unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
all are welcome to read, write and think
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Unplugged Home
  • Books Movies Music
  • News Sports Biz
  • Off-the-wall
  • Chowk Connect!
  • Chowk related topics

Benazir whodunnit and the mystery of the missing Dupata!


POST REPLY
read replies 5

Benazir whodunnit and the mystery of the missing Dupata!

Topic started by zeemax on Feb 13, 2008 10:54:35 pm

Excerpts from the Dawn report:

RAWALPINDI, Feb 13: A five-man group was involved in the assassination of PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto, but their link with militant commander Baitullah Mehsud has not been established, Chaudhry Abdul Majid, the Additional Inspector General of CID who is heading the government’s investigation into the assassination, told a press conference on Wednesday.

He said of the five, two had been captured, the man who fired shots later blew himself up and the fourth, another suicide bomber who was at the other end of Liaquat Bagh, escaped. He was waiting to strike if the first shooter failed. The “handler” is yet be traced.

It was the second press conference by Chaudhry Majid on Ms Bhutto’s assassination, but the question who was behind the plot remained unanswered.

“The planning of the Dec 27 assassination of Ms Bhutto was made by the group in Nov 2007,” he said, adding: “Their link with militant commander Baitullah Mehsud has not been established so far.”

He said that there had been five people present in the vicinity of Liaquat Bagh and it was Saeed who fired shots and later blew himself up.Answering a question, Mr Majeed said the investigators had not been able to find Ms Bhutto’s “dupata” she was wearing at the time.

He said that during the interrogation, the accused said that they were angry over Ms Bhutto’s pro-West attitude and they were afraid of strong action against them if she came to power.


So, now we see that:

- Baitullah Mehsud's connection is not clear ("but their link with militant commander Baitullah Mehsud has not been established";) but thought they had the connection all wrapped up with that taped conversation?

- The group of five were angry over pro-west attitude of Bhutto (elsewhere it's reported their relatives were killed in Lal Masjid) so then it was an individual act?

- And where's that frikkin' Dupata? The hole in that Dupata would prove beyond doubt what it was that made a hole in her skull. So where is it :?:?:?


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-5 of 5
Post by goonga on Feb 14, 2008 11:49:02 pm

Zee Pa G!
http://hrw.org/audio/2008/urdu/pakistan0208.htm

[Human Rights Watch:]
they were planning rigging in elections, so it might be election results you would be interested in soon(T)


flag objectionable content
Post by goonga on Feb 14, 2008 11:45:58 pm

And where's that frikkin' Dupata? The hole in that Dupata would prove beyond doubt what it was that made a hole in her skull. So where is it
...
My ass would be a better exclamation ...


News is that was a double barrel shotgun with 3" chambers in 20 gauge.*-)


flag objectionable content
Post by zeemax on Feb 13, 2008 11:18:34 pm

Post by majumdar,

Wud it really matter as to whether waht was the mode of assassination.

I'm surprised many people raise this question including our friend kaiser, when the implication is clear.

Would it lead to the killers or not if it was established whether she was hurled on the escape hatch lever through force of the blast after the shots by the same assassin meaning an individual act, or by two separate assassins meaning a wider organisation? or by a sniper and a shooter and a bomber meaning an elaborate covert operation with governmental involvement?

Re the ambassador, no news yet. It's probably an abduction for ransom and not to exchange Mansoor Dadullah as was earlier speculated. Dadullah had been expelled by Taliban for insubordination and they wouldn't have bothered about him.


flag objectionable content
Post by majumdar on Feb 13, 2008 11:03:59 pm

Zee sahib,

Wud it really matter as to whether waht was the mode of assassination. How relevant it is to find the true assassin from the forensic POV.

Unrelated but what's up with the Ambassador to A'stan.

Regards


flag objectionable content
Post by zeemax on Feb 13, 2008 11:00:08 pm

My ass would be a better exclamation ... B) But one can't blame the poor sods for trying to the best of their moronic ability at a cover up 8-|


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-5 of 5

Latest Interacts

  • ahmedmadani: Both Left and congress... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • BJ2: 19th July 1909 Dear Muhammad... Translation of a (Love)
  • ahmedmadani: DM as usual good... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • ahmedmadani: Re: # 89 Parthaab......... Government Wins Manmohan Singh
  • ahmedmadani: This read remembers me... Roshni
  • quin: Asif, I am glad... Translation of a (Love)
  • Naqshbandi: quin: thanks for your... Translation of a (Love)
  • quin: I don't know why... Translation of a (Love)

Latest iLogs

  • ana 07:36 pm
    Chíngate!
  • opium 04:57 pm
    Bilo De Ghar
  • rabiawsti 01:45 pm
    one ply grocery store brand toilet paper
  • mullah_toofani 11:30 am
    Today is Friday; Your chance to repent,confess, and start a new
  • Charlie 11:22 am
    Blogging Reloaded
  • quin 07:56 am
    Eternal Embrace
  • Nikhat 07:33 am
    In the Gallery Of Pakistan
  • Tazeen 04:36 am
    Mown a Lisa
  • masadi 03:44 am
    Trails of Deception: Pakistan\'s F-16s and US Aid
  • Afat 01:49 am
    Khuch Naheen badla
  • pavocavalry 12:49 am
    Men of Steel or Distortion of History
  • HP 12:11 am
    Nuclear schizophrenic
more »

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited