unflinching idealism ... since 1997 archivessitemapabouthelpfeedback
ideas, identities and interactions
  • Home
  • InFocus
  • Themes
  • Columns
  • Articles
  • Fiction
  • iLogs
  • Gallery
  • Unplugged
  • Writers
  • Interactors
  • Tags
Sign in | Join Chowk
web chowk
  • Unplugged Home
  • Books Movies Music
  • News Sports Biz
  • Off-the-wall
  • Chowk Connect!
  • Chowk related topics

Blow-up (1966, Antonioni)


POST REPLY
read replies 1

Blow-up (1966, Antonioni)

Topic started by Faizan on Apr 14, 2008 12:33:40 pm

"Blow-up" is a film where something slightly interesting happens between two long, dry spells of nothingness. It reaches a point where the plot seems to finally materialise after over 30 minutes - when a photographer hits upon a series of sequential pictures that hint at a murder captured by chance - and then it goes back to exploring its plotless premise. Celebrated as an art-house favourite from the 60's, the film has been influential on Coppola's "The Conversation" (a much superior film in every way and a personal favourite) and DePalma's "Blow Out". Here too is a man that finds something he should not, but in a distinct departure from what we might expect (and also what might interest us), the man seems rarely perturbed and the script remains at odds with this finding, choosing instead the unremarkable exploits of its horny protagonist who flirts with the women who chase him to snap them up. On one such random occasion, he meets up with a beautiful Vanessa Redgrave (half naked for most of her appearance), who wants him to return the prints of her that he took at the park. This leads him to take a close look at the park photos and discover what looks like an act of murder.

A film that sets up a premise of mystery should follow it up with some threat or danger. In "Blow-up", the hapless, arrogant, uninteresting lead never seems to be either at odds with the situation he finds himself in or his own conscience. In fact, the film almost seems to succeed when it seems it might address this amoral act of ignoring a potential crime. But the film has other, more trivial pursuits and a real punch seems to elude it to the point of making it ultimately banal.

Rating: 2/5


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-1 of 1
Post by hurricane on Apr 17, 2008 1:59:55 pm

Bravo Faizan!

You hit the nail on the head.

Pretentious artsy types go apeshit over this movie. I saw it and yawned.


flag objectionable content
Posts 1-1 of 1

Latest Interacts

  • akcheema: Re: # 328; also... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • akcheema: Re: # 329 correction: ....becomes acute... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • akcheema: Re: # 328; urstruly... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • Urstruly: akcheema Your question in #... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • akcheema: Re: # 326; urstruly... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • Urstruly: Re: # 325 I think... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • akcheema: Re: # 319; "I... Persecution of Religious Minorities
  • akcheema: Re: # 295; hamidm... Persecution of Religious Minorities

Latest iLogs

  • Selim_Chauhan 08:54 pm
    Arjun_6,
  • ana 05:43 pm
    aadmi jo kehta hai, aadmi jo sunta hai. . .
  • Salim_Chauhan 03:15 pm
    Kaal Bhayya! You couldn\'t be \'wronger!\'
  • ana 01:36 pm
    YaadeiN
  • nature_lover 12:32 pm
    Is there any cure for this ailment..??
  • Delirium 06:30 am
    Still more to come?
  • ayesha5 06:25 am
    Celeb Blog
  • Izzah 04:40 am
    The Rose Within
  • Shah2 03:54 am
    Pakistan no spokeperson of Islam/Muslim
  • Shah2 03:50 am
    Paki trying to be flag brear of Islam of OTHERS
  • sarah1983 07:25 pm
    Good bye note....
  • kashkin 06:38 pm
    12th May
more »

Write on Chowk Interact Guidelines Privacy policy Terms Contact

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 chowk.com. All Rights Reserved
Reproduction of material on any www.chowk.com pages without prior written permissions is strictly prohibited