listing 1-16
1 2
An Unnecessary Interview with History
So I hit the nerve :), Go and check the discussion threads, I have been equally defending PPP. My original support is for Lawyers movement. You on the other hand just a produce of DICTATOR .
Posted by
econfused
Apr 2, 2008 05:24 pm
Re #36So I hit the nerve :), Go and check the discussion threads, I have been equally defending PPP. My original support is for Lawyers movement. You on the other hand just a produce of DICTATOR .
An Unnecessary Interview with History
"Country's Stability" or My Job First err. Pakistan First
Posted by
econfused
Mar 28, 2008 01:12 pm
Re #33"Country's Stability" or My Job First err. Pakistan First
An Unnecessary Interview with History
You can keep on bashing NS. I am glad dark era is over and we are back toward democracy with a parliament. You can keep your assumption that my vote was for NS :) as long as it hurts you.
Your beloved Musharraf said "In the Line of Fire", that there were Mujahidins :). While you are saying those were soldiers.
Well we do need commission to get the facts right.
Next coup has to wait for another 10 years. So keep trying :)
Posted by
econfused
Mar 28, 2008 01:09 pm
Re #33You can keep on bashing NS. I am glad dark era is over and we are back toward democracy with a parliament. You can keep your assumption that my vote was for NS :) as long as it hurts you.
Your beloved Musharraf said "In the Line of Fire", that there were Mujahidins :). While you are saying those were soldiers.
Well we do need commission to get the facts right.
Next coup has to wait for another 10 years. So keep trying :)
An Unnecessary Interview with History
Following is your own sentence from #27. So prove, as your link for Shah, its HIS word against NS. He is only ex. CJ who is ok with Dictator's actions.
"There are videos on which it is shown that NS along with his cronies attacked supreme court and you are denying the facts."
Posted by
econfused
Mar 26, 2008 04:48 pm
Re #MeraPakistanFollowing is your own sentence from #27. So prove, as your link for Shah, its HIS word against NS. He is only ex. CJ who is ok with Dictator's actions.
"There are videos on which it is shown that NS along with his cronies attacked supreme court and you are denying the facts."
An Unnecessary Interview with History
Load of crap: DOCTRINE OF NECESSITY? is that a real law? Dictator was saving his job and not the country. First he he has to kick government out, and now to save job, he packed the judiciary. The guy will stop at nothing to save his job.
"Justice Sajjad Ali Shah: On the principle of doctrine of necessity, I think the changes in government can be justified. If there is no other alternative, no other way out, and this is the only solution available, then I think it is better to save the country, save the system then not."
Posted by
econfused
Mar 26, 2008 04:40 pm
Re #29Load of crap: DOCTRINE OF NECESSITY? is that a real law? Dictator was saving his job and not the country. First he he has to kick government out, and now to save job, he packed the judiciary. The guy will stop at nothing to save his job.
"Justice Sajjad Ali Shah: On the principle of doctrine of necessity, I think the changes in government can be justified. If there is no other alternative, no other way out, and this is the only solution available, then I think it is better to save the country, save the system then not."
An Unnecessary Interview with History
So again old excuses. You could not get the video, did you see my earlier post. It was a challenge, along with bet.
I firmly believe in democracy, so not voting is not an option. As there was NONE option on the ballot. Now absence of NONE does not automatically give you 55%.
As those cronies who attacked SC, they were part of thugs from 1999 to 2008.
My vote was for democracy and I am glad my voice is heard. You can wait for next coup :)
Till then, so long. Go lick your wounds!
Posted by
econfused
Mar 26, 2008 04:35 pm
Re #29So again old excuses. You could not get the video, did you see my earlier post. It was a challenge, along with bet.
I firmly believe in democracy, so not voting is not an option. As there was NONE option on the ballot. Now absence of NONE does not automatically give you 55%.
As those cronies who attacked SC, they were part of thugs from 1999 to 2008.
My vote was for democracy and I am glad my voice is heard. You can wait for next coup :)
Till then, so long. Go lick your wounds!
An Unnecessary Interview with History
I challenge you to post the video where NS was leading the attack. I bet you wont.
You also assumed I am a supporter of NS. I am a supporter of democracy. I am glad that political parties are back. As we cannot have angels on ballot, so I have to vote for the available bunch.
You are not for dictatorship :) RIGHT. I heard Musharraf is also for democracy.
