asap. :)
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 20, 2007 01:52 pm
Look more than anything, more than ever...Pakistan needs some good bars, swanky ones, dive one, pick up joints etc... How about a vodka infused sharbat? People can relax, mingle with the opposte sex and just chill. At least for one day. If you can`t beat them join them. I think they should have ``Kafir Day`` and make it trendy and fun so the mullahs will loose their thunder. Kafir Day will be like Carnival. Before you know it ...Germans, Scandinavians will be choosing Pakistan over India. (Sorry but this Pakistani tourism schtick recently is a sad sorry imitation of India tourism dept ``Discover India``. Everyone I know has been or wants to visit India)This is you chance Pakistan, imagaine all the attnand overnight it will ring true;
``Make Love Not War``.
Bet even Hamidm will hanker to rush back asap. :)
Raiwind IX
Sorry an indian friend told me about this site. I have lived long enough in places like Toronto to get a sense of dynamics. One thing I have noticed is that Pakistanis tend to be less educated, more uncouth and dowright primitive than Indians who are for the most part pretty well respected and get along with everyone. Hell Iranians and Palestinians study in India. Yet Pakistanis are the most racist towards Indians and it just cracks me up. Like this abu guy who clearly has some delusion that he is arab or how about those Pakistanis who try to pass themselves of as Persian. I mean we are all a cauldrom or races and ethnicities but the self-hatred is really unbelievable. I thought Iranians were bad (tend to say they look Italian or French etc...) but nothing like this. Also do you know who give Muslims the worst name and reputaion? Yep Pakistanis. They embody the absolute worst aspect of Islam and act like they are so proud. Proud of what? Read the article... I actually find it amusing. I have been told that they absolutely worhsip Persians and Arabs almost to a sychophantish extent just like blacks looking up to whites. Its weird.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 03:31 pm
Re: # 139Sorry an indian friend told me about this site. I have lived long enough in places like Toronto to get a sense of dynamics. One thing I have noticed is that Pakistanis tend to be less educated, more uncouth and dowright primitive than Indians who are for the most part pretty well respected and get along with everyone. Hell Iranians and Palestinians study in India. Yet Pakistanis are the most racist towards Indians and it just cracks me up. Like this abu guy who clearly has some delusion that he is arab or how about those Pakistanis who try to pass themselves of as Persian. I mean we are all a cauldrom or races and ethnicities but the self-hatred is really unbelievable. I thought Iranians were bad (tend to say they look Italian or French etc...) but nothing like this. Also do you know who give Muslims the worst name and reputaion? Yep Pakistanis. They embody the absolute worst aspect of Islam and act like they are so proud. Proud of what? Read the article... I actually find it amusing. I have been told that they absolutely worhsip Persians and Arabs almost to a sychophantish extent just like blacks looking up to whites. Its weird.
Raiwind IX
Persian women don`t go out with dogs. Sorry neither do lebanese beauties.
Besides aren`t you engaged to you cousin?
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 03:17 pm
Re: # 136Persian women don`t go out with dogs. Sorry neither do lebanese beauties.
Besides aren`t you engaged to you cousin?
Raiwind IX
Actually Abu you are ugly in person, mind and for sure in looks. Why do keep mentioning looks. Please post your picture. I doubt you look very Aryan or Arab. You Pakis think you are so great because you may have a drop of Arabic blood. You`re not. Know what arabs call you and blacks behind your backs? Abeed. Look it up retard.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 03:04 pm
Re: # 132Actually Abu you are ugly in person, mind and for sure in looks. Why do keep mentioning looks. Please post your picture. I doubt you look very Aryan or Arab. You Pakis think you are so great because you may have a drop of Arabic blood. You`re not. Know what arabs call you and blacks behind your backs? Abeed. Look it up retard.
Trapped, surrounded, quarantined or just reading too much into it?
Thanks for the laughs. That has to be one of the most unintelligble pieces of nonsense I have ever read. God help Pakistan. If you guys don`t get you act together you`ll be serving you arab masters and the entire GDP will be from remittances from the Gulf.
Abu Wabu. Know what? You`re Indian to any Middle Easterner. Name doesn`t help.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 02:57 pm
Re: # 307Thanks for the laughs. That has to be one of the most unintelligble pieces of nonsense I have ever read. God help Pakistan. If you guys don`t get you act together you`ll be serving you arab masters and the entire GDP will be from remittances from the Gulf.
