Mass Difference: The Bhuttos and Civil Society your reasoning is completely flawed. whatever people do outside the office is none of our business- the distinction between public and private life aught to remain.
Also even if as you say it is our business; if alcohol consumption and "partying with girls" is such a problem for you instead of attacking bilawal [who possibly wont be in power until considerably later] perhaps you should focus your attention on those already in office.

Mass Difference: The Bhuttos and Civil Society that is not true. The reason why Clinton was up for impeachment was because he was having an affair with monica lewinsky INSIDE the white house- inside the office in which he was supposed to be deliberating over matters of state.For that he had to be held accountable. That is a crucial difference.
Also you seemed to have jumped to the conclusion that bilawal is a drunkard which is totally unwarranted.

Mass Difference: The Bhuttos and Civil Society that is not true. The reason why Clinton was up for impeachment was because he was having an affair with monica lewinsky INSIDE the white house- inside the office in which he was supposed to be deliberating over matters of state.For that he had to be held accountable. That is a crucial difference.
Also you seemed to have jumped to the conclusion that bilawal is a drunkard which is totally unwarranted.

Mass Difference: The Bhuttos and Civil Society the link to the article given below is totally useless and irrelevant. People need to learn to distinguish between peoples private and public lives. It is none of our business what Bilawal is upto at uni and has no bearing on his being chairman of the PPP. While it is arguable whether he should have been appointed chairperson, it is definitely not so on the grounds stated in this article.