Posted by
econfused
Mar 26, 2008 06:08 am
Re: #27I challenge you to post the video where NS was leading the attack. I bet you wont.
You also assumed I am a supporter of NS. I am a supporter of democracy. I am glad that political parties are back. As we cannot have angels on ballot, so I have to vote for the available bunch.
You are not for dictatorship :) RIGHT. I heard Musharraf is also for democracy.
An Unnecessary Interview with History
No, shame is on you, who prefer military dictators. NS did pass the legislation. Supreme court did not give verdict against NS in 2002 in court attack case. Go back check the facts.
Supreme court back then was trying to block the constitution amendment.
The saying of shame on you fits even more for Military supporters.
- Military Fooled you in 1958 - 1969
- Military Fooled you in 1977 - 1988
- Military Fooled you in 1999 - 2008
I am positive you haven't learned.
Posted by
econfused
Mar 25, 2008 06:06 pm
Re #25No, shame is on you, who prefer military dictators. NS did pass the legislation. Supreme court did not give verdict against NS in 2002 in court attack case. Go back check the facts.
Supreme court back then was trying to block the constitution amendment.
The saying of shame on you fits even more for Military supporters.
- Military Fooled you in 1958 - 1969
- Military Fooled you in 1977 - 1988
- Military Fooled you in 1999 - 2008
I am positive you haven't learned.
An Unnecessary Interview with History
So instead of listening to speech of Khawaj Asif (which was the reference) you started to whine about pkpolitics. As far removal of Army chiefs and CJ, well if parliament is supreme the you have to live with that.
I am sure this Ganja Faqir along with Corrupt Zardari will give you a democracy. They are at this stage because of vote, not by barrel of gun.
Posted by
econfused
Mar 25, 2008 09:08 am
Re #23So instead of listening to speech of Khawaj Asif (which was the reference) you started to whine about pkpolitics. As far removal of Army chiefs and CJ, well if parliament is supreme the you have to live with that.
I am sure this Ganja Faqir along with Corrupt Zardari will give you a democracy. They are at this stage because of vote, not by barrel of gun.
An Unnecessary Interview with History
Once again, your answer is more of the same "hoodlums". Question is what did we get from rule of Ayub, Zia and Musharraf?
The only thing these dictator has achieved is to project politicians as evil. They feel to achieve to take democracy out of these illiterate people.
If democracy is given a chance, peopler will drive these hoodlums out of this leadership role. We do not want any General to provide us this leadership.
You are trying to say generals or saints and not hoodlums? I would suggest making "Military Inc" as the textbook of country and Kh. Asif budget speech of 2006 as morning prayer in school assemblies.
http://pkpolitics.com/2008/03/15/khawaja-asif-budget-debate-20067 /
Posted by
econfused
Mar 20, 2008 07:17 am
@#21Once again, your answer is more of the same "hoodlums". Question is what did we get from rule of Ayub, Zia and Musharraf?
The only thing these dictator has achieved is to project politicians as evil. They feel to achieve to take democracy out of these illiterate people.
If democracy is given a chance, peopler will drive these hoodlums out of this leadership role. We do not want any General to provide us this leadership.
You are trying to say generals or saints and not hoodlums? I would suggest making "Military Inc" as the textbook of country and Kh. Asif budget speech of 2006 as morning prayer in school assemblies.
http://pkpolitics.com/2008/03/15/khawaja-asif-budget-debate-20067 /
An Unnecessary Interview with History
These people are willing to give corrupt generals decades, but aren't ready to give politicians a real chance?
President says there is no leadership in the country and when I see people like:
Javed Hashmi
Aitezaz Ahsan
Kh. Asif
Raza Rabani
Munir A Malik
and countless lawyers, one has to ask what kind of leadership general is looking for. Are we waiting for angels to come down? or we are waiting for Mahmood Ghaznavi? and Ayubi?
Posted by
econfused
Mar 19, 2008 05:11 pm
I am amazed there are still so many "educated" readers (who by the way enjoy democracy) support a dictator. These guys just keep on bad mouthing politicians. For all these so called Musharraf/Army lovers should listen to Kh. Asif budget speech of 2006. These people are willing to give corrupt generals decades, but aren't ready to give politicians a real chance?