Abu Wabu. Know what? You`re Indian to any Middle Easterner. Name doesn`t help.
Trapped, surrounded, quarantined or just reading too much into it?
Your too dumb to be a Dravidian. IQ too low.
Pathetic wannabee. You go Saudi Arabia and bend over for your master.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 01:52 pm
Re: # 302Your too dumb to be a Dravidian. IQ too low.
Pathetic wannabee. You go Saudi Arabia and bend over for your master.
Trapped, surrounded, quarantined or just reading too much into it?
Pissed
Pakistani priorities
What do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on nuclear bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage?
August 1, 2006
iranian.com
One of the many distressing news items one reads these days is the Washington Post item posted on this site, on Pakistan`s plans to build another plant to make more nuclear bombs. It should prompt philosophers to reflect on the nature of human folly, folly in this case being a misapprehension of the nature of security. My own reflection is: Pakistan, you are a piss-hole state, why do you want more bombs?
You are a backward, lawless country. Your people barely respect your laws, especially the ``high`` class of dirty, crooked politicians who just seem unable to keep their dirty little fingers out of the public purse, your women are beaten or burned or scarred if they fail to do the bidding of their primitive men-folk, you are the cradle of Taliban and all manner of other fanatics that desecrate religion as they bomb and murder in God`s name - to satisfy their own insatiable thirst for violence and mayhem.
Your generals and soldiers seem to connive with this underworld, not to mention with the bandits, gangsters, and narco-terrorists that keep entering Iran (Iran: shut the border, put up a Sharon-style wall with an electrified barbed-wire topping, and keep out the narco-trash). Where would your economy be without remittances from the millions of Pakistanis who would rather live elsewhere, and without U.S. taxpayer`s money President Bush is forced to pay as ``aid`` to a supposed ally in the war on terrorism - though an ally that invites all the confidence of a Jewish carpet seller. The aid is undeserved I hardly need say, when terrorists seem to come and go as they please.
Goodness knows what the state is of public administration, the quality of services given to the public (are you laughing?) the postal system, public transports, sewerage, environmental management, security and the prevalence of firearms, consumer rights, civil rights etc... Surely the Pakistani government should be dealing with this litany of problems?
And what do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage? Do they prefer to fuss over Kashmir, as their government would like them to, as if it has anything to do with them? Pakistan of course is not the only country where the government prefers to obsess over impertinent foreign issues or finance a nuclear programme instead of making the country a better place to live and work. Has Pakistan done anything good since its foundation by that fanatic-in-a-suit Jinnah?
What an appalling man: one can see him shrilly pushing for a separate Bantustan for his folk, fomenting hatred between Hindus and Muslims so he could become a head of state. He was once chided by the Nizam [of Hyderabad] for rudely sitting in his presence, uninvited, casually crossing his legs and lighting a cigarette. ``How dare you smoke before the Nizam of Hyderabad?`` the monarch snapped. Marvellous - putting the nasty little politician in his place. Jinnah reportedly sat up, stubbed out his cigarette and mumbled ``sorry``.
The Nizam was a marvellous man: while one of India`s wealthiest princes, he wore the same cap for decades. He hid wads of cash here and there in his vast palace - for a rainy day - but forgot about them, and they rotted away or were eaten by mice. He would serve his guests one glass of tea and no more. I like the Nizam, he did as he pleased. India should have shown him a little more respect.
As for Kashmir, this endless bone of contention between India and Pakistan, the British should have just left it intact, kept the fabulous Maharajah and ``Finlandized`` the state, turning it into a neutral state and UNESCO heritage site, instead of some big old banged-out Beirut.
Frankly, the princes and despots of old were no worse - if not better - than the myriad demagogues, revolutionary chieftains, presidents and ``dear leaders`` the 20th century has thrown up, flattering ``the people`` as they plot their coups, political murders, bombings and nuclear-bomb programmes. I`ll take the Nizam over Taliban or Saddam thank you.
Personally, I have nothing against Pakistanis. I shared a flat in London once with a charming, courteous Pakistani. His parents spoke softly, like the Persians. So, to conclude on a more optimistic and amicable note: Pakistan is a stinking cesspit of a piss-pot.
COMMENT
For letters section
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 01:46 pm
An Iranian perspective:Pissed
Pakistani priorities
What do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on nuclear bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage?
August 1, 2006
iranian.com
One of the many distressing news items one reads these days is the Washington Post item posted on this site, on Pakistan`s plans to build another plant to make more nuclear bombs. It should prompt philosophers to reflect on the nature of human folly, folly in this case being a misapprehension of the nature of security. My own reflection is: Pakistan, you are a piss-hole state, why do you want more bombs?
