Cholesterol Say Paak
No thinkingstorm
Look I respect opposite and contrary opinions. My sign in name is Skeptical or sceptical.....
I doubt everything and this guy needs to be questioned for his own contradictions....
Mind you I have a love late relationship with this iconic writer and let me assure you a part of me perhaps admires him a lot and admires him much more than any one and certainly more than you……
People like NFP should exist, they are the benchmark for the left wing but in my humble and " confused" opinion Mr NFP does need to answer some questions....
You take his opinion to be an endorsement of your pro Musharraf stance or your anti Imran stance. You are narrowing your opinion to character assassination of anti Musharraf element… The typical approach is that anti Musharraf element is corrupt and self serving……
He is not pro Musharraf.....at least not the way you are ...He is trying to interpret and justify it through class "theory" and through liberalism is necessary at any cost approach….
The implicit idea according to my low intellectual and “contradictory half baked confused ” fcuking philosophy is that….( these are his favourite words...):
Things like independent Judiciary are purely a creation or reflection of middle class anal self righteous mentality…..
Though of far less intellectual calibre than him and having “no knowledge of geo politics”, I would like to offer my humble opinion that at times interests of self righteous anal bastard middle class and down trodden, though not explicitly realized, can actually converge….
And one should be careful when one’s own life is itself reflective of those anal middle class choices….
I have merely pointed out some contradictions …..
Let him answer them…..
And let me assure you once again that your opinion and his opinion though apparently same are not the same….
So while you praise and “respect” him for writing this wonderful piece (mainly because apparently he is pro Mushi and anti democracy or anti “sham democracy” or he endorses your view, his take is actually different ……
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 8, 2007 05:12 pm
Re: # 7 and 9 No thinkingstorm
Look I respect opposite and contrary opinions. My sign in name is Skeptical or sceptical.....
I doubt everything and this guy needs to be questioned for his own contradictions....
Mind you I have a love late relationship with this iconic writer and let me assure you a part of me perhaps admires him a lot and admires him much more than any one and certainly more than you……
People like NFP should exist, they are the benchmark for the left wing but in my humble and " confused" opinion Mr NFP does need to answer some questions....
You take his opinion to be an endorsement of your pro Musharraf stance or your anti Imran stance. You are narrowing your opinion to character assassination of anti Musharraf element… The typical approach is that anti Musharraf element is corrupt and self serving……
He is not pro Musharraf.....at least not the way you are ...He is trying to interpret and justify it through class "theory" and through liberalism is necessary at any cost approach….
The implicit idea according to my low intellectual and “contradictory half baked confused ” fcuking philosophy is that….( these are his favourite words...):
Things like independent Judiciary are purely a creation or reflection of middle class anal self righteous mentality…..
Though of far less intellectual calibre than him and having “no knowledge of geo politics”, I would like to offer my humble opinion that at times interests of self righteous anal bastard middle class and down trodden, though not explicitly realized, can actually converge….
And one should be careful when one’s own life is itself reflective of those anal middle class choices….
I have merely pointed out some contradictions …..
Let him answer them…..
And let me assure you once again that your opinion and his opinion though apparently same are not the same….
So while you praise and “respect” him for writing this wonderful piece (mainly because apparently he is pro Mushi and anti democracy or anti “sham democracy” or he endorses your view, his take is actually different ……
Cholesterol Say Paak
I want you to answer some bloody fcuking questions...... I have deliberately used fcuking because the real word though describes a hypocrite like you accurately would nevertheless be filtered out...
Mr Paracha if you are fcuking man enough to answer some questions, lets have your take about them....
1. Why do you write in a language which is elitist and understood by a only few......
2. Why despite your fcuking claims about being a "conventional" old fashioned Marxist Leninist and your fcuking tall claims to speak on the behalf of the down trodden, you have married an elitist yuppy commercial foreign banker..... why couldn’t you find some one from ordinary class for your steamy affairs and for your life partner.... After all in one of your articles you have actually made fun of Imran for marrying Jemima....Mr Paracha .... what about your own choice......
3. I am sorry I am getting personal here, but having slight "knowledge" of your immediate family, I would like to bring out your bloody hypocritical true face here.....because there are people here who like you because they think you are an "honest and straight forward" person. Your controversial style is interpreted as being fearless and straight forward…......
4. I do not blame you for certain things though, after all you got famous for writing "rebel" anti culture stuff... remember those anti culture days.....the News when you blamed Junoon for "selling the revolution....."