President says there is no leadership in the country and when I see people like:
Javed Hashmi
Aitezaz Ahsan
Kh. Asif
Raza Rabani
Munir A Malik
and countless lawyers, one has to ask what kind of leadership general is looking for. Are we waiting for angels to come down? or we are waiting for Mahmood Ghaznavi? and Ayubi?
Revolutionary for Sale
So regardless what the article is, you have to make a point that why people rallied for CJ? or was it about something else? Please do elaborate.
May be "Awaam" is stupid and follow tiniest shred of hope? while "leaders" stay on the sidelines.
Posted by
econfused
Jan 10, 2008 02:13 pm
Re: #1So regardless what the article is, you have to make a point that why people rallied for CJ? or was it about something else? Please do elaborate.
May be "Awaam" is stupid and follow tiniest shred of hope? while "leaders" stay on the sidelines.
Election Boycott
Posted by
econfused
Dec 13, 2007 09:35 am
Glad to see the author in interacts. Last time there was an article from Lota Ahmed Quraishi, he did not dare to respond.
Election Boycott
I don't know if recall Ch. Nisar on Capital Talk, but he said PML-N voters are shareef people. They are not Jayalas and not ready to be get beaten up. I still agree, I have seen people who might not go for street protests, as they are scared, but they do sure vote.
Personally, I would prefer to boycott. I will still go for street protests if any. I would also vote for NS, just to make sure PMLQ get the run for their money
Posted by
econfused
Dec 13, 2007 09:32 am
Re #17, I don't know if recall Ch. Nisar on Capital Talk, but he said PML-N voters are shareef people. They are not Jayalas and not ready to be get beaten up. I still agree, I have seen people who might not go for street protests, as they are scared, but they do sure vote.
Personally, I would prefer to boycott. I will still go for street protests if any. I would also vote for NS, just to make sure PMLQ get the run for their money
Election Boycott
One also has to ask if JI is that serious about Judiciary, what it has been waiting for to launch a street movement. We all know and see that JI can organize the best street protests.
JI is playing the B team for Mush, by staying in Drawing rooms. I don't know if author remembers are not, but there were about 25 to 30K people gathered on Nov 3, for their annual meeting. If they wanted, they could have changed history.
So NS might look stupid, he knows, he an still launch a protest after 8th, but he cannot count on I for that.
Posted by
econfused
Dec 13, 2007 07:20 am
I might not like NS decision, but I still think that he made the right decision. He understood what APDM did to him on September 10th. He also saw what JI did to Imran Khan at Punjab University.One also has to ask if JI is that serious about Judiciary, what it has been waiting for to launch a street movement. We all know and see that JI can organize the best street protests.
JI is playing the B team for Mush, by staying in Drawing rooms. I don't know if author remembers are not, but there were about 25 to 30K people gathered on Nov 3, for their annual meeting. If they wanted, they could have changed history.
So NS might look stupid, he knows, he an still launch a protest after 8th, but he cannot count on I for that.
And Now, The Charter of Demands—The Comedy Continues!
You have to give credit to #82 SR, that he at least tried to made Mush hero. HE also made an effort that he is blaming Mush, but also making him hero, who will make sure that elections are not rigged. I bet he never been to a polling station. He is forgetting about Nazims and Naib-Nazims at grass root level (as Mush puts it) and what they can and will do.
No matter what anybody portrays and no matter if IK is the only person not going for polls. This election will legitimize everything and try to kill the movement which started on 9th of March.
Last but not the least, don't compare Pakistan judiciary with US.
Posted by
econfused
Dec 6, 2007 11:31 am
Re: #83, You have to give credit to #82 SR, that he at least tried to made Mush hero. HE also made an effort that he is blaming Mush, but also making him hero, who will make sure that elections are not rigged. I bet he never been to a polling station. He is forgetting about Nazims and Naib-Nazims at grass root level (as Mush puts it) and what they can and will do.
No matter what anybody portrays and no matter if IK is the only person not going for polls. This election will legitimize everything and try to kill the movement which started on 9th of March.
Last but not the least, don't compare Pakistan judiciary with US.
listing 1-16
1 2
- econfused
- Interacts: 27
- iLogs: 0
- Gallery: 0
- Page views: 217
- Last visitor: guest
- Member since: Nov 15 2007
- Last signin: Sep 7 2008
- Send a message
- Add as friend
- Add to ignore list
- Add to block list