You are a backward, lawless country. Your people barely respect your laws, especially the ``high`` class of dirty, crooked politicians who just seem unable to keep their dirty little fingers out of the public purse, your women are beaten or burned or scarred if they fail to do the bidding of their primitive men-folk, you are the cradle of Taliban and all manner of other fanatics that desecrate religion as they bomb and murder in God`s name - to satisfy their own insatiable thirst for violence and mayhem.
Your generals and soldiers seem to connive with this underworld, not to mention with the bandits, gangsters, and narco-terrorists that keep entering Iran (Iran: shut the border, put up a Sharon-style wall with an electrified barbed-wire topping, and keep out the narco-trash). Where would your economy be without remittances from the millions of Pakistanis who would rather live elsewhere, and without U.S. taxpayer`s money President Bush is forced to pay as ``aid`` to a supposed ally in the war on terrorism - though an ally that invites all the confidence of a Jewish carpet seller. The aid is undeserved I hardly need say, when terrorists seem to come and go as they please.
Goodness knows what the state is of public administration, the quality of services given to the public (are you laughing?) the postal system, public transports, sewerage, environmental management, security and the prevalence of firearms, consumer rights, civil rights etc... Surely the Pakistani government should be dealing with this litany of problems?
And what do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage? Do they prefer to fuss over Kashmir, as their government would like them to, as if it has anything to do with them? Pakistan of course is not the only country where the government prefers to obsess over impertinent foreign issues or finance a nuclear programme instead of making the country a better place to live and work. Has Pakistan done anything good since its foundation by that fanatic-in-a-suit Jinnah?
What an appalling man: one can see him shrilly pushing for a separate Bantustan for his folk, fomenting hatred between Hindus and Muslims so he could become a head of state. He was once chided by the Nizam [of Hyderabad] for rudely sitting in his presence, uninvited, casually crossing his legs and lighting a cigarette. ``How dare you smoke before the Nizam of Hyderabad?`` the monarch snapped. Marvellous - putting the nasty little politician in his place. Jinnah reportedly sat up, stubbed out his cigarette and mumbled ``sorry``.
The Nizam was a marvellous man: while one of India`s wealthiest princes, he wore the same cap for decades. He hid wads of cash here and there in his vast palace - for a rainy day - but forgot about them, and they rotted away or were eaten by mice. He would serve his guests one glass of tea and no more. I like the Nizam, he did as he pleased. India should have shown him a little more respect.
As for Kashmir, this endless bone of contention between India and Pakistan, the British should have just left it intact, kept the fabulous Maharajah and ``Finlandized`` the state, turning it into a neutral state and UNESCO heritage site, instead of some big old banged-out Beirut.
Frankly, the princes and despots of old were no worse - if not better - than the myriad demagogues, revolutionary chieftains, presidents and ``dear leaders`` the 20th century has thrown up, flattering ``the people`` as they plot their coups, political murders, bombings and nuclear-bomb programmes. I`ll take the Nizam over Taliban or Saddam thank you.
Personally, I have nothing against Pakistanis. I shared a flat in London once with a charming, courteous Pakistani. His parents spoke softly, like the Persians. So, to conclude on a more optimistic and amicable note: Pakistan is a stinking cesspit of a piss-pot.
COMMENT
For letters section
Raiwind IX
Pakistani priorities
What do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on nuclear bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage?
August 1, 2006
iranian.com
One of the many distressing news items one reads these days is the Washington Post item posted on this site, on Pakistan`s plans to build another plant to make more nuclear bombs. It should prompt philosophers to reflect on the nature of human folly, folly in this case being a misapprehension of the nature of security. My own reflection is: Pakistan, you are a piss-hole state, why do you want more bombs?
You are a backward, lawless country. Your people barely respect your laws, especially the ``high`` class of dirty, crooked politicians who just seem unable to keep their dirty little fingers out of the public purse, your women are beaten or burned or scarred if they fail to do the bidding of their primitive men-folk, you are the cradle of Taliban and all manner of other fanatics that desecrate religion as they bomb and murder in God`s name - to satisfy their own insatiable thirst for violence and mayhem.