5. Answer Mr Paracha if Junoon sold the revolution to Coca Cola while never claiming to be "anti corporate" revolutionaries, you have actually "sold" your services to Nandos and Telenor.....If you claim to be straight forward and a true "socialist...", why have you written jingles for "elitist colonial" multinationals like Nandos and Telenor.... So the chicken crosses the road.... sounds familiar Mr NFP....... and the underpass is full of water.
6. Please do not claim that Engels was also an industrialist...
7. So you have decided to go against the grain.... why ... tell me and convince me, is it to merely reinforce your image as a "rebel" journalist or because you actually believe the crap you say....
8. You think that NRO and lawyers movement is a reflection of anal middle class mentality.... Your supporting evidence is lack of common man's protest......
Ok once again, lets have you take on it..... How many people actually came out when the most charismatic "roti Kapra makan " leader was hanged.....
At that time, due to Marshal Law of Zia people could not come out..... Would you give the same spin on that……Would you insult ZAB by saying that apparent lack of protest on his death was not because of Marshal Law but because he was a creation of anal middle class mentality….
9. By the way it took an air crash to remove Zia, he could not be removed through a popular movement…. Would you support him by saying that since no body came out Zia was a great leader…..
10. I have personally campaigned with a female NGO against Hudood Ordinance… I know for certain that majority of the lower class women were not even aware of the “Hudood” ordinance unless actually raped…. Would you cite that lack of awareness as endorsement in your articles the way you are ridiculing lawyers movement by saying that it is actually a reflection of anal middle class mentality ( interestingly u are yourself married into upper self righteous middle class family…..)
11. If public support is the true criteria for truthfulness of an idea, why you claim to be “Marxist Lenisist.” And yet support PPP when it despite retaining liberal outlook has moved away from nationalization……..In fact privatization started during PPP’s first tenure…and yet PPP’s street power and mass appeal is still intact….
12.. Answer Mr Paracha……. these entire questions one by one ……. Straight and to the point answers…..
13. I know that you will see this post…..You are an egoist person……. You have claimed in your articles that you have read a million books ( anti culture) and you are quick to answer anything which even mentions Salman Ahmed…..
14. Answer Mr Paracha
15. And answer logically and with proper supporting evidence
16. Do not say that I am self contradictory and a tableeghi or am Islamic fascist….
17.. In reality I may be far more left wing than a corporate jingle writing confused yet popular writer like you……
18. Great NFP……oh straight forward NFP…….
19. Answer !!!!
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 8, 2007 03:47 pm
I was waiting for your article and I had an instinctive hunch what you were about to say....I want you to answer some bloody fcuking questions...... I have deliberately used fcuking because the real word though describes a hypocrite like you accurately would nevertheless be filtered out...
Mr Paracha if you are fcuking man enough to answer some questions, lets have your take about them....
1. Why do you write in a language which is elitist and understood by a only few......
2. Why despite your fcuking claims about being a "conventional" old fashioned Marxist Leninist and your fcuking tall claims to speak on the behalf of the down trodden, you have married an elitist yuppy commercial foreign banker..... why couldn’t you find some one from ordinary class for your steamy affairs and for your life partner.... After all in one of your articles you have actually made fun of Imran for marrying Jemima....Mr Paracha .... what about your own choice......
3. I am sorry I am getting personal here, but having slight "knowledge" of your immediate family, I would like to bring out your bloody hypocritical true face here.....because there are people here who like you because they think you are an "honest and straight forward" person. Your controversial style is interpreted as being fearless and straight forward…......
4. I do not blame you for certain things though, after all you got famous for writing "rebel" anti culture stuff... remember those anti culture days.....the News when you blamed Junoon for "selling the revolution....."
5. Answer Mr Paracha if Junoon sold the revolution to Coca Cola while never claiming to be "anti corporate" revolutionaries, you have actually "sold" your services to Nandos and Telenor.....If you claim to be straight forward and a true "socialist...", why have you written jingles for "elitist colonial" multinationals like Nandos and Telenor.... So the chicken crosses the road.... sounds familiar Mr NFP....... and the underpass is full of water.
6. Please do not claim that Engels was also an industrialist...
7. So you have decided to go against the grain.... why ... tell me and convince me, is it to merely reinforce your image as a "rebel" journalist or because you actually believe the crap you say....
8. You think that NRO and lawyers movement is a reflection of anal middle class mentality.... Your supporting evidence is lack of common man's protest......
Ok once again, lets have you take on it..... How many people actually came out when the most charismatic "roti Kapra makan " leader was hanged.....