Your generals and soldiers seem to connive with this underworld, not to mention with the bandits, gangsters, and narco-terrorists that keep entering Iran (Iran: shut the border, put up a Sharon-style wall with an electrified barbed-wire topping, and keep out the narco-trash). Where would your economy be without remittances from the millions of Pakistanis who would rather live elsewhere, and without U.S. taxpayer`s money President Bush is forced to pay as ``aid`` to a supposed ally in the war on terrorism - though an ally that invites all the confidence of a Jewish carpet seller. The aid is undeserved I hardly need say, when terrorists seem to come and go as they please.
Goodness knows what the state is of public administration, the quality of services given to the public (are you laughing?) the postal system, public transports, sewerage, environmental management, security and the prevalence of firearms, consumer rights, civil rights etc... Surely the Pakistani government should be dealing with this litany of problems?
And what do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage? Do they prefer to fuss over Kashmir, as their government would like them to, as if it has anything to do with them? Pakistan of course is not the only country where the government prefers to obsess over impertinent foreign issues or finance a nuclear programme instead of making the country a better place to live and work. Has Pakistan done anything good since its foundation by that fanatic-in-a-suit Jinnah?
What an appalling man: one can see him shrilly pushing for a separate Bantustan for his folk, fomenting hatred between Hindus and Muslims so he could become a head of state. He was once chided by the Nizam [of Hyderabad] for rudely sitting in his presence, uninvited, casually crossing his legs and lighting a cigarette. ``How dare you smoke before the Nizam of Hyderabad?`` the monarch snapped. Marvellous - putting the nasty little politician in his place. Jinnah reportedly sat up, stubbed out his cigarette and mumbled ``sorry``.
The Nizam was a marvellous man: while one of India`s wealthiest princes, he wore the same cap for decades. He hid wads of cash here and there in his vast palace - for a rainy day - but forgot about them, and they rotted away or were eaten by mice. He would serve his guests one glass of tea and no more. I like the Nizam, he did as he pleased. India should have shown him a little more respect.
As for Kashmir, this endless bone of contention between India and Pakistan, the British should have just left it intact, kept the fabulous Maharajah and ``Finlandized`` the state, turning it into a neutral state and UNESCO heritage site, instead of some big old banged-out Beirut.
Frankly, the princes and despots of old were no worse - if not better - than the myriad demagogues, revolutionary chieftains, presidents and ``dear leaders`` the 20th century has thrown up, flattering ``the people`` as they plot their coups, political murders, bombings and nuclear-bomb programmes. I`ll take the Nizam over Taliban or Saddam thank you.
Personally, I have nothing against Pakistanis. I shared a flat in London once with a charming, courteous Pakistani. His parents spoke softly, like the Persians. So, to conclude on a more optimistic and amicable note: Pakistan is a stinking cesspit of a piss-pot.
COMMENT
For letters section
To Alidad Vassigh
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 01:44 pm
Pissed Pakistani priorities
What do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on nuclear bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage?
August 1, 2006
iranian.com
One of the many distressing news items one reads these days is the Washington Post item posted on this site, on Pakistan`s plans to build another plant to make more nuclear bombs. It should prompt philosophers to reflect on the nature of human folly, folly in this case being a misapprehension of the nature of security. My own reflection is: Pakistan, you are a piss-hole state, why do you want more bombs?
You are a backward, lawless country. Your people barely respect your laws, especially the ``high`` class of dirty, crooked politicians who just seem unable to keep their dirty little fingers out of the public purse, your women are beaten or burned or scarred if they fail to do the bidding of their primitive men-folk, you are the cradle of Taliban and all manner of other fanatics that desecrate religion as they bomb and murder in God`s name - to satisfy their own insatiable thirst for violence and mayhem.
Your generals and soldiers seem to connive with this underworld, not to mention with the bandits, gangsters, and narco-terrorists that keep entering Iran (Iran: shut the border, put up a Sharon-style wall with an electrified barbed-wire topping, and keep out the narco-trash). Where would your economy be without remittances from the millions of Pakistanis who would rather live elsewhere, and without U.S. taxpayer`s money President Bush is forced to pay as ``aid`` to a supposed ally in the war on terrorism - though an ally that invites all the confidence of a Jewish carpet seller. The aid is undeserved I hardly need say, when terrorists seem to come and go as they please.
Goodness knows what the state is of public administration, the quality of services given to the public (are you laughing?) the postal system, public transports, sewerage, environmental management, security and the prevalence of firearms, consumer rights, civil rights etc... Surely the Pakistani government should be dealing with this litany of problems?