At that time, due to Marshal Law of Zia people could not come out..... Would you give the same spin on that……Would you insult ZAB by saying that apparent lack of protest on his death was not because of Marshal Law but because he was a creation of anal middle class mentality….
9. By the way it took an air crash to remove Zia, he could not be removed through a popular movement…. Would you support him by saying that since no body came out Zia was a great leader…..
10. I have personally campaigned with a female NGO against Hudood Ordinance… I know for certain that majority of the lower class women were not even aware of the “Hudood” ordinance unless actually raped…. Would you cite that lack of awareness as endorsement in your articles the way you are ridiculing lawyers movement by saying that it is actually a reflection of anal middle class mentality ( interestingly u are yourself married into upper self righteous middle class family…..)
11. If public support is the true criteria for truthfulness of an idea, why you claim to be “Marxist Lenisist.” And yet support PPP when it despite retaining liberal outlook has moved away from nationalization……..In fact privatization started during PPP’s first tenure…and yet PPP’s street power and mass appeal is still intact….
12.. Answer Mr Paracha……. these entire questions one by one ……. Straight and to the point answers…..
13. I know that you will see this post…..You are an egoist person……. You have claimed in your articles that you have read a million books ( anti culture) and you are quick to answer anything which even mentions Salman Ahmed…..
14. Answer Mr Paracha
15. And answer logically and with proper supporting evidence
16. Do not say that I am self contradictory and a tableeghi or am Islamic fascist….
17.. In reality I may be far more left wing than a corporate jingle writing confused yet popular writer like you……
18. Great NFP……oh straight forward NFP…….
19. Answer !!!!
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
thanks for the compliment, I think we all need to unite and condemn the current situation. Lack of vocal protest is being interpreted as endorsement by the cronies of this fascist regime. Its not democracy but the entire system of checks and balances which is at stake.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 8, 2007 06:45 am
Re: # 141thanks for the compliment, I think we all need to unite and condemn the current situation. Lack of vocal protest is being interpreted as endorsement by the cronies of this fascist regime. Its not democracy but the entire system of checks and balances which is at stake.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
So your solution about "disruptive" institutions like Judiciary (which by the way has always always been subject to executive apart for perhaps a few months when it showed signs of coming out of its control) should be razed to the core!!!
And rebuilding be done by an all powerful military strongman. Mr Goldfinger, what makes you think that this is rebuilding in the first place? It is the return to orginal state of affairs. Secondly the whole emergency was implemented to purge judiciary so that Musharraf can have his way completely. So what makes you think that this so called "rebuilding" will be for the country's betterment and not for removal of effective checks and balances. I keep on hearing similar crap about Musharraf being a better option than BB and NS blah blah...
Those two also created problems because they tried to concentrate too much powers in their hands and Musharraf is doing the same in a manner which is far more brutal and will have disastrous long term effects on your institutions. Mind you even if his intentions are "noble", one day your favourite stable and benevolent dictator will die or will have to leave. However even if he dies he would have left a precendent and a legacy of a weak and subservient judiiary which will then be abused for the next and not so benevolent dictator. Too much power in one individual has a tendency to be abused and abusers and their apologetics have a tendency to call it "stability" and essential to prevent anarchy.
So do you want a police state where one day you can be abducted by agencies and you do not have any any recourse to law!!! Perhaps then you will understand what this "stability" is all about...
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 8, 2007 12:08 am
Re: # 136So your solution about "disruptive" institutions like Judiciary (which by the way has always always been subject to executive apart for perhaps a few months when it showed signs of coming out of its control) should be razed to the core!!!
And rebuilding be done by an all powerful military strongman. Mr Goldfinger, what makes you think that this is rebuilding in the first place? It is the return to orginal state of affairs. Secondly the whole emergency was implemented to purge judiciary so that Musharraf can have his way completely. So what makes you think that this so called "rebuilding" will be for the country's betterment and not for removal of effective checks and balances. I keep on hearing similar crap about Musharraf being a better option than BB and NS blah blah...
Those two also created problems because they tried to concentrate too much powers in their hands and Musharraf is doing the same in a manner which is far more brutal and will have disastrous long term effects on your institutions. Mind you even if his intentions are "noble", one day your favourite stable and benevolent dictator will die or will have to leave. However even if he dies he would have left a precendent and a legacy of a weak and subservient judiiary which will then be abused for the next and not so benevolent dictator. Too much power in one individual has a tendency to be abused and abusers and their apologetics have a tendency to call it "stability" and essential to prevent anarchy.
So do you want a police state where one day you can be abducted by agencies and you do not have any any recourse to law!!! Perhaps then you will understand what this "stability" is all about...
The Proposition
I would like to pose a question to the author here. Why in women there is a tendency to actually find men like Mr Iqtidar instinctively attractive despite even knowing the nature of such men or shall i say because of that?
There is apprently a conflict between rational part and instinctive part of women. Rationally women, particularly, after women's liberation are fully aware of the need for equality and freedom. But at the same time, people like Mr Iqtidar despite their treatment of women are successful with them. Despite advances in feminism why Mills and Boon hero remains a darkly dangerous archtypal of a Male Chauvanist who forces his woman to love him and uses his predatory sexual urges to subject her to his whims.
This conflict needs to be sorted out before any genuine progress is expected in a movement towards equality. Equality after all is achived not only by reforming society and individual male mindset but also by changing female mindset.
Lets have your take on that
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 7, 2007 10:15 pm
It is an interesting and complicated take on so called taboo subjects...I would like to pose a question to the author here. Why in women there is a tendency to actually find men like Mr Iqtidar instinctively attractive despite even knowing the nature of such men or shall i say because of that?
There is apprently a conflict between rational part and instinctive part of women. Rationally women, particularly, after women's liberation are fully aware of the need for equality and freedom. But at the same time, people like Mr Iqtidar despite their treatment of women are successful with them. Despite advances in feminism why Mills and Boon hero remains a darkly dangerous archtypal of a Male Chauvanist who forces his woman to love him and uses his predatory sexual urges to subject her to his whims.
This conflict needs to be sorted out before any genuine progress is expected in a movement towards equality. Equality after all is achived not only by reforming society and individual male mindset but also by changing female mindset.
Lets have your take on that
In the Loving Memory of Waleed Iqbal
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 12:53 pm
A nice and touching article.
The Wild Side Of The Mall
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 12:50 pm
Good attempt. Being from Lahore I could so easily relate to this. Nice and subtle humour
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
Tahmed this is a simple point which many on this website are failing to understand. In fact Mr Brovili Express started to abuse me when I tried to criticize Musharraf's steps to make Pakistan a police state
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 12:48 pm
Re: # 74Tahmed this is a simple point which many on this website are failing to understand. In fact Mr Brovili Express started to abuse me when I tried to criticize Musharraf's steps to make Pakistan a police state
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
As I have said before Police state should be condemned in whatever Government arrangement we are refering to. I agree with you as long as you are against a police state.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:54 am
Re: # 59As I have said before Police state should be condemned in whatever Government arrangement we are refering to. I agree with you as long as you are against a police state.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
OK fine mr express, the point is that agencies do not just hand over your country men like that. They torture and abuse and at times do not even give USA chance to exercise their decency the poor man is already dead.
Since you have taken a position here your ego is preventing you to acknowledge that this practice is a wrong practice. The point is again missed by you-it is not CJ, Mushi, BB or NS. Its about people and their fundamental rights
And yes stop these abuses and act like a grown up man. I am just asking you to reflect. If you think I am wrong, fine-but let me assure you that poor's blood is not an amusement for me. If it had been, I would have been supporting Musharraf today. I can also come up with these filthy abuses but I wont. Take a chill pill. No hard feelngs we are just interacting on a site which states "unflinching idealism since 1997"
I have nothing more to add- you are prefectly entitled to your views.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:48 am
Re: # 55OK fine mr express, the point is that agencies do not just hand over your country men like that. They torture and abuse and at times do not even give USA chance to exercise their decency the poor man is already dead.
Since you have taken a position here your ego is preventing you to acknowledge that this practice is a wrong practice. The point is again missed by you-it is not CJ, Mushi, BB or NS. Its about people and their fundamental rights
And yes stop these abuses and act like a grown up man. I am just asking you to reflect. If you think I am wrong, fine-but let me assure you that poor's blood is not an amusement for me. If it had been, I would have been supporting Musharraf today. I can also come up with these filthy abuses but I wont. Take a chill pill. No hard feelngs we are just interacting on a site which states "unflinching idealism since 1997"
I have nothing more to add- you are prefectly entitled to your views.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
I am against a police state whether under democratic pretenses or open shamelessness like Musharraf regime. You are missing the point and again and again refering to same NS, BB vs Mushi thing.
Absolute power whether accumulated the way it was under NS or Mushi should be condemned.Certain things in life are independent of nature of government arrangement..