And what do the Pakistanis think of their government spending their money on bombs, instead of on roads, trains, public toilets or sewerage? Do they prefer to fuss over Kashmir, as their government would like them to, as if it has anything to do with them? Pakistan of course is not the only country where the government prefers to obsess over impertinent foreign issues or finance a nuclear programme instead of making the country a better place to live and work. Has Pakistan done anything good since its foundation by that fanatic-in-a-suit Jinnah?
What an appalling man: one can see him shrilly pushing for a separate Bantustan for his folk, fomenting hatred between Hindus and Muslims so he could become a head of state. He was once chided by the Nizam [of Hyderabad] for rudely sitting in his presence, uninvited, casually crossing his legs and lighting a cigarette. ``How dare you smoke before the Nizam of Hyderabad?`` the monarch snapped. Marvellous - putting the nasty little politician in his place. Jinnah reportedly sat up, stubbed out his cigarette and mumbled ``sorry``.
The Nizam was a marvellous man: while one of India`s wealthiest princes, he wore the same cap for decades. He hid wads of cash here and there in his vast palace - for a rainy day - but forgot about them, and they rotted away or were eaten by mice. He would serve his guests one glass of tea and no more. I like the Nizam, he did as he pleased. India should have shown him a little more respect.
As for Kashmir, this endless bone of contention between India and Pakistan, the British should have just left it intact, kept the fabulous Maharajah and ``Finlandized`` the state, turning it into a neutral state and UNESCO heritage site, instead of some big old banged-out Beirut.
Frankly, the princes and despots of old were no worse - if not better - than the myriad demagogues, revolutionary chieftains, presidents and ``dear leaders`` the 20th century has thrown up, flattering ``the people`` as they plot their coups, political murders, bombings and nuclear-bomb programmes. I`ll take the Nizam over Taliban or Saddam thank you.
Personally, I have nothing against Pakistanis. I shared a flat in London once with a charming, courteous Pakistani. His parents spoke softly, like the Persians. So, to conclude on a more optimistic and amicable note: Pakistan is a stinking cesspit of a piss-pot.
COMMENT
For letters section
To Alidad Vassigh
Raiwind IX
One last thing...your ancestors defn were piss drinking cow worhsipping hindus and no matter how many of them you hate or kill you are still an Abeed in most arabs eyes. You are NOT Turkish, Persian or Arab. Just a self-loathing loser who has taken the worst from the Arabs and lost the best from the Indo-Aryans. Genetic disaster.
Btw what`s your real name? Arabic? Persian? Like there is anything ``Paksitani``.
Here is a great article from iranian.com. About Pakistan:
http://www.iranian.com/Vassigh/2006/August/Nuclear/index.html
Also please read Modern Jahiliyah by Nima Kasraie on same site.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 01:30 pm
Re: # 127One last thing...your ancestors defn were piss drinking cow worhsipping hindus and no matter how many of them you hate or kill you are still an Abeed in most arabs eyes. You are NOT Turkish, Persian or Arab. Just a self-loathing loser who has taken the worst from the Arabs and lost the best from the Indo-Aryans. Genetic disaster.
Btw what`s your real name? Arabic? Persian? Like there is anything ``Paksitani``.
Here is a great article from iranian.com. About Pakistan:
http://www.iranian.com/Vassigh/2006/August/Nuclear/index.html
Also please read Modern Jahiliyah by Nima Kasraie on same site.
Raiwind IX
Given your crude, abrasive manner, I don`t intend to interact here any longer. Just confirms my supicions.
Hope Iran starts building that wall fast. Sorry ignoramus but they have a culture and language that pre-dated and ended up dominating the Islamic world. Unlike you.
Maybe when you finish in China you can go to Arabia and polish your master`s shoes.
FYI Want to really insult an Iranian or Arab call him a Pakistani. Your such a pitiful wannabee.
Posted by
eastmwest
Mar 16, 2007 12:54 pm
Dear Lowlife,Given your crude, abrasive manner, I don`t intend to interact here any longer. Just confirms my supicions.
Hope Iran starts building that wall fast. Sorry ignoramus but they have a culture and language that pre-dated and ended up dominating the Islamic world. Unlike you.
Maybe when you finish in China you can go to Arabia and polish your master`s shoes.
FYI Want to really insult an Iranian or Arab call him a Pakistani. Your such a pitiful wannabee.
- eastmwest
- Interacts: 100
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 457
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Mar 9 2007
- Last signin: Aug 26 2007
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