Kidly stick to the questio I am asking and stop coming up with this NS, BB or kanjar Musharraf comparisons
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:28 am
Re: # 54I am against a police state whether under democratic pretenses or open shamelessness like Musharraf regime. You are missing the point and again and again refering to same NS, BB vs Mushi thing.
Absolute power whether accumulated the way it was under NS or Mushi should be condemned.Certain things in life are independent of nature of government arrangement..
Kidly stick to the questio I am asking and stop coming up with this NS, BB or kanjar Musharraf comparisons
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
Mr express you still have not answered the question? Do you think that Pakistan should become a police state and ordinary people should be at the whims of agencies who can abduct and torture them the way they were doing and now with judiciary purged will continue to do so. Bravo!!
You approve that our citizens should be tortured and handed over to US without even acertaining whether they are actually involved in terror activities or not just because a certain count is neccessary to satisfy USA.
Once again you are missing the point here... Incompetence of political leaders does not mean that state torture on citizens is justified. Think and reflect or may be you also need an encounter with an agency to learn the hard way.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:22 am
Re: # 52Mr express you still have not answered the question? Do you think that Pakistan should become a police state and ordinary people should be at the whims of agencies who can abduct and torture them the way they were doing and now with judiciary purged will continue to do so. Bravo!!
You approve that our citizens should be tortured and handed over to US without even acertaining whether they are actually involved in terror activities or not just because a certain count is neccessary to satisfy USA.
Once again you are missing the point here... Incompetence of political leaders does not mean that state torture on citizens is justified. Think and reflect or may be you also need an encounter with an agency to learn the hard way.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
Do you think that judiciary should be purged because NS or BB are what you think they are....
Leaders are not a question here, emergency was not declared for them, it was declared to purge judiciary and abuse citizens and to prolong your favorite's rule at any cost.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:08 am
Re: # 49Do you think that judiciary should be purged because NS or BB are what you think they are....
Leaders are not a question here, emergency was not declared for them, it was declared to purge judiciary and abuse citizens and to prolong your favorite's rule at any cost.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
Mr express or whatever post no 47 is for you also...
Just answer the central question!!! Do you think that incompetence of democratic leaders mean that Pakistan should become a police state!
Think and reflect and please do not come up with this gibberish stuff of NS, BB , Bhutto vs virtues of Musharaff.
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 11:05 am
Re: # 48Mr express or whatever post no 47 is for you also...
Just answer the central question!!! Do you think that incompetence of democratic leaders mean that Pakistan should become a police state!
Think and reflect and please do not come up with this gibberish stuff of NS, BB , Bhutto vs virtues of Musharaff.
The Empire Strikes Again in Pakistan
Mr Goldfinger the central question is not whether NS, BB or kanjar Musharraf are capable or not. The central question is that whether ordinary Pakistani deserves this treatment where agencies can abduct you at their will and you do not have any recourse to law. Is purging independent minded judiciary a right thing...
May be you wont understand it because you are not here and you perhaps never had an encounter with agencies. May be next time you care to visit Pakistan, instead of coming up with posts from USA or wherever you are sitting comfortably, you have a nasty encounter with an agency only then you will realize what the whole issue is all about.
Incompetence of NS or BB does not justify brutality on citizens and snatching their fundamental rights. Nor their incompetence or corruption justifies that police start beating lawyers on the street and worst their incompetence does not prove that kanjar Musharraf is the right man for the job. A hollow kanjar who is destroying institutions just to prolong his rule!!! And strangely he has expats saying from the comforts of another country that he is the best man for the job!!!!
Posted by
Skeptical
Nov 6, 2007 10:52 am
Re: # 44Mr Goldfinger the central question is not whether NS, BB or kanjar Musharraf are capable or not. The central question is that whether ordinary Pakistani deserves this treatment where agencies can abduct you at their will and you do not have any recourse to law. Is purging independent minded judiciary a right thing...
May be you wont understand it because you are not here and you perhaps never had an encounter with agencies. May be next time you care to visit Pakistan, instead of coming up with posts from USA or wherever you are sitting comfortably, you have a nasty encounter with an agency only then you will realize what the whole issue is all about.
Incompetence of NS or BB does not justify brutality on citizens and snatching their fundamental rights. Nor their incompetence or corruption justifies that police start beating lawyers on the street and worst their incompetence does not prove that kanjar Musharraf is the right man for the job. A hollow kanjar who is destroying institutions just to prolong his rule!!! And strangely he has expats saying from the comforts of another country that he is the best man for the job!!!!
- Skeptical
- Interacts: 186
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 650
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Oct 8 2007
- Last signin: Nov 21 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


